Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:

> So you think the location it's found among all the
> other tombs directly around it that point to the
> 4th Dynasty is "irrelevant" as to its provenance?
> Did you ever look to see the artifacts they found
> inside of it as well, or the architecture, which
> maybe is part of all that stylistic "mumbo-jumbo"
> Flentye was talking about? Of course, this is
> meaningless.

> > YOU brought it up as evidence for such. Now you
> > say it's irrelevant. Make up your mind.
> No Audrey. Even Origyptian understands the minutia
> of his familial ties to Khufu is irrelevant
> regarding the provenance of the Merrer diary.

YOU said ....
As you already know, these are not the "only" reasons the papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty, the least of which is Khufu's half brother is also mentioned in detail as an administrator. Again(8-16):

YOU brought it up as one of the reasons why the "papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty". I didn't focus on his family ties, you have. I haven't stressed his family ties, you have.

...the papyri notes Ankhhaf,half-brother of Khufu, was the administrator of the project who is well attested at Giza:

Still waiting for how he is "well attested at Giza". Looks like he was well attested at Giza by Reisner, based on the location of his tomb. You aren't coming up with thing else that 'attests' him. In other words you are going by what Reisner thought was the lay out of the tombs.

> Not really. The only reason you are taking this
> tack is to support Origyptian's argument,

That's really too bad you think so. Your vision is not clear and may be clouded by your anger. No matter how emphatically I deny your assumption, you won't believe it, so it's a waste of time to try to change your mind.

> as usual, that the Merrer diary doesn't belong to the
> 4th Dynasty and contradict any argument against
> it. The lot of you didn't even know who Ankh-haf
> was or his significance in Merrer's diary until I
> brought it up months ago (ignored then), yet now
> all of a sudden you are all over it trying to deny
> Ankh-haf even belongs to the 4th Dynasty?

Because YOU used Ankh-haf as one factor dating the diary.

> > I think the dating of Wadi al-Jarf is
> > circumstantial, not a drop of science to
> support
> > it. It's dated by the Khufu cartouche, period.
> What does the dating of Wadi al-Jarf have to do
> with the dating of the papyri?

Ask Tallet & Marouard, who for some reason title their papers with "Wadi al-Jarf", naming the site where the objects were found.

> So you omitted all the rest, which would be
> all the rest, that directly contradicts
> your opinion on purpose? My bad.

For some strange reason you think I should have posted the whole article. I gave the links so everyone could read it for themselves. Why on earth would I make unnecessary long posts when I made the articles available?
There is no need to post an entire article when the link is given. Then others can find within an article what they think are points to be discussed. If you don't like this technique, that's really your problem.

> You mean like the 700+ samples taken from the
> predynastic through the OK which clearly place
> their provenance in the 4th-3rd millenniums?
> Again, good to know the whole "science" thing is
> finally catching up with you.

They found 700+ samples at Wadi al-Jarf? We have been talking about that site, have you now gone sideways into a different subject?

> > A house of cards waiting for a breeze.
> Whatever you say Cladking.

I'm pretty sure that was my comment that I posted and not Cladkings. Unless ck can edit my posts.

> So I guess this means the tombs must date to the
> NK then. Good work Audrey.

You believe what the Egyptologists say, I'll make up my own mind, if it doesn't upset you too much

> > Now if they only had some proof of who Khufu
> was.
> > And don't give me that 'context' crap. The
> context
> > was gathered after the fact to bolster
> > their guesses.
> Oyyy... Not this again.

It will be "this again" for some time to come. You thought the subject would go away because you & Stower spit on it?

> If this is all you think it is I can't help you.
> No one is claiming the KFC across the street was
> built in the 4th Dynasty-why do you think that is?

Why do you think that's a good analogy?

> The difference is that all it is these
> "others" know (if that) is that it sits next door
> and otherwise know nothing else about what
> connects them. Bravo-got me there. And these
> "others" would include the dynamic duo of who-you
> and Origyptian? Well, hot damn. That may be
> good enough for you, but sure as hell not
> enough for me nor anyone else not named Jon or
> Cladking here I suspect.

Yet you fail to mention anything else that connects Ankh-haf to the 4th dyn.

> Audrey, the new champion of "science". And if RCD
> said it dated to the 3rd millennium then rest
> assured your narrative would only be something
> else to naysay the provenance.

