Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> So you think the location it's found among all the
> other tombs directly around it that point to the
> 4th Dynasty is "irrelevant" as to its provenance?
> Did you ever look to see the artifacts they found
> inside of it as well, or the architecture, which
> maybe is part of all that stylistic "mumbo-jumbo"
> Flentye was talking about? Of course, this is
> meaningless.

> > YOU brought it up as evidence for such. Now you
> > say it's irrelevant. Make up your mind.
>
> No Audrey. Even Origyptian understands the minutia
> of his familial ties to Khufu is irrelevant
> regarding the provenance of the Merrer diary.

YOU said ....
Quote
Thanos
As you already know, these are not the "only" reasons the papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty, the least of which is Khufu's half brother is also mentioned in detail as an administrator. Again(8-16):

YOU brought it up as one of the reasons why the "papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty". I didn't focus on his family ties, you have. I haven't stressed his family ties, you have.

Quote
Thanos
...the papyri notes Ankhhaf,half-brother of Khufu, was the administrator of the project who is well attested at Giza:

Still waiting for how he is "well attested at Giza". Looks like he was well attested at Giza by Reisner, based on the location of his tomb. You aren't coming up with thing else that 'attests' him. In other words you are going by what Reisner thought was the lay out of the tombs.

> Not really. The only reason you are taking this
> tack is to support Origyptian's argument,

That's really too bad you think so. Your vision is not clear and may be clouded by your anger. No matter how emphatically I deny your assumption, you won't believe it, so it's a waste of time to try to change your mind.

> as usual, that the Merrer diary doesn't belong to the
> 4th Dynasty and contradict any argument against
> it. The lot of you didn't even know who Ankh-haf
> was or his significance in Merrer's diary until I
> brought it up months ago (ignored then), yet now
> all of a sudden you are all over it trying to deny
> Ankh-haf even belongs to the 4th Dynasty?

Because YOU used Ankh-haf as one factor dating the diary.

> > I think the dating of Wadi al-Jarf is
> > circumstantial, not a drop of science to
> support
> > it. It's dated by the Khufu cartouche, period.
>
> What does the dating of Wadi al-Jarf have to do
> with the dating of the papyri?

Ask Tallet & Marouard, who for some reason title their papers with "Wadi al-Jarf", naming the site where the objects were found.

> So you omitted all the rest, which would be
> all the rest, that directly contradicts
> your opinion on purpose? My bad.

For some strange reason you think I should have posted the whole article. I gave the links so everyone could read it for themselves. Why on earth would I make unnecessary long posts when I made the articles available?
There is no need to post an entire article when the link is given. Then others can find within an article what they think are points to be discussed. If you don't like this technique, that's really your problem.

> You mean like the 700+ samples taken from the
> predynastic through the OK which clearly place
> their provenance in the 4th-3rd millenniums?
> Again, good to know the whole "science" thing is
> finally catching up with you.

They found 700+ samples at Wadi al-Jarf? We have been talking about that site, have you now gone sideways into a different subject?

> > A house of cards waiting for a breeze.
>
> Whatever you say Cladking.

I'm pretty sure that was my comment that I posted and not Cladkings. Unless ck can edit my posts.

> So I guess this means the tombs must date to the
> NK then. Good work Audrey.

You believe what the Egyptologists say, I'll make up my own mind, if it doesn't upset you too much

> > Now if they only had some proof of who Khufu
> was.
> > And don't give me that 'context' crap. The
> context
> > was gathered after the fact to bolster
> > their guesses.
>
> Oyyy... Not this again.

It will be "this again" for some time to come. You thought the subject would go away because you & Stower spit on it?

> If this is all you think it is I can't help you.
> No one is claiming the KFC across the street was
> built in the 4th Dynasty-why do you think that is?

Why do you think that's a good analogy?

> The difference is that all it is these
> "others" know (if that) is that it sits next door
> and otherwise know nothing else about what
> connects them. Bravo-got me there. And these
> "others" would include the dynamic duo of who-you
> and Origyptian? Well, hot damn. That may be
> good enough for you, but sure as hell not
> enough for me nor anyone else not named Jon or
> Cladking here I suspect.

Yet you fail to mention anything else that connects Ankh-haf to the 4th dyn.

