Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > You might recall my perspective of
> > those RCD C14 studies: They describe very
> > problematic methodology and are replete with the
> > risk of sample contamination due to modern carbon,
> > apparently as a deliberate design component of the
> > methodology.
>
> I also recall my disagreement with this which you
> conceded namely that of the 700+ samples between
> not just two, but 3 studies, all fall within the
> greater Dynastic period.

Well, not exactly. The '95 study systematically showed more recent dating than the earlier study and the authors conspicuously avoided addressing that clear enigma in the dating. LIkewise, all three Gizamids were dated concurrently which is not at all in line with traditional thought, or even in the realm of logic.

By the way, what's the definition of "greater Dynastic period"?



> These studies comprise
> the largest statistical RCD data sample ever taken
> of the ancient world...

Practice makes permanent, it doesn't make perfect.



> ...so despite whatever
> misgiving you may have which quite frankly I do
> not see as objective, unless we are to conclude
> RCD itself is completely bogus (which I don't)...

That strikes me as a false equivalence. There are other possibilities than your simple "unless" clause allows. I've stated on the record that I have no problem with RCD science. It's the misuse of it that I object to.



> ... at large the majority of the samples cannot all be
> "wrong" and not a one pointed to any date outside
> the Naqada period...

Yes, isn't it interesting that a couple were dated millennia earlier. Why do you think that is? Could it be that we, in fact, do NOT know what the "majority of all the samples" showed since a huge fraction of them were not reported, they weren't included in the analysis, no criteria was offered for their omission, and no reason was given for them being put into a "reserve". We only know about the data they chose to report.



> ... Feel free to interpret this how
> you like but unless one rejects RCD as a whole the
> data speaks for itself and should be deemed as a
> credible guide regardless of how one wants to
> interpret its meaning.

That's a contradiction. The data does indeed speak for itself, and from my read, it loses a great deal of credibility because of the methodology chosen by the authors regarding the handling and analysis of that data.



> > I can't speak for anyone else, but what I "want"
> > is simply the truth and not a contrived narrative
> > based on what appears to be arbitrary correlation.
> > In absence of any certainty, at least something
> > that makes the most sense that fits the evidence
> > while avoiding logical contradictions. I don't see
> > star alignments as meeting that basic criteria.
>
>
> > The "effort" I put into this merely revealed to me
> > that Proctor was able to find one of billions of
> > stars that appears to briefly align with the DP's
> > angle at some point in its history that happens to
> > correspond to the results of a couple of very
> > problematic (in my opinion) RCD studies after
> > presuming many long-term mathematical
> > extrapolations about the Earth's tilt, climate,
> > and random celestial events over the past few
> > millennia. While this may be significant to you,
> > it proves nothing to me about any meaningful
> > connection between stars and the angles of various
> > axes measured in G1 that couldn't be drawn up by
> > any number of other star correlations among those
> > other billion of stars.
>
> I'm sure you understand the pole star is not just
> "one of billions" and is significant to any
> astronomical culture in which the celestial pole
> was paramount to AE religious beliefs.

And I'm sure you understand that if a monument at the 30N latitude was intended to point to the celestial north, the passage would be built at a 30 degree angle and not at 26.5 with the hopes of catching a brief glimpse of a nearby star during its off-axis excursion.



> Given the alignment of the great pyramids to the cardinal
> points and the fact the DP's of all them point in
> the same direction at nearly the same angle it is
> logical to conclude the DP's were made to point
> at something...

Well, that may be one logic, but then when you consider that many pyramid causeways are at the same 4.6 degree incline, what do you suppose is so "logical to conclude" about what they are pointing at?


> ...which given the angle points
> the passage sufficiently close enough to the
> celestial pole it gives credence to the idea this
> was in fact their intended target which is also
> exactly where the AE believed the kings soul was
> supposed to go.

I hear you, and I disagree with that notion. Why point at the closest star rather than the celestial pole itself?



> One could argue these beliefs were
> derived after the fact having nothing to do with
> whoever built them if they wished, but "whoever"
> did build them seemed intent on pointing these
> passages in this direction on purpose which is
> perfectly logical a particular star, the pole
> star, would have been used to make this alignment.

Again, many things are designed to tilt at a certain angle, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're all designed to "point at" something. Aside from all those causeways at 4.6 degrees, modern stairways often show a standard incline between 30 and 37 degrees, so what are they "pointing at"? A standard ramp for a wheelchair is about 5 degrees; what's it pointing at?

What's the GG/AP pointing at? What do the inclined gabled roof blocks point at? what do the walls of the pyramids point at?

