Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On the contrary, Doctor, when the evidence
> > makes it a certainty that these things were
> > done and points without exception to the
> > ancient Egyptians as the ones who did them—not a
> > glimmer of a hint of anyone else—then it is
> > “incumbent” on you the naysayer to show that
> > there was another candidate for the job whose
> > abilities we could even begin to discuss.
> >
> > Allow me to remind you that you have so far
> > provided NO EVIDENCE
> > WHATSOEVER!!!!
> >
> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
> >
> > It is, after all, a “lost civilisation” . . .
> >
> > What was its language? What was its script? What
> > were its units of measurement? What materials did
> > it use? What sources of power? What was its
> > transport system?
> >
> > Were its people white, brown or purple? What did
> > they wear? What did they eat?
> >
> > Why have you failed to provide evidence of any of
> > this?
> >
> > M.
>
> All good questions. Since you consider there to be
> zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization
> in the ancient past, perhaps you can now provide
> us with the answers regarding who's responsible
> for those 1600 ton blocks of stone in Baalbek, or
> the blocks at Stonehenge, or the bizarre stonework
> in the Andes, etc. You know who did all that
> stonework too? Did they wear yellow? What did they
> eat? Where is all your evidence for that?

All good questions—so why have you not answered them, or even attempted to? Instead you resort to the tired ploy of answering my several questions with questions of your own.

Shall we count the fallacies? Certainly we have straw man. Let’s see you justify this: “you consider there to be zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization in the ancient past”. Explicit citation, verbatim quote and link, please.

You would have done better to leave Baalbek out of this, as all you are relying on in the case is your own equivalent naysaying on what the Romans could do.

Stonehenge:

https://www.aboutstonehenge.info/who-built-stonehenge/

It’s not as if no one has any idea.

Bizarre stonework in the Andes? Sorry, you’ll need to be more specific than that. I can say that the reality has likewise been fogged by naysaying, some of it driven by objectionable ideology. In the case of Tiwanaku we also have the problem of the site not having always been well protected.

So your argument from analogy (an invalid form in any case) is based (as it so often is) on a spurious analogy. The elephant in the room: in no case here is there a perceived need to deny a connection with a massively evidenced and sophisticated local culture with undeniable achievements in stoneworking to its credit.

> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
>
> Indeed.
>
> As if we have any reason whatsoever to arrogantly
> presume that we have now completely identified
> every single culture that has inhabited planet
> Earth in the past few million years who might have
> accomplished anything of note. Forget the fact
> that the older the civilization is, the less
> evidence remains of it. Forget the fact that stone
> artifacts will clearly survive longer than what
> they wore and ate.
>
> You want evidence, I present to you those
> pyramids. The evidence from the OK largely
> contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids. . . .

You arrogantly presume that you know the evidence well enough? I see no sign of your studying it worth a damn. The overwhelming preponderance of your effort goes into naysaying, as (for example) with the Merer material.

“The evidence from the OK largely contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids.” Only through your arbitrarily excluding them from the schedule of evidence in the first place.

You tried this invitation to the ad hoc before, remember? I didn’t go for it then and I’m not about to now. It’s simply not clear that an anonymous civilisation with no determinate characteristics can serve as an explanation of anything.

