Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> So you think the location it's found among all the
> other tombs directly around it that point to the
> 4th Dynasty is "irrelevant" as to its provenance?
> Did you ever look to see the artifacts they found
> inside of it as well, or the architecture, which
> maybe is part of all that stylistic "mumbo-jumbo"
> Flentye was talking about? Of course, this is
> meaningless.

> > YOU brought it up as evidence for such. Now you
> > say it's irrelevant. Make up your mind.
>
> No Audrey. Even Origyptian understands the minutia
> of his familial ties to Khufu is irrelevant
> regarding the provenance of the Merrer diary.

YOU said ....
Quote
Thanos
As you already know, these are not the "only" reasons the papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty, the least of which is Khufu's half brother is also mentioned in detail as an administrator. Again(8-16):

YOU brought it up as one of the reasons why the "papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty". I didn't focus on his family ties, you have. I haven't stressed his family ties, you have.

Quote
Thanos
...the papyri notes Ankhhaf,half-brother of Khufu, was the administrator of the project who is well attested at Giza:

Still waiting for how he is "well attested at Giza". Looks like he was well attested at Giza by Reisner, based on the location of his tomb. You aren't coming up with thing else that 'attests' him. In other words you are going by what Reisner thought was the lay out of the tombs.

> Not really. The only reason you are taking this
> tack is to support Origyptian's argument,

That's really too bad you think so. Your vision is not clear and may be clouded by your anger. No matter how emphatically I deny your assumption, you won't believe it, so it's a waste of time to try to change your mind.

> as usual, that the Merrer diary doesn't belong to the
> 4th Dynasty and contradict any argument against
> it. The lot of you didn't even know who Ankh-haf
> was or his significance in Merrer's diary until I
> brought it up months ago (ignored then), yet now
> all of a sudden you are all over it trying to deny
> Ankh-haf even belongs to the 4th Dynasty?

Because YOU used Ankh-haf as one factor dating the diary.

> > I think the dating of Wadi al-Jarf is
> > circumstantial, not a drop of science to
> support
> > it. It's dated by the Khufu cartouche, period.
>
> What does the dating of Wadi al-Jarf have to do
> with the dating of the papyri?

Ask Tallet & Marouard, who for some reason title their papers with "Wadi al-Jarf", naming the site where the objects were found.

> So you omitted all the rest, which would be
> all the rest, that directly contradicts
> your opinion on purpose? My bad.

For some strange reason you think I should have posted the whole article. I gave the links so everyone could read it for themselves. Why on earth would I make unnecessary long posts when I made the articles available?
There is no need to post an entire article when the link is given. Then others can find within an article what they think are points to be discussed. If you don't like this technique, that's really your problem.

> You mean like the 700+ samples taken from the
> predynastic through the OK which clearly place
> their provenance in the 4th-3rd millenniums?
> Again, good to know the whole "science" thing is
> finally catching up with you.

They found 700+ samples at Wadi al-Jarf? We have been talking about that site, have you now gone sideways into a different subject?

> > A house of cards waiting for a breeze.
>
> Whatever you say Cladking.

I'm pretty sure that was my comment that I posted and not Cladkings. Unless ck can edit my posts.

> So I guess this means the tombs must date to the
> NK then. Good work Audrey.

You believe what the Egyptologists say, I'll make up my own mind, if it doesn't upset you too much

> > Now if they only had some proof of who Khufu
> was.
> > And don't give me that 'context' crap. The
> context
> > was gathered after the fact to bolster
> > their guesses.
>
> Oyyy... Not this again.

It will be "this again" for some time to come. You thought the subject would go away because you & Stower spit on it?

> If this is all you think it is I can't help you.
> No one is claiming the KFC across the street was
> built in the 4th Dynasty-why do you think that is?

Why do you think that's a good analogy?

> The difference is that all it is these
> "others" know (if that) is that it sits next door
> and otherwise know nothing else about what
> connects them. Bravo-got me there. And these
> "others" would include the dynamic duo of who-you
> and Origyptian? Well, hot damn. That may be
> good enough for you, but sure as hell not
> enough for me nor anyone else not named Jon or
> Cladking here I suspect.

Yet you fail to mention anything else that connects Ankh-haf to the 4th dyn.

