WTF? So he [Scott] accepts G1 was built by Khufu and fully expects hieroglyphs bearing his name on the blocks, a no brainer: "why wouldn't we find the Khufu[...] name on the stones?", and yet all of Khufu's names found in the RC he believes to be fake and are separate issues having no relevance to each other. And this is a person worth stalking and ironically promoting their nonsense at every turn?
And yet from HOAX:
Despite millennia of fame, the origins of the Great Pyramid of Giza are shrouded in mystery. Believed to be the tomb of an Egyptian king, even though no remains have ever been found, its construction date of roughly 2550 BCE is tied to only one piece of evidence: the crudely painted marks within the pyramid’s hidden chambers that refer to the 4th Dynasty king Khufu, discovered in 1837 by Colonel Howard Vyse and his team.
But I thought he just said he accepts that Khufu built G1 and that this was not actually the issue but rather that Vyse just faked everything found in the RC for no apparent reason.
Just so there is no confusion:
Egyptologists consider the ochre-painted Khufu cartouche in the Great Pyramid as the ultimate proof that this pyramid belongs to the Fourth Dynasty pharaoh Khufu. But much controversy surrounds its authenticity. If the Khufu cartouche is indeed a hoax, then the implications are tremendous.
A powerfully-argued demolition of the 'facts' on which Egyptologists base their claim that the Great Pyramid was built by the Fourth Dynasty pharaoh Khufu. Scott Creighton's excellent new book The Great Pyramid Hoax is a first-class forensic investigation that Egyptologists should really be paying a great deal of attention to, because it pulls the rug of their chronology right out from under their feet.
Again, WTF? And yet both have stated quite clearly, like Scott, that they believe Khufu built G1 in the 4th Dynasty.
So on the one hand it is accepted G1 was built by Khufu in the 4th Dynasty rendering the "question" of whether the cartouches in the RC are genuine or not moot and is just a matter of "principle" to expose them as the "fakes" they are. Yet on the other the lie is repeated that the entire provenance and chronology of who built G1 and when rests solely on this one cartouche. Pure insanity at every level.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09-Dec-19 16:13 by Thanos5150.