Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Jon Ellison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Exactly. Only a small proportion is in hard stone,
> there's no doubt that the AE could carve soft
> stone with their copper chisels and wooden
> mallets.. No one's disputing that.

It seems that some people here are disputing that. There are chisel and adzes marks found all over the pyramids and not just the core blocks but the interior:


I am not denying the granite/igneous stone work is a mystery as just like chisel marks the evidence speaks for itself:

Abu Roash, OK:


This is obviously not the work of copper hand saws.

> The hard, rare stone artefacts being reserved for
> royal state collections and providing inspiration
> for lesser more numerous work in soft stone.

They are often inseparable because of the congruity of culture, which is the problem particularly when we get past the OK. It becomes undeniable. One was not the "inspiration" of the other-they existed contemporaneously. There are only so many pictures, sources, and logic one can post to get this point across which to me presents a mystery unto itself as the the NK in particular represents a "renaissance" of sorts of this technology which in many ways their accomplishments were even greater than the pyramids themselves.

> Question is, how did they find their way into
> those special reserve collections?

The question to me is how did they exist side by side.

> The materials and tools
> > used in question would have been very expensive
> > and rare, regardless of where they came from,
> and
> > would at large have been property of the state.
> It
> > also stands to reason these larger tools would
> > have been centrally located were the rock was
> > quarried which would have been largely Aswan.
> We
> > can only guess what has been lost never to be
> > recovered from the building of the Aswan dam or
> > what easy pickings later cultures would have
> had
> > recycling this material from centrally stored
> > locations.

> In that case we'd need to find evidence of hard
> stone working tools, Tempered Steel, dating to
> 2500BC.

We have to keep in mind that granite portcullis doors weighing upwards of 15 tons are found in 1st Dynasty tombs, custom made to fit, which I doubt they used tempered steel. Granite is not adamantium. Regardless, they must have had at least bronze as the Mesopotamian had been using it for 1,000yrs before and iron is found in Egypt earlier than the iron age and is even mentioned in a 6th Dynasty text: "The doors of Pekh-ka which are in the abyss open themselves to Pepi, the doors of the iron which is the ceiling of the sky open themselves to Pepi, and he passeth through them;". A smelted iron dagger was found in an Anatolian (Hattic) tomb dated to 2500BC and evidence of iron use dates further in Mesopotamia to at least 3000BC.

Maybe the key to the AE stone working was the discovery of relatively small caches of iron, even meteoric, which they made into "sacred tools" to build the monuments of the gods. Like I said, these tools must have been rare meaning they may have only made a handful of them given the limited amount of material they had. If you take all the granite work at Giza, for example, particularly given the fact they had ample time to fabricate the blocks, in reality it could all be done with just a few saws, lathes, ect.

If they had only one saw that could only cut one block a week this means all of the granite in G1 could have been easily cut in well less than 2yrs. No granite in G1 or G2. The rest of the fine cut granite at Giza is found facing the Valley Temple-another 2-3yrs? If you took all the cut and dressed granite blocks attributed to the 4th Dynasty at Giza and Abu Roash, cutting just one block a week with one saw, I bet you could easily cut all of it in 5yrs or less. 260 blocks. I don't know how many blocks of course but for sake of argument say it took 10yrs instead. Now imagine what you could do with two saws running that each could cut two blocks a week. All of the granite needed could be cut in a few years which of course in reality would only be a few months for each structure.

So you've got thousands of poor bastards using the basic tools we know they used to cut the core blocks with 2 saws at the "saw palace" at the quarry cutting granite as needed to spec. By the time they get to the point they would install the granite it would have already been cut and waiting for transport which would have obviously been planned for as that would have taken time as well.

At the beginning of the 5th Dynasty we all of sudden see round columns-the invention of the lathe perhaps?

I would also bring up again the "renaissance" of the NK which we see an explosion of the use of granite which just so happens to coincide with the increased use of iron in Anaotlia (and elsewhere) and the arrival of the Hyksos, likely Hurrians from Anatolia, and a few centuries later the Hittites of Anatolia of who the AE had extensive contact with the NK none greater than the time of Ramses II, the greatest builder of them all. I don't think this is a coincidence.

> Which of course would be a lost technology.
> We have interestingly and conversely plenty of
> evidence of soft stone working tool technology,
> copper, from that period and before.
>
> Correct. We can only guess at what has been lost
> forever, even a whole lost technological culture
> given enough time.
> However we do have the hard stone precision
> artefacts produced by that lost tooling
> technology. Often with inexplicable tooling marks
> and inexplicable precision dimensions.
> Inexplicable tooling marks and precision
> dimensions always in hard stone, never in soft
> stone.
>
> A lost technology. Without doubt.

I agree. I always have if anyone ever actually read what I say. The only difference is I believe that most of what I see resides within the historical period in which the AE were the labor.



