Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3483 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 503 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 524 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 528 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 534 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 602 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 368 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 392 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 343 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 395 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 453 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 387 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 427 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 389 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 358 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 381 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 421 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 356 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 314 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 368 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 373 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 341 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 362 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 412 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 470 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 344 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 469 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 374 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 353 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 327 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 364 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 321 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 387 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 334 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 377 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 403 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 394 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 325 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 306 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 394 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 362 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 413 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 378 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 351 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 373 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 324 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 356 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 291 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 423 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 357 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 476 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 330 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 375 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 361 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 344 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 356 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 341 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 455 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 364 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 310 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 452 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 300 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 322 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 342 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 390 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 359 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 257 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 348 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 278 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 372 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 332 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 354 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 278 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 417 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 326 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 463 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 266 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 410 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 302 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 341 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 336 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 324 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 399 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 343 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 359 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 279 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 349 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 335 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 302 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 285 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 415 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 391 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 356 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 386 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 360 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 364 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 364 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 367 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 469 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 306 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 396 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 332 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 399 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 424 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 386 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 331 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 451 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 358 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 373 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 490 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 492 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 525 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 340 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 413 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 399 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 391 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 361 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 353 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 389 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 358 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 363 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 420 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 407 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 333 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 365 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 382 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 310 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 455 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 363 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 350 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 359 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 373 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 346 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 342 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 491 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 489 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 308 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 261 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 381 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 322 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 329 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 513 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 380 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 361 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 355 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 469 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 281 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 428 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 290 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 431 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 354 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 431 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 309 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 324 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 283 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 310 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 407 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 390 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 534 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 324 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 285 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 316 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 336 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 254 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 287 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 232 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 299 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 443 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 355 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 356 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 288 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 382 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 474 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 465 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 347 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 594 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 287 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 288 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 382 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 283 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 334 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 359 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 383 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 278 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 324 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 294 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 242 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 361 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 334 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 343 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 330 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 361 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 361 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 300 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 304 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 336 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 328 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 376 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 263 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 331 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 304 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 303 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 245 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 290 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 237 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 286 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 150 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 335 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 190 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 289 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 188 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 270 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 262 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 175 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 348 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 173 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 221 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 157 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 419 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 189 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 243 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 283 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 250 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 257 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 271 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 274 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 172 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 210 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 296 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 281 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 215 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 260 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 397 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 178 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 225 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 327 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 236 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 156 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 192 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 218 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 153 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 283 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 172 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 194 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 241 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 176 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 171 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 313 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 287 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 241 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 161 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 285 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 176 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 240 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 230 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 163 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 217 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 197 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 237 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 216 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 191 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 272 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 252 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 195 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 320 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 319 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 238 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 252 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 221 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 251 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 297 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 457 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 215 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 331 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 300 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 232 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 237 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 178 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 288 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 246 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 161 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 333 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 154 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 168 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 190 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 341 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 164 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 239 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 253 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 268 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 338 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 210 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 241 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 297 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 300 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 184 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 336 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 214 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 237 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 160 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 238 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 250 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 203 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 156 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 257 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 205 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 308 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 306 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 219 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 315 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 149 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 278 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 220 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 00:04