Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3218 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 429 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 448 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 450 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 439 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 519 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 298 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 319 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 315 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 285 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 318 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 369 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 320 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 346 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 307 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 282 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 311 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 347 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 277 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 243 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 301 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 301 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 276 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 282 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 326 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 363 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 282 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 362 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 297 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 275 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 247 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 300 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 232 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 291 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 270 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 305 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 316 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 326 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 252 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 238 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 324 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 313 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 294 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 336 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 294 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 272 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 296 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 350 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 261 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 283 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 299 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 210 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 331 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 285 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 404 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 264 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 297 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 274 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 270 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 289 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 322 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 270 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 374 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 285 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 309 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 244 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 371 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 235 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 261 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 261 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 321 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 285 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 197 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 267 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 215 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 299 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 258 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 295 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 293 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 220 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 250 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 210 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 227 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 273 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 265 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 253 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 284 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 324 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 261 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 283 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 202 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 282 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 269 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 233 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 227 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 331 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 322 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 287 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 311 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 311 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 278 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 281 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 285 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 367 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 248 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 315 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 252 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 309 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 346 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 323 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 248 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 360 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 273 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 304 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 255 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 392 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 397 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 410 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 276 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 314 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 329 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 310 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 302 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 270 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 280 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 317 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 274 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 298 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 329 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 317 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 263 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 302 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 318 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 244 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 379 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 290 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 282 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 282 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 358 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 308 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 280 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 269 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 398 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 366 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 245 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 198 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 313 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 255 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 256 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 417 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 313 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 288 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 273 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 397 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 214 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 361 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 263 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 266 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 231 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 203 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 245 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 255 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 283 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 208 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 261 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 241 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 248 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 251 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 237 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 273 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 220 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 231 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 249 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 247 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 422 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 260 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 231 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 251 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 290 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 266 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 292 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 273 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 199 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 213 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 294 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 198 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 237 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 236 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 328 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 293 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 285 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 220 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 227 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 324 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 294 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 525 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 279 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 255 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 231 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 233 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 220 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 237 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 237 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 266 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 225 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 223 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 244 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 246 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 238 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 234 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 209 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 275 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 265 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 263 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 262 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 222 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 298 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 292 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 261 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 287 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 240 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 245 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 274 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 260 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 238 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 254 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 248 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 361 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 288 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 204 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 261 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 235 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 232 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 178 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 233 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 171 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 237 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 104 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 269 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 141 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 233 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 124 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 217 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 223 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 129 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 265 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 290 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 255 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 125 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 172 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 108 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 148 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 306 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 348 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 250 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 285 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 182 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 227 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 202 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 212 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 213 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 224 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 113 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 163 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 229 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 211 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 157 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 203 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 306 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 114 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 170 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 257 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 182 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 96 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 134 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 171 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 103 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 203 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 112 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 128 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 187 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 127 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 283 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 125 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 261 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 228 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 179 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 208 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 274 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 100 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 191 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 201 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 309 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 195 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 128 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 188 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 294 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 181 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 112 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 169 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 127 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 172 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 166 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 145 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 222 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 206 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 149 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 244 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 243 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 173 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 199 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 164 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 204 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 243 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 329 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 172 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 239 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 244 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 181 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 178 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 120 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 248 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 192 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 110 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 242 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 107 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 120 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 140 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 282 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 120 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 185 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 190 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 212 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 297 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 164 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 196 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 247 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 239 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 137 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 257 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 135 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 180 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 104 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 186 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 194 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 139 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 106 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 190 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 218 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 153 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 247 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 246 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 170 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 264 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 254 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 96 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 218 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 254 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 179 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 251 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 00:04
<