Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
This model expands Michell's canon of Ancient Measure to produce a model that should work to test all units discovered by metrologists.

it came about by working on The Harris and Stockdale Megalithic Foot in the context of the Aubrey Circle at Stonehenge.

The underpinning assumption is that the ancients used Pi as 22/7 with the canon and a version of root 2 as 99/70. This gives a square of 360 units perimeter and escribed circle of 400 units so 360 becomes 400 and 360 x 400 = 14400.

It works at stonehenge Aubrey as follows

142.8 the radius x 99/70 = 201.96 x 4 = 807.84 x 10/9 = 897.60

So three units 4 x 99/70 x 10/9 are substituted for 2 x Pi

2 x 22/7 = 44/7

4 x 99 x 10 / 70 / 9 = 3960/630 = 44/7

So 2xPi has been turned into geometric ratios involving the inscibed square and the circle.

So all that is needed is the radius and the length of the side of the inscribed square is produced using a root 2 approximation that works perfectly with the 10/9 ratio so the circle is always the sacred base 10.

This model has been front end bolted on to Michell's canon to produce a model that works from a radius.

The beauty of this model is that when laying out a circle on the ground the azimuth can be dermined hyper accurately so the super accurate azimuths discovered by myself and Bill Wilkinson have an explanation.

When a circle radius was laid out ie Stonehenge Aubrey, the azimuth to the centre of the lesser cursus at exactly 308 degrees could be surveyed and aligned to an accuracy of 1 in 1000 degrees and all the dimensions of the circle would be known against the length of the radius before the circle was laid.

Within this system Pi as 22/7 can be used in unitary form.

This is the model ( already copyrighted) the bottom section is the top line divided by Pi as 22/7.


Feet
58.33 this is 700 inches
82.50 x 99/70
330.00 x 4
366.67 x 10/9 to give solar days( note 10/9 is 400/360 )
132000.00 x 360 The standardised circumference
132000000.00 x 1000 the sacred standardised circumference
25000 /5280 miles 1000000 units of 132 feet.

Pi units
0.00
26.25
105.00
116.67
42000.00
42000000.00
7954.55


using number 7

Feet
7.00
9.90
39.60
44.00
15840.00 The Venus unit
15840000.00
3000

Pi units
0.00
3.15
12.60
14.00
5040.00
5040000.00
954.55

Using the ancient metre

Feet
39.375
55.69
222.75
247.50
89100.00
89100000.00
16875

Pi units
0.00
17.72
70.88
78.75
28350.00
28350000.00
5369.32

Using 56


Feet
56.000
79.20 this is the chain
316.80 this is the base unit of the canon
352.00 this is the lunar year as 12 x 29.333r
126720.00
126720000.00
24000 miles

Pi units
0.00
25.20 dived by 7 to get 3.6 25.2 are stades
100.80
112.00
40320.00
40320000.00
7636.36

using the smoothed lunar month as 29.333r (look at the pi units)Eclipse prediction facilitated.

Feet
29.333
41.49
165.94
184.38
66377.14
66377142.86
12571.42857

Pi units
0.00
13.20
52.80
58.67
21120.00
21120000.00
4000.00

Just a few examples

Finally the Aubrey circle

Feet
142.800
201.96
807.84
897.60
323136.00
323136000.00
61200 this is base 17 Thom units but in imperial miles.Stunning?

Pi units
0.00
64.26
257.04
285.60
102816.00
102816000.00
19472.73



Put any unit you like in and see what happens.

The canon standardised system is based on a radius of 700 inches and the distance from the centre of the Aubrey circle to the centre of the lesser cursus is 7000 feet exactly.


and the theoretical model

Feet
63.636
90.00
360.00
400.00
144000.00
144000000.00
27272.72727

Pi units
0.00
28.64
114.55
127.27
45818.18
45818181.82
8677.69

63.6363636r feet is 63 x 100/99 so 100/99 and 10/9 are both in the model



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 10-Jan-18 14:37 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 2701 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 556 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 354 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 215 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 152 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 169 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 131 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 167 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 155 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 87 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 98 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 86 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 80 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 85 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 69 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 65 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 51 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 66 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 90 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 63 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 30 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 50 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 184 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 106 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 108 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 81 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 90 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 130 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 114 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 110 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 117 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 108 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 76 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 97 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 72 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 60 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 84 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 104 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 69 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 99 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 63 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 84 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 44 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 60 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 69 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 93 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 51 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 51 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 53 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 86 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 58 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 83 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 55 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 97 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 60 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 88 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 66 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 50 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 68 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 69 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 70 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 60 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 58 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 65 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 62 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 101 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 60 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 70 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 44 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 54 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 57 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 59 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 76 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 51 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 59 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 55 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 76 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 74 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 71 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 85 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 101 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 97 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 45 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 92 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 97 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 55 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 81 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 79 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 58 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 65 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 60 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 107 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 88 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 67 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 59 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 46 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 51 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.