> Audrey, the new champion of "science". And if RCD
> said it dated to the 3rd millennium then rest
> assured your narrative would only be something
> else to naysay the provenance.

Not at all. I haven't expressed my opinion on when Ankh-haf lived. But evidently we will never know because Egyptology doesn't like to RCD

> Audrey, you cite multiple papers to contradict the
> opinion Ankh-haf is related to Khufu in some way

I DID NOT cite those papers to contradict his family ties. I cited them to show how Egyptology has placed him in the 4th dyn.

> yet ignore the fact not one word of it contradicts
> your greater point that you believe he does not
> date to the 4th Dynasty. You cherry pick-quotes to
> serve your narrative

I DID NOT cherry pick. I know this is one of the frequent complaints you use to invalidate the poster, but I was just the messenger. The articles were made available for everyone to read. I am not about to post the entire article just so you & Stower won't scream cherry picking.

> then ignore the rest in that
> otherwise there is no discrepancy as to the
> 4th Dynasty date of Ankh-haf. But please, quote
> one of your sources that supports this idea.

Why should I? The point is Egyptology says he is 4th dyn. It's not my job to disprove it. I'm only showing that the reason they say so is not based on good evidence let alone science. Why can't you guys understand the difference? It's that same old mindset of - no one can disagree unless they have a better idea.

> So I am to thank you for reciting papers written
> by Egyptologists you cherry pick from out of
> context to support your otherwise unsubstantiated
> beliefs,

Nope, no need to be grateful. And no need to insult the messenger who just happened to not post the articles in a way that would be pleasing to YOU.

> yet if I were to quote them myself to
> support the opposing view then it is I that is
> somehow the lesser for it?

No at all and do not see why you would come to this conclusion. Boy, you're really pissed that I didn't post the entire article.

> I believe that's called
> "irony" among other things, but rest assured we
> can at least count on me to quote them accurately
> and honestly if and when I do.

Yes, Thanos the Savior. How quickly you worked yourself up to that status

> The simple truth is that you are not worth my time
> to write an expose regarding the context of the
> eastern cemetery and interconnectedness of the
> artifacts and architecture that no doubt you will
> surely not understand anyways and argue with me
> about it all the same. I'd say once in a week is
> enough. But since you are the one with such
> doubts, please tell us why the eastern cemetery
> and/or the people found in it do not belong to the
> 4th Dynasty.

Because there is nothing to say they do except location.

> Hint-the big one at the bottom labelled G7510
> would be Ankh-haf's.

I gave the tomb number G7510 in a previous post, but thanks for the help.

> Some quip to follow how it is I who am not
> worth your time? You'd be right.

I don't think like that, so I wouldn't say it. But if that imaginary conversation makes you feel good, go for it.

> Its funny to me though how the lot of you decry
> anything that dates the great pyrmaids to the
> Dynastic period, yet by the same token you equally
> deny anything that dates the 4th Dynasty to, well,
> the 4th Dynasty, as if this period was just a void
> in time. If the likes of Ankh-haf do not belong to
> the 4th Dynasty then I am curious-who did?
> No one? If not then where and who do you think
> they are?

The answer to that is too long to put in a post. It would require a book to answer.

> > There really isn't anything about you that is
> alt.

> If the measure of such is the likes of yourself,
> Origyptian, Cladking et al, then I take that as a
> high compliment.

You're welcome

> Origpytian's attack parrot says what? If by
> "status quo" you mean the truth then yes, I agree.
> Wow, two compliments in one day. Your insults by
> way of saying the opposite of what you know is the
> truth because you think that's what will get under
> the other person's skin the most is quite tired at
> this point.

That's just silly. You're pseudo pyscho babble is what's tiring.

> Though you feel it clever, to the rest
> of us it's just plain dishonest which is a
> reflection of your character, not ours.

You use the word "dishonest" frequently yet how you use it is puzzling. Why call someone "dishonest" if they are posting what they truly believe?

> I fail to see how calling out belligerent
> intellectual frauds for what they are is an
> "insult".

WHO is being belligerent?

> The real insult is that the rest of us
> have to suffer it in the first place.

You don't have to "suffer" anything. You're not a victim. You choose to read and post here. If it's too much to bear, then don't do it. Your choice, no one's forcing you.

> And given
> these are the people you have cast your lot with
> and defend like a rabid dog every day, despite the
> fact I know you know they are full of shit- what
> does this say about you?

