Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister

I'm at the 9 min mark of this video and there is clear evidence of high tech involved. If pressed for time, skip to about the 6 min mark as this was the point where the evidence is revealed. Is it just too fantastic to accept that this couldn't have been done with the primitive hammer/chisel method and or sand abrasive crap that is frequently offered as an explanation? What is odd is that the cave entrance is smaller than the stone blocks that were, seemingly, cut from the bedrock.

We have bosses all over the world and the same with these sorts of cuts (Puma Punku etc.) but yet people and their Orthodoxies...just can't let go and accept a far different, likely, reality.

Hey OK and NK' did they cut all that granite with copper and sand again? Really believe that remains the truth/answer? I've been all over the world, with my keyboard, and think it ridiculous to believe that the pyramids and Sacsayhuaman's of the world are anything but the remnants of a lost, advanced, civilization. Intellectually ...ridiculous considering the available evidence let alone the 'impossible' application of copper/bronze as the tools for completing these tasks.

You may be nice, well intentioned people...but very far off target. No wonder no flak...easy to be part of the herd so to speak.

This work was easy.

edit to add...the anti-gravity tech at the 13 min mark is interesting.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11-Nov-17 21:49 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1344 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 237 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 297 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 250 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 322 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 166 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 182 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 118 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 134 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 135 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 107 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 169 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 271 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 119 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 160 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 138 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 165 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 84 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 106 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 134 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 82 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 80 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 96 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 91 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 147 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52 about being unhinged/triggered 105 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 107 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 129 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 142 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 137 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 153 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 143 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 122 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 141 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 181 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 85 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 134 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 159 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 132 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 206 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 132 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 115 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 110 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 192 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 111 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 184 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 159 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 135 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 120 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 165 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 102 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 149 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 163 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 177 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 149 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 150 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 178 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 118 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 150 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 173 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 254 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 264 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 215 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 189 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 181 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 182 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 209 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 183 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 159 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 172 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.