Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3324 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 466 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 489 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 484 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 480 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 558 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 335 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 393 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 351 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 342 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 312 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 349 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 401 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 348 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 382 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 342 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 316 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 340 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 379 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 312 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 273 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 330 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 332 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 306 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 314 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 365 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 411 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 308 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 413 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 326 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 307 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 284 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 329 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 264 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 330 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 307 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 341 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 358 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 355 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 284 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 265 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 362 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 345 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 324 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 373 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 303 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 324 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 382 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 289 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 313 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 332 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 238 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 370 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 313 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 436 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 293 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 326 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 303 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 297 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 318 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 348 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 304 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 407 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 315 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 340 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 274 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 404 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 263 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 288 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 302 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 355 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 317 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 225 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 297 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 240 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 333 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 290 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 340 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 319 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 243 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 375 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 280 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 391 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 237 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 362 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 259 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 304 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 293 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 280 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 312 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 357 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 291 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 315 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 235 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 314 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 302 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 260 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 252 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 372 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 355 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 316 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 345 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 335 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 307 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 320 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 326 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 414 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 274 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 346 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 281 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 350 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 387 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 351 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 280 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 398 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 301 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 333 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 285 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 438 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 434 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 463 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 305 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 351 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 361 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 339 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 334 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 308 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 309 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 348 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 307 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 330 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 364 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 351 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 295 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 330 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 347 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 270 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 413 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 327 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 314 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 313 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 393 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 338 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 307 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 298 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 443 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 419 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 278 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 225 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 345 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 287 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 291 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 462 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 345 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 322 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 308 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 425 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 245 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 387 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 254 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 233 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 288 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 393 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 234 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 273 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 288 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 359 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 243 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 298 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 385 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 313 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 283 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 331 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 320 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 313 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 299 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 487 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 290 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 250 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 282 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 313 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 324 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 299 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 225 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 249 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 218 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 261 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 389 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 323 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 314 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 250 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 354 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 406 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 318 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 565 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 334 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 348 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 248 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 262 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 298 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 321 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 230 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 310 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 300 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 299 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 300 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 249 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 328 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 287 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 331 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 304 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 291 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 299 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 262 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 319 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 232 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 294 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 270 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 265 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 210 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 263 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 197 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 269 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 125 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 306 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 167 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 259 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 152 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 248 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 242 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 153 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 321 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 149 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 200 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 133 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 171 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 397 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 286 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 214 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 229 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 236 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 240 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 245 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 141 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 186 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 263 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 238 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 185 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 236 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 349 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 146 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 197 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 288 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 214 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 129 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 158 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 198 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 133 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 233 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 133 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 160 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 214 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 148 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 150 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 292 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 263 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 207 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 234 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 134 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 223 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 227 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 347 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 222 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 151 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 216 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 321 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 204 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 135 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 195 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 157 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 200 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 195 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 171 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 247 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 232 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 174 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 284 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 280 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 204 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 223 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 190 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 230 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 273 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 386 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 196 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 270 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 268 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 207 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 207 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 148 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 273 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 218 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 139 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 283 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 134 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 146 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 163 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 312 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 145 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 208 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 220 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 246 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 311 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 187 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 225 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 279 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 269 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 168 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 289 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 164 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 209 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 134 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 218 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 218 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 170 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 129 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 221 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 250 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 185 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 277 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 277 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 198 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 119 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 285 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 202 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 Corpuscles