Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3276 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 449 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 472 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 464 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 460 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 540 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 316 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 379 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 335 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 325 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 299 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 334 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 387 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 336 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 364 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 328 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 299 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 325 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 359 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 295 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 255 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 317 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 314 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 291 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 296 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 348 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 386 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 295 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 393 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 313 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 290 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 268 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 314 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 250 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 309 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 290 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 324 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 335 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 341 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 268 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 252 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 341 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 327 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 307 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 355 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 306 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 286 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 312 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 276 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 300 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 317 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 223 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 300 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 420 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 278 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 311 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 288 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 282 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 308 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 338 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 288 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 394 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 299 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 323 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 260 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 384 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 248 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 273 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 274 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 333 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 302 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 213 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 281 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 225 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 311 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 274 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 315 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 306 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 233 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 363 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 265 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 371 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 223 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 342 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 242 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 291 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 280 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 268 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 299 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 339 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 275 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 296 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 217 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 294 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 283 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 248 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 240 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 349 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 338 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 300 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 329 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 326 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 291 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 299 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 302 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 392 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 260 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 333 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 268 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 329 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 365 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 339 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 264 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 380 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 286 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 317 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 270 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 414 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 415 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 437 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 291 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 336 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 345 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 324 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 319 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 289 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 294 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 335 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 289 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 315 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 341 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 332 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 279 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 316 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 332 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 255 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 399 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 308 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 301 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 298 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 373 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 321 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 295 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 282 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 420 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 398 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 264 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 212 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 328 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 273 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 274 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 435 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 331 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 304 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 290 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 414 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 229 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 376 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 277 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 240 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 219 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 262 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 221 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 277 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 364 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 255 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 249 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 231 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 285 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 246 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 263 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 315 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 460 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 276 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 239 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 266 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 300 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 277 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 304 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 286 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 215 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 230 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 206 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 245 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 363 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 306 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 299 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 318 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 235 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 242 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 330 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 403 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 383 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 542 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 240 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 319 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 245 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 232 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 247 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 251 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 279 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 331 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 238 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 270 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 241 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 254 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 250 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 219 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 292 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 279 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 283 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 286 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 237 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 310 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 304 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 257 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 287 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 275 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 315 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 251 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 306 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 217 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 300 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 251 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 248 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 198 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 248 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 183 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 252 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 115 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 287 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 155 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 245 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 138 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 233 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 230 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 138 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 274 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 361 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 270 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 138 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 188 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 121 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 343 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 384 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 159 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 200 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 243 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 215 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 225 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 227 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 234 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 129 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 174 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 248 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 227 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 166 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 223 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 331 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 129 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 184 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 271 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 200 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 112 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 148 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 186 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 120 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 215 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 123 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 144 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 202 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 136 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 137 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 247 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 194 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 220 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 119 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 207 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 213 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 205 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 139 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 201 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 193 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 122 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 180 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 140 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 185 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 183 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 157 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 233 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 217 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 163 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 262 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 264 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 189 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 212 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 175 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 216 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 259 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 361 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 184 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 253 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 255 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 195 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 192 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 133 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 260 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 208 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 126 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 263 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 120 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 132 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 154 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 296 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 133 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 193 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 204 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 230 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 305 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 174 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 206 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 263 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 252 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 154 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 271 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 151 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 197 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 119 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 202 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 206 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 156 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 118 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 207 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 232 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 169 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 263 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 261 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 186 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 107 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 236 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 270 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 191 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 265 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 00:04