Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > You might recall my perspective of
> > those RCD C14 studies: They describe very
> > problematic methodology and are replete with the
> > risk of sample contamination due to modern carbon,
> > apparently as a deliberate design component of the
> > methodology.
>
> I also recall my disagreement with this which you
> conceded namely that of the 700+ samples between
> not just two, but 3 studies, all fall within the
> greater Dynastic period.

Well, not exactly. The '95 study systematically showed more recent dating than the earlier study and the authors conspicuously avoided addressing that clear enigma in the dating. LIkewise, all three Gizamids were dated concurrently which is not at all in line with traditional thought, or even in the realm of logic.

By the way, what's the definition of "greater Dynastic period"?



> These studies comprise
> the largest statistical RCD data sample ever taken
> of the ancient world...

Practice makes permanent, it doesn't make perfect.



> ...so despite whatever
> misgiving you may have which quite frankly I do
> not see as objective, unless we are to conclude
> RCD itself is completely bogus (which I don't)...

That strikes me as a false equivalence. There are other possibilities than your simple "unless" clause allows. I've stated on the record that I have no problem with RCD science. It's the misuse of it that I object to.



> ... at large the majority of the samples cannot all be
> "wrong" and not a one pointed to any date outside
> the Naqada period...

Yes, isn't it interesting that a couple were dated millennia earlier. Why do you think that is? Could it be that we, in fact, do NOT know what the "majority of all the samples" showed since a huge fraction of them were not reported, they weren't included in the analysis, no criteria was offered for their omission, and no reason was given for them being put into a "reserve". We only know about the data they chose to report.



> ... Feel free to interpret this how
> you like but unless one rejects RCD as a whole the
> data speaks for itself and should be deemed as a
> credible guide regardless of how one wants to
> interpret its meaning.

That's a contradiction. The data does indeed speak for itself, and from my read, it loses a great deal of credibility because of the methodology chosen by the authors regarding the handling and analysis of that data.



> > I can't speak for anyone else, but what I "want"
> > is simply the truth and not a contrived narrative
> > based on what appears to be arbitrary correlation.
> > In absence of any certainty, at least something
> > that makes the most sense that fits the evidence
> > while avoiding logical contradictions. I don't see
> > star alignments as meeting that basic criteria.
>
>
> > The "effort" I put into this merely revealed to me
> > that Proctor was able to find one of billions of
> > stars that appears to briefly align with the DP's
> > angle at some point in its history that happens to
> > correspond to the results of a couple of very
> > problematic (in my opinion) RCD studies after
> > presuming many long-term mathematical
> > extrapolations about the Earth's tilt, climate,
> > and random celestial events over the past few
> > millennia. While this may be significant to you,
> > it proves nothing to me about any meaningful
> > connection between stars and the angles of various
> > axes measured in G1 that couldn't be drawn up by
> > any number of other star correlations among those
> > other billion of stars.
>
> I'm sure you understand the pole star is not just
> "one of billions" and is significant to any
> astronomical culture in which the celestial pole
> was paramount to AE religious beliefs.

And I'm sure you understand that if a monument at the 30N latitude was intended to point to the celestial north, the passage would be built at a 30 degree angle and not at 26.5 with the hopes of catching a brief glimpse of a nearby star during its off-axis excursion.



> Given the alignment of the great pyramids to the cardinal
> points and the fact the DP's of all them point in
> the same direction at nearly the same angle it is
> logical to conclude the DP's were made to point
> at something...

Well, that may be one logic, but then when you consider that many pyramid causeways are at the same 4.6 degree incline, what do you suppose is so "logical to conclude" about what they are pointing at?


> ...which given the angle points
> the passage sufficiently close enough to the
> celestial pole it gives credence to the idea this
> was in fact their intended target which is also
> exactly where the AE believed the kings soul was
> supposed to go.

I hear you, and I disagree with that notion. Why point at the closest star rather than the celestial pole itself?



> One could argue these beliefs were
> derived after the fact having nothing to do with
> whoever built them if they wished, but "whoever"
> did build them seemed intent on pointing these
> passages in this direction on purpose which is
> perfectly logical a particular star, the pole
> star, would have been used to make this alignment.

Again, many things are designed to tilt at a certain angle, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're all designed to "point at" something. Aside from all those causeways at 4.6 degrees, modern stairways often show a standard incline between 30 and 37 degrees, so what are they "pointing at"? A standard ramp for a wheelchair is about 5 degrees; what's it pointing at?

What's the GG/AP pointing at? What do the inclined gabled roof blocks point at? what do the walls of the pyramids point at?