Not at all. I haven't expressed my opinion on when Ankh-haf lived. But evidently we will never know because Egyptology doesn't like to RCD

> Audrey, you cite multiple papers to contradict the
> opinion Ankh-haf is related to Khufu in some way

I DID NOT cite those papers to contradict his family ties. I cited them to show how Egyptology has placed him in the 4th dyn.

> yet ignore the fact not one word of it contradicts
> your greater point that you believe he does not
> date to the 4th Dynasty. You cherry pick-quotes to
> serve your narrative

I DID NOT cherry pick. I know this is one of the frequent complaints you use to invalidate the poster, but I was just the messenger. The articles were made available for everyone to read. I am not about to post the entire article just so you & Stower won't scream cherry picking.

> then ignore the rest in that
> otherwise there is no discrepancy as to the
> 4th Dynasty date of Ankh-haf. But please, quote
> one of your sources that supports this idea.

Why should I? The point is Egyptology says he is 4th dyn. It's not my job to disprove it. I'm only showing that the reason they say so is not based on good evidence let alone science. Why can't you guys understand the difference? It's that same old mindset of - no one can disagree unless they have a better idea.

> So I am to thank you for reciting papers written
> by Egyptologists you cherry pick from out of
> context to support your otherwise unsubstantiated
> beliefs,

Nope, no need to be grateful. And no need to insult the messenger who just happened to not post the articles in a way that would be pleasing to YOU.

> yet if I were to quote them myself to
> support the opposing view then it is I that is
> somehow the lesser for it?

No at all and do not see why you would come to this conclusion. Boy, you're really pissed that I didn't post the entire article.

> I believe that's called
> "irony" among other things, but rest assured we
> can at least count on me to quote them accurately
> and honestly if and when I do.

Yes, Thanos the Savior. How quickly you worked yourself up to that status

> The simple truth is that you are not worth my time
> to write an expose regarding the context of the
> eastern cemetery and interconnectedness of the
> artifacts and architecture that no doubt you will
> surely not understand anyways and argue with me
> about it all the same. I'd say once in a week is
> enough. But since you are the one with such
> doubts, please tell us why the eastern cemetery
> and/or the people found in it do not belong to the
> 4th Dynasty.

Because there is nothing to say they do except location.

> Hint-the big one at the bottom labelled G7510
> would be Ankh-haf's.

I gave the tomb number G7510 in a previous post, but thanks for the help.

> Some quip to follow how it is I who am not
> worth your time? You'd be right.

I don't think like that, so I wouldn't say it. But if that imaginary conversation makes you feel good, go for it.

> Its funny to me though how the lot of you decry
> anything that dates the great pyrmaids to the
> Dynastic period, yet by the same token you equally
> deny anything that dates the 4th Dynasty to, well,
> the 4th Dynasty, as if this period was just a void
> in time. If the likes of Ankh-haf do not belong to
> the 4th Dynasty then I am curious-who did?
> No one? If not then where and who do you think
> they are?

The answer to that is too long to put in a post. It would require a book to answer.

> > There really isn't anything about you that is
> alt.

> If the measure of such is the likes of yourself,
> Origyptian, Cladking et al, then I take that as a
> high compliment.

You're welcome

> Origpytian's attack parrot says what? If by
> "status quo" you mean the truth then yes, I agree.
> Wow, two compliments in one day. Your insults by
> way of saying the opposite of what you know is the
> truth because you think that's what will get under
> the other person's skin the most is quite tired at
> this point.

That's just silly. You're pseudo pyscho babble is what's tiring.

> Though you feel it clever, to the rest
> of us it's just plain dishonest which is a
> reflection of your character, not ours.

You use the word "dishonest" frequently yet how you use it is puzzling. Why call someone "dishonest" if they are posting what they truly believe?

> I fail to see how calling out belligerent
> intellectual frauds for what they are is an
> "insult".

WHO is being belligerent?

> The real insult is that the rest of us
> have to suffer it in the first place.

You don't have to "suffer" anything. You're not a victim. You choose to read and post here. If it's too much to bear, then don't do it. Your choice, no one's forcing you.

> And given
> these are the people you have cast your lot with
> and defend like a rabid dog every day, despite the
> fact I know you know they are full of shit- what
> does this say about you?

