Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I am. That's a long series of posts though Thanos. Skimming through it all, I saw three lines of questions and one insight worth high-lighting.
1) There is disagreement as to whether the edifice on Djer's sealing has any relation to a structure at Giza alluded to by the Dream Stele.
We believe it does for the simple reason that it is a building-sized structure surmounted by an animal and that Gardiner V3 hints at Giza...(Ro)Stau. Petrie thought it was the Set animal and we expand why we think that's a harmless but consequential error...consequential for our thesis. Whether or not there is a palace facade with double axes is a side-issue. Pr-Ur may have been inspired by a monument at Giza and its use as a scribes' administration center of the early state makes perfect sense in our model.
2) There is disagreement on what the neck rings mean, but I think the poster is missing the main point...we are not saying the ring(s) were necessarily made that way on purpose 12,000 years ago. We are saying however they were created, by man or the elements, when the Mehit myth was created in AE, the rings were there and they inspired the lioness depiction as seen.
3) I agree with Laird that there is a semantic connection with the cubit and we mention that in one of the Figure captions....this is of special interest because I think the original monument bears strong associations with flooding and the measuring of Nile floods of course is a key feature of the dynastic state along with the civil calendar instead of the more archaic and less predictable timing using wp-rnpt and the lunar month.
4) There is disagreement with the logic of the rationale which first seemingly spuriously assigns "JAW" the lexical value of "key" and then uses that assumption to the build the rest of the case.
I couldn't disagree more with that opinion. First of all the symbol is obviously rare. We were up against a more acute problem then even Hermann Junker (and the symbol analysis I posted here for Madelaine) because there is no other context with which to compare this one to and mind you the symbol has been misclassified to make matters even worse. However, the dual title provides a certain set of plausible choices and key is clearly one of them especially because we also provide evidence that locks with similarly shaped keys existed and that MK Egyptians at least used locks with pin tumblers. I think Avry just didn't read the whole article and I do not in any way chide him for it. I just don't agree with his comment there.
His other comment likewise is without merit. Robert Schoch has published hard-core seismic data, with which other geologists btw have no problem because they understand the method well, which date the first exposure of the ditch surface to the elements to the 11th millenium BC. Avry needs to familiarize himself with those data and the validity of the method. The JAW/Schoch case does not soley rest on enclosure and Sphinx erosion lines and most people in this field rather strangely do not know this.

....and that's it for now. But all this back and forth on the details isn't really what matters. This paper does not settle the issue and it wasn't meant to. It was meant to formulate a testable hypothesis, not a lingering theory we can forever argue about like fake cartouches and paint runnels.

I was trained as a basic scientist, Thanos. I looked at this problem and asked myself what is a testable hypothesis, an unequivocal falsification test, of the idea that the Sphinx is as old as geology and astronomy tell us and why does the orthodox camp resist data of a non-archeological kind? I looked at Mark Lehner's entire argument from A-Z and to any well-trained scientist it doesn't hold water. The Khafre Theory may be a working model of a subset of all the data, but that's not how you make a scientific model. But ultimately an Egyptologist' gold standard is textual proof and I agreed that it was missing. If the Sphinx stood there in 3000 B.C., where was the awe of it carved and painted into ivory, clay, slate, wood, papyrus, Limestone and Granite before the Khufu clan came to power? Why did no one notice it? I propose all accept the dogma at face value and missed what has been in plain sight all along. And this is when I remembered something that had struck me previously but I passed it up (just like all those dogma-struck Egyptologists)...something on Hemiunu's pedestal....and the rest came together over breakfast with Robert Schoch and Robert Bauval.

I think we have now have more than enough probable cause to go back to the Sphinx and collect some real data (not those ill-placed probes made by Z.H. and M.L.)and eventually carefully and in an intelligent data-guided manner drill a small hole into that void beneath the left paw to see what's inside. That will make or break this thesis and that is how you do science. You put models to the test to break them and refine them. This paper is the mission statement to justify that test.



