Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister

I'm at the 9 min mark of this video and there is clear evidence of high tech involved. If pressed for time, skip to about the 6 min mark as this was the point where the evidence is revealed. Is it just too fantastic to accept that this couldn't have been done with the primitive hammer/chisel method and or sand abrasive crap that is frequently offered as an explanation? What is odd is that the cave entrance is smaller than the stone blocks that were, seemingly, cut from the bedrock.

We have bosses all over the world and the same with these sorts of cuts (Puma Punku etc.) but yet people and their Orthodoxies...just can't let go and accept a far different, likely, reality.

Hey OK and NK' did they cut all that granite with copper and sand again? Really believe that remains the truth/answer? I've been all over the world, with my keyboard, and think it ridiculous to believe that the pyramids and Sacsayhuaman's of the world are anything but the remnants of a lost, advanced, civilization. Intellectually ...ridiculous considering the available evidence let alone the 'impossible' application of copper/bronze as the tools for completing these tasks.

You may be nice, well intentioned people...but very far off target. No wonder no flak...easy to be part of the herd so to speak.

This work was easy.

edit to add...the anti-gravity tech at the 13 min mark is interesting.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11-Nov-17 21:49 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1285 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 213 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 258 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 216 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 279 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 135 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 151 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 95 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 115 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 110 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 89 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 137 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 232 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 97 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 132 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 111 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 134 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 65 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 79 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 109 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 65 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 66 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 75 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 69 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 117 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52 about being unhinged/triggered 77 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 80 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 100 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 105 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 103 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 114 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 113 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 89 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 107 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 148 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 61 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 108 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 129 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 99 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 180 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 101 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 87 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 84 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 163 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 84 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 146 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 127 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 98 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 88 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 139 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 85 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 120 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 122 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 135 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 115 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 111 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 152 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 92 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 117 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 143 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 211 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 232 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 181 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 158 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 150 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 154 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 184 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 158 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 126 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 138 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.