Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On the contrary, Doctor, when the evidence
> > makes it a certainty that these things were
> > done and points without exception to the
> > ancient Egyptians as the ones who did them—not a
> > glimmer of a hint of anyone else—then it is
> > “incumbent” on you the naysayer to show that
> > there was another candidate for the job whose
> > abilities we could even begin to discuss.
> >
> > Allow me to remind you that you have so far
> > provided NO EVIDENCE
> > WHATSOEVER!!!!
> >
> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
> >
> > It is, after all, a “lost civilisation” . . .
> >
> > What was its language? What was its script? What
> > were its units of measurement? What materials did
> > it use? What sources of power? What was its
> > transport system?
> >
> > Were its people white, brown or purple? What did
> > they wear? What did they eat?
> >
> > Why have you failed to provide evidence of any of
> > this?
> >
> > M.
>
> All good questions. Since you consider there to be
> zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization
> in the ancient past, perhaps you can now provide
> us with the answers regarding who's responsible
> for those 1600 ton blocks of stone in Baalbek, or
> the blocks at Stonehenge, or the bizarre stonework
> in the Andes, etc. You know who did all that
> stonework too? Did they wear yellow? What did they
> eat? Where is all your evidence for that?

All good questions—so why have you not answered them, or even attempted to? Instead you resort to the tired ploy of answering my several questions with questions of your own.

Shall we count the fallacies? Certainly we have straw man. Let’s see you justify this: “you consider there to be zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization in the ancient past”. Explicit citation, verbatim quote and link, please.

You would have done better to leave Baalbek out of this, as all you are relying on in the case is your own equivalent naysaying on what the Romans could do.

Stonehenge:

https://www.aboutstonehenge.info/who-built-stonehenge/

It’s not as if no one has any idea.

Bizarre stonework in the Andes? Sorry, you’ll need to be more specific than that. I can say that the reality has likewise been fogged by naysaying, some of it driven by objectionable ideology. In the case of Tiwanaku we also have the problem of the site not having always been well protected.

So your argument from analogy (an invalid form in any case) is based (as it so often is) on a spurious analogy. The elephant in the room: in no case here is there a perceived need to deny a connection with a massively evidenced and sophisticated local culture with undeniable achievements in stoneworking to its credit.

> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
>
> Indeed.
>
> As if we have any reason whatsoever to arrogantly
> presume that we have now completely identified
> every single culture that has inhabited planet
> Earth in the past few million years who might have
> accomplished anything of note. Forget the fact
> that the older the civilization is, the less
> evidence remains of it. Forget the fact that stone
> artifacts will clearly survive longer than what
> they wore and ate.
>
> You want evidence, I present to you those
> pyramids. The evidence from the OK largely
> contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids. . . .

You arrogantly presume that you know the evidence well enough? I see no sign of your studying it worth a damn. The overwhelming preponderance of your effort goes into naysaying, as (for example) with the Merer material.

“The evidence from the OK largely contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids.” Only through your arbitrarily excluding them from the schedule of evidence in the first place.

You tried this invitation to the ad hoc before, remember? I didn’t go for it then and I’m not about to now. It’s simply not clear that an anonymous civilisation with no determinate characteristics can serve as an explanation of anything.

