Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Jon

Thank you for your reply. However I was disappointed with the lack of detail provided.

Jon Ellison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Are the matters listed above in bold, the sort
> of
> > detailed analysis Creighton commissioned in
> your
> > report?
> > Can we expect to read your full "expert
> analysis"
> > and substantive supportive arguments for your
> > conclusions?
>
> No. It would be far better if you carried out your
> own analyses.


So are you suggesting that your contribution to Creighton's book is so sparse and flakey (I suspect virtually non existent) that person like me (btw who holds several degrees inc post grad) but none in Art is in just as good position to assess the cartouche as you in fact "better"?

> >
> > If not, are you able to share the answers to
> these
> > questions on GHMB now? Or are they "report"
> > secrets contracted and not available for public
> > viewing?
>
> As above.
> >
> > IOW ....Is that in the book? Or don't you know
> > what Creighton is putting in the book, which is
> > apparently attributed by name to your
> independent
> > research and expertise? If not, don't you
> > professionally care whether SC distorts your
> > expert analysis?
>
> Once any job has been completed and passed on
> there is very little any originator can do to
> control it.

>
>

Again I am thoroughly disappointed. I would expect a serious publication that cites an independent researcher and expert to at least refer to a detailed report which I would expect be included unmodified as an Appendix! Perhaps with an introduction indicating the background and verification of said "expert".

To comment on the cartouche as an "art expert" I would expect to see some explanation of the bridge between art and study of painted hieratic on stone.

Things like :
-your detailed study of the types of brushes or writing implements eg camel hair or fibrous wooden etc.
- your extensive study of multiple painted glyphs and hieractic from other sites
- Your replication of the exercise of painting a cartouche on an angled stone and a flat stone
-detailed explaination as to why it is impossible to have been painted flat in a quarry

Lots of other things, but you ought know that if you were an "expert".

So, I ask again is there significant detail of your own work in Creighton's book?

It seems all that has happened is that as a wet behind the ears newbie to GHMB you posted a theory, it was picked up by SC, then some clarifying private email exchanges and that is ALL? Perhaps he didn't even seek your authorisation to use your real name?


>
> > > My "Expert" expertise was only required to
> make
> > > people aware that this method exists..
> > > Which Scott and I did.
> >
>
> I think that any modern human would be capable of
> determining the brush stroke sequence, once they
> had been made aware of it as an analytical tool.
> It's for this reason that I would encourage you to
> carry out your own analyses and draw your own
> conclusions.

>

No expert required? No expert opinion with substantiated support given?


>
>
>
>
> It may be necessary to zoom in to see the
> crossovers, intercepts and modulation.
> This is intended only as a sequence awareness
> guide as it has obviously been edited.
> Please refer to an original photograph available
> online and carry out your own analyses.


Thank you for the great blown up pic of Monet's water lily's. I can see the layering and have some idea of the brush sequence. It helps of course to know Monet was right handed.



> A point to bear in mind is the stroke sequencing,
> painted horizontally vs. vertically.
> How would you begin if you were painting
> horizontally vs. vertically?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

This is interesting. Is this the type of stuff you did to determine the cartouche brush strokes were made in situ? Can you explain why the same thing cannot have been made vertically on a flat surface in the quarry?

> >
> > >
> > > People are intelligent and can form their own
> > > opinions. They are not sheep.
> >
> > Unfortunately , some people have a bias, then
> they > > find (conjure or imagine) conformational bias!
>
> True but that bias is the result of a plethora of
> other inputs that may not be the result of the
> pure and direct observation of the primary source.
> Which is the cartouche itself.
> In order to be objective one has to disregard the
> "is it" or "isn't it" conflict and work solely
> with the data.


However, your data consists of only a couple of pictures. You claim to see paint runs. I have stared at it like I suspect many others and do not see any paint runs! Nor clear indication of vertical/horizontal strokes
> >
> >
> > In your expert analysis:
> >
> > Did you examine all (high res photos) of the
> other
> > cartouches and quarry marks Wellington Nelson
> > upwards particularly the vertical painting
> upside
> > down in Lady Aburthnot's?
>
> None available.
> >
> > Are there any microscopic tell tale paint runs
> on
> > any of the others?
>
> As above. If you know of any I'd appreciate it if
> you'd let me have a copy.
> However there is a benefit in looking at the
> cartouche in isolation.
>
>
> >
> > Do they indicate that the "painter" was
> different
> > (style, brush, handedness etc) than the
> Campbell's
> > cartouche? If so, how do they differ? If the
> same
> > "forger" or "hoaxer" why did they bother with
> all
> > the others?
>
> There is a variation in style, brush, hand.

