Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perhaps you're the one that needs to look it up.
> NLP has nothing to do with cracking the code of a
> non-computer language to determine the meaning of
> each symbol in that language. . . .
Oh, so you’ve worked in it, then?
You’ve been to the regular talks (guest speakers and otherwise) in an NLP group?
You imagine that those doing this stuff are other than steeped in linguistics? That they could do it otherwise?
You think NLP is just one approach? That it’s all one way, with no interest from linguistics and no feedback to linguistics?
As far as language and linguistics goes, you’re in the remedial class, so don’t presume to talk about it.
Don’t you ever disgust yourself, when you connive in these squalid clique games?
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perhaps you're the one that needs to look it up.
> NLP has nothing to do with cracking the code of a
> non-computer language to determine the meaning of
> each symbol in that language. . . .
Oh, so you’ve worked in it, then?
You’ve been to the regular talks (guest speakers and otherwise) in an NLP group?
You imagine that those doing this stuff are other than steeped in linguistics? That they could do it otherwise?
You think NLP is just one approach? That it’s all one way, with no interest from linguistics and no feedback to linguistics?
As far as language and linguistics goes, you’re in the remedial class, so don’t presume to talk about it.
Don’t you ever disgust yourself, when you connive in these squalid clique games?
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.