Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> So you think the location it's found among all the
> other tombs directly around it that point to the
> 4th Dynasty is "irrelevant" as to its provenance?
> Did you ever look to see the artifacts they found
> inside of it as well, or the architecture, which
> maybe is part of all that stylistic "mumbo-jumbo"
> Flentye was talking about? Of course, this is
> meaningless.

> > YOU brought it up as evidence for such. Now you
> > say it's irrelevant. Make up your mind.
>
> No Audrey. Even Origyptian understands the minutia
> of his familial ties to Khufu is irrelevant
> regarding the provenance of the Merrer diary.

YOU said ....
Quote
Thanos
As you already know, these are not the "only" reasons the papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty, the least of which is Khufu's half brother is also mentioned in detail as an administrator. Again(8-16):

YOU brought it up as one of the reasons why the "papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty". I didn't focus on his family ties, you have. I haven't stressed his family ties, you have.

Quote
Thanos
...the papyri notes Ankhhaf,half-brother of Khufu, was the administrator of the project who is well attested at Giza:

Still waiting for how he is "well attested at Giza". Looks like he was well attested at Giza by Reisner, based on the location of his tomb. You aren't coming up with thing else that 'attests' him. In other words you are going by what Reisner thought was the lay out of the tombs.

> Not really. The only reason you are taking this
> tack is to support Origyptian's argument,

That's really too bad you think so. Your vision is not clear and may be clouded by your anger. No matter how emphatically I deny your assumption, you won't believe it, so it's a waste of time to try to change your mind.

> as usual, that the Merrer diary doesn't belong to the
> 4th Dynasty and contradict any argument against
> it. The lot of you didn't even know who Ankh-haf
> was or his significance in Merrer's diary until I
> brought it up months ago (ignored then), yet now
> all of a sudden you are all over it trying to deny
> Ankh-haf even belongs to the 4th Dynasty?

Because YOU used Ankh-haf as one factor dating the diary.

> > I think the dating of Wadi al-Jarf is
> > circumstantial, not a drop of science to
> support
> > it. It's dated by the Khufu cartouche, period.
>
> What does the dating of Wadi al-Jarf have to do
> with the dating of the papyri?

Ask Tallet & Marouard, who for some reason title their papers with "Wadi al-Jarf", naming the site where the objects were found.

> So you omitted all the rest, which would be
> all the rest, that directly contradicts
> your opinion on purpose? My bad.

For some strange reason you think I should have posted the whole article. I gave the links so everyone could read it for themselves. Why on earth would I make unnecessary long posts when I made the articles available?
There is no need to post an entire article when the link is given. Then others can find within an article what they think are points to be discussed. If you don't like this technique, that's really your problem.

> You mean like the 700+ samples taken from the
> predynastic through the OK which clearly place
> their provenance in the 4th-3rd millenniums?
> Again, good to know the whole "science" thing is
> finally catching up with you.

They found 700+ samples at Wadi al-Jarf? We have been talking about that site, have you now gone sideways into a different subject?

> > A house of cards waiting for a breeze.
>
> Whatever you say Cladking.

I'm pretty sure that was my comment that I posted and not Cladkings. Unless ck can edit my posts.

> So I guess this means the tombs must date to the
> NK then. Good work Audrey.

You believe what the Egyptologists say, I'll make up my own mind, if it doesn't upset you too much

> > Now if they only had some proof of who Khufu
> was.
> > And don't give me that 'context' crap. The
> context
> > was gathered after the fact to bolster
> > their guesses.
>
> Oyyy... Not this again.

It will be "this again" for some time to come. You thought the subject would go away because you & Stower spit on it?

> If this is all you think it is I can't help you.
> No one is claiming the KFC across the street was
> built in the 4th Dynasty-why do you think that is?

Why do you think that's a good analogy?

> The difference is that all it is these
> "others" know (if that) is that it sits next door
> and otherwise know nothing else about what
> connects them. Bravo-got me there. And these
> "others" would include the dynamic duo of who-you
> and Origyptian? Well, hot damn. That may be
> good enough for you, but sure as hell not
> enough for me nor anyone else not named Jon or
> Cladking here I suspect.

Yet you fail to mention anything else that connects Ankh-haf to the 4th dyn.

> Audrey, the new champion of "science". And if RCD
> said it dated to the 3rd millennium then rest
> assured your narrative would only be something
> else to naysay the provenance.

