Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:

>
> They only appear to be on the surface because you
> don't understand their premises.

Nope they are completely whacked out
>
> Yes, I made that up out of logic and evidence and
> even predicted it in advance. Remember this is
> the chief reason I wanted them to do infrared
> scanning.

No you simply made it up because you want it to be true.
>

> > #1: Your first assumption that water was used
> to
> > lift stones - you have yet to provide evidence
> > that this occurred. Yet you continue to assume
> > they did despite a lack of said evidence.
>
> More accurately I assumed ballast was used as a
> counterweight and the sole easy ballast is water.

However there is no source of water at Giza to do this with - a devastating point - so you made up a geyser
>
>
> > #2: Your assumption that you have special
> powers
> > of insight and can determine what the PT
> actually
> > means - when you cannot read the underlying
> > language and lack basic knowledge about the
> > culture and religion (assumption #2a denial of
> the
> > ancient Egyptian religion)
>
> I don't think like you do.

Doesn't matter they still had a religion
>
> > #3: Your assumption that the PT is a
> construction
> > manual placed in Pharaoh Anas' tomb 150 years
> > after the pyramids were built.
>
> Nonsense. I assumed the PT was the blatherings of
> sun addled bumpkins until I began to understand
> it.

You don't understand it you just use an obsolete translation and move the meaning around until you like what it says - very insulting to those AE who wrote it. In other words you make stuff up
>
> > #4: Assumption that any mention in the PT about
> > water is somehow related to the geyser lifting
> > system you imagine but have no proof of.
>
> No, not an assumption.

COMPLETELY made up and one of your most foundational assumption
>
> Only about 90% of the mentions of water are about
> geysers but there are far more than you could
> imagine because the word "water" doesn't
> necessarily appear. For instance the word "set"
> or "seth" meant standing water or expelled water.

Actually no it doesn't you simply made that up
>
>
> > #5: Assumption that water was the key
> ingredient
> > to everything, not in irrigation but
> architecture.
> > You are unable to process the idea that there
> is
> > no sign of geysers at Giza.
>
> Water is key. Just as in the deserts of ancient
> Egypt where water was life it still is today,
> everywhere.
>
Nope no geyser to run your device. This is something you made up


> > #6: Assumption that the quarry dug partially
> > around Djoser's pyramid enclosure has something
> to
> > do with your water fantasy.
>
> This is a tentatice conclusion based on many
> observations, not an assumption.

No you took a look at the evidence then made up a completely unreasonable answer to support your existing bias

#7: Your greatest assumption is that you think no one is aware of your blatant displays of intellectual dishonesty and refuse to provide evidence in support of it. If you had evidence you would have provided it - but you don't which is a clear sign said evidence doesn't exist.

Yes this has probably caused the second highest reason for your rejection at many forums the first being your constant repeating of subject - hundreds of times


>
> > #8: Finally your assumption that you can
> translate
> > a language you cannot read is beyond ridiculous
> > that one items pretty much derails all your
> > pretense to being scientific.
>
> I can only translate a few words. The rest I
> discovered their meaning through context.

'Context' means changing the meaning so it supported what you made up....yeah we know

#9: Assumption is that if you just keep saying the same thing over and over again that somehow the lack of evidence will not be noticed and your ideas accepted.

You didn't comment on those so I presume you accept them as truth

#10: Most baffling of your assumptions is that you firmly believe your opinions are facts.

You didn't comment on those so I presume you accept them as truth
>
> > #11: A claim to have debunked ramps and yet you
> > never link to where you did this - on the
> > assumption if you keep ignoring the need to
> answer
> > it - it will go away
>
> I've linked this for you numerous times and you
> choose to ignore it.

A lie you have never posted any such thing. What you have done is link to a few postings on other forums where you made some personal comment against ramps - no evidence just your opinion - completely worthless
>
> I made no special assumptions whatsoever about the
> Egyptians or their work. All my "assumptions" are
> actually more observations from a lifetime of
> thinking about such things.

Yes then making up stuff to support your ideas

I never assumed
> things like they were changeless and superstitious
> and dragged tombs up ramps.

No one has that is again something you made up

This is Egyptology
> that has made such assumptions.

No YOU made that up



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23-Feb-17 23:00 by Hanslune.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Giza Water Canals? 1039 Steve Clayton 18-Feb-17 05:21
Re: Giza Water Canals? 286 Steve Clayton 18-Feb-17 17:46
Re: Giza Water Canals? 389 Dr. Troglodyte 21-Feb-17 20:55
Re: Giza Water Canals? 229 Warwick 21-Feb-17 21:08
Re: Giza Water Canals? 193 cladking 21-Feb-17 21:33
Re: Giza Water Canals? 299 Dr. Troglodyte 21-Feb-17 23:16
Re: Giza Water Canals? 398 cladking 22-Feb-17 04:20
Re: Giza Water Canals? 247 Steve Clayton 22-Feb-17 15:36
Re: Giza Water Canals? 229 cladking 22-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Giza Water Canals? 292 Hanslune 22-Feb-17 21:39
Re: Giza Water Canals? 277 cladking 23-Feb-17 01:22
Cladking makes up stuff - come see 328 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 01:30
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 278 cladking 23-Feb-17 01:45
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 271 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 19:01
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 357 eyeofhorus33 23-Feb-17 20:15
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 227 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 20:48
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 349 cladking 23-Feb-17 21:10
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 275 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 21:15
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 274 cladking 23-Feb-17 21:55
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 265 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 22:12
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 276 cladking 23-Feb-17 22:26
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 277 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 22:31
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 291 cladking 24-Feb-17 16:49
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 259 cladking 24-Feb-17 17:05
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 283 cladking 23-Feb-17 20:44
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 351 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 321 cladking 23-Feb-17 22:18
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 204 cladking 23-Feb-17 22:22
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 202 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 22:45
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 270 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 22:44
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 282 cladking 23-Feb-17 23:13
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 289 Steve Clayton 23-Feb-17 20:45
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 266 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 20:59
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 257 Steve Clayton 23-Feb-17 23:02
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 278 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 23:10
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 377 Steve Clayton 24-Feb-17 00:21
Re: Cladking makes up stuff - come see 310 cladking 23-Feb-17 21:21
abstract plus. 316 cladking 23-Feb-17 21:06
Re: abstract plus. 501 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 22:05
Re: abstract plus. 234 cladking 23-Feb-17 22:47
Re: abstract plus. 276 Hanslune 23-Feb-17 22:59
Re: abstract plus. 252 cladking 23-Feb-17 23:26
Re: abstract plus. 264 eyeofhorus33 24-Feb-17 19:19
Re: abstract plus. 307 cladking 24-Feb-17 21:52
One step at a time... 444 Steve Clayton 24-Feb-17 22:56
Re: One step at a time... 305 cladking 25-Feb-17 00:16
Re: One step at a time... 202 Steve Clayton 25-Feb-17 02:00
Re: Giza Water Canals? 268 Hanslune 22-Feb-17 04:27
Re: Giza Water Canals? 268 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Feb-17 15:27
Re: Giza Water Canals? 226 cladking 22-Feb-17 20:36
Re: Giza Water Canals? 243 Hanslune 22-Feb-17 21:28
Re: Giza Water Canals? 389 Steve Clayton 22-Feb-17 13:07
Re: Giza Water Canals? 510 Steve Clayton 22-Feb-17 14:11
Re: Giza Water Canals? 384 SandyJesse 26-Feb-17 00:07


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.