Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On the contrary, Doctor, when the evidence
> > makes it a certainty that these things were
> > done and points without exception to the
> > ancient Egyptians as the ones who did them—not a
> > glimmer of a hint of anyone else—then it is
> > “incumbent” on you the naysayer to show that
> > there was another candidate for the job whose
> > abilities we could even begin to discuss.
> >
> > Allow me to remind you that you have so far
> > provided NO EVIDENCE
> > WHATSOEVER!!!!
> >
> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
> >
> > It is, after all, a “lost civilisation” . . .
> >
> > What was its language? What was its script? What
> > were its units of measurement? What materials did
> > it use? What sources of power? What was its
> > transport system?
> >
> > Were its people white, brown or purple? What did
> > they wear? What did they eat?
> >
> > Why have you failed to provide evidence of any of
> > this?
> >
> > M.
>
> All good questions. Since you consider there to be
> zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization
> in the ancient past, perhaps you can now provide
> us with the answers regarding who's responsible
> for those 1600 ton blocks of stone in Baalbek, or
> the blocks at Stonehenge, or the bizarre stonework
> in the Andes, etc. You know who did all that
> stonework too? Did they wear yellow? What did they
> eat? Where is all your evidence for that?

All good questions—so why have you not answered them, or even attempted to? Instead you resort to the tired ploy of answering my several questions with questions of your own.

Shall we count the fallacies? Certainly we have straw man. Let’s see you justify this: “you consider there to be zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization in the ancient past”. Explicit citation, verbatim quote and link, please.

You would have done better to leave Baalbek out of this, as all you are relying on in the case is your own equivalent naysaying on what the Romans could do.

Stonehenge:

https://www.aboutstonehenge.info/who-built-stonehenge/

It’s not as if no one has any idea.

Bizarre stonework in the Andes? Sorry, you’ll need to be more specific than that. I can say that the reality has likewise been fogged by naysaying, some of it driven by objectionable ideology. In the case of Tiwanaku we also have the problem of the site not having always been well protected.

So your argument from analogy (an invalid form in any case) is based (as it so often is) on a spurious analogy. The elephant in the room: in no case here is there a perceived need to deny a connection with a massively evidenced and sophisticated local culture with undeniable achievements in stoneworking to its credit.

> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
>
> Indeed.
>
> As if we have any reason whatsoever to arrogantly
> presume that we have now completely identified
> every single culture that has inhabited planet
> Earth in the past few million years who might have
> accomplished anything of note. Forget the fact
> that the older the civilization is, the less
> evidence remains of it. Forget the fact that stone
> artifacts will clearly survive longer than what
> they wore and ate.
>
> You want evidence, I present to you those
> pyramids. The evidence from the OK largely
> contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids. . . .

You arrogantly presume that you know the evidence well enough? I see no sign of your studying it worth a damn. The overwhelming preponderance of your effort goes into naysaying, as (for example) with the Merer material.

“The evidence from the OK largely contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids.” Only through your arbitrarily excluding them from the schedule of evidence in the first place.

You tried this invitation to the ad hoc before, remember? I didn’t go for it then and I’m not about to now. It’s simply not clear that an anonymous civilisation with no determinate characteristics can serve as an explanation of anything.