Where do you draw the line at whether something is "pointing at" something vs. has an inherent function that simply requires that level of incline?



> > Thanks for thanking me for that effort.
>
> I will always give credit where credit is due and
> my thanks is sincere.

Likewise, please don't take offense at the above. I sincerely do not see the arguments of star alignment as being very compelling but, rather, seem more akin to pareidolia. But as I've said many time before, I'm certainly willing to stand corrected.

So, do you prefer Orion over Cygnus?

______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 23-Feb-17 21:37 by Origyptian.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 2576 Dr. Troglodyte 30-Jan-17 19:29
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 436 Graham Chase 30-Jan-17 21:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 496 Origyptian 30-Jan-17 23:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 381 Thanos5150 31-Jan-17 18:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 362 cladking 31-Jan-17 19:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 373 DUNE 31-Jan-17 19:59
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 437 Thanos5150 31-Jan-17 22:18
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 332 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 00:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 379 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 01:12
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 358 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 02:49
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 363 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 04:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 474 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 07:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 387 Thanos5150 04-Feb-17 18:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 318 Warwick 04-Feb-17 18:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 340 Thanos5150 06-Feb-17 23:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 383 Thanos5150 02-Feb-17 21:06
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 294 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:16
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 345 Thanos5150 03-Feb-17 00:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 385 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:10
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 428 Martin Stower 01-Feb-17 03:02
that's easy 401 Warwick 01-Feb-17 20:07
Re: that's easy 452 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 20:49
Re: that's easy 447 M. J. Thomas 01-Feb-17 22:09
Re: that's easy 351 Warwick 01-Feb-17 22:22
Re: that's easy 382 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:15
Re: that's easy 386 Warwick 01-Feb-17 23:19
Re: that's easy 348 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:33
Re: that's easy 293 Jon Ellison 01-Feb-17 23:50
Re: that's easy 320 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:39
Re: that's easy 365 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:47
Re: that's easy 376 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:16
Re: that's easy 333 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 20:38
Re: that's easy 366 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:23
Re: that's easy 334 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:21
Re: that's easy 291 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:34
Re: that's easy 371 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:40
Re: that's easy 283 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:23
Re: that's easy 351 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 21:11
Re: that's easy 302 Warwick 02-Feb-17 21:22
Re: that's easy 366 Martin Stower 02-Feb-17 22:36
Re: that's easy 365 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:59
Re: that's easy 391 Martin Stower 02-Feb-17 22:24
Re: that's easy 310 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:33
Re: that's easy 384 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 01:55
Re: that's easy 370 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 13:46
Re: that's easy 342 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:19
Re: that's easy 358 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 14:42
Re: that's easy 384 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 15:13
Re: that's easy 389 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 15:19
Re: that's easy 306 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:00
Re: that's easy 300 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 16:11
Re: that's easy 323 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:33
Re: that's easy 346 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 17:06
Re: that's easy 242 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 19:14
Re: that's easy 310 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 20:04
Re: that's easy 171 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 21:28
Re: that's easy 345 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 21:58
Re: that's easy 321 Warwick 03-Feb-17 22:05
Re: that's easy 415 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 22:20
Re: that's easy 310 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 22:30
Re: that's easy 378 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 23:54
Re: that's easy 288 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 00:38
Re: that's easy 364 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:58
Re: that's easy 324 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 01:16
Re: that's easy 404 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 02:10
Re: that's easy 363 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 19:47
Re: that's easy 379 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 20:48
Re: that's easy 356 Warwick 04-Feb-17 19:30
Re: that's easy 321 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 22:33
Re: that's easy 355 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 22:45
Re: that's easy 369 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:43
Re: that's easy 306 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:26
more importantly 310 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:20
Re: more importantly 339 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:09
Re: that's easy 402 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 15:49
the flaw is obvious 326 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:31
Re: that's easy 349 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 16:48
Re: that's easy 288 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:44
Re: that's easy 275 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:51
Re: that's easy 321 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:25
Re: that's easy 402 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:11
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 298 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 18:52
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 383 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:57
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 335 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 22:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 336 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 363 M. J. Thomas 03-Feb-17 00:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 410 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 00:25
Re: that's easy 512 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 09:54
Re: that's easy 262 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 14:10
Re: that's easy 333 cladking 02-Feb-17 14:46
Re: that's easy 275 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 14:58
Re: that's easy 312 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 15:38
Re: that's easy 284 cladking 02-Feb-17 15:53
Re: that's easy 288 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 16:07
Re: that's easy 404 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 16:40
Re: that's easy 298 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 16:57