Not at all. I haven't expressed my opinion on when Ankh-haf lived. But evidently we will never know because Egyptology doesn't like to RCD

> Audrey, you cite multiple papers to contradict the
> opinion Ankh-haf is related to Khufu in some way

I DID NOT cite those papers to contradict his family ties. I cited them to show how Egyptology has placed him in the 4th dyn.

> yet ignore the fact not one word of it contradicts
> your greater point that you believe he does not
> date to the 4th Dynasty. You cherry pick-quotes to
> serve your narrative

I DID NOT cherry pick. I know this is one of the frequent complaints you use to invalidate the poster, but I was just the messenger. The articles were made available for everyone to read. I am not about to post the entire article just so you & Stower won't scream cherry picking.

> then ignore the rest in that
> otherwise there is no discrepancy as to the
> 4th Dynasty date of Ankh-haf. But please, quote
> one of your sources that supports this idea.

Why should I? The point is Egyptology says he is 4th dyn. It's not my job to disprove it. I'm only showing that the reason they say so is not based on good evidence let alone science. Why can't you guys understand the difference? It's that same old mindset of - no one can disagree unless they have a better idea.

> So I am to thank you for reciting papers written
> by Egyptologists you cherry pick from out of
> context to support your otherwise unsubstantiated
> beliefs,

Nope, no need to be grateful. And no need to insult the messenger who just happened to not post the articles in a way that would be pleasing to YOU.

> yet if I were to quote them myself to
> support the opposing view then it is I that is
> somehow the lesser for it?

No at all and do not see why you would come to this conclusion. Boy, you're really pissed that I didn't post the entire article.

> I believe that's called
> "irony" among other things, but rest assured we
> can at least count on me to quote them accurately
> and honestly if and when I do.

Yes, Thanos the Savior. How quickly you worked yourself up to that status

> The simple truth is that you are not worth my time
> to write an expose regarding the context of the
> eastern cemetery and interconnectedness of the
> artifacts and architecture that no doubt you will
> surely not understand anyways and argue with me
> about it all the same. I'd say once in a week is
> enough. But since you are the one with such
> doubts, please tell us why the eastern cemetery
> and/or the people found in it do not belong to the
> 4th Dynasty.

Because there is nothing to say they do except location.

> Hint-the big one at the bottom labelled G7510
> would be Ankh-haf's.

I gave the tomb number G7510 in a previous post, but thanks for the help.

> Some quip to follow how it is I who am not
> worth your time? You'd be right.

I don't think like that, so I wouldn't say it. But if that imaginary conversation makes you feel good, go for it.

> Its funny to me though how the lot of you decry
> anything that dates the great pyrmaids to the
> Dynastic period, yet by the same token you equally
> deny anything that dates the 4th Dynasty to, well,
> the 4th Dynasty, as if this period was just a void
> in time. If the likes of Ankh-haf do not belong to
> the 4th Dynasty then I am curious-who did?
> No one? If not then where and who do you think
> they are?

The answer to that is too long to put in a post. It would require a book to answer.

> > There really isn't anything about you that is
> alt.

> If the measure of such is the likes of yourself,
> Origyptian, Cladking et al, then I take that as a
> high compliment.

You're welcome

> Origpytian's attack parrot says what? If by
> "status quo" you mean the truth then yes, I agree.
> Wow, two compliments in one day. Your insults by
> way of saying the opposite of what you know is the
> truth because you think that's what will get under
> the other person's skin the most is quite tired at
> this point.

That's just silly. You're pseudo pyscho babble is what's tiring.

> Though you feel it clever, to the rest
> of us it's just plain dishonest which is a
> reflection of your character, not ours.

You use the word "dishonest" frequently yet how you use it is puzzling. Why call someone "dishonest" if they are posting what they truly believe?

> I fail to see how calling out belligerent
> intellectual frauds for what they are is an
> "insult".

WHO is being belligerent?

> The real insult is that the rest of us
> have to suffer it in the first place.

You don't have to "suffer" anything. You're not a victim. You choose to read and post here. If it's too much to bear, then don't do it. Your choice, no one's forcing you.

> And given
> these are the people you have cast your lot with
> and defend like a rabid dog every day, despite the
> fact I know you know they are full of shit- what
> does this say about you?

