Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On the contrary, Doctor, when the evidence
> > makes it a certainty that these things were
> > done and points without exception to the
> > ancient Egyptians as the ones who did them—not a
> > glimmer of a hint of anyone else—then it is
> > “incumbent” on you the naysayer to show that
> > there was another candidate for the job whose
> > abilities we could even begin to discuss.
> >
> > Allow me to remind you that you have so far
> > provided NO EVIDENCE
> > WHATSOEVER!!!!
> >
> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
> >
> > It is, after all, a “lost civilisation” . . .
> >
> > What was its language? What was its script? What
> > were its units of measurement? What materials did
> > it use? What sources of power? What was its
> > transport system?
> >
> > Were its people white, brown or purple? What did
> > they wear? What did they eat?
> >
> > Why have you failed to provide evidence of any of
> > this?
> >
> > M.
>
> All good questions. Since you consider there to be
> zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization
> in the ancient past, perhaps you can now provide
> us with the answers regarding who's responsible
> for those 1600 ton blocks of stone in Baalbek, or
> the blocks at Stonehenge, or the bizarre stonework
> in the Andes, etc. You know who did all that
> stonework too? Did they wear yellow? What did they
> eat? Where is all your evidence for that?

All good questions—so why have you not answered them, or even attempted to? Instead you resort to the tired ploy of answering my several questions with questions of your own.

Shall we count the fallacies? Certainly we have straw man. Let’s see you justify this: “you consider there to be zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization in the ancient past”. Explicit citation, verbatim quote and link, please.

You would have done better to leave Baalbek out of this, as all you are relying on in the case is your own equivalent naysaying on what the Romans could do.

Stonehenge:

https://www.aboutstonehenge.info/who-built-stonehenge/

It’s not as if no one has any idea.

Bizarre stonework in the Andes? Sorry, you’ll need to be more specific than that. I can say that the reality has likewise been fogged by naysaying, some of it driven by objectionable ideology. In the case of Tiwanaku we also have the problem of the site not having always been well protected.

So your argument from analogy (an invalid form in any case) is based (as it so often is) on a spurious analogy. The elephant in the room: in no case here is there a perceived need to deny a connection with a massively evidenced and sophisticated local culture with undeniable achievements in stoneworking to its credit.

> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
>
> Indeed.
>
> As if we have any reason whatsoever to arrogantly
> presume that we have now completely identified
> every single culture that has inhabited planet
> Earth in the past few million years who might have
> accomplished anything of note. Forget the fact
> that the older the civilization is, the less
> evidence remains of it. Forget the fact that stone
> artifacts will clearly survive longer than what
> they wore and ate.
>
> You want evidence, I present to you those
> pyramids. The evidence from the OK largely
> contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids. . . .

You arrogantly presume that you know the evidence well enough? I see no sign of your studying it worth a damn. The overwhelming preponderance of your effort goes into naysaying, as (for example) with the Merer material.

“The evidence from the OK largely contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids.” Only through your arbitrarily excluding them from the schedule of evidence in the first place.

You tried this invitation to the ad hoc before, remember? I didn’t go for it then and I’m not about to now. It’s simply not clear that an anonymous civilisation with no determinate characteristics can serve as an explanation of anything.

