Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On the contrary, Doctor, when the evidence
> > makes it a certainty that these things were
> > done and points without exception to the
> > ancient Egyptians as the ones who did them—not a
> > glimmer of a hint of anyone else—then it is
> > “incumbent” on you the naysayer to show that
> > there was another candidate for the job whose
> > abilities we could even begin to discuss.
> >
> > Allow me to remind you that you have so far
> > provided NO EVIDENCE
> > WHATSOEVER!!!!
> >
> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
> >
> > It is, after all, a “lost civilisation” . . .
> >
> > What was its language? What was its script? What
> > were its units of measurement? What materials did
> > it use? What sources of power? What was its
> > transport system?
> >
> > Were its people white, brown or purple? What did
> > they wear? What did they eat?
> >
> > Why have you failed to provide evidence of any of
> > this?
> >
> > M.
>
> All good questions. Since you consider there to be
> zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization
> in the ancient past, perhaps you can now provide
> us with the answers regarding who's responsible
> for those 1600 ton blocks of stone in Baalbek, or
> the blocks at Stonehenge, or the bizarre stonework
> in the Andes, etc. You know who did all that
> stonework too? Did they wear yellow? What did they
> eat? Where is all your evidence for that?

All good questions—so why have you not answered them, or even attempted to? Instead you resort to the tired ploy of answering my several questions with questions of your own.

Shall we count the fallacies? Certainly we have straw man. Let’s see you justify this: “you consider there to be zero chance of a yet to be identified civilization in the ancient past”. Explicit citation, verbatim quote and link, please.

You would have done better to leave Baalbek out of this, as all you are relying on in the case is your own equivalent naysaying on what the Romans could do.

Stonehenge:

https://www.aboutstonehenge.info/who-built-stonehenge/

It’s not as if no one has any idea.

Bizarre stonework in the Andes? Sorry, you’ll need to be more specific than that. I can say that the reality has likewise been fogged by naysaying, some of it driven by objectionable ideology. In the case of Tiwanaku we also have the problem of the site not having always been well protected.

So your argument from analogy (an invalid form in any case) is based (as it so often is) on a spurious analogy. The elephant in the room: in no case here is there a perceived need to deny a connection with a massively evidenced and sophisticated local culture with undeniable achievements in stoneworking to its credit.

> > No inscriptions, no depictions, no tools, no
> > settlements, no infrastructure, no burials, none
> > of the impedimenta of everyday life and death.
>
> Indeed.
>
> As if we have any reason whatsoever to arrogantly
> presume that we have now completely identified
> every single culture that has inhabited planet
> Earth in the past few million years who might have
> accomplished anything of note. Forget the fact
> that the older the civilization is, the less
> evidence remains of it. Forget the fact that stone
> artifacts will clearly survive longer than what
> they wore and ate.
>
> You want evidence, I present to you those
> pyramids. The evidence from the OK largely
> contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids. . . .

You arrogantly presume that you know the evidence well enough? I see no sign of your studying it worth a damn. The overwhelming preponderance of your effort goes into naysaying, as (for example) with the Merer material.

“The evidence from the OK largely contradicts an OK provenance for those pyramids.” Only through your arbitrarily excluding them from the schedule of evidence in the first place.

You tried this invitation to the ad hoc before, remember? I didn’t go for it then and I’m not about to now. It’s simply not clear that an anonymous civilisation with no determinate characteristics can serve as an explanation of anything.