Where do you draw the line at whether something is "pointing at" something vs. has an inherent function that simply requires that level of incline?



> > Thanks for thanking me for that effort.
>
> I will always give credit where credit is due and
> my thanks is sincere.

Likewise, please don't take offense at the above. I sincerely do not see the arguments of star alignment as being very compelling but, rather, seem more akin to pareidolia. But as I've said many time before, I'm certainly willing to stand corrected.

So, do you prefer Orion over Cygnus?

______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 23-Feb-17 21:37 by Origyptian.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 2720 Dr. Troglodyte 30-Jan-17 19:29
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 485 Graham Chase 30-Jan-17 21:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 541 Origyptian 30-Jan-17 23:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 421 Thanos5150 31-Jan-17 18:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 389 cladking 31-Jan-17 19:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 430 DUNE 31-Jan-17 19:59
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 492 Thanos5150 31-Jan-17 22:18
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 372 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 00:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 401 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 01:12
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 402 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 02:49
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 402 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 04:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 532 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 07:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 419 Thanos5150 04-Feb-17 18:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 360 Warwick 04-Feb-17 18:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 386 Thanos5150 06-Feb-17 23:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 421 Thanos5150 02-Feb-17 21:06
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 316 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:16
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 374 Thanos5150 03-Feb-17 00:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 411 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:10
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 472 Martin Stower 01-Feb-17 03:02
that's easy 455 Warwick 01-Feb-17 20:07
Re: that's easy 500 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 20:49
Re: that's easy 486 M. J. Thomas 01-Feb-17 22:09
Re: that's easy 393 Warwick 01-Feb-17 22:22
Re: that's easy 418 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:15
Re: that's easy 428 Warwick 01-Feb-17 23:19
Re: that's easy 406 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:33
Re: that's easy 332 Jon Ellison 01-Feb-17 23:50
Re: that's easy 375 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:39
Re: that's easy 386 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:47
Re: that's easy 408 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:16
Re: that's easy 371 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 20:38
Re: that's easy 409 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:23
Re: that's easy 358 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:21
Re: that's easy 333 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:34
Re: that's easy 410 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:40
Re: that's easy 323 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:23
Re: that's easy 387 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 21:11
Re: that's easy 327 Warwick 02-Feb-17 21:22
Re: that's easy 400 Martin Stower 02-Feb-17 22:36
Re: that's easy 392 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:59
Re: that's easy 430 Martin Stower 02-Feb-17 22:24
Re: that's easy 343 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:33
Re: that's easy 433 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 01:55
Re: that's easy 413 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 13:46
Re: that's easy 384 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:19
Re: that's easy 379 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 14:42
Re: that's easy 409 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 15:13
Re: that's easy 422 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 15:19
Re: that's easy 349 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:00
Re: that's easy 323 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 16:11
Re: that's easy 343 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:33
Re: that's easy 376 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 17:06
Re: that's easy 274 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 19:14
Re: that's easy 349 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 20:04
Re: that's easy 193 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 21:28
Re: that's easy 374 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 21:58
Re: that's easy 377 Warwick 03-Feb-17 22:05
Re: that's easy 441 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 22:20
Re: that's easy 332 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 22:30
Re: that's easy 404 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 23:54
Re: that's easy 325 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 00:38
Re: that's easy 386 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:58
Re: that's easy 366 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 01:16
Re: that's easy 472 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 02:10
Re: that's easy 420 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 19:47
Re: that's easy 438 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 20:48
Re: that's easy 382 Warwick 04-Feb-17 19:30
Re: that's easy 376 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 22:33
Re: that's easy 380 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 22:45
Re: that's easy 414 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:43
Re: that's easy 331 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:26
more importantly 331 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:20
Re: more importantly 379 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:09
Re: that's easy 428 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 15:49
the flaw is obvious 367 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:31
Re: that's easy 403 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 16:48
Re: that's easy 315 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:44
Re: that's easy 307 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:51
Re: that's easy 358 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:25
Re: that's easy 429 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:11
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 320 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 18:52
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 408 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:57
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 359 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 22:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 373 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 406 M. J. Thomas 03-Feb-17 00:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 432 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 00:25
Re: that's easy 551 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 09:54
Re: that's easy 314 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 14:10
Re: that's easy 390 cladking 02-Feb-17 14:46
Re: that's easy 322 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 14:58
Re: that's easy 363 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 15:38
Re: that's easy 325 cladking 02-Feb-17 15:53
Re: that's easy 330 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 16:07
Re: that's easy 431 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 16:40
Re: that's easy 340 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 16:57
