Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3868 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 651 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 705 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 688 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 704 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 797 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 510 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 612 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 587 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 552 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 570 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 679 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 533 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 578 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 591 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 505 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 532 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 576 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 545 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 469 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 540 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 514 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 483 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 535 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 553 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 659 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 497 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 640 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 530 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 553 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 493 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 514 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 494 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 549 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 474 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 536 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 586 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 548 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 505 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 477 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 579 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 535 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 495 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 567 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 497 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 519 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 576 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 455 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 501 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 515 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 440 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 585 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 508 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 655 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 581 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 508 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 503 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 486 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 516 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 644 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 483 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 641 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 541 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 558 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 433 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 613 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 444 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 466 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 554 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 538 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 515 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 390 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 445 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 533 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 507 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 583 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 424 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 556 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 475 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 626 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 420 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 561 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 468 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 491 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 484 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 466 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 483 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 572 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 508 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 441 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 521 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 516 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 430 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 414 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 555 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 536 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 520 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 527 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 487 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 565 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 490 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 550 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 648 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 476 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 531 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 483 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 545 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 581 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 576 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 517 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 653 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 508 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 532 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 528 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 675 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 674 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 720 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 569 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 577 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 561 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 563 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 522 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 517 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 537 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 529 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 530 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 577 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 578 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 468 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 539 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 614 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 468 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 584 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 521 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 528 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 494 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 637 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 495 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 490 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 758 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 692 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 451 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 414 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 547 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 485 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 493 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 725 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 573 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 545 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 550 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 653 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 466 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 600 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 490 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 495 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 456 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 456 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 514 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 574 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 539 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 532 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 517 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 403 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 491 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 579 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 467 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 452 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 458 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 465 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 524 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 491 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 563 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 599 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 501 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 512 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 506 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 504 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 568 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 522 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 710 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 509 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 482 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 479 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 513 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 523 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 507 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 473 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 350 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 445 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 424 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 611 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 516 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 510 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 522 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 470 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 556 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 525 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 664 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 535 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 632 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 627 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 493 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 751 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 495 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 467 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 500 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 521 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 407 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 504 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 530 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 470 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 482 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 421 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 512 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 421 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 364 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 513 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 492 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 479 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 474 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 503 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 492 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 485 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 454 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 510 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 459 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 509 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 516 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 470 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 509 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 485 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 472 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 504 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 548 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 494 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 447 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 581 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 459 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 501 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 488 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 586 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 479 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 449 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 390 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 415 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 386 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 408 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 292 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 474 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 314 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 402 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 336 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 322 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 423 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 590 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 309 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 384 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 462 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 500 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 514 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 550 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 311 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 487 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 610 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 572 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 384 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 387 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 394 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 310 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 337 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 420 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 422 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 334 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 387 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 565 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 307 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 344 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 491 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 357 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 271 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 326 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 290 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 456 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 278 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 532 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 472 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 405 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 406 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 480 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 312 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 408 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 566 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 321 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 367 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 470 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 502 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 306 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 364 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 372 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 330 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 388 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 359 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 321 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 460 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 503 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 381 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 406 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 348 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 371 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 437 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 654 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 346 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 482 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 436 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 371 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 394 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 323 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 398 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 367 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 285 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 486 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 276 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 297 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 303 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 471 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 289 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 351 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 401 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 385 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 460 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 354 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 366 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 433 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 437 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 312 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 489 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 344 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 356 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 284 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 357 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 378 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 322 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 301 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 391 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 454 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 462 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 451 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 472 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 451 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29