Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > No, John, they use me as a source of arguments
> and
> > > they acknowledge me as the source of these
> > > arguments. They present the arguments and
> leave
> > > the rest to the reader. They do not call me
> an
> > > “expert” and there is no appeal to
> authority
> > > (as noted below)—whereas you’ve made it
> > > abundantly clear here that an appeal to
> authority
> > > is precisely what Creighton has produced and
> this
> > > is how you see it yourself.
> >
> > Which is exactly what Scott has done ..
>
> Thanks for confirming.
>
> [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_a
> uthority]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_fr
> om_authority[/url]
>
> > He's identified and recognised an "expert". The
> > one and only "expert" in the field as far as I
> am
> > aware. (myself)
> > The expertise and method has been described,
> > leaving the "ordinary reader" free to carry out
> > their own analyses and draw there own
> conclusions.
>
> Well, John, if you’re the [i]one and only
> “expert” in the field[/i], who exactly is it
> who’s validating your expertise? Yourself?
> Creighton?
>
> Where may we find your published work on the
> topic? Where may we find your name so much as
> mentioned in connection with it? And yet the
> phrase is out there and it’s
> [i]archaeologists[/i] talking about it:
>
> [url=https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22brush+st
> roke+sequencing%22]https://www.google.co.uk/search
> ?q=%22brush+stroke+sequencing%22[/url]
>
> Looks like you need to get out there and stake
> your claim.
>
> > Time and time again we say carry out your own
> > analyses and draw your own conclusions.
> > How many times do we need to repeat it?
>
> We?
>
> > > Fully credentialed and degreed expert in
> brush
> > > stroke sequencing!
> >
> > The FIRST and ONLY fully degreed expert in
> brush
> > stroke sequencing in this field. The practice
> of
> > sequencing of brush strokes.
>
> So you keep saying. See above.
>
> > It seems that Egyptology has failed to identify
> > this analytical process.
>
> But archaeology has. See above.
>
> > I did.
> > Which I'm fully prepared to share, so that
> > "ordinary readers" can carry out their own
> > analyses and draw their own conclusions.
>
> So let’s see your dissertation, thesis,
> whatever. If not the full thing, the references
> or bibliography would be a start.
>
> > > Most of us have worked this stuff out before
> the
> > > age of five,
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 52112,1055762#msg-1055762&v=t]remember[/url]?—an
> d you’re trying to con us that it’s
> > > specialised, esoteric knowledge which
> requires
> > > credentials to comment on?
> > >
> > > So, will you be showing us your published work
> on
> > > [i]brush stroke sequencing[/i] in the work of
> > > Roger Hilton (say)?
> > >
> > > Will you be showing us some of your
> paintings?
> >
> > Why? What do my paintings have to do with
> > anything?
>
> Well, duh. It would show us that you know
> something about brush work. All we have so far is
> your saying so.
>
> I notice you’ve bypassed the bit about published
> work. When may we expect to see it?
>
> > > Past time for “the emperor has no clothes”
> on
> > > this one.
> >
> > Ridiculous statement. The "clothes" have been
> > demonstrated in the methodology.
> > The "clothes" have been freely given away and
> are
> > free for anyone who cares to use them.
>
> The methodology I’ve seen so far includes blurry
> enlargements and comments on my eyesight. Is this
> the kind of thing you submitted in fulfilment of
> the requirements of your degree?
>
> > > And, let me remind you, Scott Creighton has
> no
> > > credentials in any of the stuff he talks
> about.
> >
> > Were talking about ME, the one and only expert
> in
> > brush stroke sequencing. Scott had the
> > intelligence to seek expert advice on issues
> > outside of his knowledge base and field.
> > A fact which is being fully and ably
> demonstrated
> > here by yourself. He sought the advice of an
> > expert.
>
> No, John, the comment being answered was about me
> and my credentials.
>
> It’s not all about you, you know.
>
> > > > > What credentials does Graham Hancock have
> which
> > > > > make his opinion believable?
> > > >
> > > > Again Graham Hancock actively and constantly
> seeks
> > > > the advice of credentialed experts and
> > > > specialists.
> > >
> > > I’ve done some of that myself.
> >
> > Good for you ..
>
> Yes, John, it’s good for me and it more than
> meets your standard, as you think it merits praise
> when Scott seeks advice from people who just
> happen to be on the same message board.
>
> > > As for Graham Hancock, would you like to give
> an
> > > example? He’s clearly selective in which
> > > experts and specialists he believes and which
> not.
> > > What credentials does he have to make this
> > > choice?
> >
> > The professional integrity of GH is not the
> issue
> > here.
>
> And you’ve missed the point.
>
> > > If the books are just compilations of what
> > > credentialed experts and specialists say,
> > > where’s the room for Graham Hancock?
> >
> > Who said they were .. JUST....
>
> And you’ve missed the point.
>
> > > Who, let me remind you, has no credentials in
> any
> > > of the stuff he talks about. Pretty dumb to
> do
> > > this huffing and puffing about credentials on
> > > Graham Hancock’s Message Board!
> >
> > Not relevant..
>
> Says you, having missed the point.
>
> > > But John, most of us have applied paint with
> a
> > > brush by the age of five! Remember?
> >
> > Yes straightforward and easy to understand
> isn't
> > it? Beautiful simplicity.
>
> So much for the specialised knowledge and “one
> and only expert in the field”.
>
> > Which begs the question why hasn't Egyptology
> and
> > those such as yourself not already recognised
> it
> > and were totally unaware of it until I was
> > gracious enough to bring it to your attention.
>
> On the contrary, John, you brought nothing to my
> attention which I wouldn’t regard as
> platitudinous or wrong.
>
> What begs the question is your assumption that
> “Egyptology” hasn’t. Archaeology has, as
> noted above.
>
> > > Heard of palaeography? You think you have
> > > anything on specialists in hieratic or
> demotic?
> >
> > This has nothing at all to do with the reading
> of
> > signs and symbols.
> > It is totally about the physical process of the
> > application of paint to a surface... Painting..
>
> LOL! You don’t know what I’m talking about,
> do you?
>
> > > > They sought his expertise in that field and
> > > > proclaimed so.
> > >
> > > BS.
> > >
> > > Quote please.
> >
> > Page 101 "Giza the Truth"
>
> Hardback or paperback—and where’s the quote?
>
> M.