The status quo ante remains: we have NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of a “lost” civilisation building pyramids in Egypt, while the “reason” for so much as suggesting such a thing proves to have its basis in an arbitrary and question-begging selection of evidence of the most rudimentary kind.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Question On The Fossil Record 2645 rob24550 19-Nov-16 22:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 649 gulsbo 19-Nov-16 22:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 493 @tlantis 29-Nov-16 07:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 607 Manu 19-Nov-16 23:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 525 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 11:20
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 566 Warwick 20-Nov-16 19:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 558 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 21:29
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 568 Warwick 21-Nov-16 17:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 470 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 12:05
The Paradigm is Naked. 517 cladking 22-Nov-16 15:54
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 462 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:14
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 445 cladking 22-Nov-16 19:05
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 480 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:12
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 433 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:08
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 421 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 16:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 478 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 395 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 439 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 433 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:36
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 347 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 458 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:58
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 442 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 19:11
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 465 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:13
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 509 cladking 22-Nov-16 18:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 475 Warwick 23-Nov-16 17:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 461 Hanslune 24-Nov-16 06:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 464 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 449 Hanslune 25-Nov-16 07:22
2 questions 458 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:02
Re: 2 questions 485 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:17
Re: 2 questions 409 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:29
Re: 2 questions 409 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:34
Re: 2 questions 341 Warwick 23-Nov-16 18:07
Re: 2 questions 456 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 20:57
Re: 2 questions 427 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 21:08
Re: 2 questions 410 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:20
Re: 2 questions 422 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:17
Re: 2 questions 442 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 21:56
Re: 2 questions 379 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:27
Re: 2 questions 433 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 23:08
Re: 2 questions 392 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 517 Notinham 20-Nov-16 21:16
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 480 Thunderbird 21-Nov-16 17:14
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 455 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 14:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 457 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 15:26
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 412 cladking 23-Nov-16 15:39
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 436 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 16:03
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 402 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 471 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 19:52
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 460 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 10:32
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 451 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:41
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 454 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 18:54
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 334 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:38
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 392 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 444 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 430 cladking 23-Nov-16 22:31
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 467 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:50
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 467 cladking 23-Nov-16 23:18
Doh!! 448 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:22
Re: Doh!! 455 cladking 24-Nov-16 01:02
there you have it 442 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 470 cladking 24-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 466 Warwick 24-Nov-16 19:25
Re: there you have it 439 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:39
Re: there you have it 425 Origyptian 24-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 421 Warwick 25-Nov-16 06:13
Re: there you have it 376 cladking 25-Nov-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 415 Jon Ellison 25-Nov-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 491 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 17:53
Re: there you have it 472 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 18:54
Re: there you have it 471 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 19:55
Re: there you have it 436 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 23:09
Re: there you have it 418 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:36
Re: there you have it 476 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 512 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 01:27
Re: there you have it 366 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 15:12
Re: there you have it 575 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 361 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:11
Re: there you have it 383 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 337 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:05
Re: there you have it 314 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 18:32
Re: there you have it 408 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 414 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 13:37
Re: there you have it 460 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 434 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 16:47
Re: there you have it 435 cladking 01-Dec-16 17:40
Re: there you have it 419 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:43
Re: there you have it 394 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:54
Re: there you have it 461 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 16:13
Re: there you have it 348 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 17:03
Re: there you have it 406 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:00
Re: there you have it 352 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:17
Re: there you have it 358 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:14
Re: there you have it 458 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 19:19
Re: there you have it 421 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 23:31
Re: there you have it 444 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:31
Re: there you have it 349 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:44
Re: there you have it 345 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 22:58
Re: there you have it 450 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 513 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 15:08
Re: there you have it 436 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 18:19
Re: there you have it 425 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 546 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 13:57
Re: there you have it 313 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 471 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 16:50
Re: there you have it 366 Warwick 05-Dec-16 17:18
Re: there you have it 253 cladking 05-Dec-16 17:59
put up or shut up 421 Warwick 05-Dec-16 18:35
Re: put up or shut up 357 cladking 05-Dec-16 19:07
Re: put up or shut up 382 Warwick 05-Dec-16 19:20
Re: there you have it 483 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 20:19
Re: there you have it 404 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:28
Re: there you have it 341 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:37
Re: there you have it 394 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:53
Re: there you have it 371 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 384 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:02
Re: there you have it 322 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:17
Re: there you have it 402 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:29
Re: there you have it 416 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:50
Re: there you have it 400 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 435 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:01
Re: there you have it 520 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:26
