Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3368 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 479 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 502 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 500 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 498 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 573 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 347 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 411 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 366 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 358 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 330 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 364 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 420 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 360 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 400 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 360 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 334 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 357 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 394 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 328 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 287 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 344 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 346 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 320 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 332 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 381 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 431 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 320 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 431 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 341 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 324 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 299 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 344 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 278 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 345 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 321 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 356 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 374 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 372 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 297 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 285 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 381 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 365 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 337 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 389 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 343 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 318 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 343 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 406 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 301 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 347 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 254 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 391 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 453 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 307 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 344 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 321 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 311 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 331 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 365 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 316 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 426 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 359 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 290 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 421 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 277 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 306 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 323 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 368 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 330 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 240 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 312 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 253 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 346 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 303 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 358 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 331 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 255 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 393 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 294 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 406 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 248 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 378 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 275 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 315 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 309 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 295 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 327 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 371 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 305 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 332 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 250 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 317 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 273 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 265 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 389 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 374 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 329 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 361 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 342 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 327 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 335 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 342 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 431 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 286 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 360 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 297 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 364 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 401 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 367 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 299 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 422 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 318 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 349 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 300 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 456 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 455 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 490 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 317 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 368 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 377 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 356 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 349 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 323 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 323 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 363 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 322 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 341 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 379 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 368 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 307 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 342 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 359 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 285 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 428 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 341 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 328 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 333 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 352 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 321 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 315 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 460 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 440 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 290 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 237 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 357 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 301 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 303 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 484 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 358 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 338 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 324 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 442 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 262 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 400 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 308 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 309 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 245 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 306 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 247 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 306 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 273 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 319 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 258 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 270 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 292 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 374 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 284 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 328 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 370 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 509 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 302 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 260 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 294 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 331 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 237 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 263 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 225 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 405 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 336 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 334 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 347 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 266 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 361 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 578 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 298 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 348 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 268 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 266 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 298 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 290 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 334 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 279 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 235 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 324 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 316 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 311 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 310 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 261 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 299 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 335 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 279 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 343 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 319 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 302 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 354 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 246 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 323 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 283 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 282 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 221 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 275 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 209 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 278 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 134 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 319 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 176 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 274 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 163 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 252 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 161 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 294 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 336 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 393 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 159 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 210 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 145 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 354 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 410 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 180 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 351 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 227 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 239 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 245 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 252 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 254 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 149 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 194 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 275 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 249 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 194 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 249 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 369 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 157 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 204 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 297 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 225 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 139 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 170 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 208 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 142 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 245 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 149 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 174 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 227 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 160 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 161 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 302 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 273 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 220 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 247 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 142 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 237 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 236 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 368 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 240 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 162 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 229 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 218 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 144 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 205 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 168 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 215 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 205 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 180 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 257 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 240 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 184 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 295 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 289 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 216 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 231 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 201 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 243 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 284 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 413 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 205 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 285 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 277 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 216 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 220 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 159 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 281 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 230 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 151 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 306 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 144 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 153 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 174 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 321 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 154 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 221 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 235 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 255 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 324 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 194 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 232 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 287 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 280 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 174 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 299 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 174 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 216 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 148 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 223 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 227 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 177 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 142 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 238 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 261 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 193 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 289 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 287 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 206 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 303 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 136 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 260 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 295 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 211 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 290 Corpuscles