Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Well yes you retracted an error Sbey highlighted.

I did no such thing. Two factys are simultaneously true;

1.,= the word "ramp" is unattested in the great pyramid building age.
2.,= the PT are from a later time.

> Except that similiar utterances and texts are
> found in 6th Dynasty pyramids and tombs! Are you
> aquainted with Teti Pepi I and all those ? If so
> why do you assume ( example of your
> superior logic?) they are all 5th dynasty?

I have very7 limited knowledge of EVERYTHING AFTER THE OLD KINGDOM. I try to limit what I say about these later periods because I have little knowledge.

> Why in dynasty 1 2 3 4 is there no pyramid or tomb
> with simimilar utterances in pyramids you claim
> the PTs relate to their construction method?

The old language could be related without change. We play Chinese telephone so writing was invented when modern language was invented.

> If they are ancient what happened to the
> originals? How much more ancient than 5th D, were
> such ancient variations of AE heiroglyphic
> language?

My opinion?

It's apparent some utterances were associated with specific structures and the oldest such is for Djoser's. Some utterances are probably even older and one probably applies to a mastaba the precedes the great pyramids.

> Why is it "obviously ancient"?

This is difficult to explain. There are numerous ways they are obviously more ancient but I usually refer people to Egyptologists who believe they are more ancient.

> Also how does that
> in your 'superior logic' does it beome "most
> probably ancient" in the space of 15 of your
> garbled words ? Again how can any thing "follow" a
> most probably?

I don't understand the questions.

There's only one logic but it can be deucedly tough to see.

> Again if they relate to the great
> pyramid age why no inscription in the great
> pyramids?

Again. Ancient language needed no written form.

Don't forget, too, that these utterances underwent extensive amendment after the great pyramids when the geysers dried up. The function of the writing was different and it did not involve being inscribed in the walls of time capsules.

There may be a papyrus copy of them with the Mafdet Lynx.

> If someone else you know here (also prolific in
> his superior logic and views) wrote or reworded
> it into a fat meaningless unsupported claim such
> as:

Where in the world did you get the idea anyone thinks my logic is "superior"?

> However it is also true that the utterances
> which comprise the PT were obviously from a
> lost civilization maybe millions of years old
> when they were inscribed in the 5th and 6th
> dynasty tombs. Since
> these words and ideas were most probably
> from a separate culture altogether but was adopted
> by the civilization we call AE it follows that
> many of the concepts and even the utterances
> themselves all about lost flying saucers and high
> technology originally arose during the great
> pyramid building age millions of years ago.


I can't follow this but the culture that built the great pyramids was nothing at all like the stinky footed bumpkins described by Egyptologists. I doubt that it was extremely ancient or alien but then I DON'T KNOW. All I did was reverse engineer the pyramids using the PT for the format.
>
> How would that be any more worthy or or reliable
> than the unsupported illogical mumbo jumbo of your
> original?

The ancient language could not support mumbo jumbo or illogical concepts. If what you wanted to communicate did not resound with nature it could not be stated at all. The rules of grammar, metaphysics, and logic prevented such misstatements.

> Who was the author? What was his or her intent?
> How do you determine or guess "most probably" what
> you imagine it was?

There were several authors and editors. Each author thought very very similarly and the intent was to mark the ascension of the king through ritual.

> In what I have seen of your version of PT you talk
> about ceremonies and kings ascention where is the
> dividing line of supersitious?

I define "superstitious" as believing things without evidence and "believing" as the driving force in what we experience. They was no superstition and no belief. They wouldn't understand the concept of belief.

> When is a religious ceremony deemed not
> superstitious?

It wasn't religious.

> We know with certainty later Dynastys (Book of the
> Dead, Embalmed mummies, provisions for the
> afterlife etc) held religious (is that what you
> call supersitious?)

Later people were stinky footed bumpkins and we still are!

> Your imagined geyser powered funicular built
> structures called Great Pyramids were suddenly
> replaced by smaller relatively insignificant (but
> still astounding eg Chamber Roof blocks of Unas,
> Sahure etc) and versions yet you think somehow
> the builder of Unas wanted to splash his whole
> chamber with a detailed account of how to build
> GREAT pramid in a sub standard replica? That seems
> logical to you!!!!????

First of all there are no parallels between real pyramids and the tiny little piles Egyptologists call "pyramids" except for their original shapes.

The function of these rituals underwent change. They were a tie to the past; tradition. The king still wanted to be remembered even as he rotted in the earth.

> Are you suggesting the scribe and all concerned
> didn't know what they were writing (painting)?

No. This is what Egyptologists believe.

> If
> so, why didn't they utilize the secrets that
> only they and YOU know? Did the geysers disappear
> (you know the many thousands of them) required to
> build all OK megalithic structures?

One geyser probably built G1 and G2. There were dozens of geysers over centuries that came and went in the land of rainbows and then they all dried up after G2 was built. The scientific word for geyser was "duat" and when it quit spraying it became dead gods (natural phenomena) under the ground.

> If the PT are about the method of pyramid
> construction techniqu as you claim Then how did
> they get Aswan huge slabs granite to Giza or
> Seqqara , how did they cut and polish it,
> transport it? Why don't you know or why doesn't
> that critical part of the operation mentioned?

The Great Saw Palace was powered by water. I don't know much more than this about it.

