Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Cloister said

'I'm not dismissing your figures DavidK, I'm sure 897.6 is very productive. But linking all this to Thom is a bit of a stretch, for me at least, but then again who knows what thoughts he didn't feel able to present at the time?
Personally, finding streams of numbers that fit together and then claiming the ancients must have done the same thing feels a little uncomfortable to me, but like I said, who really knows? '

897.60 / 2.72 = 330 megalithic yards this is Thom's circumference of the Aubrey circle in his first book on page 47,

who really knows?

Clearly not you. 14/11 and 1632/520 are hardly streams of numbers.

In this model the difference between the GP side length and SH perimeter is 89760 inputting 5280 into the first cell of the model. The model is based on Petries measurement of the GP base at 9069 inches and Thom's SH measurement of 89760 and SH is a base 32 model and the GP is base 100 when 4 solar days are input into the first cell.This is 100/32 or 3.125. It is not difficult to follow. I am not saying the ancients did this I am saying the model works for Thom's and Petrie's findings.Thom said what the ancients wanted to do - predict eclipses by studying the motion of the moon's orbit to an astonishong level of precision and that is what i have been evidencing. They knew the saros as 6600 -14.666r since 5280 /360 = 14.666r and this is what Thom told us.

The Stonehenge part of the Model is 1 divided by 7 times 56 = 8 turning one solar day into a raction of a solar week then back to 8 solar days.This is the 1 to 8 relationship embedded in SH Aubrey. No Pi neede, no complex numbers. however Pi as 22/7 is produced by this model when 22 days are input.

The GP is one solar day x 25 to give one side of the base and 100 for the perimeter as base 10 represented the sacred or appeared to and Thom told us this as well.



The Megalithic Yard and the Saxon Yard.

Stonehenge

5280 A Input solar days
7 B divide by 7
754.29 C to give weeks as 240 22/7 Pi units
42240 D multiply by 56 to give 8 weeks in days 56 Postholes

The Megalithic Yard and Saxon Yard

89760 F-D 33000 In Thom's megalithic yards
89760 F-D 27200 in Saxon Yards
3.125 GP to Stonehege Ratio (Fixed)

Great pyramid

5280 E Input solar days
132000 F multiply by 25 so all 4 sides equate to 100
300 G Divide by 440 to give the variable cubit

The GP ratio is always the same and is the GP perimeter divided by the SH circumference



I'm not dismissing your figures David

oh really?

get your facts right Cloister.

330/272 = 1.2132

89760 / 1.2132 = 73984 and this is 272 squared.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 31-Jan-18 21:47 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 2866 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 620 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 423 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 260 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 187 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 215 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 165 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 217 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 246 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 133 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 148 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 134 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 127 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 128 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 106 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 98 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 84 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 100 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 129 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 93 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 69 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 101 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 249 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 153 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 162 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 119 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 130 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 184 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 168 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 155 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 168 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 152 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 109 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 140 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 101 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 101 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 121 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 145 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 105 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 140 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 102 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 122 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 70 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 102 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 107 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 132 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 86 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 86 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 90 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 128 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 95 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 125 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 85 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 141 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 92 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 137 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 108 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 93 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 116 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 107 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 107 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 94 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 92 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 95 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 100 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 148 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 93 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 113 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 66 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 86 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 92 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 101 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 128 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 82 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 97 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 95 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 119 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 108 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 115 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 117 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 145 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 141 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 78 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 133 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 159 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 88 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 177 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 115 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 83 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 109 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 93 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 159 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 150 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 126 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 112 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 124 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 91 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.