> He's proven wrong just as he is every single time
> he makes a direct statement.
Sorry Cladking I've demolished every single point you've ever had - which is why you constantly run from me
> I ignore him because he never responds on point.
Translation: He doesn't automatically agree with my twisted unscientific view and points out the flaws - I don't like that......
> The canal is still there as is its overseer
> whether anyone wants to play semantics or not.
Oh really - just as I predicted you didn't link to Petrie's information on that drainage ditch....now why is that? Edited to add that up thread you did provide links, however the links to the quote didn't work so I will add in the part you edited out above.
The part you so inexplicably left out
The N.N.E. trench was traced by excavations along the whole length of 2,840 inches, up to where it is covered by the enclosure wall of the kiosk. It is fairly straight, varying from the mean axis 2.1, on an average of five points fixed along it. The depth varies from 14 to 20 inches below the general surface. It is 38, 40, 39.2, and 36 in width, from the outer end up to a point 740 along it from the basalt pavement; here it contracts roughly and irregularly, and reaches a narrow part 18.2 wide at 644 from the pavement. The sides are built about here, and deeply covered with broken stones.
Remember Cladking your statements aren't facts they need evidence to support them - something after eleven years or abject failure you've never been able to understand.
> Reality doesn't give a hoot about the words we use
> to describe it.
Oh why don't you let other see what Petrie said and let them decide for themselves? What exactly are you afraid of? lol
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 22-Feb-17 21:41 by Hanslune.