The status quo ante remains: we have NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of a “lost” civilisation building pyramids in Egypt, while the “reason” for so much as suggesting such a thing proves to have its basis in an arbitrary and question-begging selection of evidence of the most rudimentary kind.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Question On The Fossil Record 2494 rob24550 19-Nov-16 22:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 588 gulsbo 19-Nov-16 22:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 440 @tlantis 29-Nov-16 07:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 554 Manu 19-Nov-16 23:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 487 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 11:20
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 520 Warwick 20-Nov-16 19:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 502 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 21:29
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 501 Warwick 21-Nov-16 17:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 416 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 12:05
The Paradigm is Naked. 454 cladking 22-Nov-16 15:54
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 416 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:14
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 396 cladking 22-Nov-16 19:05
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 422 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:12
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 399 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:08
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 370 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 16:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 430 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 355 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 395 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 378 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:36
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 311 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 412 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:58
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 401 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 19:11
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 406 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:13
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 451 cladking 22-Nov-16 18:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 429 Warwick 23-Nov-16 17:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 419 Hanslune 24-Nov-16 06:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 412 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 405 Hanslune 25-Nov-16 07:22
2 questions 404 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:02
Re: 2 questions 434 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:17
Re: 2 questions 359 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:29
Re: 2 questions 370 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:34
Re: 2 questions 295 Warwick 23-Nov-16 18:07
Re: 2 questions 407 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 20:57
Re: 2 questions 371 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 21:08
Re: 2 questions 374 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:20
Re: 2 questions 371 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:17
Re: 2 questions 392 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 21:56
Re: 2 questions 323 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:27
Re: 2 questions 391 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 23:08
Re: 2 questions 335 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 470 Notinham 20-Nov-16 21:16
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 440 Thunderbird 21-Nov-16 17:14
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 403 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 14:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 413 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 15:26
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 372 cladking 23-Nov-16 15:39
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 389 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 16:03
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 351 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 425 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 19:52
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 410 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 10:32
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 399 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:41
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 386 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 18:54
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 284 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:38
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 331 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 401 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 380 cladking 23-Nov-16 22:31
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 418 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:50
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 417 cladking 23-Nov-16 23:18
Doh!! 395 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:22
Re: Doh!! 414 cladking 24-Nov-16 01:02
there you have it 403 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 399 cladking 24-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 408 Warwick 24-Nov-16 19:25
Re: there you have it 390 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:39
Re: there you have it 371 Origyptian 24-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 375 Warwick 25-Nov-16 06:13
Re: there you have it 334 cladking 25-Nov-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 366 Jon Ellison 25-Nov-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 438 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 17:53
Re: there you have it 428 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 18:54
Re: there you have it 420 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 19:55
Re: there you have it 386 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 23:09
Re: there you have it 365 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:36
Re: there you have it 422 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 462 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 01:27
Re: there you have it 312 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 15:12
Re: there you have it 513 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 319 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:11
Re: there you have it 325 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 293 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:05
Re: there you have it 276 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 18:32
Re: there you have it 360 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 383 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 13:37
Re: there you have it 412 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 380 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 16:47
Re: there you have it 386 cladking 01-Dec-16 17:40
Re: there you have it 371 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:43
Re: there you have it 348 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:54
Re: there you have it 409 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 16:13
Re: there you have it 311 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 17:03
Re: there you have it 344 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:00
Re: there you have it 308 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:17
Re: there you have it 298 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:14
Re: there you have it 409 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 19:19
Re: there you have it 370 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 23:31
Re: there you have it 394 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:31
Re: there you have it 307 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:44
Re: there you have it 286 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 22:58
Re: there you have it 400 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 430 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 15:08
Re: there you have it 382 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 18:19
Re: there you have it 362 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 482 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 13:57
Re: there you have it 280 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 424 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 16:50
Re: there you have it 335 Warwick 05-Dec-16 17:18
Re: there you have it 205 cladking 05-Dec-16 17:59
put up or shut up 361 Warwick 05-Dec-16 18:35
Re: put up or shut up 323 cladking 05-Dec-16 19:07
Re: put up or shut up 346 Warwick 05-Dec-16 19:20
Re: there you have it 418 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 20:19
Re: there you have it 358 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:28
Re: there you have it 295 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:37
Re: there you have it 361 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:53
Re: there you have it 318 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 348 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:02
Re: there you have it 282 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:17
Re: there you have it 361 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:29
Re: there you have it 374 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:50
Re: there you have it 361 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 386 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:01
Re: there you have it 459 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:26