You advised above that you had no access to photographs of the cartouches and writing in other chambers, but then declare "variation in style, brush, hand". Impossible for you to determine. Are you just trying to bluff and make up BS! Is BS what Creighton asked you for?


>
>
> > Were they merely practicing for the final
> gotcha
> > cartouche?
>
>
> I don't know. I can only comment on the physical
> relationship of the materials.
>
> In your expert opinion would it not be
> > not more difficult to forge unfamiliar writing
> > (hieratic) upside down?
>
> No. How would the forger know what was the
> correct orientation?


I think poster EyeofHorus has already addressed the issue. A forger would have no reason to attempt to paint them upside down. Nor in 1837 would they be significantly skilled in hieratic to be capable of doing it.
The point,is that it is no good being an art expert when the issue is authenticity of ancient AE handwriting.


>
>
> >
> > In your expert opinion, if all that a forger
> > needed was a "Khufu" cartouche, then would it
> not
> > been easier to paint it in an upright
> horizontal
> > manner on a vertical wall in a lower chamber?
> If
> > not, then ...why not?
>
> Again can't answer I can only comment on the
> physicality of the artwork and the way in which it
> was constructed.


But you provide no reasons (supporting information) whatsoever... as to why you think they were 'painted' that way or even how?
>



> >
> > What is the advantage of having to contort
> oneself
> > into a Michelangelo pose and attempt a forgery
> on
> > an angled gable roof?
>
> Again I cannot comment on motive only the artwork
> itself.

So your independent research and expertise simply amounts to a guess based on your bias?

How is that video coming along?


>
>
>
> >
> > Edit to add: Asking did you study in your
> highly
> > admirable art degrees how to paint deep into
> > concealed crevices in multi ton block
> structures?
> > Can you tell us the technical procedure for
> that?
>
> Access the crevices and then apply paint, usually
> using a brush.

Is that what you learnt in Uni? Plain BS! How do you access such crevices attested to by many many eye witnesses who declare it impossible?



>
> > My appreciation for your expert opinion, in
> > advance.
> >
> > Cheers
>
> It's been a pleasure.
> I particularly like discussing Monet, and the
> relationship between physics and art.
> Bloody marvelous.

It is obvious you know more than a thing or too about art and impressionists in particular.

What I am yet to ascertain is whether you know anything that would qualify you as an expert or even a real researcher into painted hieratic ?

It seems Lover's "gargantuan ego's" comment seems apt to the reason for any actual consent to be cited in SC book?

Yes a pleasure ... bloody marvellous!

But can you address the questions this time?


