Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On the contrary, Doctor, when the evidence
> > makes it a certainty that these things were
> > done and points without exception to the
> > ancient Egyptians as the ones who did them—not a
> > glimmer of a hint of anyone else—then it is
> > “incumbent” on you the naysayer to show that
> > there was another candidate for the job whose
> > abilities we could even begin to discuss.
> >
> > Allow me to remind you that you have so far
> > provided NO EVIDENCE
> > WHATSOEVER!!!!
> >
> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
> >
> > It is, after all, a “lost civilisation” . . .
> >
> > What was its language? What was its script? What
> > were its units of measurement? What materials did
> > it use? What sources of power? What was its
> > transport system?
> >
> > Were its people white, brown or purple? What did
> > they wear? What did they eat?
> >
> > Why have you failed to provide evidence of any of
> > this?
> >
> > M.
>
> All good questions. Since you consider there to be
> zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization
> in the ancient past, perhaps you can now provide
> us with the answers regarding who's responsible
> for those 1600 ton blocks of stone in Baalbek, or
> the blocks at Stonehenge, or the bizarre stonework
> in the Andes, etc. You know who did all that
> stonework too? Did they wear yellow? What did they
> eat? Where is all your evidence for that?

All good questions—so why have you not answered them, or even attempted to? Instead you resort to the tired ploy of answering my several questions with questions of your own.

Shall we count the fallacies? Certainly we have straw man. Let’s see you justify this: “you consider there to be zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization in the ancient past”. Explicit citation, verbatim quote and link, please.

You would have done better to leave Baalbek out of this, as all you are relying on in the case is your own equivalent naysaying on what the Romans could do.

Stonehenge:

https://www.aboutstonehenge.info/who-built-stonehenge/

It’s not as if no one has any idea.

Bizarre stonework in the Andes? Sorry, you’ll need to be more specific than that. I can say that the reality has likewise been fogged by naysaying, some of it driven by objectionable ideology. In the case of Tiwanaku we also have the problem of the site not having always been well protected.

So your argument from analogy (an invalid form in any case) is based (as it so often is) on a spurious analogy. The elephant in the room: in no case here is there a perceived need to deny a connection with a massively evidenced and sophisticated local culture with undeniable achievements in stoneworking to its credit.

> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
>
> Indeed.
>
> As if we have any reason whatsoever to arrogantly
> presume that we have now completely identified
> every single culture that has inhabited planet
> Earth in the past few million years who might have
> accomplished anything of note. Forget the fact
> that the older the civilization is, the less
> evidence remains of it. Forget the fact that stone
> artifacts will clearly survive longer than what
> they wore and ate.
>
> You want evidence, I present to you those
> pyramids. The evidence from the OK largely
> contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids. . . .

You arrogantly presume that you know the evidence well enough? I see no sign of your studying it worth a damn. The overwhelming preponderance of your effort goes into naysaying, as (for example) with the Merer material.

“The evidence from the OK largely contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids.” Only through your arbitrarily excluding them from the schedule of evidence in the first place.

You tried this invitation to the ad hoc before, remember? I didn’t go for it then and I’m not about to now. It’s simply not clear that an anonymous civilisation with no determinate characteristics can serve as an explanation of anything.

