Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hello David,

Thanks for the well thought reply. You mention here:

<I have suggested that Michell's 'Canon of Ancient Measure' is based on a scaled circumference of 132000000 feet and this is against Jim Wakefield's unit of 1320 feet ( incidentally the length of the lesser cursus at SH )

So a model as 1000000 units of 132 feet ot 11 x 12 feet.

Using this model your unit represents a circumference of 131250000 feet and this is 750000 feet short of the top of the scale.

It equates to 24857.95455r miles very close to the polar circumference but not quite.>

This is very correct, in that John Michell initially determined the Idealized Earth sphere as 25,000 Mi. Circ., no matter how you factor it a very long time ago. But this was only a practicality, mostly due to the simplistic calculations of distances by the old Sumerian Pi ratio 25/8 = 3.125 units. However, it was also understood that in order to achieve a more accurate Pi ratio as 22/7, then either the circumference had to be shortened by, or the diameter be increased by a 176/175 ratio. And all I did was reduce this Idealized Sphere, by that same ratio to derive the Polar Meridian Circ. as you see it. But that was not how I initially discovered this figure as a more realistic value for the Polar Meridian Circ, comparable to today's known dimension's of the Earth. Actually, it was by ratio of ancient weight units of the Lb. Avoirdupois of 7000 grs./ Troy Lb. of 5760 gr., that gives a decimal equivalent to the Geographic Ft. that corresponds to this Circ. also, as 7000/5760 = 1.2527777 x 1000 x 1,296,000 Arc.Secs. = 1,575,000.000 Ins. Which is equal to the same Circ. value when divided by 12 ins. and 5280 Ft. per Mi. And the figure 157.5 equates to the grain weight of a cubic inch of Barleycorns as well. Whereas, a cubic inch of Water is in ratio to Barley by 8/5, gives Water whole integer of 252 grs. per cu.in., at a specific temperature of around 80*F.
Which figure anticipates your next comment here:

<Multiplying 39.375 by 64 gives 2520 and this is stade again ann approximation for the polar circumference as 360 x 7.>

You are no doubt recalling Eratothene's famous calculation of the Earth as 252,000 Stadia in this case. And it is my personal opinion that he never actually made that calculation based on any real measurements from Syrene to Alexandria to obtain that figure, since these two cities don't like due North of each other. But that didn't make him wrong in this case. It all depends on what figure of a Stadia one is referring to. I like one of 6250 ins. or 520.8333 Ft., which is 1 Ft. increased by the well known ratio 25/24 = 12.5 ins. x 500 units. And multiplied by 252,000 Stadia = 131,250,000 Ft. once again. I would like to point out, I am not the first metrologic researcher who has arrived at this same Polar Meridian Circ. figure, and nearly at the same time as myself yrs. ago, as far a publicizing their calculations.

Which brings me to your last query about my research into Megalithic measures. And to tell you the truth, I haven't done a whole lot with those units over the course my studies, as there appears to be so much controversy surrounding everyone's favorite value for this mysterious unit of a Megalithic Yard. I've heard them all by now I hope LOL! One that I decided to add to the ever growing list of candidate measures, consisted of another Barley grain calculation involving a cubic Ft., or 1728 cu./ins. x 157.5 grs. per cu./in. = 272,160 grs, which only needs to be decimal point shifted to 2.7216 Ft. What makes this figure interesting in relation to the initial one I mentioned, is that it is in ratio to 2.7225 Ft. by another well known comma factor of 3024/3025. Can you say GP perimeter dimensions here? LOL! But other than what I posted the other day, regarding this latter MY unit's division by the Old Meter value to arrive at another well known Earth Circ. used by a metrolgic minded poster here named Jacob Boaz, who also uses that same 3025/3024 ratio to adjust his calculations to John Michell's Canonical Earth Circ. model, I'm still working on finding other useful applications for it at this time. Got any suggestions in this study I should consider?

Best regards,

Stephen

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 4629 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 1054 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 795 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 586 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 466 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 502 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 445 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 502 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 520 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 391 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 412 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 387 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 393 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 392 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 334 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 328 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 309 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 336 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 410 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 327 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 308 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 372 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 566 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 423 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 433 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 360 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 355 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 433 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 498 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 419 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 440 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 422 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 335 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 379 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 333 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 335 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 391 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 406 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 344 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 377 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 381 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 370 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 276 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 336 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 338 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 382 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 319 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 316 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 326 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 389 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 317 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 354 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 324 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 408 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 312 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 402 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 360 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 355 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 347 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 341 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 331 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 335 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 328 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 333 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 355 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 437 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 325 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 372 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 284 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 303 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 315 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 339 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 389 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 323 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 326 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 323 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 385 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 349 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 352 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 356 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 388 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 387 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 310 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 373 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 411 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 339 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 494 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 346 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 312 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 353 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 315 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 415 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 439 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 422 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 398 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 397 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 399 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12
Re: the Giza Template 329 DavidK 14-Oct-18 21:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 318 DavidK 12-Oct-18 21:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 178 DavidK 16-Mar-19 23:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 146 rodz111 17-Mar-19 14:54
Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal 190 DavidK 17-Mar-19 10:38
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 125 DavidK 26-Mar-19 15:07
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.625 imperial inches 130 DavidK 04-Apr-19 13:17
Finding the ancient metre in the GP base 39.375 inches 125 DavidK 08-Apr-19 14:22
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 113 DavidK 25-Apr-19 21:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 126 DavidK 21-May-19 23:59


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.