Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Jon
>
> Thank you for your reply. However I was
> disappointed with the lack of detail provided.
>
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Corpuscles Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Are the matters listed above in bold, the
> sort
> > of
> > > detailed analysis Creighton commissioned in
> > your
> > > report?
> > > Can we expect to read your full "expert
> > analysis"
> > > and substantive supportive arguments for your
> > > conclusions?
> >
> > No. It would be far better if you carried out
> your
> > own analyses.

>
> So are you suggesting that your contribution to
> Creighton's book is so sparse and flakey (I
> suspect virtually non existent) that person like
> me (btw who holds several degrees inc post grad)
> but none in Art is in just as good position to
> assess the cartouche as you in fact "better"?


I don't know, I haven't read the book yet.


>
> > >
> > > If not, are you able to share the answers to
> > these
> > > questions on GHMB now? Or are they "report"
> > > secrets contracted and not available for
> public
> > > viewing?
> >
> > As above.
> > >
> > > IOW ....Is that in the book? Or don't you
> know
> > > what Creighton is putting in the book, which
> is
> > > apparently attributed by name to your
> > independent
> > > research and expertise? If not, don't you
> > > professionally care whether SC distorts your
> > > expert analysis?
> >
> > Once any job has been completed and passed on
> > there is very little any originator can do
> to
> > control it.

> >
> >
>
> Again I am thoroughly disappointed. I would
> expect a serious publication that cites an
> independent researcher and expert to at
> least refer to a detailed report which I would
> expect be included unmodified as an Appendix!
> Perhaps with an introduction indicating the
> background and verification of said "expert".
>
> To comment on the cartouche as an "art expert" I
> would expect to see some explanation of the bridge
> between art and study of painted hieratic on
> stone.
>
> Things like :
> -your detailed study of the types of brushes or
> writing implements eg camel hair or fibrous
> wooden etc.
> - your extensive study of multiple painted glyphs
> and hieractic from other sites
> - Your replication of the exercise of painting a
> cartouche on an angled stone and a flat stone
> -detailed explaination as to why it is impossible
> to have been painted flat in a quarry
>
> Lots of other things, but you ought know that if
> you were an "expert".
>
> So, I ask again is there significant detail of
> your own work in Creighton's book?

I don't know I haven't read the book yet.



>
> It seems all that has happened is that as a wet
> behind the ears newbie to GHMB you posted a
> theory, it was picked up by SC, then some
> clarifying private email exchanges and that is
> ALL? Perhaps he didn't even seek your
> authorisation to use your real name?



Make of it what you will.
I don't really see being a member of the GHMB as an academic qualification.
So being "wet behind the ears" or otherwise is irrelevant.



>
> >
> > > > My "Expert" expertise was only required to
> > make
> > > > people aware that this method exists..
> > > > Which Scott and I did.
> > >
> >
> > I think that any modern human would be capable
> of
> > determining the brush stroke sequence, once
> they
> > had been made aware of it as an analytical
> tool.
> > It's for this reason that I would encourage
> you to
> > carry out your own analyses and draw your own
> > conclusions.

> >
>
> No expert required? No expert opinion with
> substantiated support given?

>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It may be necessary to zoom in to see the
> > crossovers, intercepts and modulation.
> > This is intended only as a sequence awareness
> > guide as it has obviously been edited.
> > Please refer to an original photograph
> available
> > online and carry out your own analyses.

>
> Thank you for the great blown up pic of Monet's
> water lily's. I can see the layering and have some
> idea of the brush sequence. It helps of course to
> know Monet was right handed.


Is that a fact?



>
> > A point to bear in mind is the stroke
> sequencing,
> > painted horizontally vs. vertically.
> > How would you begin if you were painting
> > horizontally vs. vertically?
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> This is interesting. Is this the type of stuff
> you did to determine the cartouche brush strokes
> were made in situ? Can you explain why the same
> thing cannot have been made vertically on a flat
> surface in the quarry?


Scot may include that in the book, I cannot guarantee it, it's entirely up to him. He has my full permission to do so.