Re: that's easy 374 cladking 02-Feb-17 17:21
Re: that's easy 377 DUNE 02-Feb-17 16:53
Re: that's easy 468 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 17:40
Re: that's easy 495 cladking 02-Feb-17 17:54
Re: that's easy 385 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 18:43
Re: that's easy 321 cladking 02-Feb-17 18:51
Re: that's easy 307 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:28
Re: that's easy 372 cladking 02-Feb-17 23:26
IOW's 357 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:55
Re: IOW's 299 cladking 03-Feb-17 23:16
Re: IOW's 473 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:24
Re: IOW's 323 cladking 05-Feb-17 00:53
Re: IOW's 365 Warwick 05-Feb-17 18:29
Re: that's easy 359 DUNE 02-Feb-17 15:05
Re: that's easy 402 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 16:48
Re: that's easy 271 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 17:01
Re: that's easy 386 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 17:51
Re: that's easy 346 cladking 02-Feb-17 18:09
Re: that's easy 345 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 18:48
Re: that's easy 416 cladking 02-Feb-17 19:01
Re: that's easy 374 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:56
Re: that's easy 303 cladking 02-Feb-17 23:29
Re: that's easy 251 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:01
Re: that's easy 331 cladking 03-Feb-17 23:24
Re: that's easy 314 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:22
Re: that's easy 417 cladking 05-Feb-17 00:56
Re: that's easy 327 Warwick 05-Feb-17 17:48
Re: that's easy 377 cladking 05-Feb-17 18:16
Re: that's easy 312 Warwick 05-Feb-17 18:27
Re: that's easy 341 cladking 06-Feb-17 01:28
Re: that's easy 324 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:00
Re: that's easy 364 cladking 06-Feb-17 18:30
Re: that's easy 299 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:45
Re: that's easy 371 cladking 06-Feb-17 19:10
Re: that's easy 376 Warwick 06-Feb-17 19:46
Re: that's easy 299 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 19:58
Re: that's easy 321 Warwick 06-Feb-17 20:17
Re: that's easy 343 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 21:50
Re: that's easy 317 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 01:10
Re: that's easy 435 Warwick 07-Feb-17 17:02
Re: that's easy 409 cladking 07-Feb-17 19:59
Re: that's easy 292 Martin Stower 08-Feb-17 15:40
Re: that's easy 338 Warwick 08-Feb-17 16:49
Re: that's easy 395 Origyptian 07-Feb-17 20:32
Re: that's easy 406 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 23:12
Re: that's easy 301 Origyptian 08-Feb-17 21:47
Re: that's easy 360 Martin Stower 09-Feb-17 00:05
Re: that's easy 345 Origyptian 09-Feb-17 05:52
Re: that's easy 390 Martin Stower 09-Feb-17 20:09
a Question.. 385 Warwick 10-Feb-17 18:52
Re: a Question.. 456 Audrey 11-Feb-17 01:01
Re: a Question.. 289 Warwick 11-Feb-17 06:13
Re: a Question.. 349 Origyptian 11-Feb-17 16:52
Re: a Question.. 316 Warwick 11-Feb-17 21:39
Re: a Question.. 379 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 22:10
Re: a Question.. 398 Warwick 11-Feb-17 22:48
Re: a Question.. 287 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 22:48
Re: a Question.. 302 Origyptian 12-Feb-17 18:29
Re: a Question.. 350 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 20:46
Re: a Question.. 316 Audrey 12-Feb-17 22:23
FYI 318 Warwick 13-Feb-17 16:59
Re: FYI 320 cladking 13-Feb-17 17:18
Re: a Question.. 374 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 21:09
Re: a Question.. 316 Audrey 12-Feb-17 22:32
Re: a Question.. 321 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 23:36
Re: a Question.. 354 Audrey 12-Feb-17 23:44
Re: a Question.. 359 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 00:11
Re: a Question.. 302 Audrey 13-Feb-17 00:46
Re: a Question.. 410 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 02:12
Re: a Question.. 391 Audrey 13-Feb-17 04:23
Shifting opinions 337 Merrell 13-Feb-17 09:55
Re: a Question.. 386 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 12:43
This is getting silly 397 Warwick 13-Feb-17 17:23
Re: This is getting silly 492 Martin Stower 14-Feb-17 00:39
Re: This is getting silly 271 Warwick 14-Feb-17 20:28
Re: This is getting silly 363 Origyptian 14-Feb-17 20:33
Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 340 cladking 14-Feb-17 21:35
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 341 Martin Stower 14-Feb-17 22:57
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 308 cladking 14-Feb-17 23:06
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 272 M. J. Thomas 14-Feb-17 23:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 336 Martin Stower 15-Feb-17 00:10
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 409 cladking 15-Feb-17 03:53
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 462 DUNE 15-Feb-17 12:22
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 298 cladking 15-Feb-17 14:41
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 290 Martin Stower 15-Feb-17 13:59
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 316 Warwick 15-Feb-17 16:44
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 306 cladking 15-Feb-17 18:26
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 413 Martin Stower 16-Feb-17 00:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 331 cladking 16-Feb-17 01:27
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 315 Martin Stower 16-Feb-17 03:20
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 406 cladking 16-Feb-17 04:29
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 357 Martin Stower 17-Feb-17 15:20
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 335 cladking 17-Feb-17 16:17
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 395 Martin Stower 21-Feb-17 23:56
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 281 cladking 22-Feb-17 03:24
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 343 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 14:31
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 301 cladking 22-Feb-17 14:56
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 322 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 15:39
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 383 cladking 22-Feb-17 19:30
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 405 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 21:40
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 416 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 311 Martin Stower 23-Feb-17 03:52
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 353 cladking 23-Feb-17 04:22
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 207 Martin Stower 23-Feb-17 22:19
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 333 Audrey 23-Feb-17 03:27
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 219 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:41
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 350 cladking 23-Feb-17 04:48
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 252 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 16:25
Let's all have a go 177 Warwick 22-Feb-17 17:50
Re: Let's all have a go 371 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 19:10
Re: Let's all have a go 285 cladking 22-Feb-17 20:22
Re: Let's all have a go 318 Corpuscles 22-Feb-17 22:29
Re: Let's all have a go 295 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:43
Re: Let's all have a go 240 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:59
Re: Let's all have a go 353 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 03:26
Re: Let's all have a go 290 Warwick 23-Feb-17 19:18
Re: Let's all have a go 290 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:45
Re: Let's all have a go 290 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:36
Re: Let's all have a go 238 Warwick 23-Feb-17 19:05
Re: Let's all have a go 227 Warwick 23-Feb-17 16:41
Re: Let's all have a go 184 Warwick 23-Feb-17 16:57
Re: Let's all have a go 353 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 17:03
Re: Let's all have a go 186 Warwick 23-Feb-17 17:11
Re: Let's all have a go 337 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:30