The status quo ante remains: we have NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of a “lost” civilisation building pyramids in Egypt, while the “reason” for so much as suggesting such a thing proves to have its basis in an arbitrary and question-begging selection of evidence of the most rudimentary kind.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Question On The Fossil Record 2553 rob24550 19-Nov-16 22:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 629 gulsbo 19-Nov-16 22:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 476 @tlantis 29-Nov-16 07:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 588 Manu 19-Nov-16 23:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 510 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 11:20
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 544 Warwick 20-Nov-16 19:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 542 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 21:29
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 540 Warwick 21-Nov-16 17:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 452 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 12:05
The Paradigm is Naked. 493 cladking 22-Nov-16 15:54
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 451 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:14
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 430 cladking 22-Nov-16 19:05
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 456 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:12
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 422 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:08
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 403 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 16:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 463 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 381 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 425 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 407 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:36
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 336 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 443 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:58
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 430 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 19:11
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 441 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:13
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 488 cladking 22-Nov-16 18:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 463 Warwick 23-Nov-16 17:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 448 Hanslune 24-Nov-16 06:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 443 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 436 Hanslune 25-Nov-16 07:22
2 questions 440 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:02
Re: 2 questions 471 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:17
Re: 2 questions 390 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:29
Re: 2 questions 398 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:34
Re: 2 questions 329 Warwick 23-Nov-16 18:07
Re: 2 questions 443 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 20:57
Re: 2 questions 406 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 21:08
Re: 2 questions 401 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:20
Re: 2 questions 402 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:17
Re: 2 questions 424 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 21:56
Re: 2 questions 360 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:27
Re: 2 questions 418 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 23:08
Re: 2 questions 362 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 504 Notinham 20-Nov-16 21:16
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 468 Thunderbird 21-Nov-16 17:14
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 432 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 14:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 443 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 15:26
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 401 cladking 23-Nov-16 15:39
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 418 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 16:03
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 383 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 458 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 19:52
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 444 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 10:32
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 436 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:41
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 426 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 18:54
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 313 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:38
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 356 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 429 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 414 cladking 23-Nov-16 22:31
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 453 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:50
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 448 cladking 23-Nov-16 23:18
Doh!! 423 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:22
Re: Doh!! 444 cladking 24-Nov-16 01:02
there you have it 431 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 435 cladking 24-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 448 Warwick 24-Nov-16 19:25
Re: there you have it 419 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:39
Re: there you have it 403 Origyptian 24-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 406 Warwick 25-Nov-16 06:13
Re: there you have it 364 cladking 25-Nov-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 402 Jon Ellison 25-Nov-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 478 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 17:53
Re: there you have it 452 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 18:54
Re: there you have it 458 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 19:55
Re: there you have it 422 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 23:09
Re: there you have it 401 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:36
Re: there you have it 457 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 498 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 01:27
Re: there you have it 347 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 15:12
Re: there you have it 556 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 345 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:11
Re: there you have it 360 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 323 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:05
Re: there you have it 304 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 18:32
Re: there you have it 391 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 405 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 13:37
Re: there you have it 442 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 412 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 16:47
Re: there you have it 412 cladking 01-Dec-16 17:40
Re: there you have it 407 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:43
Re: there you have it 377 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:54
Re: there you have it 449 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 16:13
Re: there you have it 334 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 17:03
Re: there you have it 379 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:00
Re: there you have it 341 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:17
Re: there you have it 339 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:14
Re: there you have it 442 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 19:19
Re: there you have it 405 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 23:31
Re: there you have it 423 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:31
Re: there you have it 337 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:44
Re: there you have it 322 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 22:58
Re: there you have it 437 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 467 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 15:08
Re: there you have it 411 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 18:19
Re: there you have it 396 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 518 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 13:57
Re: there you have it 303 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 455 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 16:50
Re: there you have it 357 Warwick 05-Dec-16 17:18
Re: there you have it 232 cladking 05-Dec-16 17:59
put up or shut up 396 Warwick 05-Dec-16 18:35
Re: put up or shut up 346 cladking 05-Dec-16 19:07
Re: put up or shut up 369 Warwick 05-Dec-16 19:20
Re: there you have it 458 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 20:19
Re: there you have it 391 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:28
Re: there you have it 325 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:37
Re: there you have it 389 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:53
Re: there you have it 354 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 374 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:02
Re: there you have it 306 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:17
Re: there you have it 390 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:29
Re: there you have it 400 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:50
Re: there you have it 389 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 419 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:01
Re: there you have it 497 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:26
