Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister

I'm at the 9 min mark of this video and there is clear evidence of high tech involved. If pressed for time, skip to about the 6 min mark as this was the point where the evidence is revealed. Is it just too fantastic to accept that this couldn't have been done with the primitive hammer/chisel method and or sand abrasive crap that is frequently offered as an explanation? What is odd is that the cave entrance is smaller than the stone blocks that were, seemingly, cut from the bedrock.

We have bosses all over the world and the same with these sorts of cuts (Puma Punku etc.) but yet people and their Orthodoxies...just can't let go and accept a far different, likely, reality.

Hey OK and NK' did they cut all that granite with copper and sand again? Really believe that remains the truth/answer? I've been all over the world, with my keyboard, and think it ridiculous to believe that the pyramids and Sacsayhuaman's of the world are anything but the remnants of a lost, advanced, civilization. Intellectually ...ridiculous considering the available evidence let alone the 'impossible' application of copper/bronze as the tools for completing these tasks.

You may be nice, well intentioned people...but very far off target. No wonder no flak...easy to be part of the herd so to speak.

This work was easy.

edit to add...the anti-gravity tech at the 13 min mark is interesting.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11-Nov-17 21:49 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1174 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 184 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 205 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 173 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 224 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 94 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 109 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 78 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 89 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 75 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 65 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 89 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 185 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 71 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 83 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 77 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 82 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 49 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 55 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 84 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 47 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 44 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 51 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 55 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 85 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52 about being unhinged/triggered 47 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 52 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: about being unhinged/triggered 60 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 62 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 66 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 64 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 73 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 59 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 69 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 103 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 41 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 64 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 86 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 58 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 125 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 70 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 58 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 63 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 124 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 62 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 93 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 78 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 74 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 64 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 82 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 66 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 82 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 85 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 87 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 76 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 70 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 98 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 62 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 85 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 98 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 157 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 182 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 143 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 122 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 103 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 106 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 137 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 112 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 94 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 99 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.