Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3701 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 554 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 588 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 588 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 608 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 673 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 417 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 511 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 481 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 462 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 476 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 535 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 441 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 483 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 479 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 414 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 428 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 483 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 428 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 376 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 450 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 427 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 401 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 433 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 465 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 552 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 405 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 534 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 431 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 431 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 400 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 416 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 404 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 440 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 381 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 434 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 472 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 448 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 398 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 382 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 486 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 452 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 414 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 430 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 391 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 423 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 484 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 374 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 412 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 351 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 489 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 411 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 546 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 404 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 419 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 422 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 408 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 422 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 536 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 392 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 538 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 439 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 354 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 518 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 355 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 382 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 399 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 424 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 304 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 434 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 334 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 421 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 469 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 431 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 329 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 469 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 375 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 532 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 332 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 473 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 380 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 402 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 394 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 383 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 394 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 471 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 432 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 344 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 406 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 336 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 463 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 448 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 420 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 445 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 405 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 447 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 401 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 442 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 534 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 361 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 438 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 391 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 452 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 470 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 450 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 408 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 519 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 419 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 426 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 420 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 566 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 548 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 600 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 468 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 485 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 475 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 460 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 431 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 426 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 446 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 425 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 430 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 487 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 483 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 382 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 441 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 428 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 383 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 439 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 432 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 415 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 536 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 428 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 407 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 567 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 561 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 362 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 312 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 457 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 384 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 391 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 598 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 446 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 443 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 440 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 548 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 346 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 489 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 395 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 343 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 370 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 457 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 434 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 430 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 319 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 410 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 485 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 383 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 465 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 487 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 387 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 384 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 614 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 386 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 368 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 382 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 376 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 304 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 347 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 522 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 423 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 423 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 416 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 474 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 552 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 447 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 536 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 546 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 400 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 649 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 400 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 376 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 397 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 347 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 397 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 435 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 383 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 393 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 404 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 408 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 372 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 424 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 387 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 385 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 456 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 364 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 381 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 392 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 354 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 348 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 298 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 333 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 296 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 329 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 195 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 387 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 226 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 322 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 235 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 303 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 299 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 209 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 213 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 298 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 191 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 459 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 224 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 488 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 453 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 309 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 285 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 306 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 316 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 217 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 247 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 341 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 328 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 254 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 316 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 481 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 218 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 261 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 369 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 270 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 189 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 234 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 199 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 195 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 242 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 265 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 225 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 208 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 313 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 217 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 321 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 459 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 288 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 239 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 382 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 210 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 243 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 283 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 263 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 234 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 303 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 282 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 232 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 370 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 359 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 284 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 305 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 270 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 286 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 342 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 537 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 261 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 386 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 356 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 288 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 281 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 217 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 325 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 282 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 196 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 394 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 183 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 204 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 223 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 378 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 201 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 270 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 300 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 299 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 383 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 266 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 278 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 347 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 350 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 219 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 400 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 260 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 279 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 195 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 273 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 296 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 250 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 198 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 305 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 248 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 347 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 356 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 257 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 383 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 193 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 347 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 256 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375