Re: there you have it 396 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 427 Origyptian 06-Dec-16 02:42
Re: there you have it 439 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 22:19
Re: there you have it 389 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 393 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 00:16
Re: there you have it 367 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:18
Re: there you have it 433 Audrey 07-Dec-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 251 Warwick 07-Dec-16 19:31
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 417 cladking 07-Dec-16 19:55
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 391 Warwick 07-Dec-16 20:02
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 324 cladking 07-Dec-16 20:46
Re: there you have it 317 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 345 Warwick 07-Dec-16 21:44
Re: there you have it 405 Audrey 07-Dec-16 22:44
Re: there you have it 395 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 22:52
Re: there you have it 377 Audrey 07-Dec-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 419 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 00:37
Re: there you have it 458 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 447 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 01:10
Re: there you have it 439 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 02:48
Re: there you have it 445 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 12:08
Re: there you have it 418 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:01
Re: there you have it 384 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 348 Origyptian 08-Dec-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 350 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:33
Re: there you have it 400 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 416 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:37
Re: there you have it 411 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:54
Re: there you have it 388 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 21:01
Re: there you have it 500 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 01:02
Re: there you have it 311 Martin Stower 09-Dec-16 02:57
Re: there you have it 455 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 11:16
Re: there you have it 388 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:21
Re: there you have it 370 Origyptian 07-Dec-16 22:59
Audrey & The Peanut Gallery 500 Warwick 11-Dec-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 374 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:01
Re: there you have it 452 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:07
Re: there you have it 457 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 457 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 01:59
Re: there you have it 419 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 404 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:08
Re: there you have it 427 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 415 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:46
Re: there you have it 423 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:52
Re: there you have it 408 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:19
Re: there you have it 319 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 17:59
Re: there you have it 323 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:03
Re: there you have it 392 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 07:37
Re: there you have it 430 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 17:05
Re: there you have it 386 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 379 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 22:08
Re: there you have it 361 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 06:59
Clarification 341 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 20:53
Re: Clarification 411 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:10
Re: Clarification 563 Merrell 04-Jan-17 14:21
Re: there you have it 471 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 22:28
Re: there you have it 322 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:45
Re: there you have it 425 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:09
Re: there you have it 436 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 23:52
Re: there you have it 349 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 15:07
Re: there you have it 454 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 01:03
Re: there you have it 494 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:38
Re: there you have it 449 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 07:08
Re: there you have it 511 Martin Stower 30-Nov-16 03:00
The solution 360 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:26
Re: The solution 367 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:40
Re: The solution 328 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 03:15
Re: The solution 340 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 06:13
Re: The solution 422 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 10:08
Re: The solution 390 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 15:55
Re: there you have it 354 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 22:16
Re: there you have it 380 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 23:13
Re: there you have it 365 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:43
Re: there you have it 395 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:50
Re: there you have it 517 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 391 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:49
Re: there you have it 524 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 05:51
Re: there you have it 441 cladking 27-Nov-16 14:49
Re: there you have it 446 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 18:02
Re: there you have it 389 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 18:33
Re: there you have it 403 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 492 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 22:34
Re: there you have it 442 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:08
Re: there you have it 489 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:04
A really really good question 322 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:55
Re: A really really good question 332 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:31
Re: A really really good question 356 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:58
Re: A really really good question 331 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:10
Re: A really really good question 328 Warwick 29-Nov-16 19:57
Re: there you have it 371 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:39
Re: there you have it 371 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:12
Re: there you have it 389 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:58
Re: there you have it 384 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 04:24
Re: there you have it 301 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 383 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:26
Re: there you have it 437 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 370 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:05
Re: there you have it 440 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 00:14
Re: there you have it 402 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 01:11
Re: there you have it 403 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 03:08
Re: there you have it 348 cladking 30-Nov-16 04:31
Re: there you have it 227 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 05:40
Re: there you have it 390 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 378 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:17
Re: there you have it 296 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:32
Re: there you have it 299 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:53
Re: there you have it 410 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 04:13
Re: there you have it 428 Jon Ellison 27-Nov-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 318 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 336 cladking 28-Nov-16 00:31
Re: there you have it 354 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:38
Re: there you have it 363 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:35
Re: there you have it 315 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:46
Re: there you have it 300 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:32
Re: there you have it 388 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:06
Re: there you have it 332 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:19
Re: there you have it 221 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:59
Re: there you have it 357 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 22:53
Re: there you have it 370 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:42
Re: there you have it 332 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 12:47
Re: there you have it 359 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 18:01
Re: there you have it 307 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 18:37
Re: there you have it 427 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 23:47
Re: there you have it 359 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:09
Re: there you have it 375 cladking 30-Nov-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 282 Thanos5150 01-Dec-16 17:28
Re: there you have it 600 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 358 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:15
Re: there you have it 327 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:30
Re: there you have it 303 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 250 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:23