> > > > People are intelligent and can form their
> own
> > > > opinions. They are not sheep.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately , some people have a bias, then
> > they > > find (conjure or imagine)
> conformational bias!
> >
> > True but that bias is the result of a plethora
> of
> > other inputs that may not be the result of the
> > pure and direct observation of the primary
> source.
> > Which is the cartouche itself.
> > In order to be objective one has to disregard
> the
> > "is it" or "isn't it" conflict and work
> solely
> > with the data.

>
> However, your data consists of only a couple
> of pictures. You claim to see paint runs. I have
> stared at it like I suspect many others and do not
> see any paint runs! Nor clear indication of
> vertical/horizontal strokes



The paint runs are related to the brush stroke sequencing but the two are not interdependent insofar as analyses is concerned.



> > > In your expert analysis:
> > >
> > > Did you examine all (high res photos) of the
> > other
> > > cartouches and quarry marks Wellington
> Nelson
> > > upwards particularly the vertical painting
> > upside
> > > down in Lady Aburthnot's?
> >
> > None available.
> > >
> > > Are there any microscopic tell tale paint
> runs
> > on
> > > any of the others?
> >
> > As above. If you know of any I'd appreciate it
> if
> > you'd let me have a copy.
> > However there is a benefit in looking at the
> > cartouche in isolation.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Do they indicate that the "painter" was
> > different
> > > (style, brush, handedness etc) than the
> > Campbell's
> > > cartouche? If so, how do they differ? If the
> > same
> > > "forger" or "hoaxer" why did they bother with
> > all
> > > the others?
> >
> > There is a variation in style, brush,
> hand.

>
> You advised above that you had no access to
> photographs of the cartouches and writing in other
> chambers, but then declare "variation in style,
> brush, hand". Impossible for you to determine. Are
> you just trying to bluff and make up BS! Is BS
> what Creighton asked you for?


When I said variation in style I was referring to other marks in the same chamber.


> > > Were they merely practicing for the final
> > gotcha
> > > cartouche?
> >
> >
> > I don't know. I can only comment on the
> physical
> > relationship of the materials.
> >
> > In your expert opinion would it not be
> > > not more difficult to forge unfamiliar
> writing
> > > (hieratic) upside down?
> >
> > No. How would the forger know what was the
> > correct orientation?
>
>
> I think poster EyeofHorus has already addressed
> the issue. A forger would have no reason to
> attempt to paint them upside down. Nor in 1837
> would they be significantly skilled in hieratic to
> be capable of doing it.
> The point,is that it is no good being an art
> expert when the issue is authenticity of
> ancient AE handwriting.


I've carried out a full analyses only on the contentious cartouche. As requested.



> > > In your expert opinion, if all that a forger
> > > needed was a "Khufu" cartouche, then would it
> > not
> > > been easier to paint it in an upright
> > horizontal
> > > manner on a vertical wall in a lower chamber?
> > If
> > > not, then ...why not?
> >
> > Again can't answer I can only comment on the
> > physicality of the artwork and the way in which
> it
> > was constructed.
>
>
> But you provide no reasons (supporting
> information) whatsoever... as to why you think
> they were 'painted' that way or even how?
> >


As previously mentioned. Scott may provide details in his forthcoming book.




> > > What is the advantage of having to contort
> > oneself
> > > into a Michelangelo pose and attempt a
> forgery
> > on
> > > an angled gable roof?
> >
> > Again I cannot comment on motive only the
> artwork
> > itself.
>
> So your independent research and expertise
> simply amounts to a guess based on your bias?

No.



> How is that video coming along?



I may release it after Scott has released his book.



> > > Edit to add: Asking did you study in your
> > highly
> > > admirable art degrees how to paint deep into
> > > concealed crevices in multi ton block
> > structures?
> > > Can you tell us the technical procedure for
> > that?
> >
> > Access the crevices and then apply paint,
> usually
> > using a brush.
>
> Is that what you learnt in Uni? Plain BS!
> How do you access such crevices attested to by
> many many eye witnesses who declare it
> impossible?