Re: Let's all have a go 266 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:57
Re: Let's all have a go 177 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:00
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 238 cladking 22-Feb-17 18:58
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 316 Warwick 16-Feb-17 20:31
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 355 cladking 16-Feb-17 21:15
Re: that's easy 377 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 00:49
Re: that's easy 348 cladking 06-Feb-17 21:34
Re: that's easy 313 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:33
Re: that's easy 381 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 19:03
Re: that's easy 347 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 20:00
Re: that's easy 326 Warwick 02-Feb-17 20:07
Re: that's easy 313 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:24
Re: that's easy 344 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:35
correction 218 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:46
Re: correction 412 Origyptian 04-Feb-17 03:46
Re: correction 346 cladking 04-Feb-17 16:01
Re: correction 312 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:40
Re: correction 311 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:37
Re: correction 350 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:14
Re: correction 432 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 23:08
Re: correction 339 Origyptian 12-Feb-17 18:42
Re: correction 294 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 20:42
Re: that's easy 396 Warwick 01-Feb-17 22:13
Re: that's easy 433 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 22:46
Re: that's easy 332 Martin Stower 01-Feb-17 22:38
Re: that's easy 402 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 00:38
Re: that's easy 385 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 01:02
Re: that's easy 446 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 02:29
Re: that's easy 328 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 15:25
Re: that's easy 359 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 19:35
Re: that's easy 325 DUNE 02-Feb-17 20:34
Re: that's easy 270 Warwick 02-Feb-17 20:41
Re: that's easy 325 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:41
Re: that's easy 321 DUNE 02-Feb-17 22:55
Re: that's easy 389 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:49
Re: that's easy 480 DUNE 03-Feb-17 08:36
Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 405 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 22:08
Re: Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 339 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:11
Re: Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 319 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 369 Spiros 01-Feb-17 00:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 366 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 01:23
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 325 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 02:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 392 DUNE 01-Feb-17 21:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 284 molder 02-Feb-17 12:14
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 334 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 14:29
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 360 eyeofhorus33 02-Feb-17 19:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 341 Steve Clayton 02-Feb-17 20:20
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 325 eyeofhorus33 02-Feb-17 21:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 266 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 323 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:07
twisting and turning 283 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:52
Re: twisting and turning 415 Origyptian 04-Feb-17 02:58
Re: twisting and turning 365 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:49
Re: twisting and turning 320 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:22
Re: twisting and turning 326 Martin Stower 06-Feb-17 01:54
Re: twisting and turning 337 Warwick 06-Feb-17 17:13
Re: twisting and turning 366 cladking 06-Feb-17 17:31
Re: twisting and turning 319 Warwick 06-Feb-17 17:54
From here it looks like the backstroke. 292 cladking 06-Feb-17 18:22
Re: From here it looks like the backstroke. 313 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:28
Re: twisting and turning 312 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 19:14
More twisting nd turning 331 Warwick 06-Feb-17 19:30
Re: twisting and turning 318 Thunderbird 06-Feb-17 19:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 298 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 341 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:36
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 322 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 21:48
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 310 Warwick 03-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 340 Steve Clayton 02-Feb-17 19:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 431 drew 07-Feb-17 00:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 426 Manu 17-Feb-17 18:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 273 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Feb-17 21:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 330 Manu 18-Feb-17 21:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 199 Origyptian 19-Feb-17 17:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 210 Manu 19-Feb-17 18:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 292 Origyptian 19-Feb-17 19:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 194 Manu 19-Feb-17 20:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 284 Thanos5150 19-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 247 Manu 19-Feb-17 22:10
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 280 Thanos5150 19-Feb-17 23:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 286 Manu 20-Feb-17 04:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 305 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 15:23
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 295 Manu 20-Feb-17 16:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 276 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 16:51
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 221 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 353 Origyptian 21-Feb-17 15:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 209 Manu 21-Feb-17 16:27
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 283 Origyptian 21-Feb-17 18:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 315 Audrey 22-Feb-17 01:16
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 281 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:51
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 335 SandyJesse 24-Feb-17 02:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 339 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 253 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 301 Warwick 20-Feb-17 22:11
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 196 cladking 20-Feb-17 22:43
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 195 Warwick 21-Feb-17 17:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 263 cladking 21-Feb-17 20:06
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 258 Warwick 21-Feb-17 20:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 274 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 177 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 200 Thanos5150 21-Feb-17 23:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 351 Audrey 20-Feb-17 20:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 226 Jon Ellison 20-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 189 Manu 21-Feb-17 14:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 288 Audrey 22-Feb-17 00:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 125 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 00:42
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 193 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 00:59