Cheers

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Who Was Khufu? 4961 loveritas 02-Jun-16 07:27
Non Noh-Suphis 1191 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Jun-16 15:31
Re: Who Was Khufu? 1029 Thunderbird 02-Jun-16 17:10
Re: Oldest mines and Red ochre 907 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Who Was Khufu? 990 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 22:18
Re: Who Was Khufu? 925 loveritas 03-Jun-16 05:00
Hidden Agenda 880 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Jun-16 14:32
Re: Hidden Agenda 843 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Hidden Agenda 884 Dr. Troglodyte 04-Jun-16 00:05
Re:Co Regents ? 874 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 806 loveritas 04-Jun-16 00:24
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 885 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 01:55
The Power 861 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:40
Re: The Power 967 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:26
Re: The Power 907 Warwick 04-Jun-16 18:47
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 1292 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:06
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 873 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:27
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 851 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:26
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 1429 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 18:37
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 856 Warwick 05-Jun-16 18:51
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 925 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 20:12
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 854 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:25
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 881 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:35
Cartouche circle symbolizes a rope 792 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:30
Re: The Power 895 Martin Stower 14-Jun-16 09:36
Re: The Power 816 loveritas 21-Jun-16 11:19
Re: The Power 848 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 13:32
Re: The Power 872 Merrell 21-Jun-16 16:14
Re: The Power 834 loveritas 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: The Power 781 atul.seth 27-Jun-16 20:51
Re: Who Was Khufu? 894 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 02:42
The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 912 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 867 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:23
The Lepsius Tablet 847 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 17:20
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 868 loveritas 05-Jun-16 22:08
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 869 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 23:01
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 892 loveritas 05-Jun-16 23:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 1070 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 09:16
Re: Who Was Khufu? 923 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 17:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 947 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:30
Re: Allegorical and historical 946 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 02:37
Re: Who Was Khufu? 891 Rofhessa 04-Jun-16 09:34
Re: Who Was Khufu? 906 Notinham 04-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Runic/Vinca? 901 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: Runic/Vince? 926 Notinham 04-Jun-16 04:38
Re: Runic/Vinca? 933 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Who Was Khufu? 823 Spiros 04-Jun-16 22:05
Re: Who Was Khufu? 816 Notinham 04-Jun-16 22:26
Re: Who Was Khufu? 931 Spiros 05-Jun-16 01:02
Re: Who Was Khufu? 828 Notinham 06-Jun-16 08:23
Hancock And The Quarry Marks 904 loveritas 05-Jun-16 03:22
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 858 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:32
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 839 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 09:58
Re: Who Was Khufu? 875 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 14:25
Re: Who Was Khufu? 859 eyeofhorus33 05-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Who Was Khufu? 845 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 07:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 912 Corpuscles 05-Jun-16 23:41
Schoch and the Quarry Marks 1018 loveritas 06-Jun-16 01:17
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 902 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 987 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 02:57
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 843 loveritas 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 751 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:53
Re: Khufu Cartouche 1058 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 05:47
Re: Khufu Cartouche 894 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 07:37
Re: Khufu Cartouche 997 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Khufu Cartouche 965 R Avry Wilson 07-Jun-16 05:24
Re: Khufu Cartouche 883 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 05:58
Re: Khufu Cartouche 899 Warwick 07-Jun-16 21:28
Re: Khufu Cartouche 743 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 22:12
Re: Khufu Cartouche 819 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:15
Re: Schoch and Maryann! 822 DScribr 23-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 745 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 13:56
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 816 Warwick 23-Jun-16 15:47
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 800 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 19:21
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 823 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 892 Corpuscles 06-Jun-16 03:55
Jury in Stunned Silence 1171 loveritas 12-Jun-16 03:14
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 980 Warwick 12-Jun-16 16:49
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 865 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 17:27
showing my age 829 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:01
Re: showing my age 842 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:27
Re: showing my age 820 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 19:49
Re: showing my age 832 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 18:51
Re: showing my age 766 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:09
Re: The red ochre marks 879 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 945 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 20:50
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 885 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 21:46
Re: Who Was Khufu? 891 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 09:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 855 Spiros 06-Jun-16 13:21
Re: Who Was Khufu? Khufwey was Yakov/Jacob? 946 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 02:53
Sphinx decoded 922 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 05:13
Re: 26th Dyn. ....Homage to Khufu 880 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 16:46
Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 935 loveritas 13-Jun-16 07:31
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 896 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 11:51
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 762 Thanos5150 13-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 760 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 17:49
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 840 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 853 Thunderbird 14-Jun-16 03:03
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 851 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 04:27
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 901 Thanos5150 14-Jun-16 05:33
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 783 eyeofhorus33 13-Jun-16 17:55
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 916 Audrey 13-Jun-16 22:24
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 935 eyeofhorus33 14-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 751 Morten 14-Jun-16 02:55
Science and the Conspiracy 828 loveritas 18-Jun-16 22:46
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 802 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 03:23
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 784 loveritas 19-Jun-16 04:39
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 905 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:57
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 769 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 07:38
Re: Khufu and..... Time 856 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 08:28
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 752 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:58
Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 857 loveritas 20-Jun-16 11:11
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 897 Thunderbird 20-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 770 Brian Patterson 20-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 929 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 19:47
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 963 Jon Ellison 20-Jun-16 20:05
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 900 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 844 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 00:08
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 876 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 854 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 01:12
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 927 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 879 Audrey 21-Jun-16 05:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 805 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:41
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 759 Corpuscles 21-Jun-16 03:58
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 787 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 763 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 14:18
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 780 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 880 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 992 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 840 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 17:24
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 791 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 835 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 748 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 809 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 840 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:00
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 807 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 16:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 860 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 807 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 899 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 17:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 788 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 738 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 770 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 18:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 754 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:29
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 807 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 20:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 878 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 21:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 847 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 22:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 736 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 787 Audrey 22-Jun-16 00:07
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 757 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 790 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 780 Audrey 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 790 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 824 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 758 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 767 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:30
