> Is that confirmation that you deny Creighton had
> the (any) dignity to ask permission to use
> your real name, and provide an explanation of how
> and advance draft of the full context in which
> your "independent researcher and art expert" tag
> was to be used?
> Yes or NO?
How is that any of your business?
I think you all are jealous that you've not been included in someone's book.
> You are the one challenging Lover's (and others)
> careful reading of what you ALREADY have posted,
> and multi edited, apparently on a "smart" phone
> whilst weaving in British traffic!
So call the police. How do you know he wasn't the passenger? Or stopped at a light?
Can you find nothing else to bitch about?
> Is that imaginary distraction of a dog, difficult
> to stop it lickin' n' jumpin' on ya lap?
I knew you hadn't changed. Same old obnoxious crude poster you always were
> PS Is there a chance you missed Creighton's plea
> to include you in the official list of crackpots?
The only crackpots here are the ones who have nothing but resentment for a higher education, jealousy for not being consulted for a book, and just an overall evil need to tear down others who they view as being above their class. You cannot talk about Vyse, Brewer or cartouches, so you result to low class bar room insults. It happens every time.
You cannot tear down Scott's book by using crass Neanderthal insults against those mentioned in his book. You will fail. The book will be published and read no matter what you guys say. Deal with it.
Do unto others Corp....... do you really want the same given back to you?