I refer again to Tesla’s Map of Multiplication which indicates twelve directions in its outward spiral. He displays 4 within a triangle because “The number 4 multiplies itself throughout the system as an equilateral triangle.”, whereas any fool (of which I am one) would think of 4 in relation to a square. Thanks to Tesla, the triangular form is thus firmly related to the number 4 and, thanks to the Sumerians, the number 4 is equally firmly linked to the notion of a renowned eye. This is, of course, reminiscent of the pyramid capstone and the all-seeing eye on the dollar bill, etc.
Perhaps my comments here don’t contribute anything to the subject that Andre wanted to develop; in which case, my apologies. I also hope that I have not posted it in the wrong place. If so, more apologies.
|360 and the relations to natural numbers||443||Andre T||07-Jul-17 19:35|
|Re: 360 and the relations to natural numbers||89||Thunderbird||07-Jul-17 20:13|
|Re: 360 and the relations to natural numbers||61||lostsheep||08-Jul-17 00:12|
|Re: 360 and the relations to natural numbers||82||Sirfiroth||08-Jul-17 00:21|
|Re: 360 and the relations to natural numbers||69||MDaines||08-Jul-17 10:47|
|A purely Sumerian thread||69||MDaines||08-Jul-17 13:03|
|Mod Note > Duplicate Posts||59||Dr. Troglodyte||08-Jul-17 20:43|
|Re: A purely Sumerian thread||84||MDaines||09-Jul-17 14:51|
|Re: 360 and the relations to natural numbers||82||Reagent||08-Jul-17 12:30|