Re: there you have it 360 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 385 Origyptian 06-Dec-16 02:42
Re: there you have it 400 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 22:19
Re: there you have it 358 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 357 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 00:16
Re: there you have it 323 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:18
Re: there you have it 389 Audrey 07-Dec-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 202 Warwick 07-Dec-16 19:31
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 378 cladking 07-Dec-16 19:55
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 327 Warwick 07-Dec-16 20:02
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 290 cladking 07-Dec-16 20:46
Re: there you have it 270 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 306 Warwick 07-Dec-16 21:44
Re: there you have it 352 Audrey 07-Dec-16 22:44
Re: there you have it 357 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 22:52
Re: there you have it 332 Audrey 07-Dec-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 373 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 00:37
Re: there you have it 420 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 401 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 01:10
Re: there you have it 387 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 02:48
Re: there you have it 405 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 12:08
Re: there you have it 375 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:01
Re: there you have it 349 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 313 Origyptian 08-Dec-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 301 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:33
Re: there you have it 363 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 367 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:37
Re: there you have it 378 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:54
Re: there you have it 358 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 21:01
Re: there you have it 456 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 01:02
Re: there you have it 269 Martin Stower 09-Dec-16 02:57
Re: there you have it 406 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 11:16
Re: there you have it 317 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:21
Re: there you have it 307 Origyptian 07-Dec-16 22:59
Audrey & The Peanut Gallery 452 Warwick 11-Dec-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 336 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:01
Re: there you have it 402 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:07
Re: there you have it 397 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 413 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 01:59
Re: there you have it 372 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 367 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:08
Re: there you have it 381 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 367 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:46
Re: there you have it 387 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:52
Re: there you have it 371 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:19
Re: there you have it 286 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 17:59
Re: there you have it 293 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:03
Re: there you have it 349 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 07:37
Re: there you have it 387 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 17:05
Re: there you have it 349 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 331 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 22:08
Re: there you have it 317 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 06:59
Clarification 302 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 20:53
Re: Clarification 361 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:10
Re: Clarification 515 Merrell 04-Jan-17 14:21
Re: there you have it 419 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 22:28
Re: there you have it 269 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:45
Re: there you have it 380 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:09
Re: there you have it 395 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 23:52
Re: there you have it 303 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 15:07
Re: there you have it 405 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 01:03
Re: there you have it 433 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:38
Re: there you have it 402 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 07:08
Re: there you have it 459 Martin Stower 30-Nov-16 03:00
The solution 317 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:26
Re: The solution 320 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:40
Re: The solution 281 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 03:15
Re: The solution 306 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 06:13
Re: The solution 378 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 10:08
Re: The solution 341 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 15:55
Re: there you have it 323 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 22:16
Re: there you have it 340 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 23:13
Re: there you have it 324 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:43
Re: there you have it 363 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:50
Re: there you have it 458 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 345 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:49
Re: there you have it 469 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 05:51
Re: there you have it 397 cladking 27-Nov-16 14:49
Re: there you have it 401 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 18:02
Re: there you have it 341 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 18:33
Re: there you have it 364 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 428 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 22:34
Re: there you have it 404 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:08
Re: there you have it 428 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:04
A really really good question 287 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:55
Re: A really really good question 295 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:31
Re: A really really good question 322 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:58
Re: A really really good question 286 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:10
Re: A really really good question 297 Warwick 29-Nov-16 19:57
Re: there you have it 332 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:39
Re: there you have it 334 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:12
Re: there you have it 339 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:58
Re: there you have it 338 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 04:24
Re: there you have it 262 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 335 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:26
Re: there you have it 383 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 318 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:05
Re: there you have it 383 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 00:14
Re: there you have it 370 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 01:11
Re: there you have it 356 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 03:08
Re: there you have it 304 cladking 30-Nov-16 04:31
Re: there you have it 180 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 05:40
Re: there you have it 326 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 338 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:17
Re: there you have it 260 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:32
Re: there you have it 256 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:53
Re: there you have it 354 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 04:13
Re: there you have it 377 Jon Ellison 27-Nov-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 281 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 281 cladking 28-Nov-16 00:31
Re: there you have it 310 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:38
Re: there you have it 306 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:35
Re: there you have it 262 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:46
Re: there you have it 253 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:32
Re: there you have it 348 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:06
Re: there you have it 298 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:19
Re: there you have it 184 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:59
Re: there you have it 311 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 22:53
Re: there you have it 328 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:42
Re: there you have it 294 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 12:47
Re: there you have it 320 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 18:01
Re: there you have it 262 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 18:37
Re: there you have it 371 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 23:47
Re: there you have it 306 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:09
Re: there you have it 326 cladking 30-Nov-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 242 Thanos5150 01-Dec-16 17:28
Re: there you have it 534 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 320 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:15
Re: there you have it 288 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:30
Re: there you have it 260 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 208 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:23