Sorry I thought you meant in the chambers themselves.
I have seen no evidence of readable and recognizable Egyptian hieroglyphs in crevices. Only unreadable masons marks which are most likely contemporaneous with the construction of the pyramid.
>
>
>
> >
> > > My appreciation for your expert opinion, in
> > > advance.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> >
> > It's been a pleasure.
> > I particularly like discussing Monet, and the
> > relationship between physics and art.
> > Bloody marvelous.
>
> It is obvious you know more than a thing or too
> about art and impressionists in particular.
>
> What I am yet to ascertain is whether you know
> anything that would qualify you as an expert or
> even a real researcher into painted hieratic ?

I'm only concerned with the application of red ocher paint,
and the sequential relationship between individual brush strokes.



> > It seems Lover's "gargantuan ego's" comment
> seems apt to the reason for any actual consent to
> be cited in SC book?
>
> Yes a pleasure ... bloody marvellous!
>
> But can you address the questions this time?


I hope this helps.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Who Was Khufu? 4236 loveritas 02-Jun-16 07:27
Non Noh-Suphis 809 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Jun-16 15:31
Re: Who Was Khufu? 733 Thunderbird 02-Jun-16 17:10
Re: Oldest mines and Red ochre 590 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Who Was Khufu? 625 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 22:18
Re: Who Was Khufu? 625 loveritas 03-Jun-16 05:00
Hidden Agenda 607 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Jun-16 14:32
Re: Hidden Agenda 549 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Hidden Agenda 579 Dr. Troglodyte 04-Jun-16 00:05
Re:Co Regents ? 578 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 495 loveritas 04-Jun-16 00:24
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 596 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 01:55
The Power 546 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:40
Re: The Power 607 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:26
Re: The Power 606 Warwick 04-Jun-16 18:47
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 750 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:06
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 543 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:27
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 565 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:26
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 901 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 18:37
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 579 Warwick 05-Jun-16 18:51
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 581 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 20:12
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 569 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:25
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 492 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:35
Cartouche circle symbolizes a rope 507 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:30
Re: The Power 587 Martin Stower 14-Jun-16 09:36
Re: The Power 519 loveritas 21-Jun-16 11:19
Re: The Power 520 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 13:32
Re: The Power 563 Merrell 21-Jun-16 16:14
Re: The Power 561 loveritas 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: The Power 500 atul.seth 27-Jun-16 20:51
Re: Who Was Khufu? 573 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 02:42
The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 627 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 556 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:23
The Lepsius Tablet 521 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 17:20
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 568 loveritas 05-Jun-16 22:08
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 590 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 23:01
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 588 loveritas 05-Jun-16 23:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 761 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 09:16
Re: Who Was Khufu? 621 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 17:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 618 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:30
Re: Allegorical and historical 632 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 02:37
Re: Who Was Khufu? 575 Rofhessa 04-Jun-16 09:34
Re: Who Was Khufu? 603 Notinham 04-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Runic/Vinca? 586 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: Runic/Vince? 639 Notinham 04-Jun-16 04:38
Re: Runic/Vinca? 614 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Who Was Khufu? 519 Spiros 04-Jun-16 22:05
Re: Who Was Khufu? 528 Notinham 04-Jun-16 22:26
Re: Who Was Khufu? 623 Spiros 05-Jun-16 01:02
Re: Who Was Khufu? 534 Notinham 06-Jun-16 08:23
Hancock And The Quarry Marks 620 loveritas 05-Jun-16 03:22
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 564 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:32
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 535 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 09:58
Re: Who Was Khufu? 593 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 14:25
Re: Who Was Khufu? 573 eyeofhorus33 05-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Who Was Khufu? 563 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 07:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 606 Corpuscles 05-Jun-16 23:41
Schoch and the Quarry Marks 622 loveritas 06-Jun-16 01:17
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 544 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 622 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 02:57
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 571 loveritas 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 478 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:53
Re: Khufu Cartouche 685 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 05:47
Re: Khufu Cartouche 599 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 07:37
Re: Khufu Cartouche 599 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Khufu Cartouche 593 R Avry Wilson 07-Jun-16 05:24
Re: Khufu Cartouche 578 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 05:58
Re: Khufu Cartouche 619 Warwick 07-Jun-16 21:28
Re: Khufu Cartouche 472 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 22:12
Re: Khufu Cartouche 535 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:15
Re: Schoch and Maryann! 533 DScribr 23-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 451 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 13:56
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 523 Warwick 23-Jun-16 15:47
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 521 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 19:21
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 535 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 609 Corpuscles 06-Jun-16 03:55
Jury in Stunned Silence 794 loveritas 12-Jun-16 03:14
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 656 Warwick 12-Jun-16 16:49
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 547 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 17:27
showing my age 557 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:01
Re: showing my age 561 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:27
Re: showing my age 537 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 19:49
Re: showing my age 536 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 18:51
Re: showing my age 472 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:09
Re: The red ochre marks 557 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 599 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 20:50
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 560 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 21:46
Re: Who Was Khufu? 561 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 09:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 571 Spiros 06-Jun-16 13:21
Re: Who Was Khufu? Khufwey was Yakov/Jacob? 656 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 02:53
Sphinx decoded 598 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 05:13
Re: 26th Dyn. ....Homage to Khufu 562 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 16:46
Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 648 loveritas 13-Jun-16 07:31
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 617 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 11:51
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 485 Thanos5150 13-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 469 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 17:49
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 553 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 572 Thunderbird 14-Jun-16 03:03
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 558 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 04:27
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 613 Thanos5150 14-Jun-16 05:33
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 519 eyeofhorus33 13-Jun-16 17:55
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 618 Audrey 13-Jun-16 22:24
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 638 eyeofhorus33 14-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 441 Morten 14-Jun-16 02:55
Science and the Conspiracy 538 loveritas 18-Jun-16 22:46
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 482 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 03:23
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 486 loveritas 19-Jun-16 04:39
