Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3627 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 548 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 546 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 583 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 626 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 391 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 445 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 423 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 442 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 508 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 421 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 465 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 432 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 380 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 393 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 462 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 392 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 352 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 409 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 413 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 369 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 415 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 452 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 513 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 384 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 512 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 414 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 400 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 377 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 378 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 362 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 419 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 355 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 395 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 442 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 413 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 380 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 350 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 442 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 398 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 452 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 415 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 368 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 446 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 358 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 394 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 385 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 305 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 469 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 382 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 510 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 357 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 400 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 392 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 378 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 406 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 472 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 361 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 507 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 441 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 326 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 500 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 339 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 339 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 359 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 406 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 398 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 272 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 395 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 316 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 387 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 364 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 416 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 388 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 294 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 343 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 509 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 307 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 456 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 347 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 374 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 361 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 363 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 445 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 382 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 410 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 297 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 399 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 355 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 335 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 305 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 427 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 416 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 375 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 425 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 392 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 408 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 379 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 395 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 507 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 342 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 417 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 346 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 414 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 439 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 417 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 390 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 473 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 400 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 390 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 388 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 511 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 511 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 551 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 363 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 423 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 444 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 461 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 438 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 413 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 400 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 410 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 391 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 383 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 453 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 460 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 363 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 400 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 396 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 349 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 475 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 379 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 401 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 462 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 401 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 377 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 521 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 531 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 331 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 282 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 411 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 347 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 352 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 539 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 401 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 382 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 392 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 503 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 316 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 466 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 364 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 451 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 403 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 300 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 463 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 343 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 321 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 405 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 310 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 309 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 439 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 320 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 444 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 465 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 583 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 353 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 328 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 345 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 352 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 395 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 282 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 471 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 385 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 385 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 385 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 318 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 448 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 304 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 519 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 423 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 508 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 524 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 627 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 310 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 381 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 313 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 358 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 372 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 331 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 299 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 407 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 350 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 372 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 368 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 395 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 376 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 410 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 366 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 424 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 387 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 344 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 393 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 467 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 287 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 330 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 329 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 277 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 316 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 266 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 308 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 167 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 346 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 199 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 310 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 218 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 286 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 195 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 353 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 185 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 265 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 177 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 382 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 429 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 211 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 376 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 455 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 381 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 416 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 291 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 299 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 183 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 232 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 308 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 314 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 225 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 286 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 424 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 200 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 245 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 350 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 258 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 176 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 203 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 244 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 166 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 180 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 210 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 251 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 196 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 397 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 180 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 256 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 392 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 181 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 297 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 429 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 278 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 197 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 265 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 254 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 183 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 226 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 229 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 251 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 233 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 213 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 283 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 272 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 206 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 352 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 339 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 264 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 274 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 241 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 271 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 319 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 504 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 239 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 369 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 325 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 267 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 260 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 188 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 308 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 256 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 171 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 369 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 165 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 176 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 212 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 350 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 174 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 262 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 282 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 288 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 354 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 242 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 262 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 320 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 328 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 206 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 377 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 233 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 247 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 180 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 260 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 265 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 237 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 180 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 272 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 306 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 236 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 323 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 344 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 230 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 334 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 162 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 300 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 319 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 230 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 Corpuscles