It's a shame you can't read the post and respond to it. If you had actually read the post you'd know that it was Warwick who brought up "ramps". There was no reason for him not to since he believes I am obsessed and some people believe that this very void inside a tomb built with ramps was actually.. drum roll... ...a ramp.
But you wouldn't know any of this because you don't read what people write. You just skim it looking for key words to pick at. Saying Egyptologists don't play nice is a major understatement. They'll do anything at all to belittle opposing arguments and avoid actual response to points. They fixate on their beliefs and presenting a cultural context that is wholly inconsistent with known facts and logic. Egyptapologists are even worse and are abusive and mean spirited. You would rather insult than engage. You use tactics and strategies instead of logic and evidence.