Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:

> So you think the location it's found among all the
> other tombs directly around it that point to the
> 4th Dynasty is "irrelevant" as to its provenance?
> Did you ever look to see the artifacts they found
> inside of it as well, or the architecture, which
> maybe is part of all that stylistic "mumbo-jumbo"
> Flentye was talking about? Of course, this is
> meaningless.

> > YOU brought it up as evidence for such. Now you
> > say it's irrelevant. Make up your mind.
> No Audrey. Even Origyptian understands the minutia
> of his familial ties to Khufu is irrelevant
> regarding the provenance of the Merrer diary.

YOU said ....
As you already know, these are not the "only" reasons the papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty, the least of which is Khufu's half brother is also mentioned in detail as an administrator. Again(8-16):

YOU brought it up as one of the reasons why the "papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty". I didn't focus on his family ties, you have. I haven't stressed his family ties, you have.

...the papyri notes Ankhhaf,half-brother of Khufu, was the administrator of the project who is well attested at Giza:

Still waiting for how he is "well attested at Giza". Looks like he was well attested at Giza by Reisner, based on the location of his tomb. You aren't coming up with thing else that 'attests' him. In other words you are going by what Reisner thought was the lay out of the tombs.

> Not really. The only reason you are taking this
> tack is to support Origyptian's argument,

That's really too bad you think so. Your vision is not clear and may be clouded by your anger. No matter how emphatically I deny your assumption, you won't believe it, so it's a waste of time to try to change your mind.

> as usual, that the Merrer diary doesn't belong to the
> 4th Dynasty and contradict any argument against
> it. The lot of you didn't even know who Ankh-haf
> was or his significance in Merrer's diary until I
> brought it up months ago (ignored then), yet now
> all of a sudden you are all over it trying to deny
> Ankh-haf even belongs to the 4th Dynasty?

Because YOU used Ankh-haf as one factor dating the diary.

> > I think the dating of Wadi al-Jarf is
> > circumstantial, not a drop of science to
> support
> > it. It's dated by the Khufu cartouche, period.
> What does the dating of Wadi al-Jarf have to do
> with the dating of the papyri?

Ask Tallet & Marouard, who for some reason title their papers with "Wadi al-Jarf", naming the site where the objects were found.

> So you omitted all the rest, which would be
> all the rest, that directly contradicts
> your opinion on purpose? My bad.

For some strange reason you think I should have posted the whole article. I gave the links so everyone could read it for themselves. Why on earth would I make unnecessary long posts when I made the articles available?
There is no need to post an entire article when the link is given. Then others can find within an article what they think are points to be discussed. If you don't like this technique, that's really your problem.

> You mean like the 700+ samples taken from the
> predynastic through the OK which clearly place
> their provenance in the 4th-3rd millenniums?
> Again, good to know the whole "science" thing is
> finally catching up with you.

They found 700+ samples at Wadi al-Jarf? We have been talking about that site, have you now gone sideways into a different subject?

> > A house of cards waiting for a breeze.
> Whatever you say Cladking.

I'm pretty sure that was my comment that I posted and not Cladkings. Unless ck can edit my posts.

> So I guess this means the tombs must date to the
> NK then. Good work Audrey.

You believe what the Egyptologists say, I'll make up my own mind, if it doesn't upset you too much

> > Now if they only had some proof of who Khufu
> was.
> > And don't give me that 'context' crap. The
> context
> > was gathered after the fact to bolster
> > their guesses.
> Oyyy... Not this again.

It will be "this again" for some time to come. You thought the subject would go away because you & Stower spit on it?

> If this is all you think it is I can't help you.
> No one is claiming the KFC across the street was
> built in the 4th Dynasty-why do you think that is?

Why do you think that's a good analogy?

> The difference is that all it is these
> "others" know (if that) is that it sits next door
> and otherwise know nothing else about what
> connects them. Bravo-got me there. And these
> "others" would include the dynamic duo of who-you
> and Origyptian? Well, hot damn. That may be
> good enough for you, but sure as hell not
> enough for me nor anyone else not named Jon or
> Cladking here I suspect.

Yet you fail to mention anything else that connects Ankh-haf to the 4th dyn.

> Audrey, the new champion of "science". And if RCD
> said it dated to the 3rd millennium then rest
> assured your narrative would only be something
> else to naysay the provenance.