The status quo ante remains: we have NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of a “lost” civilisation building pyramids in Egypt, while the “reason” for so much as suggesting such a thing proves to have its basis in an arbitrary and question-begging selection of evidence of the most rudimentary kind.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Question On The Fossil Record 2777 rob24550 19-Nov-16 22:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 685 gulsbo 19-Nov-16 22:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 550 @tlantis 29-Nov-16 07:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 671 Manu 19-Nov-16 23:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 583 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 11:20
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 627 Warwick 20-Nov-16 19:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 622 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 21:29
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 618 Warwick 21-Nov-16 17:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 531 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 12:05
The Paradigm is Naked. 579 cladking 22-Nov-16 15:54
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 527 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:14
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 515 cladking 22-Nov-16 19:05
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 546 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:12
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 484 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:08
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 483 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 16:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 529 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 444 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 487 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 497 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:36
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 395 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 509 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:58
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 496 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 19:11
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 516 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:13
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 569 cladking 22-Nov-16 18:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 525 Warwick 23-Nov-16 17:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 516 Hanslune 24-Nov-16 06:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 514 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 495 Hanslune 25-Nov-16 07:22
2 questions 508 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:02
Re: 2 questions 533 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:17
Re: 2 questions 469 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:29
Re: 2 questions 457 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:34
Re: 2 questions 385 Warwick 23-Nov-16 18:07
Re: 2 questions 502 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 20:57
Re: 2 questions 484 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 21:08
Re: 2 questions 456 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:20
Re: 2 questions 469 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:17
Re: 2 questions 510 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 21:56
Re: 2 questions 436 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:27
Re: 2 questions 481 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 23:08
Re: 2 questions 446 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 567 Notinham 20-Nov-16 21:16
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 513 Thunderbird 21-Nov-16 17:14
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 526 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 14:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 506 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 15:26
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 461 cladking 23-Nov-16 15:39
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 499 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 16:03
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 455 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 517 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 19:52
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 504 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 10:32
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 516 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:41
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 502 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 18:54
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 409 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:38
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 452 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 502 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 485 cladking 23-Nov-16 22:31
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 526 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:50
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 523 cladking 23-Nov-16 23:18
Doh!! 510 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:22
Re: Doh!! 503 cladking 24-Nov-16 01:02
there you have it 488 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 556 cladking 24-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 520 Warwick 24-Nov-16 19:25
Re: there you have it 488 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:39
Re: there you have it 494 Origyptian 24-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 483 Warwick 25-Nov-16 06:13
Re: there you have it 423 cladking 25-Nov-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 461 Jon Ellison 25-Nov-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 536 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 17:53
Re: there you have it 518 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 18:54
Re: there you have it 526 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 19:55
Re: there you have it 495 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 23:09
Re: there you have it 492 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:36
Re: there you have it 532 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 574 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 01:27
Re: there you have it 425 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 15:12
Re: there you have it 640 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 411 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:11
Re: there you have it 444 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 386 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:05
Re: there you have it 361 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 18:32
Re: there you have it 474 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 454 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 13:37
Re: there you have it 526 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 489 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 16:47
Re: there you have it 497 cladking 01-Dec-16 17:40
Re: there you have it 467 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:43
Re: there you have it 443 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:54
Re: there you have it 513 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 16:13
Re: there you have it 396 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 17:03
Re: there you have it 486 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:00
Re: there you have it 402 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:17
Re: there you have it 429 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:14
Re: there you have it 505 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 19:19
Re: there you have it 472 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 23:31
Re: there you have it 514 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:31
Re: there you have it 401 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:44
Re: there you have it 408 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 22:58
Re: there you have it 496 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 709 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 15:08
Re: there you have it 563 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 18:19
Re: there you have it 485 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 620 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 13:57
Re: there you have it 370 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 530 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 16:50
Re: there you have it 411 Warwick 05-Dec-16 17:18
Re: there you have it 317 cladking 05-Dec-16 17:59
put up or shut up 476 Warwick 05-Dec-16 18:35
Re: put up or shut up 406 cladking 05-Dec-16 19:07
Re: put up or shut up 428 Warwick 05-Dec-16 19:20
Re: there you have it 569 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 20:19
Re: there you have it 437 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:28
Re: there you have it 394 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:37
Re: there you have it 427 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:53
Re: there you have it 424 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 407 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:02
Re: there you have it 347 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:17
Re: there you have it 429 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:29
Re: there you have it 449 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:50
Re: there you have it 420 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 476 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:01
Re: there you have it 571 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:26