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 581 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:57
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 464 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 07:38
Re: Khufu and..... Time 555 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 08:28
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 482 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:58
Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 561 loveritas 20-Jun-16 11:11
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 570 Thunderbird 20-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 443 Brian Patterson 20-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 594 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 19:47
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 646 Jon Ellison 20-Jun-16 20:05
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 590 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 568 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 00:08
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 573 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 594 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 01:12
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 593 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 596 Audrey 21-Jun-16 05:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 484 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:41
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 483 Corpuscles 21-Jun-16 03:58
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 488 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 490 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 14:18
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 473 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 537 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 554 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 548 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 17:24
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 506 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 512 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 452 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 533 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 525 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:00
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 511 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 16:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 568 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 517 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 578 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 17:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 491 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 465 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 453 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 18:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 466 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:29
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 499 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 20:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 568 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 21:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 529 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 22:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 434 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 504 Audrey 22-Jun-16 00:07
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 490 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 498 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 517 Audrey 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 513 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 565 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 489 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 527 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:30
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 592 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 450 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 547 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 02:35
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 496 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 477 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 486 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 627 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 12:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 551 Merrell 24-Jun-16 13:06
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 460 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 531 Audrey 24-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 476 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 19:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 533 Audrey 24-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 481 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:44
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 538 Audrey 24-Jun-16 22:58
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 411 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 403 Audrey 25-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 522 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 545 Audrey 25-Jun-16 03:15
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 547 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 21:23
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 442 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 21:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 510 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 22:00
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 450 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 460 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 518 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 23:34
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 554 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 568 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 00:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 592 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 449 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:25
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 447 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 06:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 534 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 12:23
Expert? Specialist? 519 Merrell 26-Jun-16 14:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 545 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 15:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 500 Merrell 26-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 399 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 499 Merrell 26-Jun-16 17:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 444 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 482 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 588 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 19:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 491 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 444 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 20:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 476 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 492 Corpuscles 27-Jun-16 00:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 507 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 07:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 527 Merrell 27-Jun-16 08:16
Re: Expert? Specialist? 556 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 08:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 506 DUNE 27-Jun-16 09:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 472 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 448 Merrell 27-Jun-16 09:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 520 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 547 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 521 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 14:53
Re: Expert? Specialist? 576 Merrell 27-Jun-16 15:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 432 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 544 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 386 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 543 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 453 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 00:23
Re: Expert? Specialist? 494 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 00:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 510 Audrey 28-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 496 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 13:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 457 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 13:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 401 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 14:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 441 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 02:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 461 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 16:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 468 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 466 Audrey 27-Jun-16 20:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 549 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 20:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 452 Audrey 27-Jun-16 21:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 425 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 21:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 475 Merrell 28-Jun-16 09:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 452 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 09:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 515 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 11:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 471 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 12:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 447 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 14:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 465 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 14:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 437 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 15:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 469 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 489 Merrell 28-Jun-16 15:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 437 Audrey 28-Jun-16 16:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 478 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 18:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 495 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 470 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 464 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 21:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 510 Audrey 28-Jun-16 19:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 573 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 01:35