> Audrey, the new champion of "science". And if RCD
> said it dated to the 3rd millennium then rest
> assured your narrative would only be something
> else to naysay the provenance.

Not at all. I haven't expressed my opinion on when Ankh-haf lived. But evidently we will never know because Egyptology doesn't like to RCD

> Audrey, you cite multiple papers to contradict the
> opinion Ankh-haf is related to Khufu in some way

I DID NOT cite those papers to contradict his family ties. I cited them to show how Egyptology has placed him in the 4th dyn.

> yet ignore the fact not one word of it contradicts
> your greater point that you believe he does not
> date to the 4th Dynasty. You cherry pick-quotes to
> serve your narrative

I DID NOT cherry pick. I know this is one of the frequent complaints you use to invalidate the poster, but I was just the messenger. The articles were made available for everyone to read. I am not about to post the entire article just so you & Stower won't scream cherry picking.

> then ignore the rest in that
> otherwise there is no discrepancy as to the
> 4th Dynasty date of Ankh-haf. But please, quote
> one of your sources that supports this idea.

Why should I? The point is Egyptology says he is 4th dyn. It's not my job to disprove it. I'm only showing that the reason they say so is not based on good evidence let alone science. Why can't you guys understand the difference? It's that same old mindset of - no one can disagree unless they have a better idea.

> So I am to thank you for reciting papers written
> by Egyptologists you cherry pick from out of
> context to support your otherwise unsubstantiated
> beliefs,

Nope, no need to be grateful. And no need to insult the messenger who just happened to not post the articles in a way that would be pleasing to YOU.

> yet if I were to quote them myself to
> support the opposing view then it is I that is
> somehow the lesser for it?

No at all and do not see why you would come to this conclusion. Boy, you're really pissed that I didn't post the entire article.

> I believe that's called
> "irony" among other things, but rest assured we
> can at least count on me to quote them accurately
> and honestly if and when I do.

Yes, Thanos the Savior. How quickly you worked yourself up to that status

> The simple truth is that you are not worth my time
> to write an expose regarding the context of the
> eastern cemetery and interconnectedness of the
> artifacts and architecture that no doubt you will
> surely not understand anyways and argue with me
> about it all the same. I'd say once in a week is
> enough. But since you are the one with such
> doubts, please tell us why the eastern cemetery
> and/or the people found in it do not belong to the
> 4th Dynasty.

Because there is nothing to say they do except location.

> Hint-the big one at the bottom labelled G7510
> would be Ankh-haf's.

I gave the tomb number G7510 in a previous post, but thanks for the help.

> Some quip to follow how it is I who am not
> worth your time? You'd be right.

I don't think like that, so I wouldn't say it. But if that imaginary conversation makes you feel good, go for it.

> Its funny to me though how the lot of you decry
> anything that dates the great pyrmaids to the
> Dynastic period, yet by the same token you equally
> deny anything that dates the 4th Dynasty to, well,
> the 4th Dynasty, as if this period was just a void
> in time. If the likes of Ankh-haf do not belong to
> the 4th Dynasty then I am curious-who did?
> No one? If not then where and who do you think
> they are?

The answer to that is too long to put in a post. It would require a book to answer.

> > There really isn't anything about you that is
> alt.

> If the measure of such is the likes of yourself,
> Origyptian, Cladking et al, then I take that as a
> high compliment.

You're welcome

> Origpytian's attack parrot says what? If by
> "status quo" you mean the truth then yes, I agree.
> Wow, two compliments in one day. Your insults by
> way of saying the opposite of what you know is the
> truth because you think that's what will get under
> the other person's skin the most is quite tired at
> this point.

That's just silly. You're pseudo pyscho babble is what's tiring.

> Though you feel it clever, to the rest
> of us it's just plain dishonest which is a
> reflection of your character, not ours.

You use the word "dishonest" frequently yet how you use it is puzzling. Why call someone "dishonest" if they are posting what they truly believe?

> I fail to see how calling out belligerent
> intellectual frauds for what they are is an
> "insult".

WHO is being belligerent?

> The real insult is that the rest of us
> have to suffer it in the first place.

You don't have to "suffer" anything. You're not a victim. You choose to read and post here. If it's too much to bear, then don't do it. Your choice, no one's forcing you.

> And given
> these are the people you have cast your lot with
> and defend like a rabid dog every day, despite the
> fact I know you know they are full of shit- what
> does this say about you?