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 04-Dec-16 05:48 by Thanos5150.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Question On The Fossil Record 2398 rob24550 19-Nov-16 22:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 535 gulsbo 19-Nov-16 22:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 384 @tlantis 29-Nov-16 07:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 489 Manu 19-Nov-16 23:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 428 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 11:20
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 466 Warwick 20-Nov-16 19:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 442 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 21:29
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 446 Warwick 21-Nov-16 17:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 353 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 12:05
The Paradigm is Naked. 393 cladking 22-Nov-16 15:54
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 362 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:14
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 335 cladking 22-Nov-16 19:05
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 362 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:12
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 366 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:08
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 324 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 16:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 374 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 303 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 340 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 328 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:36
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 269 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 361 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:58
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 348 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 19:11
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 357 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:13
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 399 cladking 22-Nov-16 18:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 378 Warwick 23-Nov-16 17:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 354 Hanslune 24-Nov-16 06:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 352 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 348 Hanslune 25-Nov-16 07:22
2 questions 352 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:02
Re: 2 questions 379 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:17
Re: 2 questions 307 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:29
Re: 2 questions 315 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:34
Re: 2 questions 253 Warwick 23-Nov-16 18:07
Re: 2 questions 355 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 20:57
Re: 2 questions 324 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 21:08
Re: 2 questions 324 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:20
Re: 2 questions 321 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:17
Re: 2 questions 338 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 21:56
Re: 2 questions 270 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:27
Re: 2 questions 342 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 23:08
Re: 2 questions 282 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 421 Notinham 20-Nov-16 21:16
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 381 Thunderbird 21-Nov-16 17:14
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 352 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 14:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 349 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 15:26
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 320 cladking 23-Nov-16 15:39
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 338 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 16:03
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 302 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 366 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 19:52
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 356 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 10:32
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 339 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:41
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 336 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 18:54
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 236 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:38
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 286 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 351 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 324 cladking 23-Nov-16 22:31
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 356 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:50
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 357 cladking 23-Nov-16 23:18
Doh!! 342 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:22
Re: Doh!! 374 cladking 24-Nov-16 01:02
there you have it 347 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 346 cladking 24-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 354 Warwick 24-Nov-16 19:25
Re: there you have it 331 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:39
Re: there you have it 314 Origyptian 24-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 324 Warwick 25-Nov-16 06:13
Re: there you have it 284 cladking 25-Nov-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 313 Jon Ellison 25-Nov-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 374 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 17:53
Re: there you have it 374 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 18:54
Re: there you have it 362 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 19:55
Re: there you have it 328 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 23:09
Re: there you have it 316 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:36
Re: there you have it 369 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 400 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 01:27
Re: there you have it 265 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 15:12
Re: there you have it 445 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 278 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:11
Re: there you have it 283 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 236 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:05
Re: there you have it 240 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 18:32
Re: there you have it 311 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 342 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 13:37
Re: there you have it 363 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 324 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 16:47
Re: there you have it 342 cladking 01-Dec-16 17:40
Re: there you have it 316 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:43
Re: there you have it 298 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:54
Re: there you have it 338 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 16:13
Re: there you have it 263 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 17:03
Re: there you have it 288 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:00
Re: there you have it 272 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:17
Re: there you have it 256 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:14
Re: there you have it 350 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 19:19
Re: there you have it 314 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 23:31
Re: there you have it 326 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:31
Re: there you have it 257 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:44
Re: there you have it 253 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 22:58
Re: there you have it 354 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 370 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 15:08
Re: there you have it 320 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 18:19
Re: there you have it 312 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 407 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 13:57
Re: there you have it 239 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 372 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 16:50
Re: there you have it 292 Warwick 05-Dec-16 17:18
Re: there you have it 162 cladking 05-Dec-16 17:59
put up or shut up 302 Warwick 05-Dec-16 18:35
Re: put up or shut up 273 cladking 05-Dec-16 19:07
Re: put up or shut up 297 Warwick 05-Dec-16 19:20
Re: there you have it 352 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 20:19
Re: there you have it 304 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:28
Re: there you have it 253 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:37
Re: there you have it 303 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:53
Re: there you have it 262 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 300 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:02
Re: there you have it 232 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:17
Re: there you have it 313 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:29
Re: there you have it 322 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:50
Re: there you have it 316 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 334 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:01
Re: there you have it 404 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:26
Re: there you have it 307 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 334 Origyptian 06-Dec-16 02:42
Re: there you have it 350 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 22:19
