Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums

For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).

Origyptian Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No.

>

> 26.34.23 is the coordinate equivalent using

> degrees.minutes.seconds. 30 minutes = 0.5 degrees,

> therefore, 26.34.23 is approximately 26.5 degrees.

> It's actually closer to 26.57 degrees, thereby

> adding a total of another 0.07 degrees, or 0.035

> degrees to the upper and lower range of the DP

> FOV. This increases the upper FOV to 26.87 degrees

> (vs. my rough estimate of 26.835 degrees) which is

> still significantly lower than Thuban's minimum

> which would still be greater than 28 degrees. As I

> said, it was a rough estimate, but even when

> reconciling the small estimation error in

> precision, the calculation still arrives at the

> same result: Thuban would not be visible from the

> bottom of the DP in 2550BC. Considering that

> 28-26.87 = 1.13 degrees, G1 construction would

> need to have been about 300 years earlier, and

> that's just for Thuban to barely be seen at the

> upper edge of DP. For it to be in the middle of

> the DP, add another 160 years for a total of 460

> years earlier than 2550BC.

Which is the whole point of the thread:Thuban and the Descending Passages-The Key to Dating the Pyramids?. Using Proctor's calculations Thuban would have been visible in the DP c. 3,350BC with a range of a few hundred years either which way. Your calculations say it would have been in the middle of the DP c. 3010BC. Audrey says Starry Night says Proctor is correct. The thread further goes on to show how the RCD studies are much more in line with this date on average than they are the traditional 2550BC. I know this is not what some of you want to hear, but all told I find this very interesting. Thank you for your effort on this.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23-Feb-17 17:10 by Thanos5150.

-------------------------------------------------------

> No.

>

> 26.34.23 is the coordinate equivalent using

> degrees.minutes.seconds. 30 minutes = 0.5 degrees,

> therefore, 26.34.23 is approximately 26.5 degrees.

> It's actually closer to 26.57 degrees, thereby

> adding a total of another 0.07 degrees, or 0.035

> degrees to the upper and lower range of the DP

> FOV. This increases the upper FOV to 26.87 degrees

> (vs. my rough estimate of 26.835 degrees) which is

> still significantly lower than Thuban's minimum

> which would still be greater than 28 degrees. As I

> said, it was a rough estimate, but even when

> reconciling the small estimation error in

> precision, the calculation still arrives at the

> same result: Thuban would not be visible from the

> bottom of the DP in 2550BC. Considering that

> 28-26.87 = 1.13 degrees, G1 construction would

> need to have been about 300 years earlier, and

> that's just for Thuban to barely be seen at the

> upper edge of DP. For it to be in the middle of

> the DP, add another 160 years for a total of 460

> years earlier than 2550BC.

Which is the whole point of the thread:Thuban and the Descending Passages-The Key to Dating the Pyramids?. Using Proctor's calculations Thuban would have been visible in the DP c. 3,350BC with a range of a few hundred years either which way. Your calculations say it would have been in the middle of the DP c. 3010BC. Audrey says Starry Night says Proctor is correct. The thread further goes on to show how the RCD studies are much more in line with this date on average than they are the traditional 2550BC. I know this is not what some of you want to hear, but all told I find this very interesting. Thank you for your effort on this.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 23-Feb-17 17:10 by Thanos5150.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.