I cast my lot with those I share interests with. Unfortunately I did not consult Oracle Thanos for his approval first, who knows all truths and therefore knows who is full of shit.

I don't cast my lot with those who think they know everything.

> It's ok to be
> willfully ignorant intellectual frauds because
> they are on your "team"? Sounds like some of these
> "higher standards" we've heard so much about.

Brother, you're really pissed about nothing. I don't think tirades will further you points, but I could be wrong. Maybe less judgmental emotion and more objectivity would be better for a forum.

This is what I call... stupid; going back and forth trying to reason point by point with one of your tirades. It's got to be boring for the readers. Insult me, call me what your wish, I will not engage in anymore of your tantrums. And I will continue to form my own opinions outside of Egyptology. You can't stop that.

If you want to talk about the subjects, that's great. But the subject isn't ME. The subject WAS Ankh-haf and Wadi al-Jarf, which I think you have now effectively buried

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3754 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 647 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 748 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 752 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 613 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 566 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 553 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 648 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 476 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 552 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 546 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 487 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 473 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 503 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 589 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 591 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 501 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 507 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 441 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 359 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 403 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 425 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 544 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 625 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 525 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 510 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 427 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 542 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 416 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 564 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 574 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 481 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 517 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 628 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 519 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 566 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 485 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 463 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 445 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 546 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 562 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 427 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 472 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 454 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 530 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 558 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 497 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 620 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 477 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 512 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 598 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 478 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 446 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 512 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 535 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 413 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 407 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 533 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 478 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 503 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 535 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 516 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 380 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 410 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 510 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 491 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 547 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 501 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 440 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 465 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 549 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 481 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 434 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 526 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 505 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 408 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 563 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 439 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 472 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 412 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 448 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 518 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 520 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 496 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 674 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 553 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 455 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 422 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 447 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 469 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 361 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 429 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 496 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 380 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 375 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 577 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 546 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 437 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 464 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 438 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 352 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 454 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 616 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 635 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 520 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 479 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 681 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 620 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 471 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 365 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 650 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 390 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 506 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 600 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 457 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 489 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 639 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 517 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 510 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 627 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 455 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 420 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 554 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 370 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 363 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 531 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 500 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 413 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 411 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 395 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 811 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 507 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 510 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 515 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 453 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 556 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 506 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 507 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 475 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 547 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 474 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 531 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 575 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 351 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 596 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 427 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 522 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 381 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 416 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 349 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 460 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 462 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 468 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 704 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 499 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 492 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 454 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 386 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 592 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 372 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 457 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 531 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 439 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 533 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 434 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 479 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 507 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 447 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 417 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 350 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 436 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 344 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 466 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 539 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 598 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 496 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 384 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 421 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 532 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 388 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 333 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 461 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 397 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 404 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 394 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 392 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 487 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 476 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 354 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 453 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 365 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 396 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 388 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 456 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 369 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 401 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 447 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 459 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 423 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 414 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 417 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 426 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 406 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 444 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 356 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 434 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 449 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 415 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 376 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 465 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 373 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 464 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 439 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 403 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 369 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 412 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 432 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 404 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 401 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 539 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 410 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 413 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 448 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 425 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 543 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 362 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 352 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 316 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 369 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 375 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 318 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 375 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 267 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 381 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 283 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 409 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 426 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 311 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 464 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 382 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 233 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 315 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 346 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 206 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 390 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 347 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 245 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 384 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 232 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 322 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 335 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 272 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 421 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 447 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 322 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 269 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 404 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 196 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 352 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 397 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 325 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 282 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 319 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 282 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 264 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 317 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 287 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 253 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 384 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 516 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 411 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 334 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 384 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 397 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 424 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 200 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 269 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 312 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 262 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 265 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 319 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 330 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 328 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 260 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 407 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 223 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 313 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 343 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 254 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 305 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 240 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 402 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 228 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 358 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 204 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 288 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 433 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 234 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 285 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 270 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 368 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 239 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 328 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 247 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 391 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 323 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 417 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 414 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 415 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 378 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 415 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 376 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 498 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 328 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 288 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 295 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 222 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 259 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 302 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 352 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 252 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 323 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 336 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 252 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 379 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 287 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 377 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 328 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 221 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 257 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 385 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 223 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 441 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33