Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3431 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 494 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 518 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 514 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 514 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 591 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 363 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 427 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 381 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 372 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 337 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 379 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 441 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 376 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 414 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 377 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 350 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 371 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 410 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 347 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 302 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 357 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 363 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 333 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 347 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 400 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 457 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 333 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 452 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 364 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 336 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 315 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 360 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 297 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 378 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 328 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 371 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 390 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 387 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 310 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 297 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 390 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 345 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 404 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 333 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 360 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 426 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 313 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 344 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 358 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 278 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 406 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 351 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 470 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 370 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 336 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 329 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 343 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 385 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 336 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 439 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 346 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 370 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 305 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 438 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 289 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 318 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 337 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 351 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 252 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 338 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 268 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 326 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 376 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 350 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 272 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 413 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 317 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 439 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 257 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 395 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 288 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 334 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 325 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 312 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 344 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 386 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 323 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 349 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 274 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 340 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 330 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 293 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 279 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 405 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 383 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 350 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 374 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 353 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 351 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 357 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 357 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 456 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 297 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 389 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 324 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 392 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 419 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 378 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 318 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 442 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 339 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 367 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 314 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 479 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 482 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 514 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 335 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 399 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 405 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 379 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 367 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 347 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 341 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 383 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 345 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 359 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 411 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 394 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 327 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 356 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 376 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 303 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 442 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 353 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 343 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 347 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 427 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 337 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 480 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 475 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 300 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 253 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 374 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 318 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 319 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 508 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 371 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 354 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 347 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 459 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 274 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 421 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 336 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 261 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 371 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 330 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 304 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 309 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 321 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 385 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 324 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 286 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 359 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 299 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 352 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 431 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 384 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 525 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 319 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 276 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 311 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 330 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 249 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 230 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 422 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 349 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 351 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 469 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 451 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 470 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 591 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 310 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 285 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 274 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 292 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 354 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 274 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 298 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 290 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 348 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 287 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 239 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 349 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 329 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 331 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 321 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 320 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 354 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 359 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 371 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 371 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 354 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 323 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 324 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 370 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 310 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 431 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 343 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 348 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 331 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 328 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 298 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 295 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 241 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 287 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 231 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 283 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 149 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 332 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 187 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 284 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 177 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 171 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 344 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 315 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 172 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 216 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 155 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 370 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 187 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 361 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 239 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 247 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 254 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 267 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 271 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 169 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 207 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 292 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 271 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 209 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 258 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 386 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 174 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 222 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 320 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 234 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 151 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 188 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 215 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 150 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 167 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 186 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 239 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 169 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 170 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 285 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 236 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 160 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 255 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 255 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 171 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 238 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 343 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 227 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 159 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 213 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 187 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 231 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 214 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 189 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 270 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 250 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 193 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 314 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 313 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 232 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 250 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 217 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 249 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 294 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 441 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 212 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 313 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 295 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 227 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 234 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 175 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 284 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 243 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 159 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 326 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 150 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 165 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 188 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 335 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 162 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 233 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 245 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 265 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 333 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 207 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 239 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 294 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 295 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 182 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 323 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 200 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 235 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 156 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 232 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 244 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 192 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 154 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 253 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 274 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 202 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 304 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 304 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 217 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 330 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 146 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 219 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 303 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 00:04