Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Cloister said

'I'm not dismissing your figures DavidK, I'm sure 897.6 is very productive. But linking all this to Thom is a bit of a stretch, for me at least, but then again who knows what thoughts he didn't feel able to present at the time?
Personally, finding streams of numbers that fit together and then claiming the ancients must have done the same thing feels a little uncomfortable to me, but like I said, who really knows? '

897.60 / 2.72 = 330 megalithic yards this is Thom's circumference of the Aubrey circle in his first book on page 47,

who really knows?

Clearly not you. 14/11 and 1632/520 are hardly streams of numbers.

In this model the difference between the GP side length and SH perimeter is 89760 inputting 5280 into the first cell of the model. The model is based on Petries measurement of the GP base at 9069 inches and Thom's SH measurement of 89760 and SH is a base 32 model and the GP is base 100 when 4 solar days are input into the first cell.This is 100/32 or 3.125. It is not difficult to follow. I am not saying the ancients did this I am saying the model works for Thom's and Petrie's findings.Thom said what the ancients wanted to do - predict eclipses by studying the motion of the moon's orbit to an astonishong level of precision and that is what i have been evidencing. They knew the saros as 6600 -14.666r since 5280 /360 = 14.666r and this is what Thom told us.

The Stonehenge part of the Model is 1 divided by 7 times 56 = 8 turning one solar day into a raction of a solar week then back to 8 solar days.This is the 1 to 8 relationship embedded in SH Aubrey. No Pi neede, no complex numbers. however Pi as 22/7 is produced by this model when 22 days are input.

The GP is one solar day x 25 to give one side of the base and 100 for the perimeter as base 10 represented the sacred or appeared to and Thom told us this as well.



The Megalithic Yard and the Saxon Yard.

Stonehenge

5280 A Input solar days
7 B divide by 7
754.29 C to give weeks as 240 22/7 Pi units
42240 D multiply by 56 to give 8 weeks in days 56 Postholes

The Megalithic Yard and Saxon Yard

89760 F-D 33000 In Thom's megalithic yards
89760 F-D 27200 in Saxon Yards
3.125 GP to Stonehege Ratio (Fixed)

Great pyramid

5280 E Input solar days
132000 F multiply by 25 so all 4 sides equate to 100
300 G Divide by 440 to give the variable cubit

The GP ratio is always the same and is the GP perimeter divided by the SH circumference



I'm not dismissing your figures David

oh really?

get your facts right Cloister.

330/272 = 1.2132

89760 / 1.2132 = 73984 and this is 272 squared.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 31-Jan-18 21:47 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 3310 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 742 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 515 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 342 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 251 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 277 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 226 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 288 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 309 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 191 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 213 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 197 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 201 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 201 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 159 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 149 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 137 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 156 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 205 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 153 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 128 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 168 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 349 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 217 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 226 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 174 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 189 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 254 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 256 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 224 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 238 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 225 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 159 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 201 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 159 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 157 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 188 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 205 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 158 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 202 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 169 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 182 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 109 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 163 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 175 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 197 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 143 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 143 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 146 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 195 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 149 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 179 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 139 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 209 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 144 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 204 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 166 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 155 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 175 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 160 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 162 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 150 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 150 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 151 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 169 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 227 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 154 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 178 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 114 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 137 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 144 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 156 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 194 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 135 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 151 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 144 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 185 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 170 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 169 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 169 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 205 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 208 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 132 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 194 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 229 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 146 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 278 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 170 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 126 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 169 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 144 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 231 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 235 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 206 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 177 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 190 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 180 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12
Re: the Giza Template 87 DavidK 14-Oct-18 21:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 106 DavidK 12-Oct-18 21:21


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.