Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
David wrote:

<The classic example is that Thom's system 5440 units is hidden in the imperial system by using a unit of 12 inches x 33/34 giving 5440 units in a mile so the case for the MY is somewhat proven. The length of the units decide the outcomes.

i suggested that the canon is scaled to 366.6666r solar days x 360 x 1000 = 132000000 feet 25000 miles. Immediately it must be noted the unit discovered in my first book is 3.6666 feet and i really had no idea that this was in barleycorns it was just an obviously misunderstood use of the imperial system that needed further investigation. It aligns with the canon perfectly. 3.666r x 4 = 14.666r.>

Hi David,

You are probably right about this matter of us all being right, depending on application. Right now though my thoughts on this situation are the ratio relationships between these various systems and applications. Your mention of Ann MacCauly's discovery of an alleged Roman Ft. of 12/(35/34) = 11.65714286 ins. is a new one I haven't seen before till now. But it has very interesting properties. That along with Thom's units expressed in Ft. value as you mention 12/(34/33) = 11.64705882 ins. And my own variant of 12/(36/35) = 11.6666r. ins. I can see each of these ratios in progression stages. Together with 12 x .972 = 11.664 ins. which is the more commonly used calculation of a Roman Ft., mentioned by Michell and Neal. The ratio relationships between these units are what if find most interesting, as the triangular ratio relationship I am most familiar with is the Imp. Ft. to Egyptian being 12 x (64/63) = 11.8125 ins., to the Roman x (80/81) = 11.666rback to the Imp. x (36/35) = 12.

What I find most intriguing at the moment, is that variant of MacCauley's being in ratio to the one I most often use as 11.666 ins. x (1224/1225) = 11.65714286 ins. I have been studying this ratio relationship in various contexts since my last topic post, from my granular acct. System. As I might have already mentioned, a cubic Ft. volume of 1728 cu/ins. x a Wheat cu/in. of 196.875 grs. = 340,200 grs. (Which you might more familiarly notice is twice 170,100). Such that when I multiply the most commonly accepted value of the Roman Ft. of 11.664 ins. x 1701/1700 = 11.67086118, (Ann MacCauley's unit Roman Ft.) Or in ratio to my unit is equal to 11.664 ins. x (4375/4374) = 11.666r. ins. But getting back to the cubic volume weight significance, this cubit Ft. of Wheat grains weighs 340,200 gr. / 5760 gr.(Troy Lb.) = 59.0625 Tr./Lbs. This might not look familiar to some until I divide that value in half to get, 29.53125 Lbs., which also expresses a Lunar Month. in the Egyptian system adopted by the Romans along with their Sothic Calendar system of 4 yrs of 1461 days, consequently renamed the Julian Calendar of 365.25 days.

But even more interesting than that to me now is this same weight value of the cubic Fr. of Wheat grains, expressed by that unit of MacCauley's, is 59.0625 Tr./Lbs x (34/35) = 57.375 Tr./Lbs. Or my curious Egyptian Radian unit once again. Hmm! Things get real topsy turvy in the Volumetric/Weights system, as one type of unit also expresses Linear units via the same numeric values. It is most similar to a checks and balances system, such that if one factor becomes lost or corrupted, (most often the Linear units), it can be corrected by scales of Volumetric/Weight units. So it's no surprise to find A.Thom's Megalithic system expressed as Barleycorn units of .36666r ins. as part of this system also, now that you have presented your findings concerning this. I will be exploring further relationships between these various systems for more coherence factors such as this.

Best regards to you and also Jim,

Stephen

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 4658 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 1063 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 804 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 592 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 475 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 512 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 453 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 506 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 525 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 396 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 421 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 392 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 399 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 397 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 339 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 331 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 313 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 341 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 425 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 334 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 314 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 378 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 569 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 433 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 438 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 364 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 358 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 437 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 505 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 423 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 445 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 427 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 340 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 383 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 335 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 339 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 402 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 411 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 351 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 379 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 386 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 372 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 278 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 346 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 340 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 386 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 329 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 320 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 330 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 392 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 322 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 359 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 328 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 413 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 316 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 410 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 365 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 359 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 351 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 344 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 335 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 340 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 331 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 338 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 358 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 443 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 328 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 376 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 286 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 311 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 321 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 346 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 398 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 327 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 331 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 327 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 389 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 352 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 357 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 361 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 393 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 393 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 313 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 377 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 416 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 345 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 498 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 351 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 316 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 357 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 321 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 423 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 445 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 432 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 405 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 403 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 405 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12
Re: the Giza Template 333 DavidK 14-Oct-18 21:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 320 DavidK 12-Oct-18 21:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 182 DavidK 16-Mar-19 23:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 148 rodz111 17-Mar-19 14:54
Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal 195 DavidK 17-Mar-19 10:38
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 128 DavidK 26-Mar-19 15:07
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.625 imperial inches 135 DavidK 04-Apr-19 13:17
Finding the ancient metre in the GP base 39.375 inches 130 DavidK 08-Apr-19 14:22
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 117 DavidK 25-Apr-19 21:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 136 DavidK 21-May-19 23:59


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.