Re: there you have it 427 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 467 Origyptian 06-Dec-16 02:42
Re: there you have it 465 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 22:19
Re: there you have it 409 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 411 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 00:16
Re: there you have it 394 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:18
Re: there you have it 474 Audrey 07-Dec-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 281 Warwick 07-Dec-16 19:31
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 444 cladking 07-Dec-16 19:55
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 438 Warwick 07-Dec-16 20:02
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 351 cladking 07-Dec-16 20:46
Re: there you have it 365 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 365 Warwick 07-Dec-16 21:44
Re: there you have it 445 Audrey 07-Dec-16 22:44
Re: there you have it 426 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 22:52
Re: there you have it 418 Audrey 07-Dec-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 457 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 00:37
Re: there you have it 481 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 480 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 01:10
Re: there you have it 477 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 02:48
Re: there you have it 466 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 12:08
Re: there you have it 449 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:01
Re: there you have it 418 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 375 Origyptian 08-Dec-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 386 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:33
Re: there you have it 424 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 455 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:37
Re: there you have it 436 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:54
Re: there you have it 411 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 21:01
Re: there you have it 542 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 01:02
Re: there you have it 360 Martin Stower 09-Dec-16 02:57
Re: there you have it 506 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 11:16
Re: there you have it 434 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:21
Re: there you have it 439 Origyptian 07-Dec-16 22:59
Audrey & The Peanut Gallery 557 Warwick 11-Dec-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 415 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:01
Re: there you have it 487 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:07
Re: there you have it 527 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 508 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 01:59
Re: there you have it 443 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 428 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:08
Re: there you have it 454 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 436 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:46
Re: there you have it 451 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:52
Re: there you have it 448 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:19
Re: there you have it 340 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 17:59
Re: there you have it 346 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:03
Re: there you have it 418 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 07:37
Re: there you have it 461 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 17:05
Re: there you have it 415 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 408 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 22:08
Re: there you have it 394 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 06:59
Clarification 388 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 20:53
Re: Clarification 489 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:10
Re: Clarification 620 Merrell 04-Jan-17 14:21
Re: there you have it 513 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 22:28
Re: there you have it 368 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:45
Re: there you have it 481 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:09
Re: there you have it 459 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 23:52
Re: there you have it 402 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 15:07
Re: there you have it 490 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 01:03
Re: there you have it 573 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:38
Re: there you have it 476 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 07:08
Re: there you have it 547 Martin Stower 30-Nov-16 03:00
The solution 390 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:26
Re: The solution 402 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:40
Re: The solution 358 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 03:15
Re: The solution 366 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 06:13
Re: The solution 464 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 10:08
Re: The solution 430 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 15:55
Re: there you have it 397 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 22:16
Re: there you have it 410 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 23:13
Re: there you have it 399 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:43
Re: there you have it 416 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:50
Re: there you have it 583 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 428 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:49
Re: there you have it 558 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 05:51
Re: there you have it 470 cladking 27-Nov-16 14:49
Re: there you have it 476 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 18:02
Re: there you have it 410 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 18:33
Re: there you have it 426 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 550 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 22:34
Re: there you have it 469 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:08
Re: there you have it 534 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:04
A really really good question 359 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:55
Re: A really really good question 351 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:31
Re: A really really good question 383 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:58
Re: A really really good question 365 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:10
Re: A really really good question 358 Warwick 29-Nov-16 19:57
Re: there you have it 408 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:39
Re: there you have it 398 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:12
Re: there you have it 432 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:58
Re: there you have it 418 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 04:24
Re: there you have it 350 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 423 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:26
Re: there you have it 484 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 413 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:05
Re: there you have it 494 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 00:14
Re: there you have it 430 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 01:11
Re: there you have it 437 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 03:08
Re: there you have it 378 cladking 30-Nov-16 04:31
Re: there you have it 260 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 05:40
Re: there you have it 428 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 400 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:17
Re: there you have it 328 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:32
Re: there you have it 347 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:53
Re: there you have it 435 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 04:13
Re: there you have it 451 Jon Ellison 27-Nov-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 345 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 371 cladking 28-Nov-16 00:31
Re: there you have it 387 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:38
Re: there you have it 403 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:35
Re: there you have it 358 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:46
Re: there you have it 344 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:32
Re: there you have it 410 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:06
Re: there you have it 368 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:19
Re: there you have it 245 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:59
Re: there you have it 396 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 22:53
Re: there you have it 408 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:42
Re: there you have it 358 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 12:47
Re: there you have it 383 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 18:01
Re: there you have it 361 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 18:37
Re: there you have it 457 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 23:47
Re: there you have it 402 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:09
Re: there you have it 426 cladking 30-Nov-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 330 Thanos5150 01-Dec-16 17:28
Re: there you have it 650 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 382 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:15
Re: there you have it 359 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:30
Re: there you have it 325 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 297 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:23