Not at all. I haven't expressed my opinion on when Ankh-haf lived. But evidently we will never know because Egyptology doesn't like to RCD

> Audrey, you cite multiple papers to contradict the
> opinion Ankh-haf is related to Khufu in some way

I DID NOT cite those papers to contradict his family ties. I cited them to show how Egyptology has placed him in the 4th dyn.

> yet ignore the fact not one word of it contradicts
> your greater point that you believe he does not
> date to the 4th Dynasty. You cherry pick-quotes to
> serve your narrative

I DID NOT cherry pick. I know this is one of the frequent complaints you use to invalidate the poster, but I was just the messenger. The articles were made available for everyone to read. I am not about to post the entire article just so you & Stower won't scream cherry picking.

> then ignore the rest in that
> otherwise there is no discrepancy as to the
> 4th Dynasty date of Ankh-haf. But please, quote
> one of your sources that supports this idea.

Why should I? The point is Egyptology says he is 4th dyn. It's not my job to disprove it. I'm only showing that the reason they say so is not based on good evidence let alone science. Why can't you guys understand the difference? It's that same old mindset of - no one can disagree unless they have a better idea.

> So I am to thank you for reciting papers written
> by Egyptologists you cherry pick from out of
> context to support your otherwise unsubstantiated
> beliefs,

Nope, no need to be grateful. And no need to insult the messenger who just happened to not post the articles in a way that would be pleasing to YOU.

> yet if I were to quote them myself to
> support the opposing view then it is I that is
> somehow the lesser for it?

No at all and do not see why you would come to this conclusion. Boy, you're really pissed that I didn't post the entire article.

> I believe that's called
> "irony" among other things, but rest assured we
> can at least count on me to quote them accurately
> and honestly if and when I do.

Yes, Thanos the Savior. How quickly you worked yourself up to that status

> The simple truth is that you are not worth my time
> to write an expose regarding the context of the
> eastern cemetery and interconnectedness of the
> artifacts and architecture that no doubt you will
> surely not understand anyways and argue with me
> about it all the same. I'd say once in a week is
> enough. But since you are the one with such
> doubts, please tell us why the eastern cemetery
> and/or the people found in it do not belong to the
> 4th Dynasty.

Because there is nothing to say they do except location.

> Hint-the big one at the bottom labelled G7510
> would be Ankh-haf's.

I gave the tomb number G7510 in a previous post, but thanks for the help.

> Some quip to follow how it is I who am not
> worth your time? You'd be right.

I don't think like that, so I wouldn't say it. But if that imaginary conversation makes you feel good, go for it.

> Its funny to me though how the lot of you decry
> anything that dates the great pyrmaids to the
> Dynastic period, yet by the same token you equally
> deny anything that dates the 4th Dynasty to, well,
> the 4th Dynasty, as if this period was just a void
> in time. If the likes of Ankh-haf do not belong to
> the 4th Dynasty then I am curious-who did?
> No one? If not then where and who do you think
> they are?

The answer to that is too long to put in a post. It would require a book to answer.

> > There really isn't anything about you that is
> alt.

> If the measure of such is the likes of yourself,
> Origyptian, Cladking et al, then I take that as a
> high compliment.

You're welcome

> Origpytian's attack parrot says what? If by
> "status quo" you mean the truth then yes, I agree.
> Wow, two compliments in one day. Your insults by
> way of saying the opposite of what you know is the
> truth because you think that's what will get under
> the other person's skin the most is quite tired at
> this point.

That's just silly. You're pseudo pyscho babble is what's tiring.

> Though you feel it clever, to the rest
> of us it's just plain dishonest which is a
> reflection of your character, not ours.

You use the word "dishonest" frequently yet how you use it is puzzling. Why call someone "dishonest" if they are posting what they truly believe?

> I fail to see how calling out belligerent
> intellectual frauds for what they are is an
> "insult".

WHO is being belligerent?

> The real insult is that the rest of us
> have to suffer it in the first place.

You don't have to "suffer" anything. You're not a victim. You choose to read and post here. If it's too much to bear, then don't do it. Your choice, no one's forcing you.

> And given
> these are the people you have cast your lot with
> and defend like a rabid dog every day, despite the
> fact I know you know they are full of shit- what
> does this say about you?

