Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> So you think the location it's found among all the
> other tombs directly around it that point to the
> 4th Dynasty is "irrelevant" as to its provenance?
> Did you ever look to see the artifacts they found
> inside of it as well, or the architecture, which
> maybe is part of all that stylistic "mumbo-jumbo"
> Flentye was talking about? Of course, this is
> meaningless.

> > YOU brought it up as evidence for such. Now you
> > say it's irrelevant. Make up your mind.
>
> No Audrey. Even Origyptian understands the minutia
> of his familial ties to Khufu is irrelevant
> regarding the provenance of the Merrer diary.

YOU said ....
Quote
Thanos
As you already know, these are not the "only" reasons the papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty, the least of which is Khufu's half brother is also mentioned in detail as an administrator. Again(8-16):

YOU brought it up as one of the reasons why the "papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty". I didn't focus on his family ties, you have. I haven't stressed his family ties, you have.

Quote
Thanos
...the papyri notes Ankhhaf,half-brother of Khufu, was the administrator of the project who is well attested at Giza:

Still waiting for how he is "well attested at Giza". Looks like he was well attested at Giza by Reisner, based on the location of his tomb. You aren't coming up with thing else that 'attests' him. In other words you are going by what Reisner thought was the lay out of the tombs.

> Not really. The only reason you are taking this
> tack is to support Origyptian's argument,

That's really too bad you think so. Your vision is not clear and may be clouded by your anger. No matter how emphatically I deny your assumption, you won't believe it, so it's a waste of time to try to change your mind.

> as usual, that the Merrer diary doesn't belong to the
> 4th Dynasty and contradict any argument against
> it. The lot of you didn't even know who Ankh-haf
> was or his significance in Merrer's diary until I
> brought it up months ago (ignored then), yet now
> all of a sudden you are all over it trying to deny
> Ankh-haf even belongs to the 4th Dynasty?

Because YOU used Ankh-haf as one factor dating the diary.

> > I think the dating of Wadi al-Jarf is
> > circumstantial, not a drop of science to
> support
> > it. It's dated by the Khufu cartouche, period.
>
> What does the dating of Wadi al-Jarf have to do
> with the dating of the papyri?

Ask Tallet & Marouard, who for some reason title their papers with "Wadi al-Jarf", naming the site where the objects were found.

> So you omitted all the rest, which would be
> all the rest, that directly contradicts
> your opinion on purpose? My bad.

For some strange reason you think I should have posted the whole article. I gave the links so everyone could read it for themselves. Why on earth would I make unnecessary long posts when I made the articles available?
There is no need to post an entire article when the link is given. Then others can find within an article what they think are points to be discussed. If you don't like this technique, that's really your problem.

> You mean like the 700+ samples taken from the
> predynastic through the OK which clearly place
> their provenance in the 4th-3rd millenniums?
> Again, good to know the whole "science" thing is
> finally catching up with you.

They found 700+ samples at Wadi al-Jarf? We have been talking about that site, have you now gone sideways into a different subject?

> > A house of cards waiting for a breeze.
>
> Whatever you say Cladking.

I'm pretty sure that was my comment that I posted and not Cladkings. Unless ck can edit my posts.

> So I guess this means the tombs must date to the
> NK then. Good work Audrey.

You believe what the Egyptologists say, I'll make up my own mind, if it doesn't upset you too much

> > Now if they only had some proof of who Khufu
> was.
> > And don't give me that 'context' crap. The
> context
> > was gathered after the fact to bolster
> > their guesses.
>
> Oyyy... Not this again.

It will be "this again" for some time to come. You thought the subject would go away because you & Stower spit on it?

> If this is all you think it is I can't help you.
> No one is claiming the KFC across the street was
> built in the 4th Dynasty-why do you think that is?

Why do you think that's a good analogy?

> The difference is that all it is these
> "others" know (if that) is that it sits next door
> and otherwise know nothing else about what
> connects them. Bravo-got me there. And these
> "others" would include the dynamic duo of who-you
> and Origyptian? Well, hot damn. That may be
> good enough for you, but sure as hell not
> enough for me nor anyone else not named Jon or
> Cladking here I suspect.

Yet you fail to mention anything else that connects Ankh-haf to the 4th dyn.

> Audrey, the new champion of "science". And if RCD
> said it dated to the 3rd millennium then rest
> assured your narrative would only be something
> else to naysay the provenance.

