Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
This model expands Michell's canon of Ancient Measure to produce a model that should work to test all units discovered by metrologists.

it came about by working on The Harris and Stockdale Megalithic Foot in the context of the Aubrey Circle at Stonehenge.

The underpinning assumption is that the ancients used Pi as 22/7 with the canon and a version of root 2 as 99/70. This gives a square of 360 units perimeter and escribed circle of 400 units so 360 becomes 400 and 360 x 400 = 14400.

It works at stonehenge Aubrey as follows

142.8 the radius x 99/70 = 201.96 x 4 = 807.84 x 10/9 = 897.60

So three units 4 x 99/70 x 10/9 are substituted for 2 x Pi

2 x 22/7 = 44/7

4 x 99 x 10 / 70 / 9 = 3960/630 = 44/7

So 2xPi has been turned into geometric ratios involving the inscibed square and the circle.

So all that is needed is the radius and the length of the side of the inscribed square is produced using a root 2 approximation that works perfectly with the 10/9 ratio so the circle is always the sacred base 10.

This model has been front end bolted on to Michell's canon to produce a model that works from a radius.

The beauty of this model is that when laying out a circle on the ground the azimuth can be dermined hyper accurately so the super accurate azimuths discovered by myself and Bill Wilkinson have an explanation.

When a circle radius was laid out ie Stonehenge Aubrey, the azimuth to the centre of the lesser cursus at exactly 308 degrees could be surveyed and aligned to an accuracy of 1 in 1000 degrees and all the dimensions of the circle would be known against the length of the radius before the circle was laid.

Within this system Pi as 22/7 can be used in unitary form.

This is the model ( already copyrighted) the bottom section is the top line divided by Pi as 22/7.


Feet
58.33 this is 700 inches
82.50 x 99/70
330.00 x 4
366.67 x 10/9 to give solar days( note 10/9 is 400/360 )
132000.00 x 360 The standardised circumference
132000000.00 x 1000 the sacred standardised circumference
25000 /5280 miles 1000000 units of 132 feet.

Pi units
0.00
26.25
105.00
116.67
42000.00
42000000.00
7954.55


using number 7

Feet
7.00
9.90
39.60
44.00
15840.00 The Venus unit
15840000.00
3000

Pi units
0.00
3.15
12.60
14.00
5040.00
5040000.00
954.55

Using the ancient metre

Feet
39.375
55.69
222.75
247.50
89100.00
89100000.00
16875

Pi units
0.00
17.72
70.88
78.75
28350.00
28350000.00
5369.32

Using 56


Feet
56.000
79.20 this is the chain
316.80 this is the base unit of the canon
352.00 this is the lunar year as 12 x 29.333r
126720.00
126720000.00
24000 miles

Pi units
0.00
25.20 dived by 7 to get 3.6 25.2 are stades
100.80
112.00
40320.00
40320000.00
7636.36

using the smoothed lunar month as 29.333r (look at the pi units)Eclipse prediction facilitated.

Feet
29.333
41.49
165.94
184.38
66377.14
66377142.86
12571.42857

Pi units
0.00
13.20
52.80
58.67
21120.00
21120000.00
4000.00

Just a few examples

Finally the Aubrey circle

Feet
142.800
201.96
807.84
897.60
323136.00
323136000.00
61200 this is base 17 Thom units but in imperial miles.Stunning?

Pi units
0.00
64.26
257.04
285.60
102816.00
102816000.00
19472.73



Put any unit you like in and see what happens.

The canon standardised system is based on a radius of 700 inches and the distance from the centre of the Aubrey circle to the centre of the lesser cursus is 7000 feet exactly.


and the theoretical model

Feet
63.636
90.00
360.00
400.00
144000.00
144000000.00
27272.72727

Pi units
0.00
28.64
114.55
127.27
45818.18
45818181.82
8677.69

63.6363636r feet is 63 x 100/99 so 100/99 and 10/9 are both in the model



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 10-Jan-18 14:37 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 4712 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 1084 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 816 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 605 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 486 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 522 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 464 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 516 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 539 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 406 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 432 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 401 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 407 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 405 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 351 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 339 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 327 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 349 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 443 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 347 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 324 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 389 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 578 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 447 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 452 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 372 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 366 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 444 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 514 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 434 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 455 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 439 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 354 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 391 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 346 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 347 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 417 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 422 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 360 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 389 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 394 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 381 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 289 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 361 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 348 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 391 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 337 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 326 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 337 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 398 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 327 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 367 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 336 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 427 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 324 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 426 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 378 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 371 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 362 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 353 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 353 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 351 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 347 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 354 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 363 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 450 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 338 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 385 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 293 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 315 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 328 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 355 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 404 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 333 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 337 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 343 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 403 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 365 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 366 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 375 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 399 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 402 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 324 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 384 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 428 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 353 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 511 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 359 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 325 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 365 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 328 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 432 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 465 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 444 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 415 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 417 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 417 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12
Re: the Giza Template 349 DavidK 14-Oct-18 21:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 333 DavidK 12-Oct-18 21:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 192 DavidK 16-Mar-19 23:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 157 rodz111 17-Mar-19 14:54
Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal 209 DavidK 17-Mar-19 10:38
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 140 DavidK 26-Mar-19 15:07
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.625 imperial inches 168 DavidK 04-Apr-19 13:17
Finding the ancient metre in the GP base 39.375 inches 157 DavidK 08-Apr-19 14:22
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 138 DavidK 25-Apr-19 21:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 159 DavidK 21-May-19 23:59


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.