Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3704 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 554 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 590 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 590 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 608 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 674 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 417 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 512 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 482 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 462 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 385 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 477 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 537 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 441 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 483 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 483 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 414 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 428 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 483 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 432 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 377 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 452 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 428 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 401 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 433 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 466 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 552 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 405 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 536 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 431 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 434 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 401 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 416 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 405 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 441 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 383 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 435 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 474 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 449 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 399 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 383 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 489 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 452 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 415 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 431 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 392 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 424 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 486 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 375 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 413 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 489 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 411 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 549 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 406 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 421 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 423 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 408 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 423 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 537 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 392 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 538 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 441 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 355 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 518 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 355 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 382 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 399 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 426 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 305 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 436 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 334 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 423 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 386 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 469 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 432 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 329 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 470 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 375 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 532 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 334 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 476 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 383 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 396 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 396 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 472 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 407 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 432 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 346 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 434 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 408 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 337 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 464 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 449 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 420 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 446 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 405 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 448 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 401 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 447 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 536 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 361 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 439 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 392 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 453 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 472 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 451 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 409 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 520 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 419 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 427 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 420 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 566 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 552 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 603 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 413 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 469 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 488 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 477 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 461 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 433 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 429 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 447 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 428 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 431 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 487 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 483 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 383 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 443 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 429 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 383 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 441 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 434 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 417 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 537 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 428 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 404 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 568 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 563 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 362 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 313 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 457 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 385 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 391 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 599 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 447 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 444 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 441 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 548 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 347 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 489 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 395 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 344 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 371 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 419 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 486 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 459 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 410 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 485 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 390 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 440 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 467 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 488 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 387 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 478 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 616 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 386 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 368 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 384 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 347 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 525 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 427 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 423 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 416 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 552 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 538 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 546 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 400 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 650 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 328 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 353 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 273 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 435 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 384 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 393 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 344 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 404 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 408 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 387 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 458 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 364 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 486 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 381 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 324 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 392 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 400 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 387 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 354 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 349 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 300 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 333 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 296 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 330 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 195 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 387 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 227 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 322 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 236 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 306 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 300 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 209 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 213 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 191 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 459 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 224 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 395 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 454 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 310 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 285 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 306 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 316 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 218 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 253 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 342 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 328 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 254 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 318 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 482 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 222 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 261 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 370 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 270 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 190 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 235 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 202 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 197 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 243 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 265 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 227 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 444 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 209 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 313 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 219 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 290 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 240 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 383 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 210 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 244 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 267 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 235 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 304 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 283 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 232 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 372 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 361 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 285 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 305 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 270 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 286 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 344 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 540 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 263 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 386 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 357 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 289 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 281 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 219 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 325 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 285 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 196 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 396 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 183 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 205 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 223 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 379 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 201 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 272 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 303 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 300 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 383 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 270 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 279 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 347 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 350 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 220 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 400 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 260 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 279 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 195 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 274 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 298 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 251 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 199 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 306 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 249 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 347 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 357 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 257 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 193 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 348 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 256 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377