Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister

I'm at the 9 min mark of this video and there is clear evidence of high tech involved. If pressed for time, skip to about the 6 min mark as this was the point where the evidence is revealed. Is it just too fantastic to accept that this couldn't have been done with the primitive hammer/chisel method and or sand abrasive crap that is frequently offered as an explanation? What is odd is that the cave entrance is smaller than the stone blocks that were, seemingly, cut from the bedrock.

We have bosses all over the world and the same with these sorts of cuts (Puma Punku etc.) but yet people and their Orthodoxies...just can't let go and accept a far different, likely, reality.

Hey OK and NK' did they cut all that granite with copper and sand again? Really believe that remains the truth/answer? I've been all over the world, with my keyboard, and think it ridiculous to believe that the pyramids and Sacsayhuaman's of the world are anything but the remnants of a lost, advanced, civilization. Intellectually ...ridiculous considering the available evidence let alone the 'impossible' application of copper/bronze as the tools for completing these tasks.

You may be nice, well intentioned people...but very far off target. No wonder no flak...easy to be part of the herd so to speak.

This work was easy.

edit to add...the anti-gravity tech at the 13 min mark is interesting.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11-Nov-17 21:49 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1403 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 253 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 327 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 277 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 342 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 188 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 210 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 128 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 151 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 152 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 123 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 193 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 298 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 136 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 184 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 165 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 193 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 91 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 125 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 154 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 88 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 90 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 114 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 96 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 172 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52 about being unhinged/triggered 123 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 121 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 157 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 173 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 168 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 185 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 180 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 142 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 163 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 210 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 99 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 166 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 182 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 152 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 232 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 150 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 129 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 126 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 219 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 136 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 215 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 187 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 149 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 133 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 191 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 116 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 174 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 183 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 202 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 173 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 173 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 206 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 132 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 175 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 206 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 281 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 292 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 237 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 204 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 204 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 202 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 236 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 208 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 178 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 196 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.