Re: there you have it 309 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 305 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 00:16
Re: there you have it 282 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:18
Re: there you have it 338 Audrey 07-Dec-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 170 Warwick 07-Dec-16 19:31
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 327 cladking 07-Dec-16 19:55
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 275 Warwick 07-Dec-16 20:02
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 246 cladking 07-Dec-16 20:46
Re: there you have it 230 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 261 Warwick 07-Dec-16 21:44
Re: there you have it 304 Audrey 07-Dec-16 22:44
Re: there you have it 312 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 22:52
Re: there you have it 286 Audrey 07-Dec-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 322 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 00:37
Re: there you have it 357 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 354 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 01:10
Re: there you have it 334 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 02:48
Re: there you have it 358 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 12:08
Re: there you have it 320 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:01
Re: there you have it 299 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 277 Origyptian 08-Dec-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 255 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:33
Re: there you have it 312 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 322 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:37
Re: there you have it 323 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:54
Re: there you have it 313 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 21:01
Re: there you have it 406 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 01:02
Re: there you have it 226 Martin Stower 09-Dec-16 02:57
Re: there you have it 359 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 11:16
Re: there you have it 266 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:21
Re: there you have it 262 Origyptian 07-Dec-16 22:59
Audrey & The Peanut Gallery 393 Warwick 11-Dec-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 286 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:01
Re: there you have it 353 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:07
Re: there you have it 344 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 340 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 01:59
Re: there you have it 320 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 321 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:08
Re: there you have it 329 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 319 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:46
Re: there you have it 338 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:52
Re: there you have it 320 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:19
Re: there you have it 244 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 17:59
Re: there you have it 261 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:03
Re: there you have it 313 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 07:37
Re: there you have it 333 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 17:05
Re: there you have it 310 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 290 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 22:08
Re: there you have it 278 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 06:59
Clarification 256 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 20:53
Re: Clarification 308 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:10
Re: Clarification 464 Merrell 04-Jan-17 14:21
Re: there you have it 363 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 22:28
Re: there you have it 230 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:45
Re: there you have it 325 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:09
Re: there you have it 336 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 23:52
Re: there you have it 272 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 15:07
Re: there you have it 351 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 01:03
Re: there you have it 375 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:38
Re: there you have it 347 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 07:08
Re: there you have it 394 Martin Stower 30-Nov-16 03:00
The solution 268 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:26
Re: The solution 271 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:40
Re: The solution 247 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 03:15
Re: The solution 258 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 06:13
Re: The solution 321 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 10:08
Re: The solution 290 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 15:55
Re: there you have it 270 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 22:16
Re: there you have it 296 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 23:13
Re: there you have it 279 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:43
Re: there you have it 319 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:50
Re: there you have it 397 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 291 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:49
Re: there you have it 397 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 05:51
Re: there you have it 344 cladking 27-Nov-16 14:49
Re: there you have it 345 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 18:02
Re: there you have it 301 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 18:33
Re: there you have it 319 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 362 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 22:34
Re: there you have it 349 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:08
Re: there you have it 372 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:04
A really really good question 243 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:55
Re: A really really good question 243 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:31
Re: A really really good question 278 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:58
Re: A really really good question 240 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:10
Re: A really really good question 246 Warwick 29-Nov-16 19:57
Re: there you have it 293 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:39
Re: there you have it 285 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:12
Re: there you have it 294 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:58
Re: there you have it 294 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 04:24
Re: there you have it 213 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 286 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:26
Re: there you have it 321 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 264 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:05
Re: there you have it 325 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 00:14
Re: there you have it 320 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 01:11
Re: there you have it 310 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 03:08
Re: there you have it 255 cladking 30-Nov-16 04:31
Re: there you have it 138 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 05:40
Re: there you have it 275 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 288 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:17
Re: there you have it 218 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:32
Re: there you have it 213 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:53
Re: there you have it 305 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 04:13
Re: there you have it 326 Jon Ellison 27-Nov-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 247 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 246 cladking 28-Nov-16 00:31
Re: there you have it 270 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:38
Re: there you have it 249 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:35
Re: there you have it 224 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:46
Re: there you have it 225 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:32
Re: there you have it 296 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:06
Re: there you have it 250 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:19
Re: there you have it 153 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:59
Re: there you have it 258 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 22:53
Re: there you have it 277 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:42
Re: there you have it 237 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 12:47
Re: there you have it 278 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 18:01
Re: there you have it 212 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 18:37
Re: there you have it 319 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 23:47
Re: there you have it 266 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:09
Re: there you have it 282 cladking 30-Nov-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 205 Thanos5150 01-Dec-16 17:28
Re: there you have it 469 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 270 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:15
Re: there you have it 234 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:30
Re: there you have it 216 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 170 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:23
Re: there you have it 158 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:35
Re: there you have it 204 Audrey 02-Dec-16 17:57
