> In conclusion, some of you will read this and
> ignore what is said and only focus on the minutia
Many find that paying attention to detail is often beneficial in any research program.
> that does not conform to you pet theories and
> pedantically argue accordingly.
As far as I am aware all hypothesis have not yet been proven. Pet or otherwise.
Do yourself and
> the rest of us a favor and save it.
This is tha GHMB "Mysteries Board" a place in which ideas are exchanged and discussed.
Any attempt at censorship would stifle open discussion.
Have you considered a blog site or Youtube channel wherein you and you alone are in total control of the content?
The point is
> that when thinking of theories of how G1 was
> constructed, how all of the pyramids were
> built must be considered, not only as it applies
> to them all, meaning whatever system is used must
> also apply to the rest, but also how what we see
> in these other pyramids applies to G1.
You are assuming that all pyramids were constructed using identical technology and technique.
> of how amazing G1 is, it did not fall out of the
> sky and belongs to a greater whole that must
> equally be accounted for.
You are assuming that "the greater whole", as you put it are all the product of the same technological culture.
Here's an example of another "greater whole".
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 11-Dec-16 13:08 by Jon Ellison.