Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3735 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 569 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 600 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 602 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 627 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 694 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 431 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 522 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 492 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 473 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 397 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 493 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 552 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 453 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 494 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 499 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 428 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 441 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 494 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 454 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 391 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 465 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 438 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 413 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 443 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 477 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 568 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 414 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 548 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 441 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 454 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 412 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 428 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 414 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 453 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 393 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 446 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 502 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 465 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 411 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 399 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 504 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 464 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 424 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 486 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 443 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 504 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 387 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 422 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 444 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 363 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 508 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 422 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 567 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 425 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 430 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 437 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 417 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 434 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 552 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 404 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 559 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 458 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 488 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 367 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 368 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 395 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 413 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 456 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 319 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 449 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 369 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 436 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 491 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 449 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 343 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 479 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 389 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 544 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 345 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 487 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 393 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 415 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 407 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 397 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 484 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 429 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 444 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 357 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 448 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 429 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 362 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 348 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 477 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 460 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 457 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 418 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 469 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 416 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 550 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 372 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 449 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 406 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 462 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 495 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 468 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 419 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 545 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 440 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 443 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 434 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 590 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 570 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 628 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 432 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 485 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 499 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 488 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 471 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 443 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 443 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 459 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 441 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 446 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 512 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 498 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 394 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 462 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 439 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 395 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 518 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 452 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 447 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 427 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 550 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 443 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 423 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 414 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 586 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 595 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 371 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 326 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 470 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 400 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 408 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 632 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 472 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 458 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 468 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 568 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 372 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 513 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 423 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 390 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 384 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 440 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 498 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 474 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 445 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 334 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 421 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 503 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 390 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 452 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 480 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 370 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 505 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 424 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 397 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 447 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 634 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 403 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 387 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 393 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 429 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 439 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 416 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 352 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 536 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 440 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 437 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 382 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 487 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 448 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 568 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 555 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 557 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 663 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 384 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 430 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 453 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 408 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 352 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 334 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 445 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 415 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 405 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 419 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 385 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 372 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 441 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 443 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 423 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 397 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 429 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 505 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 406 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 382 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 361 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 312 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 343 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 305 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 338 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 208 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 398 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 239 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 333 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 262 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 231 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 352 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 515 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 235 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 201 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 430 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 233 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 516 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 314 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 328 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 231 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 268 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 351 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 353 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 265 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 330 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 495 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 247 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 271 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 394 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 280 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 207 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 245 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 213 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 208 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 257 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 278 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 240 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 461 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 220 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 230 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 303 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 251 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 392 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 403 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 292 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 221 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 256 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 287 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 255 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 314 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 292 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 244 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 387 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 374 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 295 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 335 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 280 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 295 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 358 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 566 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 273 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 399 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 372 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 301 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 305 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 230 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 336 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 299 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 209 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 408 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 192 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 216 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 237 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 390 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 212 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 283 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 320 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 310 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 393 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 279 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 296 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 358 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 359 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 244 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 412 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 268 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 289 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 205 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 287 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 309 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 259 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 219 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 320 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 361 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 366 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 400 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 205 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 361 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 265 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388