Re: Expert? Specialist? 459 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 399 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 19:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 407 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 486 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 459 Merrell 28-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 459 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 478 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 506 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:42
Re: No parallel? 462 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 22:27
Re: No parallel? 437 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 483 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:49
Re: Expert? Specialist? 456 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 481 R Avry Wilson 28-Jun-16 19:31
Re: R Avery Wilson 392 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 20:47
Thanks, Brad 435 drrayeye 28-Jun-16 22:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 458 Audrey 29-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Expert? Specialist? 403 R Avry Wilson 29-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 374 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 458 Thunderbird 29-Jun-16 06:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 444 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 411 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 409 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 385 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:33
Re: Expert? Specialist? 499 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 00:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 399 Audrey 30-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 360 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 03:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 386 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 323 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 327 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:29
Re: Expert? Specialist? 379 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 383 eyeofhorus33 30-Jun-16 06:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 457 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:37
Re: Ignore the evidence 415 Thunderbird 30-Jun-16 06:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 416 Audrey 30-Jun-16 04:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 452 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:34
Re: Expert? Specialist? 438 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 426 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 439 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 383 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 23:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 391 Audrey 30-Jun-16 23:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 366 Martin Stower 30-Jun-16 23:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 416 Audrey 01-Jul-16 00:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 437 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 00:50
Re: Expert? Specialist? 319 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 430 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 375 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:57
Re: Expert? Specialist? 458 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 436 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 420 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 14:55
Please, Steven 444 drrayeye 01-Jul-16 00:44
Re: Please, Steven 419 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:19
Re: Please, Steven 480 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:56
Re: Please, Steven 492 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:24
Re: Please, Steven 378 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 15:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 384 Origyptian 26-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 433 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 399 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Expert? Specialist? 360 Merrell 27-Jun-16 07:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 439 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 13:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 329 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 13:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 425 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 413 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 363 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 373 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 506 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 429 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 493 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 21:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 520 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 22:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 424 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:21
Re: Expert? Specialist? 461 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 449 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 435 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 338 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 522 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Expert? Specialist? 343 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 426 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 21:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 419 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 402 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 17:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 452 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:51
Re: Gatekeeping 363 Thunderbird 27-Jun-16 16:38
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 465 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:54
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 539 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 387 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 470 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:18
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 465 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 373 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:31
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 474 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 381 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 412 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 414 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:23
No Moderator Conspiracy 394 loveritas 27-Jun-16 05:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 402 Morten 25-Jun-16 23:19
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 376 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 450 Audrey 25-Jun-16 23:51
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 378 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 465 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:49
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 516 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 373 DScribr 30-Jun-16 02:48
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 441 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 399 Merrell 26-Jun-16 13:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 390 Audrey 24-Jun-16 16:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 523 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:08
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 439 Audrey 24-Jun-16 20:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 505 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 528 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:59
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 487 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 11:38
Post o' the week! 425 DScribr 22-Jun-16 21:07
Summertime In England 444 loveritas 21-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Who Was Khufu? 505 DUNE 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 385 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:22
Re: Who Was Khufu? 506 DUNE 21-Jun-16 16:05
Re: Minute Examination 486 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Minute Examination 448 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:48
Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 605 loveritas 22-Jun-16 03:34
