Several posts back I showed how the Noah's Arc is giving us information on the mysterious Neanderthals, whose bones are only found within the range of the Noah's Arc and just to the east of it. The east side of Noah's Arc is Mt Ararat in Turkey and of course we have biblical stories of a new beginning happening from Mt Ararat after a great catastrophe. The inner circle of Noah's Arc, the “Near O”, passes right thru Dusseldorf, Germany, and as I mentioned, the original find of Neanderthal bones happened in the Neander valley just outside of Dusseldorf in the early 1800s. If you use the online map programs I have suggested, you will find a whole string of Neanderthal-named locations, from the Neander valley to the Neanderthal Museum … to several more leading into the city of Dusseldorf. It's obvious to me that the Noah's Arc is telling us that the Neanderthals are central to our history on this planet.
I did some digging and found a 1913 online Webster's dictionary and this is the definition it gives for Neanderthal:
Ne*an"der*thal` (?), a. (Anthropol.) Of, pertaining to, or named from, the Neanderthal, a valley in the Rhine Province, in which were found parts of a skeleton of an early type of man. The skull is characterized by extreme dolichocephaly, flat, retreating forehead, with closed frontal sutures, and enormous superciliary ridges. The cranial capacity is estimated at about 1,220 cubic centimeters, being about midway between that of the Pithecanthropus and modern man. Hence, designating the Neanderthal race, or man, a species supposed to have been widespread in paleolithic Europe.
Looking up Pithecanthropus, the dictionary gives:
Pith`e*can*thro"pus, n. [NL.; Gr. ? ape + ? man.] 1. A hypothetical genus of primates intermediate between man and the anthropoid apes. Haeckel.
2. A genus consisting of an primate (P. erectus) apparently intermediate between man and the existing anthropoid apes, known from bones of a single individual found in Java (hence called Java man) in 1891-92. These bones include a thigh bone of the human type, two molar teeth intermediate between those of man and the anthropoids, and the calvaria of the skull, indicating a brain capacity of about 900 cubic centimeters, and resembling in form that of the Neanderthal man.
Ok so this sounds very scientific and fits well with the theory that humans evolved on earth from ape like beings. It's giving us the sequence: apes, then a primate with a 900 cc brain called Java Man, then the Neanderthals about halfway between Java Man and modern humans in terms of brain size.
Makes perfect sense except for the fact that, if we look up the establishment's current definition of Neanderthal, we find on wikipedia this statement:
Male Neanderthals had cranial capacities averaging 1,600 cm3 (98 cu in), females 1,300 cm3 (79 cu in), extending to 1,736 cm3 (105.9 cu in) in Amud 1. This is notably larger than the 1,250 to 1,400 cm3 (76 to 85 cu in) typical of modern humans.
Golly that's quite a different story. What if, back in 1913, people had been told that Neanderthals had brains notably larger than ours? Remember, this was before the age of “carbon dating”. Do you think that would have raised some questions, such as:
Do Neanderthals still exist?
Are they superior to us?
Are there any references to beings looking like us but being different, maybe superior, in the histories of peoples on this planet? (answer: er, yeah, like in every culture.)
So they made the problem go away by simply lying, packaging the Neanderthals as ape humans fitting neatly into the ape to human evolutionary theory we've all been taught.
How does the establishment get away with saying today that Neanderthals were larger brained than us yet still hold onto their ape to human, man-is-the-pinnacle-of-evolution story? They make the problem go away by using: Carbon dating. That same wikipedia article says:
Neanderthals or more rarely, Neandertals, named for the Neandertal region of Germany, were a species or subspecies of archaic humans in the genus Homo that went extinct about 40,000 years ago.
Voila! Problem solved. Whatever they were, they've been gone so long that they couldn't possibly have affected modern human history.
Only problem is, the Noah's Arc code says Neanderthals are a recent phenomenon and central to our history. In other words, the establishment is lying about the age of them bones.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23-Jul-17 19:34 by Tom M Culhane.