> > Not only does this show how little you did know
> > Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here,
> > you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> > such things as you, despite your knowing about
> > Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before
> > of us were even born, that it was only until
> > end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> > became "apparent" to "most of us" they
> > have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> > "most of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> > Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please
> > not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> > actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> > before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
> 4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to
> form, you morph that into "most of
> us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on
> the basis of the figment of your own imagination.
You are such a fraud. Day after day you misrepresent what others say, purposefully or otherwise, most often to weasel out of whatever mess you've gotten yourself into or prop up yet another straw man, several instances well documented in just this thread alone, yet my "typo", which you can see I was correct on my 1st quote of it (highlighted in bold above), dumb ass, constitutes some willful and sinister "attempt" on my part to insult you when it would make sense to even someone with one good eye makes no difference whether you said "many" or "most".
But since we are on the topic of your dishonesty, maybe you can explain to us how you were able to quantify the statement "many [again note Origyptian's emphasis with italics] of us"? Who are these "many"?
What you said in full:
But only when the new excavations revealed what lies under the surface did it become all too apparent to many of us that the Romans didn't do that work.
Several times now I have caught you bald face lying about giving undue weight to your claims by noting a phantom "many", "most", and the like, to support it in one way or another when in reality you are just flat out making it up in which you are the only one who thinks this. So, again, please tell us how you arrived at a figure of not just "many", but "many", who it suddenly had "become all too apparent[...] that the Romans didn't do that work."
Or how about just name "one", other than yourself? Audrey already disqualified herself as she thought this long ago from reading Von Daniken, so this leaves you and who else out of this "many"?
Here's the thread in question (started by me): Largest ancient stone discovered at Baalbek. Can you find one person in this thread, let alone "many", who upon learning about this "new discovery" was swayed to the conclusion, becoming "all too apparent", "that the Romans didn't do the work"? I looked and could not find one so where did you get "many" from? Did you just make it up again having the gall to actually italicize something you knew wasn't true to make it seem even more "authoritative" than it really was? Or is there some other website you can link to that you are a part of or read that would give us at least some sense of this "many" you assert were converted to a non-Roman origin upon learning of this "new discovery" whereas before they just followed the "traditionalist" dogma?
Of course the answer is no just like every other time you've done the same thing. You are literally just making it up out of thin air no different than the many times before, so before you start lying about how others are "attempting" to purposefully misrepresent you to deflect away from your own pathological behavior, I'd worry about your own never ending flow of made up bullshit first.
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 19-Apr-17 02:10 by Thanos5150.