The status quo ante remains: we have NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER of a “lost” civilisation building pyramids in Egypt, while the “reason” for so much as suggesting such a thing proves to have its basis in an arbitrary and question-begging selection of evidence of the most rudimentary kind.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Question On The Fossil Record 2462 rob24550 19-Nov-16 22:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 567 gulsbo 19-Nov-16 22:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 424 @tlantis 29-Nov-16 07:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 533 Manu 19-Nov-16 23:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 468 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 11:20
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 506 Warwick 20-Nov-16 19:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 485 Jon Ellison 20-Nov-16 21:29
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 480 Warwick 21-Nov-16 17:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 395 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 12:05
The Paradigm is Naked. 434 cladking 22-Nov-16 15:54
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 398 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:14
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 380 cladking 22-Nov-16 19:05
Re: The Paradigm is Naked. 399 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:12
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 391 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:08
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 354 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 16:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 412 cladking 22-Nov-16 16:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 339 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 378 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 356 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:36
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 295 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:40
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 393 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:58
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 385 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 19:11
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 390 Warwick 22-Nov-16 21:13
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 439 cladking 22-Nov-16 18:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 415 Warwick 23-Nov-16 17:51
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 401 Hanslune 24-Nov-16 06:23
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 394 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 389 Hanslune 25-Nov-16 07:22
2 questions 391 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:02
Re: 2 questions 419 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:17
Re: 2 questions 342 Warwick 22-Nov-16 18:29
Re: 2 questions 353 Jon Ellison 22-Nov-16 18:34
Re: 2 questions 278 Warwick 23-Nov-16 18:07
Re: 2 questions 392 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 20:57
Re: 2 questions 361 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 21:08
Re: 2 questions 358 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:20
Re: 2 questions 355 Warwick 23-Nov-16 21:17
Re: 2 questions 373 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 21:56
Re: 2 questions 303 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:27
Re: 2 questions 375 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 23:08
Re: 2 questions 320 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:15
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 459 Notinham 20-Nov-16 21:16
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 424 Thunderbird 21-Nov-16 17:14
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 385 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 14:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 394 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 15:26
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 354 cladking 23-Nov-16 15:39
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 372 Jon Ellison 23-Nov-16 16:03
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 336 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 409 Origyptian 23-Nov-16 19:52
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 394 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 10:32
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 377 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:41
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 371 Jon Ellison 24-Nov-16 18:54
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 268 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:38
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 315 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:46
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 384 Anomalies 23-Nov-16 19:33
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 363 cladking 23-Nov-16 22:31
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 399 Warwick 23-Nov-16 22:50
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 393 cladking 23-Nov-16 23:18
Doh!! 379 Warwick 23-Nov-16 23:22
Re: Doh!! 402 cladking 24-Nov-16 01:02
there you have it 387 Warwick 24-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 384 cladking 24-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 390 Warwick 24-Nov-16 19:25
Re: there you have it 374 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:39
Re: there you have it 352 Origyptian 24-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 360 Warwick 25-Nov-16 06:13
Re: there you have it 320 cladking 25-Nov-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 348 Jon Ellison 25-Nov-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 414 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 17:53
Re: there you have it 414 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 18:54
Re: there you have it 401 Origyptian 25-Nov-16 19:55
Re: there you have it 369 Martin Stower 25-Nov-16 23:09
Re: there you have it 351 Hanslune 26-Nov-16 00:36
Re: there you have it 404 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 442 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 01:27
Re: there you have it 300 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 15:12
Re: there you have it 492 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 17:33
Re: there you have it 304 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:11
Re: there you have it 311 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 276 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:05
Re: there you have it 264 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 18:32
Re: there you have it 345 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 367 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 13:37
Re: there you have it 399 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 366 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 16:47
Re: there you have it 374 cladking 01-Dec-16 17:40
Re: there you have it 352 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:43