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 263 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 01:46
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 189 Audrey 22-Feb-17 03:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 263 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 282 Audrey 23-Feb-17 01:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 201 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 02:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 345 Audrey 23-Feb-17 04:11
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 257 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:28
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 234 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 360 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 198 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 282 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 18:42
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 234 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 09:18
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 304 Audrey 22-Feb-17 18:02
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 294 Audrey 22-Feb-17 02:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 261 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 15:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 292 Audrey 23-Feb-17 01:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 267 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 02:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 257 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 249 Audrey 23-Feb-17 04:17
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 345 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 300 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 11:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 311 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 14:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 296 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 16:48
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 213 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 16:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 182 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 17:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 249 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 17:13
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 244 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 18:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 292 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:34
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 263 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:43
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 311 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 19:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 280 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 20:14
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 287 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 20:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 250 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 21:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 191 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 21:56
a really awesome post 289 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 203 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 219 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 258 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 19:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 199 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 304 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 293 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 262 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 353 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 292 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 270 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 17:20
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 345 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 20:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 332 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 21:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 259 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 21:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 266 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 01:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 340 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 21:13
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 417 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 21:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 321 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 22:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 272 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 01:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 354 Audrey 25-Feb-17 19:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 477 Origyptian 25-Feb-17 21:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 445 Audrey 25-Feb-17 16:49
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 496 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 18:09
I see all the stars. ;) 248 cladking 25-Feb-17 18:17
quote of the month 336 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 290 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 03:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 214 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 04:26
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 322 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 05:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 308 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 14:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 283 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 22:28
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 233 Warwick 20-Feb-17 22:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 297 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 22:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 471 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 23:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 346 Warwick 21-Feb-17 18:47
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 330 cladking 21-Feb-17 19:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 302 Warwick 21-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 322 cladking 21-Feb-17 21:36
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 264 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 197 Warwick 22-Feb-17 17:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 254 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 18:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 257 Warwick 22-Feb-17 18:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 223 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 19:15
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 399 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 21:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 463 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 22:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 297 Warwick 24-Feb-17 18:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 285 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 19:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 184 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 20:28
Angle, Orientation, time of year 300 Warwick 20-Feb-17 18:37
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 290 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 23:14
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 194 Warwick 21-Feb-17 18:15
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 328 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:07
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 348 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 05:00
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 328 Spiros 25-Feb-17 01:17


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.