Re: that's easy 335 cladking 02-Feb-17 17:21
Re: that's easy 333 DUNE 02-Feb-17 16:53
Re: that's easy 407 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 17:40
Re: that's easy 432 cladking 02-Feb-17 17:54
Re: that's easy 321 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 18:43
Re: that's easy 296 cladking 02-Feb-17 18:51
Re: that's easy 285 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:28
Re: that's easy 341 cladking 02-Feb-17 23:26
IOW's 314 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:55
Re: IOW's 275 cladking 03-Feb-17 23:16
Re: IOW's 417 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:24
Re: IOW's 281 cladking 05-Feb-17 00:53
Re: IOW's 327 Warwick 05-Feb-17 18:29
Re: that's easy 334 DUNE 02-Feb-17 15:05
Re: that's easy 372 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 16:48
Re: that's easy 231 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 17:01
Re: that's easy 344 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 17:51
Re: that's easy 326 cladking 02-Feb-17 18:09
Re: that's easy 317 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 18:48
Re: that's easy 388 cladking 02-Feb-17 19:01
Re: that's easy 350 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:56
Re: that's easy 278 cladking 02-Feb-17 23:29
Re: that's easy 215 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:01
Re: that's easy 308 cladking 03-Feb-17 23:24
Re: that's easy 294 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:22
Re: that's easy 395 cladking 05-Feb-17 00:56
Re: that's easy 288 Warwick 05-Feb-17 17:48
Re: that's easy 342 cladking 05-Feb-17 18:16
Re: that's easy 277 Warwick 05-Feb-17 18:27
Re: that's easy 315 cladking 06-Feb-17 01:28
Re: that's easy 302 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:00
Re: that's easy 309 cladking 06-Feb-17 18:30
Re: that's easy 273 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:45
Re: that's easy 340 cladking 06-Feb-17 19:10
Re: that's easy 336 Warwick 06-Feb-17 19:46
Re: that's easy 266 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 19:58
Re: that's easy 301 Warwick 06-Feb-17 20:17
Re: that's easy 304 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 21:50
Re: that's easy 294 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 01:10
Re: that's easy 394 Warwick 07-Feb-17 17:02
Re: that's easy 386 cladking 07-Feb-17 19:59
Re: that's easy 253 Martin Stower 08-Feb-17 15:40
Re: that's easy 313 Warwick 08-Feb-17 16:49
Re: that's easy 371 Origyptian 07-Feb-17 20:32
Re: that's easy 376 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 23:12
Re: that's easy 278 Origyptian 08-Feb-17 21:47
Re: that's easy 338 Martin Stower 09-Feb-17 00:05
Re: that's easy 321 Origyptian 09-Feb-17 05:52
Re: that's easy 351 Martin Stower 09-Feb-17 20:09
a Question.. 356 Warwick 10-Feb-17 18:52
Re: a Question.. 412 Audrey 11-Feb-17 01:01
Re: a Question.. 268 Warwick 11-Feb-17 06:13
Re: a Question.. 324 Origyptian 11-Feb-17 16:52
Re: a Question.. 292 Warwick 11-Feb-17 21:39
Re: a Question.. 338 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 22:10
Re: a Question.. 369 Warwick 11-Feb-17 22:48
Re: a Question.. 261 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 22:48
Re: a Question.. 278 Origyptian 12-Feb-17 18:29
Re: a Question.. 305 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 20:46
Re: a Question.. 295 Audrey 12-Feb-17 22:23
FYI 280 Warwick 13-Feb-17 16:59
Re: FYI 281 cladking 13-Feb-17 17:18
Re: a Question.. 352 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 21:09
Re: a Question.. 293 Audrey 12-Feb-17 22:32
Re: a Question.. 296 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 23:36
Re: a Question.. 321 Audrey 12-Feb-17 23:44
Re: a Question.. 333 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 00:11
Re: a Question.. 266 Audrey 13-Feb-17 00:46
Re: a Question.. 369 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 02:12
Re: a Question.. 369 Audrey 13-Feb-17 04:23
Shifting opinions 313 Merrell 13-Feb-17 09:55
Re: a Question.. 359 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 12:43
This is getting silly 360 Warwick 13-Feb-17 17:23
Re: This is getting silly 452 Martin Stower 14-Feb-17 00:39
Re: This is getting silly 243 Warwick 14-Feb-17 20:28
Re: This is getting silly 325 Origyptian 14-Feb-17 20:33
Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 317 cladking 14-Feb-17 21:35
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 316 Martin Stower 14-Feb-17 22:57
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 287 cladking 14-Feb-17 23:06
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 246 M. J. Thomas 14-Feb-17 23:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 311 Martin Stower 15-Feb-17 00:10
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 371 cladking 15-Feb-17 03:53
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 412 DUNE 15-Feb-17 12:22
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 271 cladking 15-Feb-17 14:41
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 248 Martin Stower 15-Feb-17 13:59
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 277 Warwick 15-Feb-17 16:44
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 279 cladking 15-Feb-17 18:26
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 385 Martin Stower 16-Feb-17 00:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 304 cladking 16-Feb-17 01:27
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 281 Martin Stower 16-Feb-17 03:20
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 372 cladking 16-Feb-17 04:29
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 326 Martin Stower 17-Feb-17 15:20
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 304 cladking 17-Feb-17 16:17
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 305 Martin Stower 21-Feb-17 23:56
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 260 cladking 22-Feb-17 03:24
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 306 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 14:31
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 277 cladking 22-Feb-17 14:56
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 290 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 15:39
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 346 cladking 22-Feb-17 19:30
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 369 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 21:40
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 388 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 263 Martin Stower 23-Feb-17 03:52
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 326 cladking 23-Feb-17 04:22
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 174 Martin Stower 23-Feb-17 22:19
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 305 Audrey 23-Feb-17 03:27
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 184 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:41
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 311 cladking 23-Feb-17 04:48
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 230 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 16:25
Let's all have a go 153 Warwick 22-Feb-17 17:50
Re: Let's all have a go 330 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 19:10
Re: Let's all have a go 262 cladking 22-Feb-17 20:22
Re: Let's all have a go 297 Corpuscles 22-Feb-17 22:29
Re: Let's all have a go 268 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:43
Re: Let's all have a go 197 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:59
Re: Let's all have a go 313 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 03:26
Re: Let's all have a go 261 Warwick 23-Feb-17 19:18
Re: Let's all have a go 261 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:45
Re: Let's all have a go 256 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:36
Re: Let's all have a go 212 Warwick 23-Feb-17 19:05
Re: Let's all have a go 205 Warwick 23-Feb-17 16:41
Re: Let's all have a go 161 Warwick 23-Feb-17 16:57
Re: Let's all have a go 323 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 17:03
Re: Let's all have a go 147 Warwick 23-Feb-17 17:11
Re: Let's all have a go 288 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:30