I cast my lot with those I share interests with. Unfortunately I did not consult Oracle Thanos for his approval first, who knows all truths and therefore knows who is full of shit.

I don't cast my lot with those who think they know everything.

> It's ok to be
> willfully ignorant intellectual frauds because
> they are on your "team"? Sounds like some of these
> "higher standards" we've heard so much about.

Brother, you're really pissed about nothing. I don't think tirades will further you points, but I could be wrong. Maybe less judgmental emotion and more objectivity would be better for a forum.

This is what I call... stupid; going back and forth trying to reason point by point with one of your tirades. It's got to be boring for the readers. Insult me, call me what your wish, I will not engage in anymore of your tantrums. And I will continue to form my own opinions outside of Egyptology. You can't stop that.

If you want to talk about the subjects, that's great. But the subject isn't ME. The subject WAS Ankh-haf and Wadi al-Jarf, which I think you have now effectively buried

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3678 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 607 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 717 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 732 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 592 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 545 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 514 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 617 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 459 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 529 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 521 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 461 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 445 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 475 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 567 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 568 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 477 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 487 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 419 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 341 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 384 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 402 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 516 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 603 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 507 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 492 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 401 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 513 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 397 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 533 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 545 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 453 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 496 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 596 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 499 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 540 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 462 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 443 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 414 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 527 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 525 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 406 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 447 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 432 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 511 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 537 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 473 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 592 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 456 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 488 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 572 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 457 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 414 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 492 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 494 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 389 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 389 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 516 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 455 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 483 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 511 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 487 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 359 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 385 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 488 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 468 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 528 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 483 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 411 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 441 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 530 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 452 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 414 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 499 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 486 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 384 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 535 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 421 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 454 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 392 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 426 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 500 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 500 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 476 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 648 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 536 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 436 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 397 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 428 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 442 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 339 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 406 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 472 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 339 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 354 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 541 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 525 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 415 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 438 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 416 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 331 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 434 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 559 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 595 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 502 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 455 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 659 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 587 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 452 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 348 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 618 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 373 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 467 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 579 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 432 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 468 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 616 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 491 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 491 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 589 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 426 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 396 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 505 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 330 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 339 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 496 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 473 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 389 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 391 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 378 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 765 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 480 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 483 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 499 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 426 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 538 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 484 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 486 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 452 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 527 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 450 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 512 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 553 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 331 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 573 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 399 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 501 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 359 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 390 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 327 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 432 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 440 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 439 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 659 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 471 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 466 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 433 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 366 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 570 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 353 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 438 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 493 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 417 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 505 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 410 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 455 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 485 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 426 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 392 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 328 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 412 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 321 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 448 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 517 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 571 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 466 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 363 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 403 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 512 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 359 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 314 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 433 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 375 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 380 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 361 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 366 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 438 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 448 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 335 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 430 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 349 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 352 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 364 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 433 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 345 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 376 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 418 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 425 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 400 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 384 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 372 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 394 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 379 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 415 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 300 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 416 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 422 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 396 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 347 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 435 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 346 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 445 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 418 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 384 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 353 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 389 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 405 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 387 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 380 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 522 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 385 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 384 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 397 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 392 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 513 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 348 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 318 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 297 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 341 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 348 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 288 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 351 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 235 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 360 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 265 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 389 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 385 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 277 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 440 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 323 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 211 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 288 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 322 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 186 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 347 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 334 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 223 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 348 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 209 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 297 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 275 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 247 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 391 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 418 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 294 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 237 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 378 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 180 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 320 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 378 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 305 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 258 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 282 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 258 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 237 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 296 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 270 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 232 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 343 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 489 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 387 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 316 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 352 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 355 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 386 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 181 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 230 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 287 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 223 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 245 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 292 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 312 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 304 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 231 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 392 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 205 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 287 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 313 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 231 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 276 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 210 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 362 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 200 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 325 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 186 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 271 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 398 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 204 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 251 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 255 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 338 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 217 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 303 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 218 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 362 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 308 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 393 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 397 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 397 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 367 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 399 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 355 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 457 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 309 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 269 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 278 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 204 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 243 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 264 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 318 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 225 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 297 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 321 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 230 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 355 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 249 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 363 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 304 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 187 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 236 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 360 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 195 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 397 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33