Re: there you have it 387 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 413 Origyptian 06-Dec-16 02:42
Re: there you have it 425 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 22:19
Re: there you have it 383 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 384 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 00:16
Re: there you have it 352 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:18
Re: there you have it 419 Audrey 07-Dec-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 228 Warwick 07-Dec-16 19:31
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 406 cladking 07-Dec-16 19:55
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 358 Warwick 07-Dec-16 20:02
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 313 cladking 07-Dec-16 20:46
Re: there you have it 298 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 334 Warwick 07-Dec-16 21:44
Re: there you have it 384 Audrey 07-Dec-16 22:44
Re: there you have it 387 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 22:52
Re: there you have it 364 Audrey 07-Dec-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 404 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 00:37
Re: there you have it 450 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 432 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 01:10
Re: there you have it 416 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 02:48
Re: there you have it 433 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 12:08
Re: there you have it 405 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:01
Re: there you have it 375 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 337 Origyptian 08-Dec-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 326 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:33
Re: there you have it 393 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 402 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:37
Re: there you have it 404 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:54
Re: there you have it 380 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 21:01
Re: there you have it 483 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 01:02
Re: there you have it 290 Martin Stower 09-Dec-16 02:57
Re: there you have it 435 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 11:16
Re: there you have it 347 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:21
Re: there you have it 343 Origyptian 07-Dec-16 22:59
Audrey & The Peanut Gallery 484 Warwick 11-Dec-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 359 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:01
Re: there you have it 432 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:07
Re: there you have it 442 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 449 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 01:59
Re: there you have it 404 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 393 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:08
Re: there you have it 417 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 402 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:46
Re: there you have it 411 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:52
Re: there you have it 401 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:19
Re: there you have it 312 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 17:59
Re: there you have it 313 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:03
Re: there you have it 380 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 07:37
Re: there you have it 409 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 17:05
Re: there you have it 378 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 362 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 22:08
Re: there you have it 342 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 06:59
Clarification 325 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 20:53
Re: Clarification 392 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:10
Re: Clarification 545 Merrell 04-Jan-17 14:21
Re: there you have it 447 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 22:28
Re: there you have it 301 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:45
Re: there you have it 410 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:09
Re: there you have it 424 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 23:52
Re: there you have it 330 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 15:07
Re: there you have it 436 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 01:03
Re: there you have it 471 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:38
Re: there you have it 435 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 07:08
Re: there you have it 496 Martin Stower 30-Nov-16 03:00
The solution 346 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:26
Re: The solution 350 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:40
Re: The solution 307 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 03:15
Re: The solution 328 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 06:13
Re: The solution 410 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 10:08
Re: The solution 369 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 15:55
Re: there you have it 347 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 22:16
Re: there you have it 367 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 23:13
Re: there you have it 352 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:43
Re: there you have it 386 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:50
Re: there you have it 493 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 379 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:49
Re: there you have it 506 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 05:51
Re: there you have it 430 cladking 27-Nov-16 14:49
Re: there you have it 429 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 18:02
Re: there you have it 369 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 18:33
Re: there you have it 393 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 463 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 22:34
Re: there you have it 428 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:08
Re: there you have it 464 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:04
A really really good question 312 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:55
Re: A really really good question 324 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:31
Re: A really really good question 342 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:58
Re: A really really good question 313 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:10
Re: A really really good question 321 Warwick 29-Nov-16 19:57
Re: there you have it 362 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:39
Re: there you have it 364 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:12
Re: there you have it 370 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:58
Re: there you have it 370 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 04:24
Re: there you have it 284 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 367 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:26
Re: there you have it 416 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 357 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:05
Re: there you have it 419 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 00:14
Re: there you have it 397 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 01:11
Re: there you have it 386 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 03:08
Re: there you have it 325 cladking 30-Nov-16 04:31
Re: there you have it 205 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 05:40
Re: there you have it 359 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 364 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:17
Re: there you have it 287 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:32
Re: there you have it 281 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:53
Re: there you have it 380 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 04:13
Re: there you have it 414 Jon Ellison 27-Nov-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 305 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 306 cladking 28-Nov-16 00:31
Re: there you have it 330 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:38
Re: there you have it 348 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:35
Re: there you have it 288 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:46
Re: there you have it 284 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:32
Re: there you have it 380 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:06
Re: there you have it 325 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:19
Re: there you have it 212 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:59
Re: there you have it 342 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 22:53
Re: there you have it 358 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:42
Re: there you have it 321 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 12:47
Re: there you have it 347 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 18:01
Re: there you have it 290 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 18:37
Re: there you have it 407 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 23:47
Re: there you have it 329 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:09
Re: there you have it 356 cladking 30-Nov-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 265 Thanos5150 01-Dec-16 17:28
Re: there you have it 579 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 348 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:15
Re: there you have it 315 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:30
Re: there you have it 284 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 233 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:23
