Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hello David,

Thanks for the well thought reply. You mention here:

<I have suggested that Michell's 'Canon of Ancient Measure' is based on a scaled circumference of 132000000 feet and this is against Jim Wakefield's unit of 1320 feet ( incidentally the length of the lesser cursus at SH )

So a model as 1000000 units of 132 feet ot 11 x 12 feet.

Using this model your unit represents a circumference of 131250000 feet and this is 750000 feet short of the top of the scale.

It equates to 24857.95455r miles very close to the polar circumference but not quite.>

This is very correct, in that John Michell initially determined the Idealized Earth sphere as 25,000 Mi. Circ., no matter how you factor it a very long time ago. But this was only a practicality, mostly due to the simplistic calculations of distances by the old Sumerian Pi ratio 25/8 = 3.125 units. However, it was also understood that in order to achieve a more accurate Pi ratio as 22/7, then either the circumference had to be shortened by, or the diameter be increased by a 176/175 ratio. And all I did was reduce this Idealized Sphere, by that same ratio to derive the Polar Meridian Circ. as you see it. But that was not how I initially discovered this figure as a more realistic value for the Polar Meridian Circ, comparable to today's known dimension's of the Earth. Actually, it was by ratio of ancient weight units of the Lb. Avoirdupois of 7000 grs./ Troy Lb. of 5760 gr., that gives a decimal equivalent to the Geographic Ft. that corresponds to this Circ. also, as 7000/5760 = 1.2527777 x 1000 x 1,296,000 Arc.Secs. = 1,575,000.000 Ins. Which is equal to the same Circ. value when divided by 12 ins. and 5280 Ft. per Mi. And the figure 157.5 equates to the grain weight of a cubic inch of Barleycorns as well. Whereas, a cubic inch of Water is in ratio to Barley by 8/5, gives Water whole integer of 252 grs. per cu.in., at a specific temperature of around 80*F.
Which figure anticipates your next comment here:

<Multiplying 39.375 by 64 gives 2520 and this is stade again ann approximation for the polar circumference as 360 x 7.>

You are no doubt recalling Eratothene's famous calculation of the Earth as 252,000 Stadia in this case. And it is my personal opinion that he never actually made that calculation based on any real measurements from Syrene to Alexandria to obtain that figure, since these two cities don't like due North of each other. But that didn't make him wrong in this case. It all depends on what figure of a Stadia one is referring to. I like one of 6250 ins. or 520.8333 Ft., which is 1 Ft. increased by the well known ratio 25/24 = 12.5 ins. x 500 units. And multiplied by 252,000 Stadia = 131,250,000 Ft. once again. I would like to point out, I am not the first metrologic researcher who has arrived at this same Polar Meridian Circ. figure, and nearly at the same time as myself yrs. ago, as far a publicizing their calculations.

Which brings me to your last query about my research into Megalithic measures. And to tell you the truth, I haven't done a whole lot with those units over the course my studies, as there appears to be so much controversy surrounding everyone's favorite value for this mysterious unit of a Megalithic Yard. I've heard them all by now I hope LOL! One that I decided to add to the ever growing list of candidate measures, consisted of another Barley grain calculation involving a cubic Ft., or 1728 cu./ins. x 157.5 grs. per cu./in. = 272,160 grs, which only needs to be decimal point shifted to 2.7216 Ft. What makes this figure interesting in relation to the initial one I mentioned, is that it is in ratio to 2.7225 Ft. by another well known comma factor of 3024/3025. Can you say GP perimeter dimensions here? LOL! But other than what I posted the other day, regarding this latter MY unit's division by the Old Meter value to arrive at another well known Earth Circ. used by a metrolgic minded poster here named Jacob Boaz, who also uses that same 3025/3024 ratio to adjust his calculations to John Michell's Canonical Earth Circ. model, I'm still working on finding other useful applications for it at this time. Got any suggestions in this study I should consider?

Best regards,

Stephen

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 4576 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 1037 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 774 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 566 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 455 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 487 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 428 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 486 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 499 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 375 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 397 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 378 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 382 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 381 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 320 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 316 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 298 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 327 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 391 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 318 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 296 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 358 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 556 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 413 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 418 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 349 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 346 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 422 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 479 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 403 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 420 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 410 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 326 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 364 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 322 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 324 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 378 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 393 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 327 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 365 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 365 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 358 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 265 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 326 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 324 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 370 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 308 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 305 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 315 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 376 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 308 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 344 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 311 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 392 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 305 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 388 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 342 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 341 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 337 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 328 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 322 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 324 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 319 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 324 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 343 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 426 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 312 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 360 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 273 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 289 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 307 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 325 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 373 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 314 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 313 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 309 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 370 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 336 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 335 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 343 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 377 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 377 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 297 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 363 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 399 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 322 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 480 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 336 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 298 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 342 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 305 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 403 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 424 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 407 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 385 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 384 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 382 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12
Re: the Giza Template 310 DavidK 14-Oct-18 21:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 302 DavidK 12-Oct-18 21:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 160 DavidK 16-Mar-19 23:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 135 rodz111 17-Mar-19 14:54
Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal 173 DavidK 17-Mar-19 10:38
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 116 DavidK 26-Mar-19 15:07
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.625 imperial inches 113 DavidK 04-Apr-19 13:17
Finding the ancient metre in the GP base 39.375 inches 108 DavidK 08-Apr-19 14:22
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 96 DavidK 25-Apr-19 21:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 104 DavidK 21-May-19 23:59


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.