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 843 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 691 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 831 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 02:35
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 742 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 760 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 753 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 867 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 12:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 790 Merrell 24-Jun-16 13:06
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 720 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 810 Audrey 24-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 733 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 19:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 780 Audrey 24-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 745 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:44
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 761 Audrey 24-Jun-16 22:58
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 685 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 664 Audrey 25-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 782 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 812 Audrey 25-Jun-16 03:15
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 800 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 21:23
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 719 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 21:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 754 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 22:00
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 694 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 735 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 763 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 23:34
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 841 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 829 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 00:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 840 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 718 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:25
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 748 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 06:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 806 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 12:23
Expert? Specialist? 787 Merrell 26-Jun-16 14:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 816 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 15:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 767 Merrell 26-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 668 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 758 Merrell 26-Jun-16 17:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 759 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 740 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 906 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 19:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 740 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 722 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 20:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 734 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 745 Corpuscles 27-Jun-16 00:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 831 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 07:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 784 Merrell 27-Jun-16 08:16
Re: Expert? Specialist? 861 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 08:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 756 DUNE 27-Jun-16 09:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 738 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 725 Merrell 27-Jun-16 09:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 787 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 814 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 779 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 14:53
Re: Expert? Specialist? 852 Merrell 27-Jun-16 15:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 684 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 836 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 642 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 792 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 712 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 00:23
Re: Expert? Specialist? 754 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 00:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 796 Audrey 28-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 761 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 13:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 705 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 13:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 674 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 14:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 746 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 02:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 722 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 16:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 728 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 706 Audrey 27-Jun-16 20:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 833 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 20:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 713 Audrey 27-Jun-16 21:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 658 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 21:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 728 Merrell 28-Jun-16 09:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 697 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 09:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 785 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 11:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 795 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 12:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 747 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 14:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 767 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 14:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 696 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 15:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 740 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 753 Merrell 28-Jun-16 15:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 683 Audrey 28-Jun-16 16:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 767 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 18:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 737 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 720 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 731 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 21:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 767 Audrey 28-Jun-16 19:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 834 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 01:35
Re: Expert? Specialist? 713 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 664 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 19:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 668 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 746 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 707 Merrell 28-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 710 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 739 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 778 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:42
Re: No parallel? 713 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 22:27
Re: No parallel? 693 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 730 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:49
Re: Expert? Specialist? 725 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 784 R Avry Wilson 28-Jun-16 19:31
Re: R Avery Wilson 668 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 20:47
Thanks, Brad 724 drrayeye 28-Jun-16 22:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 689 Audrey 29-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Expert? Specialist? 703 R Avry Wilson 29-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 633 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 746 Thunderbird 29-Jun-16 06:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 678 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 668 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 675 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 644 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:33
Re: Expert? Specialist? 782 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 00:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 635 Audrey 30-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 636 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 03:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 625 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 572 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 587 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:29
Re: Expert? Specialist? 661 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 643 eyeofhorus33 30-Jun-16 06:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 723 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:37
Re: Ignore the evidence 704 Thunderbird 30-Jun-16 06:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 685 Audrey 30-Jun-16 04:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 719 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:34
Re: Expert? Specialist? 714 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 750 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 686 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 642 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 23:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 664 Audrey 30-Jun-16 23:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 622 Martin Stower 30-Jun-16 23:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 689 Audrey 01-Jul-16 00:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 693 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 00:50
Re: Expert? Specialist? 590 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 719 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 607 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:57
Re: Expert? Specialist? 714 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 768 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 687 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 14:55
Please, Steven 746 drrayeye 01-Jul-16 00:44
Re: Please, Steven 704 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:19
Re: Please, Steven 756 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:56
Re: Please, Steven 795 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:24
Re: Please, Steven 646 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 15:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 658 Origyptian 26-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 723 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 666 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Expert? Specialist? 688 Merrell 27-Jun-16 07:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 686 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 13:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 599 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 13:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 681 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 673 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 648 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 639 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 757 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 693 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 735 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 21:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 765 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 22:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 685 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:21
Re: Expert? Specialist? 787 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 693 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 692 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 582 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 799 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Expert? Specialist? 621 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 648 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 21:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 676 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 650 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 17:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 754 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:51