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 26-Oct-17 04:43 by Manu.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 2278 MDaines 22-Oct-17 11:00
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 554 cladking 22-Oct-17 13:32
Egyptian Thoth gave technology around the world 626 Howard West 22-Oct-17 15:04
Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 562 MDaines 22-Oct-17 15:30
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 510 Howard West 23-Oct-17 00:58
Djet's Comb 543 MDaines 22-Oct-17 15:39
Re: Djet's Comb 518 MDaines 26-Oct-17 18:20
Re: Djet's Comb 541 Manu 26-Oct-17 20:41
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 563 cladking 22-Oct-17 15:54
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 483 MDaines 22-Oct-17 16:50
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 525 cladking 22-Oct-17 18:52
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 464 MDaines 22-Oct-17 19:39
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 592 Thanos5150 22-Oct-17 23:21
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 517 MDaines 23-Oct-17 08:32
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 708 Thanos5150 23-Oct-17 22:03
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 485 R Avry Wilson 23-Oct-17 19:54
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 507 Thanos5150 23-Oct-17 22:29
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 463 R Avry Wilson 23-Oct-17 23:30
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 518 Manu 24-Oct-17 01:36
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 475 Thanos5150 24-Oct-17 02:06
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 487 R Avry Wilson 24-Oct-17 02:59
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 559 eyeofhorus33 24-Oct-17 09:46
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 458 Thanos5150 24-Oct-17 16:00
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 463 Manu 23-Oct-17 01:45
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 475 MDaines 23-Oct-17 13:31
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 524 Manu 23-Oct-17 15:00
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 507 MDaines 23-Oct-17 15:39
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 472 Manu 23-Oct-17 16:35
The Ankh, the Djed, and the Spinnekrok 747 MDaines 24-Oct-17 11:21
Re: The Ankh, the Djed, and the Spinnekrok 466 Manu 24-Oct-17 15:34
Re: The Ankh, the Djed, and the Spinnekrok 462 MDaines 25-Oct-17 08:37
Re: The Ankh, the Djed, and the Spinnekrok 438 Manu 25-Oct-17 14:44
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 440 Reagent 23-Oct-17 01:57
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 463 cladking 23-Oct-17 02:40
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 492 Reagent 23-Oct-17 03:58
Tayet 480 R Avry Wilson 23-Oct-17 04:37
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 487 R Avry Wilson 23-Oct-17 04:27
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 465 MDaines 23-Oct-17 13:49
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 487 R Avry Wilson 23-Oct-17 19:50
Isler’s Gnomon Progression 600 Dr. Troglodyte 23-Oct-17 22:25
Re: Isler’s Gnomon Progression 432 MDaines 25-Oct-17 08:33
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 583 Manu 23-Oct-17 21:12
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 429 MDaines 25-Oct-17 15:36
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 489 Manu 25-Oct-17 19:08
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 421 Thanos5150 26-Oct-17 02:37
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 449 Manu 26-Oct-17 04:14
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 450 R Avry Wilson 26-Oct-17 05:08
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 422 Manu 26-Oct-17 06:05
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 444 Thanos5150 26-Oct-17 05:41
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 502 Manu 26-Oct-17 06:07
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 447 cladking 26-Oct-17 13:45
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 569 Manu 26-Oct-17 14:43
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 561 Broker 31-Oct-17 01:43
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 480 MDaines 31-Oct-17 11:26
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 519 Broker 31-Oct-17 19:33
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 592 Broker 31-Oct-17 23:45
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 488 MDaines 01-Nov-17 13:52
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 468 Broker 02-Nov-17 00:13
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 418 MDaines 02-Nov-17 11:19
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 410 Broker 03-Nov-17 02:31
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 529 Broker 03-Nov-17 18:31
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 535 Thanos5150 02-Nov-17 06:08
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 422 MDaines 02-Nov-17 12:05
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 421 Thanos5150 02-Nov-17 16:25
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 487 Thanos5150 02-Nov-17 16:43
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 423 Broker 03-Nov-17 03:44
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 428 Thanos5150 03-Nov-17 03:55
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 419 Broker 03-Nov-17 04:32
Re: Was Egyptian Thoth the Great Weaver? 476 Broker 03-Nov-17 04:36
Why is it important? 499 MDaines 04-Nov-17 10:57
Perhaps it was Isis! 561 Eddie Larry 04-Nov-17 15:59
Re: Perhaps it was Isis! 413 MDaines 05-Nov-17 17:57
Re: Perhaps it was Isis! 547 Eddie Larry 05-Nov-17 18:17


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.