Re: there you have it 198 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:35
Re: there you have it 240 Audrey 02-Dec-16 17:57
Re: there you have it 222 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:30
Re: there you have it 245 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:39
Re: there you have it 347 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:10
Re: there you have it 456 Audrey 03-Dec-16 05:24
Re: there you have it 351 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 342 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 324 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 302 cladking 04-Dec-16 03:12
Re: there you have it 356 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 04:58
Re: there you have it 191 cladking 04-Dec-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 247 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 05:31
Re: there you have it 215 cladking 04-Dec-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 343 Audrey 04-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 383 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 10:44
Re: there you have it 251 Warwick 04-Dec-16 20:00
Answer to your question 267 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-16 22:07
Re: there you have it 284 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:56
Re: there you have it 447 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 308 cladking 03-Dec-16 03:50
Re: there you have it 399 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 346 Origyptian 03-Dec-16 20:56
Re: there you have it 215 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:23
Re: there you have it 320 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 319 Audrey 03-Dec-16 23:17
Re: there you have it 327 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 00:51
Re: there you have it 238 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:13
Re: there you have it 313 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 297 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 02:29
Re: there you have it 271 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 04:48
Re: there you have it 256 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 364 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:56
Re: there you have it 309 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 02:04
Re: there you have it 159 Audrey 04-Dec-16 07:02
Re: there you have it 279 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 21:28
Re: there you have it 213 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 223 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 325 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 314 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 375 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 342 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 03:11
Re: there you have it 315 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 12:26
Re: there you have it 198 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 15:25
Re: there you have it 318 Audrey 06-Dec-16 02:35
Re: there you have it 463 Thanos5150 06-Dec-16 07:03
Re: there you have it 256 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 14:54
Re: there you have it 236 Corpuscles 06-Dec-16 17:09
Re: there you have it 220 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 19:03
Re: there you have it 353 Thanos5150 09-Dec-16 19:46
Re: there you have it 383 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 21:56
Re: there you have it 300 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:03
Re: there you have it 227 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 257 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 331 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 322 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 286 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:33
Re: there you have it 257 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 21:53
Re: there you have it 163 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 300 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 205 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:41
Re: there you have it 307 cladking 29-Nov-16 22:05
Re: there you have it 234 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:32
Re: there you have it 259 cladking 29-Nov-16 23:05
Re: there you have it 250 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:24
Re: there you have it 221 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:16
Re: there you have it 319 randompHactor 30-Nov-16 05:25
Re: there you have it 293 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 326 cladking 30-Nov-16 05:46
Re: there you have it 356 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 251 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:49
Re: there you have it 265 Corpuscles 27-Nov-16 21:49
Re: there you have it 314 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:34
Re: there you have it 291 cladking 27-Nov-16 22:02
Re: there you have it 274 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 296 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:07
Re: there you have it 355 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 08:03
Re: there you have it 319 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 13:55
Re: there you have it 243 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 22:09
Re: there you have it 285 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:09
Re: there you have it 231 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 07:28
Re: there you have it 303 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 13:48
Re: there you have it 234 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 20:17
Re: there you have it 296 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 269 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 269 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:59
Re: there you have it 234 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 00:13
Re: there you have it 299 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:20
Re: there you have it 217 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:30
Re: there you have it 308 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:29
Re: there you have it 195 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:47
Re: there you have it 272 cladking 30-Nov-16 15:18
Re: there you have it 299 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 15:21
what about Rameses 299 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:46
Re: what about Rameses 282 Audrey 30-Nov-16 17:54
Re: what about Rameses 331 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:29
Re: what about Rameses 329 Audrey 02-Dec-16 04:03
Re: what about Rameses 339 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:14
Re: what about Rameses 215 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:46
Re: what about Rameses 310 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:01
Not the Statuary.. 281 Warwick 04-Dec-16 19:38
Re: what about Rameses 348 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 17:58
Re: what about Rameses 291 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 14:30
Re: what about Rameses 321 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:13
Re: there you have it 333 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 16:15
Re: there you have it 312 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 16:56
Re: there you have it 232 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:11
Re: there you have it 207 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:32
Re: there you have it 348 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:15
Re: there you have it 307 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 329 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:12
Re: there you have it 244 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:40
Re: there you have it 257 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:37
Re: there you have it 247 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 327 Thanos5150 26-Nov-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 352 cladking 26-Nov-16 23:18
Re: there you have it 296 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:38
Re: there you have it 213 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:42
Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 341 cladking 28-Nov-16 14:43
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 239 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:12
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 318 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:56
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 285 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:18
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 299 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 328 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:07
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 304 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:03
But you never answered my questions. 278 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:24
Re: But you never answered my questions. 237 Thunderbird 29-Nov-16 20:48
Re: But you never answered my questions. 325 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:39
Re: But you never answered my questions. 306 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:03
Re: But you never answered my questions. 266 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:59
Re: there you have it 310 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:23
Re: there you have it 234 randompHactor 29-Nov-16 03:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 427 Anomalies 28-Nov-16 16:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 290 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:49
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 332 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 374 D-Archer 29-Nov-16 11:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.