I cast my lot with those I share interests with. Unfortunately I did not consult Oracle Thanos for his approval first, who knows all truths and therefore knows who is full of shit.

I don't cast my lot with those who think they know everything.

> It's ok to be
> willfully ignorant intellectual frauds because
> they are on your "team"? Sounds like some of these
> "higher standards" we've heard so much about.

Brother, you're really pissed about nothing. I don't think tirades will further you points, but I could be wrong. Maybe less judgmental emotion and more objectivity would be better for a forum.

This is what I call... stupid; going back and forth trying to reason point by point with one of your tirades. It's got to be boring for the readers. Insult me, call me what your wish, I will not engage in anymore of your tantrums. And I will continue to form my own opinions outside of Egyptology. You can't stop that.

If you want to talk about the subjects, that's great. But the subject isn't ME. The subject WAS Ankh-haf and Wadi al-Jarf, which I think you have now effectively buried

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3253 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 388 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 518 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 505 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 400 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 359 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 320 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 360 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 279 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 345 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 312 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 286 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 287 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 301 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 383 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 386 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 298 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 289 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 245 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 215 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 235 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 240 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 317 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 458 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 323 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 323 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 230 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 331 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 255 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 321 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 341 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 303 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 296 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 390 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 291 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 325 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 283 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 259 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 232 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 329 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 321 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 250 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 249 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 240 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 333 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 366 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 274 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 402 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 273 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 302 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 358 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 283 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 220 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 292 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 307 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 218 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 209 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 316 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 275 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 277 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 288 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 330 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 207 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 230 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 330 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 278 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 319 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 305 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 250 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 248 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 345 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 283 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 230 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 311 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 314 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 191 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 356 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 226 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 249 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 218 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 246 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 315 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 307 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 307 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 415 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 351 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 276 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 224 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 254 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 254 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 175 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 221 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 281 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 192 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 182 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 292 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 320 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 229 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 249 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 249 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 183 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 232 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 288 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 384 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 297 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 276 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 448 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 338 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 269 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 175 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 411 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 197 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 259 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 319 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 263 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 279 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 341 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 311 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 311 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 373 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 275 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 272 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 274 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 177 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 187 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 284 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 268 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 236 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 239 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 225 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 411 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 267 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 275 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 289 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 244 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 347 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 318 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 326 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 306 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 319 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 291 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 343 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 356 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 194 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 392 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 244 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 329 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 215 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 234 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 157 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 262 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 264 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 279 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 383 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 263 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 284 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 268 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 207 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 345 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 176 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 264 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 254 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 236 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 260 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 227 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 272 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 338 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 287 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 257 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 200 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 248 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 177 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 268 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 309 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 366 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 310 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 215 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 249 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 340 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 171 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 184 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 214 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 238 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 209 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 198 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 203 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 237 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 278 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 220 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 257 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 197 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 187 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 201 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 271 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 200 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 214 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 252 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 254 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 228 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 206 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 196 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 207 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 203 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 239 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 156 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 233 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 274 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 228 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 201 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 254 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 178 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 258 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 262 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 231 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 205 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 235 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 260 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 257 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 241 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 322 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 228 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 248 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 245 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 250 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 290 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 242 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 170 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 158 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 181 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 182 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 132 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 193 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 89 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 205 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 129 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 226 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 240 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 152 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 260 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 183 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 97 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 142 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 168 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 67 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 191 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 167 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 88 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 193 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 88 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 141 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 111 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 118 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 223 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 271 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 154 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 110 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 217 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 101 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 155 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 175 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 160 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 92 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 129 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 96 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 94 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 143 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 126 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 91 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 170 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 284 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 221 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 142 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 187 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 200 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 248 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 53 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 79 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 151 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 74 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 81 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 120 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 161 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 147 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 107 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 255 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 80 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 148 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 148 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 86 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 116 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 76 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 187 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 54 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 175 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 83 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 102 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 214 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 79 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 106 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 137 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 171 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 71 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 167 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 65 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 198 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 179 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 250 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 261 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 260 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 198 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 209 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 200 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 257 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 180 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 141 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 134 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 80 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 93 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 116 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 154 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 83 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 114 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 185 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 95 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 217 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 112 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 206 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 169 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 60 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 105 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 195 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 56 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 237 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33
I will give you one last chance 83 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:34