Re: Let's all have a go 236 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:57
Re: Let's all have a go 148 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:00
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 198 cladking 22-Feb-17 18:58
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 270 Warwick 16-Feb-17 20:31
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 295 cladking 16-Feb-17 21:15
Re: that's easy 333 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 00:49
Re: that's easy 309 cladking 06-Feb-17 21:34
Re: that's easy 292 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:33
Re: that's easy 331 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 19:03
Re: that's easy 311 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 20:00
Re: that's easy 303 Warwick 02-Feb-17 20:07
Re: that's easy 289 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:24
Re: that's easy 323 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:35
correction 193 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:46
Re: correction 377 Origyptian 04-Feb-17 03:46
Re: correction 320 cladking 04-Feb-17 16:01
Re: correction 289 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:40
Re: correction 291 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:37
Re: correction 313 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:14
Re: correction 381 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 23:08
Re: correction 301 Origyptian 12-Feb-17 18:42
Re: correction 254 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 20:42
Re: that's easy 372 Warwick 01-Feb-17 22:13
Re: that's easy 397 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 22:46
Re: that's easy 290 Martin Stower 01-Feb-17 22:38
Re: that's easy 363 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 00:38
Re: that's easy 345 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 01:02
Re: that's easy 415 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 02:29
Re: that's easy 308 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 15:25
Re: that's easy 316 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 19:35
Re: that's easy 304 DUNE 02-Feb-17 20:34
Re: that's easy 242 Warwick 02-Feb-17 20:41
Re: that's easy 283 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:41
Re: that's easy 299 DUNE 02-Feb-17 22:55
Re: that's easy 331 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:49
Re: that's easy 393 DUNE 03-Feb-17 08:36
Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 345 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 22:08
Re: Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 310 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:11
Re: Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 296 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 345 Spiros 01-Feb-17 00:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 334 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 01:23
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 288 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 02:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 343 DUNE 01-Feb-17 21:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 259 molder 02-Feb-17 12:14
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 294 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 14:29
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 320 eyeofhorus33 02-Feb-17 19:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 302 Steve Clayton 02-Feb-17 20:20
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 302 eyeofhorus33 02-Feb-17 21:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 227 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 286 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:07
twisting and turning 253 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:52
Re: twisting and turning 384 Origyptian 04-Feb-17 02:58
Re: twisting and turning 340 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:49
Re: twisting and turning 287 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:22
Re: twisting and turning 292 Martin Stower 06-Feb-17 01:54
Re: twisting and turning 314 Warwick 06-Feb-17 17:13
Re: twisting and turning 318 cladking 06-Feb-17 17:31
Re: twisting and turning 279 Warwick 06-Feb-17 17:54
From here it looks like the backstroke. 269 cladking 06-Feb-17 18:22
Re: From here it looks like the backstroke. 288 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:28
Re: twisting and turning 288 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 19:14
More twisting nd turning 286 Warwick 06-Feb-17 19:30
Re: twisting and turning 295 Thunderbird 06-Feb-17 19:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 276 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 304 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:36
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 299 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 21:48
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 287 Warwick 03-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 307 Steve Clayton 02-Feb-17 19:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 366 drew 07-Feb-17 00:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 355 Manu 17-Feb-17 18:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 236 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Feb-17 21:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 285 Manu 18-Feb-17 21:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 161 Origyptian 19-Feb-17 17:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 183 Manu 19-Feb-17 18:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 268 Origyptian 19-Feb-17 19:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 166 Manu 19-Feb-17 20:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 256 Thanos5150 19-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 207 Manu 19-Feb-17 22:10
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 256 Thanos5150 19-Feb-17 23:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 249 Manu 20-Feb-17 04:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 282 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 15:23
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 257 Manu 20-Feb-17 16:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 250 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 16:51
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 184 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 329 Origyptian 21-Feb-17 15:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 186 Manu 21-Feb-17 16:27
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 250 Origyptian 21-Feb-17 18:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 293 Audrey 22-Feb-17 01:16
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 245 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:51
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 293 SandyJesse 24-Feb-17 02:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 303 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 229 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 267 Warwick 20-Feb-17 22:11
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 159 cladking 20-Feb-17 22:43
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 166 Warwick 21-Feb-17 17:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 222 cladking 21-Feb-17 20:06
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 221 Warwick 21-Feb-17 20:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 231 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 156 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 176 Thanos5150 21-Feb-17 23:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 322 Audrey 20-Feb-17 20:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 201 Jon Ellison 20-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 164 Manu 21-Feb-17 14:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 249 Audrey 22-Feb-17 00:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 101 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 00:42
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 171 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 00:59