Re: there you have it 223 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:35
Re: there you have it 260 Audrey 02-Dec-16 17:57
Re: there you have it 246 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:30
Re: there you have it 271 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:39
Re: there you have it 382 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:10
Re: there you have it 508 Audrey 03-Dec-16 05:24
Re: there you have it 380 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 371 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 353 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 325 cladking 04-Dec-16 03:12
Re: there you have it 390 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 04:58
Re: there you have it 216 cladking 04-Dec-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 272 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 05:31
Re: there you have it 237 cladking 04-Dec-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 376 Audrey 04-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 410 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 10:44
Re: there you have it 275 Warwick 04-Dec-16 20:00
Answer to your question 292 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-16 22:07
Re: there you have it 306 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:56
Re: there you have it 489 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 331 cladking 03-Dec-16 03:50
Re: there you have it 425 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 380 Origyptian 03-Dec-16 20:56
Re: there you have it 238 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:23
Re: there you have it 354 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 349 Audrey 03-Dec-16 23:17
Re: there you have it 361 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 00:51
Re: there you have it 264 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:13
Re: there you have it 339 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 320 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 02:29
Re: there you have it 302 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 04:48
Re: there you have it 278 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 404 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:56
Re: there you have it 337 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 02:04
Re: there you have it 184 Audrey 04-Dec-16 07:02
Re: there you have it 311 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 21:28
Re: there you have it 239 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 245 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 357 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 347 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 407 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 371 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 03:11
Re: there you have it 345 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 12:26
Re: there you have it 224 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 15:25
Re: there you have it 349 Audrey 06-Dec-16 02:35
Re: there you have it 507 Thanos5150 06-Dec-16 07:03
Re: there you have it 284 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 14:54
Re: there you have it 266 Corpuscles 06-Dec-16 17:09
Re: there you have it 246 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 19:03
Re: there you have it 388 Thanos5150 09-Dec-16 19:46
Re: there you have it 416 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 21:56
Re: there you have it 333 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:03
Re: there you have it 255 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 291 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 364 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 351 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 323 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:33
Re: there you have it 281 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 21:53
Re: there you have it 189 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 322 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 229 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:41
Re: there you have it 342 cladking 29-Nov-16 22:05
Re: there you have it 261 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:32
Re: there you have it 285 cladking 29-Nov-16 23:05
Re: there you have it 280 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:24
Re: there you have it 240 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:16
Re: there you have it 343 randompHactor 30-Nov-16 05:25
Re: there you have it 322 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 354 cladking 30-Nov-16 05:46
Re: there you have it 385 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 282 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:49
Re: there you have it 290 Corpuscles 27-Nov-16 21:49
Re: there you have it 350 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:34
Re: there you have it 313 cladking 27-Nov-16 22:02
Re: there you have it 299 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 324 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:07
Re: there you have it 387 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 08:03
Re: there you have it 351 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 13:55
Re: there you have it 269 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 22:09
Re: there you have it 314 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:09
Re: there you have it 262 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 07:28
Re: there you have it 326 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 13:48
Re: there you have it 263 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 20:17
Re: there you have it 328 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 302 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 297 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:59
Re: there you have it 259 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 00:13
Re: there you have it 331 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:20
Re: there you have it 240 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:30
Re: there you have it 336 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:29
Re: there you have it 223 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:47
Re: there you have it 295 cladking 30-Nov-16 15:18
Re: there you have it 322 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 15:21
what about Rameses 328 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:46
Re: what about Rameses 318 Audrey 30-Nov-16 17:54
Re: what about Rameses 364 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:29
Re: what about Rameses 359 Audrey 02-Dec-16 04:03
Re: what about Rameses 369 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:14
Re: what about Rameses 240 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:46
Re: what about Rameses 337 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:01
Not the Statuary.. 305 Warwick 04-Dec-16 19:38
Re: what about Rameses 373 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 17:58
Re: what about Rameses 309 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 14:30
Re: what about Rameses 349 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:13
Re: there you have it 367 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 16:15
Re: there you have it 343 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 16:56
Re: there you have it 258 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:11
Re: there you have it 230 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:32
Re: there you have it 389 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:15
Re: there you have it 334 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 355 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:12
Re: there you have it 273 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:40
Re: there you have it 284 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:37
Re: there you have it 276 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 360 Thanos5150 26-Nov-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 387 cladking 26-Nov-16 23:18
Re: there you have it 330 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:38
Re: there you have it 242 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:42
Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 374 cladking 28-Nov-16 14:43
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 264 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:12
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 342 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:56
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 314 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:18
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 324 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 362 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:07
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 331 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:03
But you never answered my questions. 304 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:24
Re: But you never answered my questions. 269 Thunderbird 29-Nov-16 20:48
Re: But you never answered my questions. 360 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:39
Re: But you never answered my questions. 336 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:03
Re: But you never answered my questions. 292 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:59
Re: there you have it 341 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:23
Re: there you have it 259 randompHactor 29-Nov-16 03:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 466 Anomalies 28-Nov-16 16:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 313 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:49
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 354 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 400 D-Archer 29-Nov-16 11:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.