Re: there you have it 334 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:54
Re: there you have it 391 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 16:13
Re: there you have it 296 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 17:03
Re: there you have it 326 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:00
Re: there you have it 295 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:17
Re: there you have it 283 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:14
Re: there you have it 388 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 19:19
Re: there you have it 353 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 23:31
Re: there you have it 377 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:31
Re: there you have it 293 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:44
Re: there you have it 275 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 22:58
Re: there you have it 387 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 00:30
Re: there you have it 412 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 15:08
Re: there you have it 366 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 18:19
Re: there you have it 345 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 456 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 13:57
Re: there you have it 266 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 15:27
Re: there you have it 407 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 16:50
Re: there you have it 324 Warwick 05-Dec-16 17:18
Re: there you have it 192 cladking 05-Dec-16 17:59
put up or shut up 343 Warwick 05-Dec-16 18:35
Re: put up or shut up 311 cladking 05-Dec-16 19:07
Re: put up or shut up 332 Warwick 05-Dec-16 19:20
Re: there you have it 394 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 20:19
Re: there you have it 340 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:28
Re: there you have it 282 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:37
Re: there you have it 341 Warwick 05-Dec-16 20:53
Re: there you have it 298 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 332 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:02
Re: there you have it 263 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:17
Re: there you have it 346 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 21:29
Re: there you have it 358 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:50
Re: there you have it 347 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 373 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:01
Re: there you have it 440 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:26
Re: there you have it 344 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 368 Origyptian 06-Dec-16 02:42
Re: there you have it 385 Martin Stower 06-Dec-16 22:19
Re: there you have it 343 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 340 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 00:16
Re: there you have it 310 Warwick 06-Dec-16 20:18
Re: there you have it 373 Audrey 07-Dec-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 188 Warwick 07-Dec-16 19:31
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 362 cladking 07-Dec-16 19:55
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 310 Warwick 07-Dec-16 20:02
Re: there you have it- -one jumped shark. 274 cladking 07-Dec-16 20:46
Re: there you have it 253 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 291 Warwick 07-Dec-16 21:44
Re: there you have it 338 Audrey 07-Dec-16 22:44
Re: there you have it 341 Jon Ellison 07-Dec-16 22:52
Re: there you have it 319 Audrey 07-Dec-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 357 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 00:37
Re: there you have it 400 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 385 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 01:10
Re: there you have it 370 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 02:48
Re: there you have it 388 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 12:08
Re: there you have it 357 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:01
Re: there you have it 331 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 301 Origyptian 08-Dec-16 16:23
Re: there you have it 287 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:33
Re: there you have it 346 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 355 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 16:37
Re: there you have it 362 Jon Ellison 08-Dec-16 16:54
Re: there you have it 344 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 21:01
Re: there you have it 440 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 01:02
Re: there you have it 255 Martin Stower 09-Dec-16 02:57
Re: there you have it 394 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 11:16
Re: there you have it 299 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:21
Re: there you have it 294 Origyptian 07-Dec-16 22:59
Audrey & The Peanut Gallery 434 Warwick 11-Dec-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 320 Martin Stower 08-Dec-16 00:01
Re: there you have it 387 Origyptian 05-Dec-16 21:07
Re: there you have it 382 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 383 Martin Stower 05-Dec-16 01:59
Re: there you have it 353 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 356 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:08
Re: there you have it 367 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 353 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:46
Re: there you have it 367 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:52
Re: there you have it 353 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:19
Re: there you have it 267 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 17:59
Re: there you have it 281 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:03
Re: there you have it 334 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 07:37
Re: there you have it 372 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 17:05
Re: there you have it 335 Histplorer 26-Nov-16 21:57
Re: there you have it 318 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 22:08
Re: there you have it 302 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 06:59
Clarification 289 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 20:53
Re: Clarification 344 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:10
Re: Clarification 498 Merrell 04-Jan-17 14:21
Re: there you have it 403 Dr. Troglodyte 26-Nov-16 22:28
Re: there you have it 257 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:45
Re: there you have it 359 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:09
Re: there you have it 377 Dr. Troglodyte 28-Nov-16 23:52
Re: there you have it 291 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 15:07
Re: there you have it 384 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 01:03
Re: there you have it 414 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:38
Re: there you have it 380 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 07:08
Re: there you have it 433 Martin Stower 30-Nov-16 03:00
The solution 302 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:26
