Would you mind giving a further explanation of the following points which you raised.
This precisely explains astronomer Tony Fairall's claim that the pyramids have an angle of 38-degrees from North when it should have an angle of 50-degrees in 10,500 BC. If you rotate the earth to where it has a 50-degree angle (from the 38-degrees of the pyramids), you have just increased the Latitude of North America 12-degrees,
To my knowledge, the 12 degree discrepancy theorized by Fairall was the difference of angle between the celestial Orion's Belt and the Giza Pyramids - the so called Orion Correlation Theory as espoused by Bauval ie As above, so below. It had nothing to do with the pyramids having 38 degrees deviation from true North. A diagram to illustrate your point might be helpful.
If you rotate the earth to where it has a 50-degree angle (from the 38-degrees of the pyramids), you have just increased the Latitude of North America 12-degrees, causing it to rapidly cool. While global temperatures were warming, this would have thrust back into a cool icy-chill.
Any rapid cooling of the Earth cannot be the result of Precession of the Equinoxes. The 26 000 year cycle would ensure that any climatic events which may be caused would be gradual.
How does the Earth suddenly tilt on its axis a further 12 degrees? Precession of the Equinoxes has nothing to do with changes in the Angle of Earth's axis. The Angle of Obliquity changes only 2.5 degrees over a period of 41 000 years, and this small change is not the result of Precession of the Equinoxes.
This proves that the Giza Pyramid Complex was built prior to 10,500 BC and answers the question of what caused Younger Dryas and the existence of Nibiru. I would even speculate that it explains what happened to the Lost City of Atlantis since a rapid change in the Precession of the earth would cause major flooding and tsunamis.
The Pyramids of Giza may have an earlier commencement date than commonly postulated but I highly doubt that this speculation offers any proof.
Precession of the Earth would cause a Tidal Force that is a secondary effect of the force of gravity.
How does Precession of the Equinoxes affect the tides?
There was a 2-6°C change in temperature, which indicates about a 10-14 degree change in Latitude from the Equator towards the North Pole. This matches the 9-12 degree discrepancy between the Orion Correlation Theory. The overlap is 10-12 degrees. I think it modified it 12-degrees.
How can the Equator move towards the North Pole? The lines of latitude are imaginary fixed lines. You can tilt the Earth any way that you like, but the lines do not move. Again, the 12 degree discrepancy is simply a disagreement between Fairall and Bauval about the position of the Giza Pyramids on the plateau matched against their supposed counterparts in the sky viz. Orion's Belt. How do you correlate the position of the pyramids with Axial Tilt?
My own investigation showed that, while the line of the two outer pyramids is set 38 degrees from north, the angle of Orion's Belt to north in 10500 BC is close on 50 degrees! Hardy an exact match. I calculate that circular precessional motion would give 47 degrees, whereas including nutational terms makes it slightly higher. Measurements in the planetarium agree.”
Could you please provide a diagram to better explain this?
The pyramids themselves make an angle of 37° 51' 6" from a survey made by Flinders Petrie in 1881 and published in 1883 in his book The Temples and Pyramids of Gizeh
Could you please provide this diagram?
As for the angle in 10,500 BC, the late Astronomer Tony Fairall has given several calculations. In June of 1999, he said 50°, according to Bauval in 2000 said it was closer to 48° in subsequent calculations, but BBC ran a program that year saying that the angle was 54°.
Could you please provide these diagrams so that the reader can understand how you arrive at your conclusions?