Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Well yes you retracted an error Sbey highlighted.

I did no such thing. Two factys are simultaneously true;

1.,= the word "ramp" is unattested in the great pyramid building age.
2.,= the PT are from a later time.

> Except that similiar utterances and texts are
> found in 6th Dynasty pyramids and tombs! Are you
> aquainted with Teti Pepi I and all those ? If so
> why do you assume ( example of your
> superior logic?) they are all 5th dynasty?

I have very7 limited knowledge of EVERYTHING AFTER THE OLD KINGDOM. I try to limit what I say about these later periods because I have little knowledge.

> Why in dynasty 1 2 3 4 is there no pyramid or tomb
> with simimilar utterances in pyramids you claim
> the PTs relate to their construction method?

The old language could be related without change. We play Chinese telephone so writing was invented when modern language was invented.

> If they are ancient what happened to the
> originals? How much more ancient than 5th D, were
> such ancient variations of AE heiroglyphic
> language?

My opinion?

It's apparent some utterances were associated with specific structures and the oldest such is for Djoser's. Some utterances are probably even older and one probably applies to a mastaba the precedes the great pyramids.

> Why is it "obviously ancient"?

This is difficult to explain. There are numerous ways they are obviously more ancient but I usually refer people to Egyptologists who believe they are more ancient.

> Also how does that
> in your 'superior logic' does it beome "most
> probably ancient" in the space of 15 of your
> garbled words ? Again how can any thing "follow" a
> most probably?

I don't understand the questions.

There's only one logic but it can be deucedly tough to see.

> Again if they relate to the great
> pyramid age why no inscription in the great
> pyramids?

Again. Ancient language needed no written form.

Don't forget, too, that these utterances underwent extensive amendment after the great pyramids when the geysers dried up. The function of the writing was different and it did not involve being inscribed in the walls of time capsules.

There may be a papyrus copy of them with the Mafdet Lynx.

> If someone else you know here (also prolific in
> his superior logic and views) wrote or reworded
> it into a fat meaningless unsupported claim such
> as:

Where in the world did you get the idea anyone thinks my logic is "superior"?

> However it is also true that the utterances
> which comprise the PT were obviously from a
> lost civilization maybe millions of years old
> when they were inscribed in the 5th and 6th
> dynasty tombs. Since
> these words and ideas were most probably
> from a separate culture altogether but was adopted
> by the civilization we call AE it follows that
> many of the concepts and even the utterances
> themselves all about lost flying saucers and high
> technology originally arose during the great
> pyramid building age millions of years ago.


I can't follow this but the culture that built the great pyramids was nothing at all like the stinky footed bumpkins described by Egyptologists. I doubt that it was extremely ancient or alien but then I DON'T KNOW. All I did was reverse engineer the pyramids using the PT for the format.
>
> How would that be any more worthy or or reliable
> than the unsupported illogical mumbo jumbo of your
> original?

The ancient language could not support mumbo jumbo or illogical concepts. If what you wanted to communicate did not resound with nature it could not be stated at all. The rules of grammar, metaphysics, and logic prevented such misstatements.

> Who was the author? What was his or her intent?
> How do you determine or guess "most probably" what
> you imagine it was?

There were several authors and editors. Each author thought very very similarly and the intent was to mark the ascension of the king through ritual.

> In what I have seen of your version of PT you talk
> about ceremonies and kings ascention where is the
> dividing line of supersitious?

I define "superstitious" as believing things without evidence and "believing" as the driving force in what we experience. They was no superstition and no belief. They wouldn't understand the concept of belief.

> When is a religious ceremony deemed not
> superstitious?

It wasn't religious.

> We know with certainty later Dynastys (Book of the
> Dead, Embalmed mummies, provisions for the
> afterlife etc) held religious (is that what you
> call supersitious?)

Later people were stinky footed bumpkins and we still are!

> Your imagined geyser powered funicular built
> structures called Great Pyramids were suddenly
> replaced by smaller relatively insignificant (but
> still astounding eg Chamber Roof blocks of Unas,
> Sahure etc) and versions yet you think somehow
> the builder of Unas wanted to splash his whole
> chamber with a detailed account of how to build
> GREAT pramid in a sub standard replica? That seems
> logical to you!!!!????

First of all there are no parallels between real pyramids and the tiny little piles Egyptologists call "pyramids" except for their original shapes.

The function of these rituals underwent change. They were a tie to the past; tradition. The king still wanted to be remembered even as he rotted in the earth.

> Are you suggesting the scribe and all concerned
> didn't know what they were writing (painting)?

No. This is what Egyptologists believe.

> If
> so, why didn't they utilize the secrets that
> only they and YOU know? Did the geysers disappear
> (you know the many thousands of them) required to
> build all OK megalithic structures?

One geyser probably built G1 and G2. There were dozens of geysers over centuries that came and went in the land of rainbows and then they all dried up after G2 was built. The scientific word for geyser was "duat" and when it quit spraying it became dead gods (natural phenomena) under the ground.

> If the PT are about the method of pyramid
> construction techniqu as you claim Then how did
> they get Aswan huge slabs granite to Giza or
> Seqqara , how did they cut and polish it,
> transport it? Why don't you know or why doesn't
> that critical part of the operation mentioned?