Re: The solution 303 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:40
Re: The solution 268 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 03:15
Re: The solution 290 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 06:13
Re: The solution 363 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 10:08
Re: The solution 324 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 15:55
Re: there you have it 309 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 22:16
Re: there you have it 325 Martin Stower 26-Nov-16 23:13
Re: there you have it 311 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:43
Re: there you have it 350 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 00:50
Re: there you have it 438 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 329 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:49
Re: there you have it 447 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 05:51
Re: there you have it 378 cladking 27-Nov-16 14:49
Re: there you have it 378 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 18:02
Re: there you have it 329 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 18:33
Re: there you have it 351 cladking 27-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 402 Thanos5150 27-Nov-16 22:34
Re: there you have it 389 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:08
Re: there you have it 410 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:04
A really really good question 273 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:55
Re: A really really good question 278 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:31
Re: A really really good question 308 Warwick 28-Nov-16 21:58
Re: A really really good question 269 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:10
Re: A really really good question 281 Warwick 29-Nov-16 19:57
Re: there you have it 319 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 23:39
Re: there you have it 319 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:12
Re: there you have it 326 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:58
Re: there you have it 324 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 04:24
Re: there you have it 247 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:24
Re: there you have it 321 Warwick 28-Nov-16 20:26
Re: there you have it 357 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 301 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:05
Re: there you have it 368 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 00:14
Re: there you have it 354 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 01:11
Re: there you have it 342 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 03:08
Re: there you have it 289 cladking 30-Nov-16 04:31
Re: there you have it 167 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 05:40
Re: there you have it 310 Warwick 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 320 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 02:17
Re: there you have it 249 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 03:32
Re: there you have it 242 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:53
Re: there you have it 335 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 04:13
Re: there you have it 358 Jon Ellison 27-Nov-16 16:09
Re: there you have it 273 Origyptian 27-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 269 cladking 28-Nov-16 00:31
Re: there you have it 296 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:38
Re: there you have it 280 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 00:35
Re: there you have it 250 Thanos5150 28-Nov-16 00:46
Re: there you have it 241 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:32
Re: there you have it 330 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:06
Re: there you have it 283 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:19
Re: there you have it 173 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:59
Re: there you have it 294 Martin Stower 28-Nov-16 22:53
Re: there you have it 313 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 06:42
Re: there you have it 274 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 12:47
Re: there you have it 306 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 18:01
Re: there you have it 248 Martin Stower 29-Nov-16 18:37
Re: there you have it 353 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 23:47
Re: there you have it 290 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:09
Re: there you have it 313 cladking 30-Nov-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 231 Thanos5150 01-Dec-16 17:28
Re: there you have it 513 Martin Stower 01-Dec-16 20:25
Re: there you have it 304 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:15
Re: there you have it 272 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 11:30
Re: there you have it 246 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 192 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:23
Re: there you have it 188 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:35
Re: there you have it 228 Audrey 02-Dec-16 17:57
Re: there you have it 206 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 18:30
Re: there you have it 229 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 18:39
Re: there you have it 332 Martin Stower 02-Dec-16 20:10
Re: there you have it 433 Audrey 03-Dec-16 05:24
Re: there you have it 334 Martin Stower 03-Dec-16 23:44
Re: there you have it 327 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:07
Re: there you have it 308 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 291 cladking 04-Dec-16 03:12
Re: there you have it 337 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 04:58
Re: there you have it 177 cladking 04-Dec-16 05:09
Re: there you have it 229 Corpuscles 04-Dec-16 05:31
Re: there you have it 206 cladking 04-Dec-16 15:22
Re: there you have it 326 Audrey 04-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 365 Martin Stower 04-Dec-16 10:44
Re: there you have it 233 Warwick 04-Dec-16 20:00
Answer to your question 251 eyeofhorus33 04-Dec-16 22:07
Re: there you have it 269 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 05:56
Re: there you have it 400 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 293 cladking 03-Dec-16 03:50
Re: there you have it 379 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 06:43
Re: there you have it 329 Origyptian 03-Dec-16 20:56
Re: there you have it 202 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:23
Re: there you have it 302 Jon Ellison 03-Dec-16 21:37
Re: there you have it 306 Audrey 03-Dec-16 23:17
Re: there you have it 308 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 00:51
Re: there you have it 221 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:13
Re: there you have it 301 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 01:51
Re: there you have it 283 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 02:29
Re: there you have it 253 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 04:48
Re: there you have it 240 Audrey 04-Dec-16 01:28
Re: there you have it 343 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 01:56