The status quo ante remains: we have NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of a “lost” civilisation building pyramids in Egypt, while the “reason” for so much as suggesting such a thing proves to have its basis in an arbitrary and question-begging selection of evidence of the most rudimentary kind.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Question On The Fossil Record 2752 rob24550 19-Nov-16 22:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 677 gulsbo 19-Nov-16 22:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 535 @tlantis 29-Nov-16 07:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 658 Manu 19-Nov-16 23:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 570 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 11:20
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 614 Warwick 20-Nov-16 19:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 603 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 21:29
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 605 Warwick 21-Nov-16 17:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 519 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 12:05
The Paradigm is Naked. 565 cladking 22-Nov-16 15:54
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 514 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:14
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 491 cladking 22-Nov-16 19:05
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 535 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:12
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 471 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:08
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 473 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 16:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 517 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 433 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 480 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 484 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:36
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 389 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 502 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:58
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 481 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 19:11
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 508 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:13
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 558 cladking 22-Nov-16 18:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 514 Warwick 23-Nov-16 17:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 503 Hanslune 24-Nov-16 06:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 506 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 488 Hanslune 25-Nov-16 07:22
2 questions 500 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:02
Re: 2 questions 527 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:17
Re: 2 questions 459 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:29
Re: 2 questions 450 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:34
Re: 2 questions 380 Warwick 23-Nov-16 18:07
Re: 2 questions 494 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 20:57
Re: 2 questions 470 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 21:08
Re: 2 questions 451 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:20
Re: 2 questions 462 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:17
Re: 2 questions 483 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 21:56
Re: 2 questions 419 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:27
Re: 2 questions 475 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 23:08
Re: 2 questions 435 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 560 Notinham 20-Nov-16 21:16
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 507 Thunderbird 21-Nov-16 17:14
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 506 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 14:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 499 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 15:26
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 450 cladking 23-Nov-16 15:39
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 483 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 16:03
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 446 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 511 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 19:52
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 499 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 10:32
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 499 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:41
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 494 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 18:54
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 394 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:38
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 438 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 490 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 471 cladking 23-Nov-16 22:31
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 517 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:50
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 516 cladking 23-Nov-16 23:18
Doh!! 498 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:22
Re: Doh!! 498 cladking 24-Nov-16 01:02
there you have it 482 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 538 cladking 24-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 512 Warwick 24-Nov-16 19:25
Re: there you have it 480 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:39
Re: there you have it 475 Origyptian 24-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 459 Warwick 25-Nov-16 06:13
Re: there you have it 416 cladking 25-Nov-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 454 Jon Ellison 25-Nov-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 530 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 17:53
Re: there you have it 512 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 18:54
Re: there you have it 517 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 19:55
Re: there you have it 477 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 23:09
Re: there you have it 458 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:36
Re: there you have it 517 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 566 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 01:27
Re: there you have it 414 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 15:12
Re: there you have it 633 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 400 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:11
Re: there you have it 432 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 379 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:05
Re: there you have it 355 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 18:32
Re: there you have it 462 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 449 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 13:37
Re: there you have it 512 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 480 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 16:47
Re: there you have it 480 cladking 01-Dec-16 17:40
Re: there you have it 458 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:43
Re: there you have it 435 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:54
Re: there you have it 505 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 16:13
Re: there you have it 387 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 17:03
Re: there you have it 467 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:00
Re: there you have it 395 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:17
Re: there you have it 411 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:14
Re: there you have it 496 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 19:19
Re: there you have it 460 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 23:31
Re: there you have it 487 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:31
Re: there you have it 393 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:44
Re: there you have it 392 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 22:58
Re: there you have it 485 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 620 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 15:08
Re: there you have it 520 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 18:19
Re: there you have it 475 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 607 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 13:57
Re: there you have it 355 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 522 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 16:50
Re: there you have it 402 Warwick 05-Dec-16 17:18
Re: there you have it 300 cladking 05-Dec-16 17:59
put up or shut up 469 Warwick 05-Dec-16 18:35
Re: put up or shut up 393 cladking 05-Dec-16 19:07
Re: put up or shut up 422 Warwick 05-Dec-16 19:20
Re: there you have it 552 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 20:19
Re: there you have it 430 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:28
Re: there you have it 372 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:37
Re: there you have it 423 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:53
Re: there you have it 416 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 397 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:02
Re: there you have it 336 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:17
Re: there you have it 417 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:29
Re: there you have it 439 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:50
Re: there you have it 414 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 456 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:01
Re: there you have it 560 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:26