I cast my lot with those I share interests with. Unfortunately I did not consult Oracle Thanos for his approval first, who knows all truths and therefore knows who is full of shit.

I don't cast my lot with those who think they know everything.

> It's ok to be
> willfully ignorant intellectual frauds because
> they are on your "team"? Sounds like some of these
> "higher standards" we've heard so much about.

Brother, you're really pissed about nothing. I don't think tirades will further you points, but I could be wrong. Maybe less judgmental emotion and more objectivity would be better for a forum.

This is what I call... stupid; going back and forth trying to reason point by point with one of your tirades. It's got to be boring for the readers. Insult me, call me what your wish, I will not engage in anymore of your tantrums. And I will continue to form my own opinions outside of Egyptology. You can't stop that.

If you want to talk about the subjects, that's great. But the subject isn't ME. The subject WAS Ankh-haf and Wadi al-Jarf, which I think you have now effectively buried

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3943 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 756 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 866 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 875 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 723 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 684 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 658 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 755 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 586 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 651 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 652 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 601 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 594 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 603 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 699 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 711 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 660 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 625 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 576 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 473 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 513 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 525 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 645 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 726 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 634 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 681 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 540 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 662 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 525 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 673 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 703 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 601 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 638 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 742 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 635 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 698 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 596 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 596 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 553 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 681 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 677 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 539 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 595 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 567 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 644 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 667 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 606 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 726 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 606 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 616 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 709 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 577 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 544 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 616 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 688 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 529 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 516 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 640 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 572 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 617 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 659 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 629 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 491 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 524 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 622 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 611 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 670 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 597 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 558 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 570 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 666 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 603 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 548 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 633 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 614 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 510 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 672 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 541 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 577 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 526 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 555 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 672 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 621 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 612 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 803 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 668 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 572 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 532 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 566 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 578 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 586 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 531 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 617 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 499 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 486 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 686 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 684 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 545 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 580 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 529 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 463 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 561 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 742 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 738 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 642 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 604 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 799 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 735 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 583 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 478 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 761 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 500 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 721 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 726 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 568 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 595 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 778 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 624 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 625 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 742 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 563 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 517 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 670 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 499 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 475 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 667 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 623 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 530 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 520 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 497 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 975 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 671 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 638 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 621 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 569 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 675 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 728 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 626 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 584 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 665 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 602 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 667 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 689 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 472 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 727 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 545 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 638 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 484 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 538 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 444 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 577 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 590 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 570 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 822 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 637 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 607 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 553 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 505 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 699 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 477 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 584 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 630 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 549 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 659 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 543 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 603 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 609 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 574 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 527 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 482 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 525 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 499 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 568 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 648 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 711 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 600 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 504 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 538 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 749 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 497 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 442 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 565 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 510 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 532 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 486 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 483 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 622 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 585 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 454 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 547 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 465 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 504 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 483 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 574 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 479 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 512 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 558 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 581 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 619 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 529 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 531 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 550 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 522 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 561 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 457 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 536 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 545 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 520 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 487 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 583 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 533 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 577 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 542 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 527 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 471 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 513 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 552 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 497 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 501 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 627 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 521 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 520 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 637 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 557 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 659 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 459 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 448 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 500 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 548 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 482 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 419 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 475 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 370 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 474 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 386 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 510 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 553 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 405 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 562 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 487 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 379 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 443 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 449 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 302 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 489 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 448 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 362 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 488 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 346 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 434 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 437 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 428 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 521 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 540 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 426 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 357 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 508 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 286 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 468 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 635 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 416 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 374 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 423 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 402 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 385 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 419 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 376 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 350 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 494 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 639 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 516 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 440 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 521 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 505 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 524 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 315 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 464 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 426 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 372 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 365 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 412 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 443 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 438 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 361 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 524 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 326 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 413 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 439 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 356 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 410 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 334 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 502 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 336 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 473 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 306 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 383 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 557 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 334 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 409 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 379 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 479 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 339 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 433 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 341 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 509 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 460 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 514 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 611 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 527 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 476 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 550 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 484 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 608 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 430 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 382 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 398 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 332 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 380 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 413 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 439 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 356 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 426 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 451 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 363 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 472 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 377 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 481 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 423 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 325 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 366 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 484 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 313 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 543 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33