Not at all. I haven't expressed my opinion on when Ankh-haf lived. But evidently we will never know because Egyptology doesn't like to RCD

> Audrey, you cite multiple papers to contradict the
> opinion Ankh-haf is related to Khufu in some way

I DID NOT cite those papers to contradict his family ties. I cited them to show how Egyptology has placed him in the 4th dyn.

> yet ignore the fact not one word of it contradicts
> your greater point that you believe he does not
> date to the 4th Dynasty. You cherry pick-quotes to
> serve your narrative

I DID NOT cherry pick. I know this is one of the frequent complaints you use to invalidate the poster, but I was just the messenger. The articles were made available for everyone to read. I am not about to post the entire article just so you & Stower won't scream cherry picking.

> then ignore the rest in that
> otherwise there is no discrepancy as to the
> 4th Dynasty date of Ankh-haf. But please, quote
> one of your sources that supports this idea.

Why should I? The point is Egyptology says he is 4th dyn. It's not my job to disprove it. I'm only showing that the reason they say so is not based on good evidence let alone science. Why can't you guys understand the difference? It's that same old mindset of - no one can disagree unless they have a better idea.

> So I am to thank you for reciting papers written
> by Egyptologists you cherry pick from out of
> context to support your otherwise unsubstantiated
> beliefs,

Nope, no need to be grateful. And no need to insult the messenger who just happened to not post the articles in a way that would be pleasing to YOU.

> yet if I were to quote them myself to
> support the opposing view then it is I that is
> somehow the lesser for it?

No at all and do not see why you would come to this conclusion. Boy, you're really pissed that I didn't post the entire article.

> I believe that's called
> "irony" among other things, but rest assured we
> can at least count on me to quote them accurately
> and honestly if and when I do.

Yes, Thanos the Savior. How quickly you worked yourself up to that status

> The simple truth is that you are not worth my time
> to write an expose regarding the context of the
> eastern cemetery and interconnectedness of the
> artifacts and architecture that no doubt you will
> surely not understand anyways and argue with me
> about it all the same. I'd say once in a week is
> enough. But since you are the one with such
> doubts, please tell us why the eastern cemetery
> and/or the people found in it do not belong to the
> 4th Dynasty.

Because there is nothing to say they do except location.

> Hint-the big one at the bottom labelled G7510
> would be Ankh-haf's.

I gave the tomb number G7510 in a previous post, but thanks for the help.

> Some quip to follow how it is I who am not
> worth your time? You'd be right.

I don't think like that, so I wouldn't say it. But if that imaginary conversation makes you feel good, go for it.

> Its funny to me though how the lot of you decry
> anything that dates the great pyrmaids to the
> Dynastic period, yet by the same token you equally
> deny anything that dates the 4th Dynasty to, well,
> the 4th Dynasty, as if this period was just a void
> in time. If the likes of Ankh-haf do not belong to
> the 4th Dynasty then I am curious-who did?
> No one? If not then where and who do you think
> they are?

The answer to that is too long to put in a post. It would require a book to answer.

> > There really isn't anything about you that is
> alt.

> If the measure of such is the likes of yourself,
> Origyptian, Cladking et al, then I take that as a
> high compliment.

You're welcome

> Origpytian's attack parrot says what? If by
> "status quo" you mean the truth then yes, I agree.
> Wow, two compliments in one day. Your insults by
> way of saying the opposite of what you know is the
> truth because you think that's what will get under
> the other person's skin the most is quite tired at
> this point.

That's just silly. You're pseudo pyscho babble is what's tiring.

> Though you feel it clever, to the rest
> of us it's just plain dishonest which is a
> reflection of your character, not ours.

You use the word "dishonest" frequently yet how you use it is puzzling. Why call someone "dishonest" if they are posting what they truly believe?

> I fail to see how calling out belligerent
> intellectual frauds for what they are is an
> "insult".

WHO is being belligerent?

> The real insult is that the rest of us
> have to suffer it in the first place.

You don't have to "suffer" anything. You're not a victim. You choose to read and post here. If it's too much to bear, then don't do it. Your choice, no one's forcing you.

> And given
> these are the people you have cast your lot with
> and defend like a rabid dog every day, despite the
> fact I know you know they are full of shit- what
> does this say about you?