Re: there you have it 413 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 447 Origyptian 06-Dec-16 02:42
Re: there you have it 457 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 22:19
Re: there you have it 402 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 405 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 00:16
Re: there you have it 384 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:18
Re: there you have it 465 Audrey 07-Dec-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 271 Warwick 07-Dec-16 19:31
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 433 cladking 07-Dec-16 19:55
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 429 Warwick 07-Dec-16 20:02
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 338 cladking 07-Dec-16 20:46
Re: there you have it 348 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 360 Warwick 07-Dec-16 21:44
Re: there you have it 427 Audrey 07-Dec-16 22:44
Re: there you have it 415 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 22:52
Re: there you have it 406 Audrey 07-Dec-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 443 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 00:37
Re: there you have it 474 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 468 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 01:10
Re: there you have it 465 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 02:48
Re: there you have it 460 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 12:08
Re: there you have it 442 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:01
Re: there you have it 402 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 363 Origyptian 08-Dec-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 372 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:33
Re: there you have it 417 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 445 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:37
Re: there you have it 424 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:54
Re: there you have it 402 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 21:01
Re: there you have it 531 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 01:02
Re: there you have it 352 Martin Stower 09-Dec-16 02:57
Re: there you have it 497 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 11:16
Re: there you have it 422 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:21
Re: there you have it 427 Origyptian 07-Dec-16 22:59
Audrey & The Peanut Gallery 538 Warwick 11-Dec-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 408 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:01
Re: there you have it 481 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:07
Re: there you have it 502 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 478 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 01:59
Re: there you have it 436 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 419 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:08
Re: there you have it 440 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 428 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:46
Re: there you have it 440 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:52
Re: there you have it 434 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:19
Re: there you have it 332 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 17:59
Re: there you have it 336 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:03
Re: there you have it 410 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 07:37
Re: there you have it 450 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 17:05
Re: there you have it 400 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 398 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 22:08
Re: there you have it 379 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 06:59
Clarification 380 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 20:53
Re: Clarification 463 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:10
Re: Clarification 609 Merrell 04-Jan-17 14:21
Re: there you have it 501 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 22:28
Re: there you have it 356 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:45
Re: there you have it 465 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:09
Re: there you have it 451 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 23:52
Re: there you have it 383 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 15:07
Re: there you have it 478 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 01:03
Re: there you have it 531 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:38
Re: there you have it 464 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 07:08
Re: there you have it 532 Martin Stower 30-Nov-16 03:00
The solution 377 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:26
Re: The solution 386 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:40
Re: The solution 349 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 03:15
Re: The solution 355 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 06:13
Re: The solution 445 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 10:08
Re: The solution 413 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 15:55
Re: there you have it 390 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 22:16
Re: there you have it 400 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 23:13
Re: there you have it 388 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:43
Re: there you have it 410 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:50
Re: there you have it 552 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 414 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:49
Re: there you have it 547 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 05:51
Re: there you have it 458 cladking 27-Nov-16 14:49
Re: there you have it 468 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 18:02
Re: there you have it 402 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 18:33
Re: there you have it 415 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 521 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 22:34
Re: there you have it 463 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:08
Re: there you have it 519 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:04
A really really good question 345 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:55
Re: A really really good question 344 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:31
Re: A really really good question 372 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:58
Re: A really really good question 353 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:10
Re: A really really good question 346 Warwick 29-Nov-16 19:57
Re: there you have it 399 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:39
Re: there you have it 384 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:12
Re: there you have it 420 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:58
Re: there you have it 403 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 04:24
Re: there you have it 329 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 414 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:26
Re: there you have it 462 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 391 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:05
Re: there you have it 476 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 00:14
Re: there you have it 415 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 01:11
Re: there you have it 420 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 03:08
Re: there you have it 367 cladking 30-Nov-16 04:31
Re: there you have it 246 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 05:40
Re: there you have it 412 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 393 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:17
Re: there you have it 315 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:32
Re: there you have it 329 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:53
Re: there you have it 427 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 04:13
Re: there you have it 446 Jon Ellison 27-Nov-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 337 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 360 cladking 28-Nov-16 00:31
Re: there you have it 378 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:38
Re: there you have it 389 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:35
Re: there you have it 342 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:46
Re: there you have it 317 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:32
Re: there you have it 403 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:06
Re: there you have it 352 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:19
Re: there you have it 234 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:59
Re: there you have it 388 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 22:53
Re: there you have it 388 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:42
Re: there you have it 348 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 12:47
Re: there you have it 373 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 18:01
Re: there you have it 335 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 18:37
Re: there you have it 446 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 23:47
Re: there you have it 381 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:09
Re: there you have it 397 cladking 30-Nov-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 305 Thanos5150 01-Dec-16 17:28
Re: there you have it 633 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 370 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:15
Re: there you have it 346 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:30
Re: there you have it 319 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 278 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:23