> Just one , and makes much more sense in the
> aggregate context of confirmed consistent Ancient
> Egyptian culture over millenia, than your pyscho
> babble fantasy.

Exactly. If you don't accept that these stinky footed bumpkins never changed then you have to admit you know nothing at all about them. Egyptologists invent a context that doesn't exist and leaves the word "ramp" unattested!

> If a new find was made today containing
> heiroglyphs seeming to be consistent with PT
> would you be able to read it and decipher it?

Yes, but remember I am neither fluent in ancient metaphysics nor ancient science. I'd have trouble even recognizing a chemistry text much less understanding it while more mundane writing should usually be fairly easy for me. I'd also do very poorly if much math were involved such as astronomy or their version of logic. My understanding is highly specialized but all of their writing wouldn't have been.

> Or would you have to wait for someone else to read
> and publish it so you could google it and put your
> spin on it?

I wouldn't bother to try to translate it if that's what you mean. I'd seek out a more stilted (literal) translation.

> It is like you hammering a nail into a house and
> then claiming you built it!

I used to tell the story that I built the John Hancock building in Chicago because I retrieved a rivet that fell off the elevator for a man.

No man is an island. I stole or borrowed most of what I know. I see little bits and pieces of many people I've known all through my theory including some of my best teachers.

I built nothing at all except a theory. I merely rediscovered ancient science and the means to build the pyramid.

> If you ever come up with a fact not clouded by
> your opinion then there will celebration on the
> interwebs from folks all over the world.

I am opinionated but hoped that didn't show in my posts... ...well... ...not all of my posts anyway.

There aren't so much any "opinions" in my theory but rather extrapolations though some of these are a stretch. I keep a few that are big stretches because in my opinion they are beautiful and elegant.




373 huh? I might.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02-Mar-17 01:32 by cladking.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3066 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 310 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 434 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 362 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 317 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 260 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 258 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 231 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 203 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 236 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 240 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 213 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 234 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 226 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 306 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 269 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 250 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 217 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 168 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 172 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 162 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 178 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 237 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 390 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 240 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 278 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 170 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 236 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 192 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 245 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 225 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 221 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 225 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 299 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 213 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 227 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 192 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 190 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 189 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 218 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 224 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 185 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 178 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 170 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 231 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 272 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 207 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 313 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 206 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 211 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 222 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 187 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 157 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 216 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 219 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 151 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 141 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 224 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 200 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 175 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 181 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 208 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 173 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 148 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 260 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 199 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 235 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 222 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 177 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 154 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 278 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 178 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 155 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 227 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 215 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 137 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 277 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 149 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 171 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 151 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 179 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 226 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 197 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 202 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 281 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 251 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 190 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 162 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 171 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 168 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 137 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 134 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 182 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 135 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 128 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 199 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 208 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 159 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 201 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 176 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 143 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 156 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 182 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 280 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 207 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 194 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 354 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 221 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 183 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 130 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 272 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 134 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 170 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 219 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 183 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 187 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 226 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 201 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 220 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 274 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 192 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 189 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 188 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 125 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 127 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 202 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 171 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 166 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 160 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 150 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 262 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 195 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 204 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 182 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 159 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 235 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 233 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 234 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 213 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 214 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 216 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 215 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 231 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 156 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 282 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 176 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 230 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 150 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 153 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 98 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 178 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 193 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 191 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 222 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 173 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 204 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 177 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 130 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 243 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 113 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 186 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 155 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 156 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 185 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 155 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 195 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 244 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 214 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 174 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 161 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 164 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 129 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 191 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 247 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 239 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 210 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 156 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 178 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 233 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 100 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 143 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 151 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 160 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 143 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 142 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 133 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 161 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 199 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 154 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 174 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 150 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 126 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 137 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 180 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 134 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 146 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 177 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 169 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 152 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 129 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 124 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 145 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 123 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 161 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 115 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 152 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 174 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 136 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 119 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 164 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 103 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 168 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 182 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 150 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 130 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 158 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 185 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 163 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 134 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 208 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 145 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 160 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 160 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 173 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 208 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 183 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 124 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 98 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 101 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 133 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 61 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 126 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 63 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 123 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 88 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 149 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 163 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 101 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 173 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 125 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 81 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 85 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 99 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 52 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 119 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 107 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 52 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 119 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 46 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 94 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 64 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 68 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 148 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 215 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 90 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 70 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 147 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 46 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 88 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 112 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 96 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 61 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 83 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 61 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 43 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 94 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 89 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 55 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 98 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 204 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 144 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 75 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 115 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 106 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 156 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 30 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 40 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 87 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 36 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 49 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 68 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 93 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 79 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 57 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 120 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 42 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 87 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 83 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 32 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 76 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 37 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 125 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 33 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 95 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 47 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 33 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 131 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 39 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 42 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 90 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 109 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 39 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 100 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 41 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 104 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 110 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 166 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 174 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 170 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 109 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 141 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 132 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 159 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 117 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 78 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 74 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 46 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 53 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 73 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 76 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 51 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 72 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 103 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 65 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 118 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 74 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 128 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 103 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 39 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 54 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 125 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 34 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 112 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33
I will give you one last chance 36 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:34
Re: I will give you one last chance 70 cladking 13-Mar-17 20:34