The Great Saw Palace was powered by water. I don't know much more than this about it.

> Just one , and makes much more sense in the
> aggregate context of confirmed consistent Ancient
> Egyptian culture over millenia, than your pyscho
> babble fantasy.

Exactly. If you don't accept that these stinky footed bumpkins never changed then you have to admit you know nothing at all about them. Egyptologists invent a context that doesn't exist and leaves the word "ramp" unattested!

> If a new find was made today containing
> heiroglyphs seeming to be consistent with PT
> would you be able to read it and decipher it?

Yes, but remember I am neither fluent in ancient metaphysics nor ancient science. I'd have trouble even recognizing a chemistry text much less understanding it while more mundane writing should usually be fairly easy for me. I'd also do very poorly if much math were involved such as astronomy or their version of logic. My understanding is highly specialized but all of their writing wouldn't have been.

> Or would you have to wait for someone else to read
> and publish it so you could google it and put your
> spin on it?

I wouldn't bother to try to translate it if that's what you mean. I'd seek out a more stilted (literal) translation.

> It is like you hammering a nail into a house and
> then claiming you built it!

I used to tell the story that I built the John Hancock building in Chicago because I retrieved a rivet that fell off the elevator for a man.

No man is an island. I stole or borrowed most of what I know. I see little bits and pieces of many people I've known all through my theory including some of my best teachers.

I built nothing at all except a theory. I merely rediscovered ancient science and the means to build the pyramid.

> If you ever come up with a fact not clouded by
> your opinion then there will celebration on the
> interwebs from folks all over the world.

I am opinionated but hoped that didn't show in my posts... ...well... ...not all of my posts anyway.

There aren't so much any "opinions" in my theory but rather extrapolations though some of these are a stretch. I keep a few that are big stretches because in my opinion they are beautiful and elegant.




373 huh? I might.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02-Mar-17 01:32 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 2990 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 287 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 394 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 312 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 277 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 238 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 236 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 194 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 173 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 204 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 215 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 178 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 212 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 190 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 264 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 233 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 232 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 182 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 141 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 150 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 144 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 161 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 197 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 354 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 208 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 256 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 148 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 197 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 172 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 228 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 205 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 181 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 191 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 259 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 185 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 196 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 166 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 171 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 169 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 197 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 194 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 170 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 164 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 151 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 202 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 245 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 177 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 280 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 176 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 183 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 189 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 161 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 137 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 188 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 196 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 138 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 126 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 200 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 182 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 152 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 164 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 165 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 157 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 134 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 235 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 176 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 201 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 190 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 167 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 138 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 255 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 140 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 140 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 207 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 182 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 123 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 249 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 126 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 163 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 136 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 154 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 199 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 169 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 181 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 246 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 220 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 167 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 146 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 141 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 138 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 121 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 116 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 146 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 123 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 112 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 163 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 173 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 134 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 181 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 148 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 134 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 134 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 153 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 236 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 176 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 167 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 332 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 183 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 153 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 122 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 228 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 119 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 143 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 189 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 169 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 161 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 203 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 173 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 192 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 243 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 163 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 159 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 157 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 118 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 112 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 167 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 134 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 141 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 136 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 121 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 201 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 161 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 179 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 156 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 130 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 203 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 206 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 202 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 188 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 181 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 194 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 186 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 204 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 140 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 254 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 156 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 203 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 135 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 136 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 86 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 154 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 169 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 154 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 181 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 146 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 176 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 161 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 115 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 208 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 101 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 164 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 135 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 144 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 156 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 127 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 172 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 222 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 190 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 154 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 143 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 143 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 113 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 167 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 232 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 200 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 184 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 140 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 157 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 195 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 86 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 128 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 134 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 134 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 124 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 128 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 117 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 137 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 168 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 126 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 153 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 132 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 110 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 120 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 160 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 119 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 131 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 146 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 145 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 135 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 108 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 109 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 121 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 107 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 134 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 101 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 139 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 153 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 125 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 105 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 137 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 92 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 141 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 157 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 120 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 117 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 142 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 157 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 137 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 105 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 164 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 116 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 142 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 133 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 147 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 174 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 154 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 107 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 88 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 92 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 120 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 41 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 106 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 62 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 106 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 73 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 130 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 147 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 84 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 145 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 115 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 79 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 75 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 88 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 50 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 96 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 86 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 49 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 93 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 42 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 82 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 44 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 56 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 121 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 196 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 75 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 59 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 121 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 34 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 73 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 108 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 74 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 59 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 71 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 54 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 40 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 79 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 80 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 52 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 79 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 175 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 121 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 66 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 95 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 85 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 135 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 29 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 38 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 72 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 34 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 40 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 58 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 74 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 62 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 38 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 78 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 39 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 78 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 66 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 30 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 65 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 37 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 104 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 31 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 75 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 38 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 26 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 103 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 37 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 38 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 79 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 93 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 38 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 91 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 39 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 86 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 97 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 139 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 151 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 146 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 94 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 114 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 111 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 124 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 101 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 67 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 59 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 37 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 51 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 63 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 64 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 45 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 60 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 89 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 62 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 96 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 71 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 102 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 86 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 37 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 44 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 101 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 32 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 91 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33
I will give you one last chance 32 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:34
Re: I will give you one last chance