Re: Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 468 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 20:20
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 499 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:14
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 532 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 21:37
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 448 DScribr 23-Jun-16 23:00
Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 476 loveritas 22-Jun-16 23:20
Re: Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 533 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:57
Creighton's Legal Team In Hiding 528 loveritas 23-Jun-16 23:54
it all boils down to this 457 Warwick 25-Jun-16 19:21
How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 475 Corpuscles 25-Jun-16 23:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 481 Audrey 26-Jun-16 00:19
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 489 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:24
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 418 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:17
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 466 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 475 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:48
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 392 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:52
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 424 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:57
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 439 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:59
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 355 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 393 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 505 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:04
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 471 Audrey 26-Jun-16 04:47
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 482 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 13:49
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 381 Warwick 26-Jun-16 17:32
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 444 Corpuscles 26-Jun-16 07:01
Re: Who Was Khufu? 488 atul.seth 28-Jun-16 12:48
Re: Who Was Khufu? 440 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:13
Re: Who Was Khufu? 506 Howard West 28-Jun-16 15:37
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 442 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 16:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 457 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 18:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 402 wonderwall 28-Jun-16 20:52
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 439 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 21:22
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 484 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:46
Lackeys 496 loveritas 29-Jun-16 07:19
Re: Lackeys 469 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Lackeys 397 Corpuscles 29-Jun-16 09:41
Re: Lackeys 442 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 09:45
Re: Lackeys 407 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:52
Re: Lackeys 449 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:05
Oxymoron Alert 336 Warwick 29-Jun-16 16:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 387 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Oxymoron Alert 380 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Oxymoron Alert 419 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Oxymoron Alert 454 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 343 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Oxymoron Alert 351 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 18:59
Surely you Jest 380 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 19:59
Re: Surely you Jest 438 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:29
Re: Surely you Jest 399 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 20:48
Re: Oxymoron Alert 405 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:32
N/T 361 Merrell 01-Jul-16 17:22
Re: Oxymoron Alert 440 Warwick 29-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Oxymoron Alert 475 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:24
Say what? 416 Warwick 30-Jun-16 14:27
Re: Say what? 350 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:16
Re: Say what? 412 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:55
Re: Say what? 421 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 17:10
Re: Say what? 429 Warwick 01-Jul-16 17:28
Re: Say what? 474 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 15:26
Re: Say what? 419 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:51
The Lackey Called John Snape 370 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:14
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 410 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 11:38
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 475 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:55
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 395 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 12:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 406 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:16
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 429 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:33
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 378 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:47
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 450 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:58
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 353 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:09
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 483 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:28
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 389 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 440 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 396 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 17:10
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 439 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:30
Re: Lackeys 400 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Lackeys 377 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:08
Re: Lackeys 452 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:31
Re: Lackeys 347 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: Lackeys 365 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Lackeys 419 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Lackeys 349 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Lackeys 426 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 18:46
Re: Lackeys 451 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Lackeys 429 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 19:19
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 446 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 12:40
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 419 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 13:35
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 346 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:38
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 364 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 14:42
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 419 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 15:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 445 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:50
'Officially' in the gutter. 435 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:16
Scotts 'New" Book 468 DScribr 29-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 428 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:27
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 388 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 14:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 402 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:44
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 431 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 375 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:57
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 407 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 396 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:14
n/t 419 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:59
The Need For Proof. 412 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:56
Re: The Need For Proof. 430 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:00
Hypocrisy 471 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:10
Re: Hypocrisy 386 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:19
Re: Hypocrisy 414 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:56
Re: Hypocrisy 372 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Hypocrisy 425 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Hypocrisy 442 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:36
Re: Hypocrisy 394 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 22:21
Re: Hypocrisy 406 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Hypocrisy 352 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:53
Re: Hypocrisy denied, but..... 449 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:50
Re: Hypocrisy 435 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 398 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:49
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 384 cladking 29-Jun-16 03:48
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 442 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 05:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 351 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.