Re: there you have it 284 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:35
Re: there you have it 316 Audrey 02-Dec-16 17:57
Re: there you have it 317 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:30
Re: there you have it 343 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:39
Re: there you have it 467 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:10
Re: there you have it 582 Audrey 03-Dec-16 05:24
Re: there you have it 462 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 426 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 401 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 364 cladking 04-Dec-16 03:12
Re: there you have it 433 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 04:58
Re: there you have it 248 cladking 04-Dec-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 309 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 05:31
Re: there you have it 294 cladking 04-Dec-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 419 Audrey 04-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 438 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 10:44
Re: there you have it 357 Warwick 04-Dec-16 20:00
Answer to your question 324 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-16 22:07
Re: there you have it 363 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:56
Re: there you have it 527 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 364 cladking 03-Dec-16 03:50
Re: there you have it 471 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 437 Origyptian 03-Dec-16 20:56
Re: there you have it 304 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:23
Re: there you have it 401 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 386 Audrey 03-Dec-16 23:17
Re: there you have it 449 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 00:51
Re: there you have it 307 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:13
Re: there you have it 396 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 392 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 02:29
Re: there you have it 379 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 04:48
Re: there you have it 334 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 444 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:56
Re: there you have it 409 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 02:04
Re: there you have it 209 Audrey 04-Dec-16 07:02
Re: there you have it 355 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 21:28
Re: there you have it 291 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 293 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 402 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 433 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 463 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 424 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 03:11
Re: there you have it 403 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 12:26
Re: there you have it 281 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 15:25
Re: there you have it 401 Audrey 06-Dec-16 02:35
Re: there you have it 581 Thanos5150 06-Dec-16 07:03
Re: there you have it 344 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 14:54
Re: there you have it 298 Corpuscles 06-Dec-16 17:09
Re: there you have it 300 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 19:03
Re: there you have it 462 Thanos5150 09-Dec-16 19:46
Re: there you have it 461 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 21:56
Re: there you have it 369 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:03
Re: there you have it 307 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 331 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 404 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 389 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 361 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:33
Re: there you have it 330 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 21:53
Re: there you have it 242 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 372 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 278 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:41
Re: there you have it 393 cladking 29-Nov-16 22:05
Re: there you have it 326 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:32
Re: there you have it 355 cladking 29-Nov-16 23:05
Re: there you have it 330 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:24
Re: there you have it 284 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:16
Re: there you have it 382 randompHactor 30-Nov-16 05:25
Re: there you have it 351 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 400 cladking 30-Nov-16 05:46
Re: there you have it 416 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 327 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:49
Re: there you have it 329 Corpuscles 27-Nov-16 21:49
Re: there you have it 384 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:34
Re: there you have it 356 cladking 27-Nov-16 22:02
Re: there you have it 337 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 356 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:07
Re: there you have it 449 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 08:03
Re: there you have it 415 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 13:55
Re: there you have it 308 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 22:09
Re: there you have it 364 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:09
Re: there you have it 338 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 07:28
Re: there you have it 360 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 13:48
Re: there you have it 329 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 20:17
Re: there you have it 392 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 356 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 337 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:59
Re: there you have it 307 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 00:13
Re: there you have it 364 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:20
Re: there you have it 312 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:30
Re: there you have it 376 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:29
Re: there you have it 284 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:47
Re: there you have it 376 cladking 30-Nov-16 15:18
Re: there you have it 376 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 15:21
what about Rameses 372 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:46
Re: what about Rameses 377 Audrey 30-Nov-16 17:54
Re: what about Rameses 423 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:29
Re: what about Rameses 414 Audrey 02-Dec-16 04:03
Re: what about Rameses 437 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:14
Re: what about Rameses 295 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:46
Re: what about Rameses 394 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:01
Not the Statuary.. 333 Warwick 04-Dec-16 19:38
Re: what about Rameses 420 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 17:58
Re: what about Rameses 352 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 14:30
Re: what about Rameses 413 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:13
Re: there you have it 438 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 16:15
Re: there you have it 418 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 16:56
Re: there you have it 308 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:11
Re: there you have it 265 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:32
Re: there you have it 459 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:15
Re: there you have it 365 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 404 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:12
Re: there you have it 336 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:40
Re: there you have it 320 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:37
Re: there you have it 322 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 407 Thanos5150 26-Nov-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 459 cladking 26-Nov-16 23:18
Re: there you have it 386 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:38
Re: there you have it 287 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:42
Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 410 cladking 28-Nov-16 14:43
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 303 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:12
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 395 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:56
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 377 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:18
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 374 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 416 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:07
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 377 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:03
But you never answered my questions. 374 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:24
Re: But you never answered my questions. 311 Thunderbird 29-Nov-16 20:48
Re: But you never answered my questions. 417 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:39
Re: But you never answered my questions. 376 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:03
Re: But you never answered my questions. 351 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:59
Re: there you have it 408 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:23
Re: there you have it 318 randompHactor 29-Nov-16 03:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 517 Anomalies 28-Nov-16 16:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 352 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:49
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 392 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 431 D-Archer 29-Nov-16 11:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.