Re: there you have it 241 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:35
Re: there you have it 278 Audrey 02-Dec-16 17:57
Re: there you have it 267 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:30
Re: there you have it 291 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:39
Re: there you have it 401 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:10
Re: there you have it 526 Audrey 03-Dec-16 05:24
Re: there you have it 402 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 382 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 366 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 341 cladking 04-Dec-16 03:12
Re: there you have it 403 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 04:58
Re: there you have it 228 cladking 04-Dec-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 282 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 05:31
Re: there you have it 261 cladking 04-Dec-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 388 Audrey 04-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 420 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 10:44
Re: there you have it 288 Warwick 04-Dec-16 20:00
Answer to your question 300 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-16 22:07
Re: there you have it 319 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:56
Re: there you have it 500 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 342 cladking 03-Dec-16 03:50
Re: there you have it 439 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 394 Origyptian 03-Dec-16 20:56
Re: there you have it 254 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:23
Re: there you have it 369 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 363 Audrey 03-Dec-16 23:17
Re: there you have it 387 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 00:51
Re: there you have it 276 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:13
Re: there you have it 351 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 340 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 02:29
Re: there you have it 329 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 04:48
Re: there you have it 297 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 416 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:56
Re: there you have it 361 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 02:04
Re: there you have it 190 Audrey 04-Dec-16 07:02
Re: there you have it 323 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 21:28
Re: there you have it 266 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 263 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 382 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 367 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 417 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 383 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 03:11
Re: there you have it 361 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 12:26
Re: there you have it 237 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 15:25
Re: there you have it 364 Audrey 06-Dec-16 02:35
Re: there you have it 525 Thanos5150 06-Dec-16 07:03
Re: there you have it 312 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 14:54
Re: there you have it 273 Corpuscles 06-Dec-16 17:09
Re: there you have it 257 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 19:03
Re: there you have it 410 Thanos5150 09-Dec-16 19:46
Re: there you have it 428 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 21:56
Re: there you have it 343 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:03
Re: there you have it 267 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 304 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 375 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 360 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 335 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:33
Re: there you have it 297 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 21:53
Re: there you have it 202 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 334 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 257 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:41
Re: there you have it 357 cladking 29-Nov-16 22:05
Re: there you have it 295 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:32
Re: there you have it 307 cladking 29-Nov-16 23:05
Re: there you have it 298 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:24
Re: there you have it 255 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:16
Re: there you have it 356 randompHactor 30-Nov-16 05:25
Re: there you have it 331 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 364 cladking 30-Nov-16 05:46
Re: there you have it 392 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 291 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:49
Re: there you have it 299 Corpuscles 27-Nov-16 21:49
Re: there you have it 356 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:34
Re: there you have it 329 cladking 27-Nov-16 22:02
Re: there you have it 308 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 335 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:07
Re: there you have it 404 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 08:03
Re: there you have it 372 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 13:55
Re: there you have it 281 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 22:09
Re: there you have it 332 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:09
Re: there you have it 292 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 07:28
Re: there you have it 339 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 13:48
Re: there you have it 280 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 20:17
Re: there you have it 348 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 318 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 311 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:59
Re: there you have it 274 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 00:13
Re: there you have it 344 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:20
Re: there you have it 260 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:30
Re: there you have it 346 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:29
Re: there you have it 243 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:47
Re: there you have it 311 cladking 30-Nov-16 15:18
Re: there you have it 334 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 15:21
what about Rameses 341 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:46
Re: what about Rameses 329 Audrey 30-Nov-16 17:54
Re: what about Rameses 384 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:29
Re: what about Rameses 373 Audrey 02-Dec-16 04:03
Re: what about Rameses 399 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:14
Re: what about Rameses 247 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:46
Re: what about Rameses 352 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:01
Not the Statuary.. 309 Warwick 04-Dec-16 19:38
Re: what about Rameses 388 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 17:58
Re: what about Rameses 319 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 14:30
Re: what about Rameses 367 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:13
Re: there you have it 386 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 16:15
Re: there you have it 365 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 16:56
Re: there you have it 272 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:11
Re: there you have it 243 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:32
Re: there you have it 420 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:15
Re: there you have it 342 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 366 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:12
Re: there you have it 296 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:40
Re: there you have it 294 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:37
Re: there you have it 290 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 376 Thanos5150 26-Nov-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 418 cladking 26-Nov-16 23:18
Re: there you have it 352 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:38
Re: there you have it 253 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:42
Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 382 cladking 28-Nov-16 14:43
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 279 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:12
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 362 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:56
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 328 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:18
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 335 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 377 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:07
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 347 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:03
But you never answered my questions. 322 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:24
Re: But you never answered my questions. 281 Thunderbird 29-Nov-16 20:48
Re: But you never answered my questions. 381 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:39
Re: But you never answered my questions. 348 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:03
Re: But you never answered my questions. 314 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:59
Re: there you have it 361 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:23
Re: there you have it 277 randompHactor 29-Nov-16 03:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 477 Anomalies 28-Nov-16 16:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 325 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:49
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 362 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 407 D-Archer 29-Nov-16 11:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.