I cast my lot with those I share interests with. Unfortunately I did not consult Oracle Thanos for his approval first, who knows all truths and therefore knows who is full of shit.

I don't cast my lot with those who think they know everything.

> It's ok to be
> willfully ignorant intellectual frauds because
> they are on your "team"? Sounds like some of these
> "higher standards" we've heard so much about.

Brother, you're really pissed about nothing. I don't think tirades will further you points, but I could be wrong. Maybe less judgmental emotion and more objectivity would be better for a forum.

This is what I call... stupid; going back and forth trying to reason point by point with one of your tirades. It's got to be boring for the readers. Insult me, call me what your wish, I will not engage in anymore of your tantrums. And I will continue to form my own opinions outside of Egyptology. You can't stop that.

If you want to talk about the subjects, that's great. But the subject isn't ME. The subject WAS Ankh-haf and Wadi al-Jarf, which I think you have now effectively buried

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3138 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 344 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 470 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 425 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 363 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 291 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 287 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 284 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 244 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 283 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 274 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 252 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 255 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 260 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 346 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 316 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 268 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 249 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 206 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 193 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 188 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 204 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 277 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 424 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 272 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 299 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 197 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 274 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 209 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 273 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 254 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 259 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 257 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 339 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 244 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 270 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 235 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 226 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 211 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 253 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 267 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 212 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 205 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 199 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 273 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 305 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 244 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 350 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 238 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 248 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 262 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 222 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 181 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 246 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 264 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 182 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 169 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 259 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 231 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 204 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 210 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 277 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 188 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 173 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 294 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 234 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 269 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 256 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 205 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 188 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 301 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 237 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 185 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 265 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 254 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 160 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 313 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 184 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 205 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 180 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 209 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 264 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 232 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 245 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 328 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 294 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 227 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 190 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 202 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 201 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 157 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 157 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 244 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 158 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 153 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 245 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 255 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 188 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 220 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 206 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 161 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 187 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 234 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 327 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 246 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 234 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 395 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 277 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 223 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 149 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 333 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 159 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 207 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 262 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 209 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 224 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 275 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 245 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 257 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 308 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 229 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 230 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 227 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 143 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 151 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 239 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 225 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 196 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 197 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 184 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 337 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 227 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 237 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 236 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 198 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 286 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 272 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 270 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 246 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 263 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 253 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 252 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 286 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 174 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 322 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 200 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 268 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 183 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 185 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 123 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 218 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 227 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 230 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 285 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 202 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 238 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 214 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 163 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 297 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 136 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 219 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 193 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 187 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 220 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 188 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 227 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 288 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 251 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 208 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 181 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 195 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 151 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 224 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 267 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 316 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 251 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 180 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 210 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 284 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 129 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 158 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 172 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 191 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 168 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 166 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 163 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 192 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 235 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 185 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 200 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 167 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 149 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 163 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 214 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 157 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 171 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 216 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 210 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 178 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 164 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 149 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 173 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 156 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 196 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 134 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 180 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 209 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 163 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 156 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 201 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 130 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 203 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 217 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 182 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 156 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 188 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 220 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 207 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 194 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 256 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 180 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 200 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 196 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 202 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 247 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 208 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 145 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 121 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 127 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 151 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 107 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 156 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 71 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 152 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 104 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 176 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 189 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 124 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 205 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 151 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 83 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 114 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 127 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 56 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 151 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 126 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 62 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 159 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 60 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 114 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 84 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 85 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 183 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 234 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 114 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 84 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 179 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 52 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 114 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 129 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 120 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 68 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 101 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 71 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 60 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 114 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 100 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 67 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 127 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 235 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 178 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 99 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 148 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 143 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 195 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 34 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 50 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 106 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 48 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 57 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 89 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 121 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 105 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 74 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 189 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 54 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 106 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 105 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 47 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 95 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 46 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 150 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 38 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 129 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 64 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 60 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 167 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 53 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 46 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 110 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 134 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 49 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 129 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 46 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 140 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 138 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 199 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 210 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 205 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 157 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 168 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 159 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 200 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 140 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 103 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 94 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 57 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 59 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 92 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 100 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 59 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 88 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 131 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 75 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 176 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 83 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 168 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 128 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 45 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 77 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 158 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 38 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 150 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33
I will give you one last chance 51 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:34