Re: there you have it 186 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:30
Re: there you have it 202 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:39
Re: there you have it 296 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:10
Re: there you have it 383 Audrey 03-Dec-16 05:24
Re: there you have it 289 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 288 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 278 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 259 cladking 04-Dec-16 03:12
Re: there you have it 301 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 04:58
Re: there you have it 156 cladking 04-Dec-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 203 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 05:31
Re: there you have it 187 cladking 04-Dec-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 288 Audrey 04-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 327 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 10:44
Re: there you have it 200 Warwick 04-Dec-16 20:00
Answer to your question 221 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-16 22:07
Re: there you have it 235 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:56
Re: there you have it 345 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 263 cladking 03-Dec-16 03:50
Re: there you have it 339 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 289 Origyptian 03-Dec-16 20:56
Re: there you have it 170 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:23
Re: there you have it 268 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 271 Audrey 03-Dec-16 23:17
Re: there you have it 260 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 00:51
Re: there you have it 196 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:13
Re: there you have it 273 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 259 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 02:29
Re: there you have it 224 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 04:48
Re: there you have it 216 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 309 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:56
Re: there you have it 258 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 02:04
Re: there you have it 122 Audrey 04-Dec-16 07:02
Re: there you have it 228 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 21:28
Re: there you have it 172 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 177 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 277 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 252 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 311 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 302 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 03:11
Re: there you have it 268 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 12:26
Re: there you have it 164 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 15:25
Re: there you have it 277 Audrey 06-Dec-16 02:35
Re: there you have it 397 Thanos5150 06-Dec-16 07:03
Re: there you have it 211 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 14:54
Re: there you have it 191 Corpuscles 06-Dec-16 17:09
Re: there you have it 184 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 19:03
Re: there you have it 298 Thanos5150 09-Dec-16 19:46
Re: there you have it 343 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 21:56
Re: there you have it 249 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:03
Re: there you have it 191 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 213 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 282 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 271 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 245 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:33
Re: there you have it 214 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 21:53
Re: there you have it 124 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 264 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 162 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:41
Re: there you have it 256 cladking 29-Nov-16 22:05
Re: there you have it 197 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:32
Re: there you have it 208 cladking 29-Nov-16 23:05
Re: there you have it 195 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:24
Re: there you have it 174 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:16
Re: there you have it 276 randompHactor 30-Nov-16 05:25
Re: there you have it 247 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 277 cladking 30-Nov-16 05:46
Re: there you have it 296 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 208 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:49
Re: there you have it 217 Corpuscles 27-Nov-16 21:49
Re: there you have it 267 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:34
Re: there you have it 256 cladking 27-Nov-16 22:02
Re: there you have it 233 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 260 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:07
Re: there you have it 303 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 08:03
Re: there you have it 276 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 13:55
Re: there you have it 189 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 22:09
Re: there you have it 240 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:09
Re: there you have it 188 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 07:28
Re: there you have it 257 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 13:48
Re: there you have it 191 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 20:17
Re: there you have it 253 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 215 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 221 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:59
Re: there you have it 184 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 00:13
Re: there you have it 252 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:20
Re: there you have it 171 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:30
Re: there you have it 255 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:29
Re: there you have it 150 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:47
Re: there you have it 239 cladking 30-Nov-16 15:18
Re: there you have it 256 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 15:21
what about Rameses 250 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:46
Re: what about Rameses 230 Audrey 30-Nov-16 17:54
Re: what about Rameses 277 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:29
Re: what about Rameses 285 Audrey 02-Dec-16 04:03
Re: what about Rameses 288 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:14
Re: what about Rameses 170 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:46
Re: what about Rameses 259 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:01
Not the Statuary.. 244 Warwick 04-Dec-16 19:38
Re: what about Rameses 301 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 17:58
Re: what about Rameses 253 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 14:30
Re: what about Rameses 271 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:13
Re: there you have it 281 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 16:15
Re: there you have it 262 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 16:56
Re: there you have it 191 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:11
Re: there you have it 169 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:32
Re: there you have it 301 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:15
Re: there you have it 251 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 287 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:12
Re: there you have it 196 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:40
Re: there you have it 204 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:37
Re: there you have it 199 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 272 Thanos5150 26-Nov-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 306 cladking 26-Nov-16 23:18
Re: there you have it 247 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:38
Re: there you have it 170 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:42
Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 291 cladking 28-Nov-16 14:43
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 194 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:12
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 271 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:56
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 236 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:18
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 249 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 279 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:07
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 256 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:03
But you never answered my questions. 229 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:24
Re: But you never answered my questions. 185 Thunderbird 29-Nov-16 20:48
Re: But you never answered my questions. 270 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:39
Re: But you never answered my questions. 253 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:03
Re: But you never answered my questions. 222 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:59
Re: there you have it 252 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:23
Re: there you have it 196 randompHactor 29-Nov-16 03:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 372 Anomalies 28-Nov-16 16:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 252 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:49
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 283 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 320 D-Archer 29-Nov-16 11:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.