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 228 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 01:46
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 169 Audrey 22-Feb-17 03:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 226 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 252 Audrey 23-Feb-17 01:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 163 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 02:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 299 Audrey 23-Feb-17 04:11
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 220 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:28
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 213 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 308 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 161 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 244 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 18:42
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 183 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 09:18
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 273 Audrey 22-Feb-17 18:02
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 271 Audrey 22-Feb-17 02:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 227 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 15:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 261 Audrey 23-Feb-17 01:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 229 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 02:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 223 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 227 Audrey 23-Feb-17 04:17
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 301 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 269 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 11:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 274 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 14:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 256 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 16:48
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 187 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 16:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 146 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 17:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 229 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 17:13
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 213 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 18:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 241 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:34
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 228 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:43
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 280 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 19:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 250 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 20:14
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 260 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 20:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 217 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 21:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 151 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 21:56
a really awesome post 246 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 176 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 197 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 234 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 19:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 177 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 258 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 241 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 237 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 309 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 257 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 246 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 17:20
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 310 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 20:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 298 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 21:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 236 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 21:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 242 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 01:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 297 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 21:13
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 366 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 21:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 257 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 22:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 236 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 01:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 295 Audrey 25-Feb-17 19:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 430 Origyptian 25-Feb-17 21:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 399 Audrey 25-Feb-17 16:49
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 438 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 18:09
I see all the stars. ;) 212 cladking 25-Feb-17 18:17
quote of the month 308 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 255 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 03:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 190 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 04:26
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 298 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 05:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 286 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 14:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 262 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 22:28
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 209 Warwick 20-Feb-17 22:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 261 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 22:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 423 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 23:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 309 Warwick 21-Feb-17 18:47
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 305 cladking 21-Feb-17 19:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 269 Warwick 21-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 285 cladking 21-Feb-17 21:36
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 243 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 175 Warwick 22-Feb-17 17:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 230 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 18:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 234 Warwick 22-Feb-17 18:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 199 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 19:15
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 363 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 21:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 424 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 22:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 257 Warwick 24-Feb-17 18:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 263 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 19:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 162 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 20:28
Angle, Orientation, time of year 261 Warwick 20-Feb-17 18:37
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 244 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 23:14
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 167 Warwick 21-Feb-17 18:15
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 282 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:07
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 311 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 05:00
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 304 Spiros 25-Feb-17 01:17


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.