Re: there you have it 294 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 02:04
Re: there you have it 146 Audrey 04-Dec-16 07:02
Re: there you have it 264 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 21:28
Re: there you have it 200 Jon Ellison 04-Dec-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 207 Thanos5150 04-Dec-16 23:49
Re: there you have it 311 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 01:01
Re: there you have it 293 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:07
Re: there you have it 350 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 02:39
Re: there you have it 326 Thanos5150 05-Dec-16 03:11
Re: there you have it 302 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 12:26
Re: there you have it 184 Jon Ellison 05-Dec-16 15:25
Re: there you have it 302 Audrey 06-Dec-16 02:35
Re: there you have it 443 Thanos5150 06-Dec-16 07:03
Re: there you have it 244 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 14:54
Re: there you have it 219 Corpuscles 06-Dec-16 17:09
Re: there you have it 205 Jon Ellison 06-Dec-16 19:03
Re: there you have it 336 Thanos5150 09-Dec-16 19:46
Re: there you have it 369 Jon Ellison 09-Dec-16 21:56
Re: there you have it 282 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:03
Re: there you have it 212 Thanos5150 03-Dec-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 235 Origyptian 04-Dec-16 16:17
Re: there you have it 317 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:41
Re: there you have it 307 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:57
Re: there you have it 272 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:33
Re: there you have it 243 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 21:53
Re: there you have it 149 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:59
Re: there you have it 287 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:43
Re: there you have it 187 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:41
Re: there you have it 295 cladking 29-Nov-16 22:05
Re: there you have it 222 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 22:32
Re: there you have it 244 cladking 29-Nov-16 23:05
Re: there you have it 234 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:24
Re: there you have it 207 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:16
Re: there you have it 304 randompHactor 30-Nov-16 05:25
Re: there you have it 277 Thanos5150 30-Nov-16 17:07
Re: there you have it 310 cladking 30-Nov-16 05:46
Re: there you have it 340 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 19:10
Re: there you have it 234 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:49
Re: there you have it 253 Corpuscles 27-Nov-16 21:49
Re: there you have it 299 Warwick 27-Nov-16 20:34
Re: there you have it 280 cladking 27-Nov-16 22:02
Re: there you have it 263 Martin Stower 27-Nov-16 22:45
Re: there you have it 280 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 06:07
Re: there you have it 337 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 08:03
Re: there you have it 306 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 13:55
Re: there you have it 226 Corpuscles 28-Nov-16 22:09
Re: there you have it 269 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:09
Re: there you have it 218 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 07:28
Re: there you have it 286 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 13:48
Re: there you have it 217 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 20:17
Re: there you have it 285 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:10
Re: there you have it 254 Corpuscles 29-Nov-16 23:42
Re: there you have it 252 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:59
Re: there you have it 219 Corpuscles 30-Nov-16 00:13
Re: there you have it 286 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 00:20
Re: there you have it 206 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:30
Re: there you have it 290 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 23:29
Re: there you have it 182 Warwick 30-Nov-16 14:47
Re: there you have it 263 cladking 30-Nov-16 15:18
Re: there you have it 285 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 15:21
what about Rameses 282 Warwick 30-Nov-16 16:46
Re: what about Rameses 265 Audrey 30-Nov-16 17:54
Re: what about Rameses 314 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 03:29
Re: what about Rameses 312 Audrey 02-Dec-16 04:03
Re: what about Rameses 323 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:14
Re: what about Rameses 201 Jon Ellison 02-Dec-16 11:46
Re: what about Rameses 291 Origyptian 02-Dec-16 16:01
Not the Statuary.. 269 Warwick 04-Dec-16 19:38
Re: what about Rameses 337 Jon Ellison 30-Nov-16 17:58
Re: what about Rameses 279 Origyptian 01-Dec-16 14:30
Re: what about Rameses 309 cladking 01-Dec-16 15:13
Re: there you have it 312 Origyptian 28-Nov-16 16:15
Re: there you have it 297 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 16:56
Re: there you have it 217 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:11
Re: there you have it 193 Jon Ellison 28-Nov-16 17:32
Re: there you have it 331 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:15
Re: there you have it 292 Jon Ellison 29-Nov-16 02:16
Re: there you have it 315 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:12
Re: there you have it 230 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:40
Re: there you have it 243 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 05:37
Re: there you have it 230 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:20
Re: there you have it 308 Thanos5150 26-Nov-16 22:11
Re: there you have it 340 cladking 26-Nov-16 23:18
Re: there you have it 282 Origyptian 26-Nov-16 23:38
Re: there you have it 198 Histplorer 28-Nov-16 07:42
Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 325 cladking 28-Nov-16 14:43
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 222 Hanslune 28-Nov-16 18:12
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 303 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:56
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 272 Warwick 28-Nov-16 22:18
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 283 Warwick 28-Nov-16 19:30
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 315 cladking 28-Nov-16 22:07
Re: Fossilized Gobbledtygook. 291 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:03
But you never answered my questions. 266 cladking 29-Nov-16 20:24
Re: But you never answered my questions. 218 Thunderbird 29-Nov-16 20:48
Re: But you never answered my questions. 307 Warwick 29-Nov-16 21:39
Re: But you never answered my questions. 289 Origyptian 30-Nov-16 05:03
Re: But you never answered my questions. 250 Warwick 29-Nov-16 20:59
Re: there you have it 293 Thanos5150 29-Nov-16 03:23
Re: there you have it 222 randompHactor 29-Nov-16 03:53
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 409 Anomalies 28-Nov-16 16:27
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 278 cladking 28-Nov-16 21:49
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 312 Origyptian 29-Nov-16 00:09
Re: Question On The Fossil Record 358 D-Archer 29-Nov-16 11:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.