Re: Gatekeeping 610 Thunderbird 27-Jun-16 16:38
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 729 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:54
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 893 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 688 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 755 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:18
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 716 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 641 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:31
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 740 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 652 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 655 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 747 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:23
No Moderator Conspiracy 668 loveritas 27-Jun-16 05:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 702 Morten 25-Jun-16 23:19
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 667 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 708 Audrey 25-Jun-16 23:51
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 619 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 756 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:49
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 793 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 625 DScribr 30-Jun-16 02:48
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 688 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 666 Merrell 26-Jun-16 13:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 639 Audrey 24-Jun-16 16:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 797 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:08
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 701 Audrey 24-Jun-16 20:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 793 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 811 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:59
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 749 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 11:38
Post o' the week! 691 DScribr 22-Jun-16 21:07
Summertime In England 728 loveritas 21-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Who Was Khufu? 776 DUNE 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 650 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:22
Re: Who Was Khufu? 825 DUNE 21-Jun-16 16:05
Re: Minute Examination 741 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Minute Examination 694 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:48
Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 851 loveritas 22-Jun-16 03:34
Re: Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 699 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 20:20
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 762 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:14
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 805 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 21:37
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 716 DScribr 23-Jun-16 23:00
Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 755 loveritas 22-Jun-16 23:20
Re: Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 832 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:57
Creighton's Legal Team In Hiding 826 loveritas 23-Jun-16 23:54
it all boils down to this 715 Warwick 25-Jun-16 19:21
How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 738 Corpuscles 25-Jun-16 23:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 755 Audrey 26-Jun-16 00:19
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 738 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:24
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 716 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:17
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 722 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 741 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:48
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 643 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:52
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 699 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:57
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 759 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:59
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 585 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 704 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 842 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:04
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 722 Audrey 26-Jun-16 04:47
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 751 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 13:49
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 713 Warwick 26-Jun-16 17:32
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 712 Corpuscles 26-Jun-16 07:01
Re: Who Was Khufu? 732 atul.seth 28-Jun-16 12:48
Re: Who Was Khufu? 713 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:13
Re: Who Was Khufu? 779 Howard West 28-Jun-16 15:37
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 722 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 16:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 713 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 18:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 663 wonderwall 28-Jun-16 20:52
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 720 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 21:22
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 868 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:46
Lackeys 785 loveritas 29-Jun-16 07:19
Re: Lackeys 746 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Lackeys 715 Corpuscles 29-Jun-16 09:41
Re: Lackeys 706 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 09:45
Re: Lackeys 644 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:52
Re: Lackeys 739 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:05
Oxymoron Alert 632 Warwick 29-Jun-16 16:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 683 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Oxymoron Alert 636 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Oxymoron Alert 684 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Oxymoron Alert 760 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 602 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Oxymoron Alert 593 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 18:59
Surely you Jest 671 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 19:59
Re: Surely you Jest 680 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:29
Re: Surely you Jest 671 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 20:48
Re: Oxymoron Alert 746 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:32
N/T 677 Merrell 01-Jul-16 17:22
Re: Oxymoron Alert 721 Warwick 29-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Oxymoron Alert 746 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:24
Say what? 707 Warwick 30-Jun-16 14:27
Re: Say what? 627 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:16
Re: Say what? 686 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:55
Re: Say what? 670 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 17:10
Re: Say what? 695 Warwick 01-Jul-16 17:28
Re: Say what? 759 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 15:26
Re: Say what? 699 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:51
The Lackey Called John Snape 631 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:14
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 661 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 11:38
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 751 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:55
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 625 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 12:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 660 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:16
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 752 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:33
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 635 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:47
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 743 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:58
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 622 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:09
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 762 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:28
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 670 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 701 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 654 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 17:10
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 717 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:30
Re: Lackeys 695 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Lackeys 662 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:08
Re: Lackeys 724 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:31
Re: Lackeys 611 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: Lackeys 614 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Lackeys 686 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Lackeys 596 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Lackeys 695 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 18:46
Re: Lackeys 681 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Lackeys 708 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 19:19
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 726 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 12:40
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 700 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 13:35
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 611 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:38
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 601 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 14:42
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 684 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 15:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 716 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:50
'Officially' in the gutter. 747 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:16
Scotts 'New" Book 755 DScribr 29-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 698 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:27
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 627 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 14:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 680 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:44
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 685 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 648 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:57
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 690 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 678 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:14
n/t 673 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:59
The Need For Proof. 706 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:56
Re: The Need For Proof. 718 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:00
Hypocrisy 729 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:10
Re: Hypocrisy 653 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:19
Re: Hypocrisy 658 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:56
Re: Hypocrisy 629 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Hypocrisy 666 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Hypocrisy 691 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:36
Re: Hypocrisy 639 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 22:21
Re: Hypocrisy 652 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Hypocrisy 597 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:53
Re: Hypocrisy denied, but..... 721 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:50
Re: Hypocrisy 676 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 647 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:49
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 631 cladking 29-Jun-16 03:48
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 718 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 05:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 590 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.