Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
David wrote:

<The classic example is that Thom's system 5440 units is hidden in the imperial system by using a unit of 12 inches x 33/34 giving 5440 units in a mile so the case for the MY is somewhat proven. The length of the units decide the outcomes.

i suggested that the canon is scaled to 366.6666r solar days x 360 x 1000 = 132000000 feet 25000 miles. Immediately it must be noted the unit discovered in my first book is 3.6666 feet and i really had no idea that this was in barleycorns it was just an obviously misunderstood use of the imperial system that needed further investigation. It aligns with the canon perfectly. 3.666r x 4 = 14.666r.>

Hi David,

You are probably right about this matter of us all being right, depending on application. Right now though my thoughts on this situation are the ratio relationships between these various systems and applications. Your mention of Ann MacCauly's discovery of an alleged Roman Ft. of 12/(35/34) = 11.65714286 ins. is a new one I haven't seen before till now. But it has very interesting properties. That along with Thom's units expressed in Ft. value as you mention 12/(34/33) = 11.64705882 ins. And my own variant of 12/(36/35) = 11.6666r. ins. I can see each of these ratios in progression stages. Together with 12 x .972 = 11.664 ins. which is the more commonly used calculation of a Roman Ft., mentioned by Michell and Neal. The ratio relationships between these units are what if find most interesting, as the triangular ratio relationship I am most familiar with is the Imp. Ft. to Egyptian being 12 x (64/63) = 11.8125 ins., to the Roman x (80/81) = 11.666rback to the Imp. x (36/35) = 12.

What I find most intriguing at the moment, is that variant of MacCauley's being in ratio to the one I most often use as 11.666 ins. x (1224/1225) = 11.65714286 ins. I have been studying this ratio relationship in various contexts since my last topic post, from my granular acct. System. As I might have already mentioned, a cubic Ft. volume of 1728 cu/ins. x a Wheat cu/in. of 196.875 grs. = 340,200 grs. (Which you might more familiarly notice is twice 170,100). Such that when I multiply the most commonly accepted value of the Roman Ft. of 11.664 ins. x 1701/1700 = 11.67086118, (Ann MacCauley's unit Roman Ft.) Or in ratio to my unit is equal to 11.664 ins. x (4375/4374) = 11.666r. ins. But getting back to the cubic volume weight significance, this cubit Ft. of Wheat grains weighs 340,200 gr. / 5760 gr.(Troy Lb.) = 59.0625 Tr./Lbs. This might not look familiar to some until I divide that value in half to get, 29.53125 Lbs., which also expresses a Lunar Month. in the Egyptian system adopted by the Romans along with their Sothic Calendar system of 4 yrs of 1461 days, consequently renamed the Julian Calendar of 365.25 days.

But even more interesting than that to me now is this same weight value of the cubic Fr. of Wheat grains, expressed by that unit of MacCauley's, is 59.0625 Tr./Lbs x (34/35) = 57.375 Tr./Lbs. Or my curious Egyptian Radian unit once again. Hmm! Things get real topsy turvy in the Volumetric/Weights system, as one type of unit also expresses Linear units via the same numeric values. It is most similar to a checks and balances system, such that if one factor becomes lost or corrupted, (most often the Linear units), it can be corrected by scales of Volumetric/Weight units. So it's no surprise to find A.Thom's Megalithic system expressed as Barleycorn units of .36666r ins. as part of this system also, now that you have presented your findings concerning this. I will be exploring further relationships between these various systems for more coherence factors such as this.

Best regards to you and also Jim,

Stephen

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 4462 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 991 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 727 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 528 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 416 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 441 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 386 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 442 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 463 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 338 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 360 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 348 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 349 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 354 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 294 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 284 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 272 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 295 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 357 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 290 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 262 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 323 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 519 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 378 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 389 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 319 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 320 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 391 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 432 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 370 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 383 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 378 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 292 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 329 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 290 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 296 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 340 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 358 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 299 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 339 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 322 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 329 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 235 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 299 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 295 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 338 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 280 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 274 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 274 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 340 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 278 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 315 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 271 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 358 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 274 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 355 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 302 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 303 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 309 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 300 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 291 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 290 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 287 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 292 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 309 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 389 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 282 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 325 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 242 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 262 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 278 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 288 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 336 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 277 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 284 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 279 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 337 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 302 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 300 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 313 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 344 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 349 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 266 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 333 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 367 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 284 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 444 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 304 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 263 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 314 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 276 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 369 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 389 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 367 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 349 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 344 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 345 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12
Re: the Giza Template 266 DavidK 14-Oct-18 21:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 267 DavidK 12-Oct-18 21:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 115 DavidK 16-Mar-19 23:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 106 rodz111 17-Mar-19 14:54
Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal 132 DavidK 17-Mar-19 10:38
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 90 DavidK 26-Mar-19 15:07
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.625 imperial inches 76 DavidK 04-Apr-19 13:17
Finding the ancient metre in the GP base 39.375 inches 78 DavidK 08-Apr-19 14:22
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 67 DavidK 25-Apr-19 21:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 62 DavidK 21-May-19 23:59


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.