Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
[www.youtube.com]

I'm at the 9 min mark of this video and there is clear evidence of high tech involved. If pressed for time, skip to about the 6 min mark as this was the point where the evidence is revealed. Is it just too fantastic to accept that this couldn't have been done with the primitive hammer/chisel method and or sand abrasive crap that is frequently offered as an explanation? What is odd is that the cave entrance is smaller than the stone blocks that were, seemingly, cut from the bedrock.

We have bosses all over the world and the same with these sorts of cuts (Puma Punku etc.) but yet people and their Orthodoxies...just can't let go and accept a far different, likely, reality.

Hey OK and NK'ers...how did they cut all that granite with copper and sand again? Really believe that remains the truth/answer? I've been all over the world, with my keyboard, and think it ridiculous to believe that the pyramids and Sacsayhuaman's of the world are anything but the remnants of a lost, advanced, civilization. Intellectually ...ridiculous considering the available evidence let alone the 'impossible' application of copper/bronze as the tools for completing these tasks.

You may be nice, well intentioned people...but very far off target. No wonder no flak...easy to be part of the herd so to speak.

This work was easy.

edit to add...the anti-gravity tech at the 13 min mark is interesting.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11-Nov-17 21:49 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1924 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 415 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 94 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 111 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 470 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 444 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 542 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 350 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 365 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 252 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 279 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 286 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 244 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 339 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 446 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 269 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 334 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 309 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 348 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 222 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 266 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 296 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 213 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 210 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 249 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 222 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 312 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 255 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 252 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 287 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 318 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 313 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 351 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 367 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 293 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 313 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 385 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 236 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 340 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 388 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 283 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 427 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 296 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 277 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 244 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 374 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 300 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 365 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 310 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 279 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 262 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 344 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 241 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 319 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 328 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 364 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 304 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 317 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 332 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 256 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 347 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 370 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 408 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 456 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 371 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 340 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 345 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 328 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 363 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 339 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 306 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 334 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.