Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister

I'm at the 9 min mark of this video and there is clear evidence of high tech involved. If pressed for time, skip to about the 6 min mark as this was the point where the evidence is revealed. Is it just too fantastic to accept that this couldn't have been done with the primitive hammer/chisel method and or sand abrasive crap that is frequently offered as an explanation? What is odd is that the cave entrance is smaller than the stone blocks that were, seemingly, cut from the bedrock.

We have bosses all over the world and the same with these sorts of cuts (Puma Punku etc.) but yet people and their Orthodoxies...just can't let go and accept a far different, likely, reality.

Hey OK and NK' did they cut all that granite with copper and sand again? Really believe that remains the truth/answer? I've been all over the world, with my keyboard, and think it ridiculous to believe that the pyramids and Sacsayhuaman's of the world are anything but the remnants of a lost, advanced, civilization. Intellectually ...ridiculous considering the available evidence let alone the 'impossible' application of copper/bronze as the tools for completing these tasks.

You may be nice, well intentioned people...but very far off target. No wonder no flak...easy to be part of the herd so to speak.

This work was easy.

edit to add...the anti-gravity tech at the 13 min mark is interesting.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11-Nov-17 21:49 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1542 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 309 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 382 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 342 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 417 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 254 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 275 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 171 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 195 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 200 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 164 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 253 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 356 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 190 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 250 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 230 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 263 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 140 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 182 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 211 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 113 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 138 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 164 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 140 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 222 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52 about being unhinged/triggered 170 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 175 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 215 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 237 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 232 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 253 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 265 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 198 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 230 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 297 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 147 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 242 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 278 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 210 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 306 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 214 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 183 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 175 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 281 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 204 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 280 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 237 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 206 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 186 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 251 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 162 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 250 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 246 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 269 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 227 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 230 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 261 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 177 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 245 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 276 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 332 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 356 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 290 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 259 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 272 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 251 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 291 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 262 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 229 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 257 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.