> Tuck's Orion Precession Theory
> I have figured-out what caused the Younger Dryas
> climatic event in 11,000 BC. It was from the
> Precession of the earth when a massive object
> passed near the earth. I believe the massive
> object was Nibiru because the timing of Nibiru's
> arrival. The proof is in the correlation between
> the effect of Latitude on Annual Temperature Range
> that matches the decline of 2-6°C (average of
> 4°C) in the Northern Hemisphere and the angle of
> Orion's Belt from North at the time when the Giza
> Pyramid Complex was built. I believe the Giza
> Pyramids Complex was built prior to 11,000 BC
> (ushering the age of Leo). This precisely explains
> astronomer Tony Fairall's claim that the pyramids
> have an angle of 38-degrees from North when it
> should have an angle of 50-degrees in 10,500 BC.
> If you rotate the earth to where it has a
> 50-degree angle (from the 38-degrees of the
> pyramids), you have just increased the Latitude of
> North America 12-degrees, causing it to rapidly
> cool. While global temperatures were warming, this
> would have thrust back into a cool icy-chill.
> Modern astronomers would use calculations
> based-upon this new tilt of the earth's axis
> (which explains the 50-degree calculation).
> This proves that the Giza Pyramid Complex was
> built prior to 10,500 BC and answers the question
> of what caused Younger Dryas and the existence of
> Nibiru. I would even speculate that it explains
> what happened to the Lost City of Atlantis since a
> rapid change in the Precession of the earth would
> cause major flooding and tsunamis.
> Precession of the Earth would cause a Tidal Force
> that is a secondary effect of the force of
> gravity. This would be similar to how the moon
> causes ocean tides. Ocean Tides result because the
> gravitational force exerted by one body on another
> is not consistent across it. The nearest side is
> attracted more strongly than the fairest side,
> causing a differential.
> There was a 2-6°C change in temperature, which
> indicates about a 10-14 degree change in Latitude
> from the Equator towards the North Pole. This
> matches the 9-12 degree discrepancy between the
> Orion Correlation Theory. The overlap is 10-12
> degrees. I think it modified it 12-degrees.
> In a 1999 article in the Journal of the Royal
> Astronomical Society, astronomer Tony Fairall
> “Bauval claims that going back to 10500 BC gives
> ‘a perfect match’.
> Or does it? My own investigation showed that,
> while the line of the two outer pyramids is set 38
> degrees from north, the angle of Orion's Belt to
> north in 10500 BC is close on 50 degrees! Hardy an
> exact match. I calculate that circular
> precessional motion would give 47 degrees, whereas
> including nutational terms makes it slightly
> higher. Measurements in the planetarium agree.”
> There has been some variation over the angle
> measurements of the line of the two outermost
> pyramids. The pyramids themselves make an angle of
> 37° 51' 6" from a survey made by Flinders Petrie
> in 1881 and published in 1883 in his book The
> Temples and Pyramids of Gizeh. As for the angle in
> 10,500 BC, the late Astronomer Tony Fairall has
> given several calculations. In June of 1999, he
> said 50°, according to Bauval in 2000 said it was
> closer to 48° in subsequent calculations, but BBC
> ran a program that year saying that the angle was
> 54°. I think that the 54° measurement must be
> erroneous and that the closest measurement is
> between 48-50°. That still leaves us with a
> difference of 10-12°, which corresponds with my
> theory that Precession of the earth caused the
> Younger Dryas climactic event and led to a major
> global flooding.
Congratulations Mr Tuck.
I confess I actually thought you were being serious when you posted this & subsequent posts.
brilliant troll job.
Cheers sir for the laugh.
As if anyone could believe all THAT!