Re: there you have it 263 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:35
Re: there you have it 307 Audrey 02-Dec-16 17:57
Re: there you have it 294 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:30
Re: there you have it 334 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:39
Re: there you have it 460 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:10
Re: there you have it 560 Audrey 03-Dec-16 05:24
Re: there you have it 444 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 406 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 391 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 355 cladking 04-Dec-16 03:12
Re: there you have it 421 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 04:58
Re: there you have it 243 cladking 04-Dec-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 298 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 05:31
Re: there you have it 276 cladking 04-Dec-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 407 Audrey 04-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 432 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 10:44
Re: there you have it 314 Warwick 04-Dec-16 20:00
Answer to your question 313 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-16 22:07
Re: there you have it 342 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:56
Re: there you have it 514 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 357 cladking 03-Dec-16 03:50
Re: there you have it 457 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 418 Origyptian 03-Dec-16 20:56
Re: there you have it 286 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:23
Re: there you have it 390 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 379 Audrey 03-Dec-16 23:17
Re: there you have it 426 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 00:51
Re: there you have it 296 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:13
Re: there you have it 376 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 362 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 02:29
Re: there you have it 358 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 04:48
Re: there you have it 317 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 434 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:56
Re: there you have it 382 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 02:04
Re: there you have it 204 Audrey 04-Dec-16 07:02
Re: there you have it 343 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 21:28
Re: there you have it 283 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 283 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 396 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 409 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 448 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 405 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 03:11
Re: there you have it 389 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 12:26
Re: there you have it 257 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 15:25
Re: there you have it 383 Audrey 06-Dec-16 02:35
Re: there you have it 557 Thanos5150 06-Dec-16 07:03
Re: there you have it 330 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 14:54
Re: there you have it 293 Corpuscles 06-Dec-16 17:09
Re: there you have it 279 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 19:03
Re: there you have it 448 Thanos5150 09-Dec-16 19:46
Re: there you have it 450 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 21:56
Re: there you have it 356 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:03
Re: there you have it 285 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 319 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 392 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 374 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 348 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:33
Re: there you have it 313 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 21:53
Re: there you have it 232 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 356 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 270 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:41
Re: there you have it 385 cladking 29-Nov-16 22:05
Re: there you have it 314 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:32
Re: there you have it 333 cladking 29-Nov-16 23:05
Re: there you have it 315 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:24
Re: there you have it 271 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:16
Re: there you have it 370 randompHactor 30-Nov-16 05:25
Re: there you have it 344 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 389 cladking 30-Nov-16 05:46
Re: there you have it 410 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 321 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:49
Re: there you have it 318 Corpuscles 27-Nov-16 21:49
Re: there you have it 371 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:34
Re: there you have it 345 cladking 27-Nov-16 22:02
Re: there you have it 330 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 349 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:07
Re: there you have it 431 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 08:03
Re: there you have it 402 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 13:55
Re: there you have it 296 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 22:09
Re: there you have it 352 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:09
Re: there you have it 316 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 07:28
Re: there you have it 354 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 13:48
Re: there you have it 317 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 20:17
Re: there you have it 380 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 337 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 328 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:59
Re: there you have it 292 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 00:13
Re: there you have it 356 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:20
Re: there you have it 290 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:30
Re: there you have it 363 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:29
Re: there you have it 269 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:47
Re: there you have it 339 cladking 30-Nov-16 15:18
Re: there you have it 358 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 15:21
what about Rameses 363 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:46
Re: what about Rameses 352 Audrey 30-Nov-16 17:54
Re: what about Rameses 404 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:29
Re: what about Rameses 404 Audrey 02-Dec-16 04:03
Re: what about Rameses 422 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:14
Re: what about Rameses 262 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:46
Re: what about Rameses 382 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:01
Not the Statuary.. 323 Warwick 04-Dec-16 19:38
Re: what about Rameses 412 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 17:58
Re: what about Rameses 343 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 14:30
Re: what about Rameses 402 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:13
Re: there you have it 421 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 16:15
Re: there you have it 396 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 16:56
Re: there you have it 295 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:11
Re: there you have it 259 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:32
Re: there you have it 447 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:15
Re: there you have it 358 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 395 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:12
Re: there you have it 318 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:40
Re: there you have it 314 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:37
Re: there you have it 307 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 394 Thanos5150 26-Nov-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 441 cladking 26-Nov-16 23:18
Re: there you have it 373 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:38
Re: there you have it 271 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:42
Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 398 cladking 28-Nov-16 14:43
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 297 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:12
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 383 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:56
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 350 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:18
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 361 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 404 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:07
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 368 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:03
But you never answered my questions. 337 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:24
Re: But you never answered my questions. 304 Thunderbird 29-Nov-16 20:48
Re: But you never answered my questions. 404 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:39
Re: But you never answered my questions. 363 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:03
Re: But you never answered my questions. 341 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:59
Re: there you have it 388 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:23
Re: there you have it 306 randompHactor 29-Nov-16 03:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 503 Anomalies 28-Nov-16 16:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 343 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:49
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 378 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 423 D-Archer 29-Nov-16 11:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.