> > The statement of Merrell's that I have
> > corrected actually, is only what was stated
> > above-that the quarry marks in the RC are
> > the construction of G1 began and ended with
> On the available evidence, it has been deduced
> that the presence of aper names themselves act as
> indications of the presence of a substantial
How is this relevant to the comment above? It is not. If Khufu started working on G1 from the QC and up, for example, his labor force would be just as "substantial" as indicated by the aper names.
> For more discussion of the numbers of workers of
> which aperu were composed, see Mark Lehner, 2016,
> The Name and Nature of the Heit el-Ghurab Old
> Kingdom Site (126-9).
And what would this do for us regarding the fact the quarry marks in the RC do not prove Khufu originated and completed construction of G1 counter to your claims of fact? Its irrelevant which we are to question why you would offer it.
> > > You obviously was aware of where Merrell may
> > have
> > > obtained such a date. You detail it later!
> > I do not know where she got it from
> I provided the relevant citation, twice.
Corp is reffering to my very first comments to you about it which at that point you had not.
> > I am just
> > noting where it comes from to the general
> > that only starts getting repeated after 2017.
> For the third time:
> allet 2017,[/url] pg. 12.
It strange that you have taken the time to in your words cite this 3 times, yet refuse to actually quote it...? Methinks the reason may be is that you do not actually have this reference and are reffering to a bibliography from another book.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12-Apr-19 15:27 by Thanos5150.