I cast my lot with those I share interests with. Unfortunately I did not consult Oracle Thanos for his approval first, who knows all truths and therefore knows who is full of shit.

I don't cast my lot with those who think they know everything.

> It's ok to be
> willfully ignorant intellectual frauds because
> they are on your "team"? Sounds like some of these
> "higher standards" we've heard so much about.

Brother, you're really pissed about nothing. I don't think tirades will further you points, but I could be wrong. Maybe less judgmental emotion and more objectivity would be better for a forum.

This is what I call... stupid; going back and forth trying to reason point by point with one of your tirades. It's got to be boring for the readers. Insult me, call me what your wish, I will not engage in anymore of your tantrums. And I will continue to form my own opinions outside of Egyptology. You can't stop that.

If you want to talk about the subjects, that's great. But the subject isn't ME. The subject WAS Ankh-haf and Wadi al-Jarf, which I think you have now effectively buried

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3291 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 402 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 539 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 534 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 417 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 379 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 330 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 394 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 305 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 362 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 340 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 308 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 301 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 322 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 401 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 408 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 312 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 308 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 259 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 228 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 247 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 247 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 334 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 472 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 335 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 335 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 248 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 349 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 266 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 344 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 357 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 322 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 315 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 407 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 313 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 346 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 295 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 275 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 246 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 347 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 337 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 264 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 270 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 262 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 350 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 381 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 307 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 423 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 299 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 319 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 382 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 309 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 234 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 319 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 328 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 231 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 221 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 338 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 297 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 293 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 312 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 350 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 222 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 246 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 345 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 296 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 344 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 321 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 265 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 280 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 363 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 302 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 247 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 320 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 334 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 205 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 369 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 243 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 267 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 231 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 266 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 331 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 334 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 320 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 443 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 366 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 291 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 235 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 267 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 273 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 189 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 245 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 316 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 208 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 190 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 309 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 347 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 249 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 271 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 268 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 191 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 254 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 307 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 403 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 315 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 296 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 468 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 358 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 284 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 193 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 426 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 213 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 278 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 360 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 277 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 299 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 369 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 329 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 329 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 398 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 298 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 279 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 291 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 197 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 199 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 317 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 288 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 245 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 256 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 243 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 447 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 279 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 293 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 325 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 260 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 362 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 330 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 339 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 324 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 346 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 300 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 366 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 380 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 205 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 419 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 260 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 348 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 227 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 254 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 179 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 284 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 290 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 297 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 414 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 291 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 297 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 284 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 223 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 370 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 197 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 284 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 289 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 250 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 291 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 252 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 294 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 355 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 305 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 272 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 212 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 263 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 193 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 289 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 337 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 379 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 322 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 225 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 263 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 360 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 194 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 201 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 236 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 252 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 226 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 209 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 214 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 262 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 297 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 238 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 269 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 210 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 201 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 217 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 287 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 217 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 230 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 265 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 264 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 257 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 219 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 215 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 235 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 218 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 254 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 165 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 255 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 291 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 244 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 209 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 277 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 203 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 280 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 287 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 248 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 231 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 250 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 281 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 275 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 261 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 347 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 247 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 257 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 262 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 273 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 335 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 249 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 176 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 177 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 204 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 201 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 140 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 216 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 105 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 224 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 147 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 252 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 259 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 162 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 276 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 195 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 106 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 164 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 190 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 88 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 210 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 183 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 97 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 215 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 98 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 160 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 137 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 139 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 237 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 289 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 173 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 130 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 237 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 104 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 174 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 194 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 185 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 107 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 148 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 107 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 113 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 161 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 150 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 114 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 191 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 301 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 242 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 157 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 210 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 217 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 264 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 69 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 92 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 163 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 90 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 105 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 143 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 180 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 175 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 112 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 268 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 88 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 166 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 171 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 99 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 132 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 84 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 208 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 63 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 200 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 89 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 125 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 237 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 93 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 122 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 153 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 191 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 99 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 185 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 79 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 225 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 191 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 275 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 273 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 271 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 208 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 234 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 225 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 278 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 189 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 158 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 156 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 97 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 110 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 129 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 173 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 89 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 131 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 201 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 116 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 223 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 123 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 239 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 185 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 72 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 118 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 220 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 66 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 251 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33
I will give you one last chance 107 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:34