All total pointless deflective bunkum typical of Stower.

If anyone would like to seriously discuss the technicalities of this methodology, "The sequential analyses of mark making" I may at some point in the future run a thread.
Scott Creighton may or may not include a section with regard to the contentious cartouche in his forthcoming book. We will just have to wait and see.
In the meantime I think the basic principles have been well enough described, and as I have stated on numerous occasions the "ordinary reader" should have little difficulty in carrying out a basic analyses for him or herself, and further be able to form their own conclusions.
The process application is not at all complex. It was simply a question of someone with the appropriate experience and education to identify it. Which in this case was me.
The photographs are readily available online. They are of more than adequate spatial resolution and bit depth for these purposes and using images from three totally independent platforms taken over a decade or so negates any possibility of optical or electronic distortion or interference.

Those opposed to the idea of "ordinary readers" using this analytical tool in order to carry out their own analyses and therefore forming their own conclusions may well have a vested interest in adopting that stance for reasons known only to themselves.

Mission accomplished.

Good luck and have fun.
J.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 28-Jun-16 15:30 by Jon Ellison.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Who Was Khufu? 4435 loveritas 02-Jun-16 07:27
Non Noh-Suphis 871 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Jun-16 15:31
Re: Who Was Khufu? 795 Thunderbird 02-Jun-16 17:10
Re: Oldest mines and Red ochre 657 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Who Was Khufu? 691 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 22:18
Re: Who Was Khufu? 686 loveritas 03-Jun-16 05:00
Hidden Agenda 667 Dr. Troglodyte 03-Jun-16 14:32
Re: Hidden Agenda 608 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Hidden Agenda 639 Dr. Troglodyte 04-Jun-16 00:05
Re:Co Regents ? 636 Thunderbird 03-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 561 loveritas 04-Jun-16 00:24
Re: Re:Co Regents ? 656 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 01:55
The Power 612 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:40
Re: The Power 669 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:26
Re: The Power 664 Warwick 04-Jun-16 18:47
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 863 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:06
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 600 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 21:27
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 618 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:26
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 1003 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 18:37
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 632 Warwick 05-Jun-16 18:51
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 647 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 20:12
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 624 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:25
Re: 3rd Dynasty Cartouche 550 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:35
Cartouche circle symbolizes a rope 561 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:30
Re: The Power 653 Martin Stower 14-Jun-16 09:36
Re: The Power 573 loveritas 21-Jun-16 11:19
Re: The Power 586 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 13:32
Re: The Power 622 Merrell 21-Jun-16 16:14
Re: The Power 615 loveritas 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: The Power 556 atul.seth 27-Jun-16 20:51
Re: Who Was Khufu? 631 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 02:42
The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 682 loveritas 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: The Entrance Cartouche Puzzle 615 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 05:23
The Lepsius Tablet 585 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 17:20
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 626 loveritas 05-Jun-16 22:08
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 651 Dr. Troglodyte 05-Jun-16 23:01
Re: The Lepsius Tablet 649 loveritas 05-Jun-16 23:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 818 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 09:16
Re: Who Was Khufu? 691 Rofhessa 03-Jun-16 17:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 690 loveritas 03-Jun-16 22:30
Re: Allegorical and historical 702 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 02:37
Re: Who Was Khufu? 630 Rofhessa 04-Jun-16 09:34
Re: Who Was Khufu? 662 Notinham 04-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Runic/Vinca? 656 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 04:18
Re: Runic/Vince? 699 Notinham 04-Jun-16 04:38
Re: Runic/Vinca? 687 Thunderbird 04-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Who Was Khufu? 569 Spiros 04-Jun-16 22:05
Re: Who Was Khufu? 583 Notinham 04-Jun-16 22:26
Re: Who Was Khufu? 686 Spiros 05-Jun-16 01:02
Re: Who Was Khufu? 590 Notinham 06-Jun-16 08:23
Hancock And The Quarry Marks 678 loveritas 05-Jun-16 03:22
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 618 Warwick 05-Jun-16 07:32
Re: Hancock And The Quarry Marks 592 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 09:58
Re: Who Was Khufu? 654 Rofhessa 05-Jun-16 14:25
Re: Who Was Khufu? 632 eyeofhorus33 05-Jun-16 15:35
Re: Who Was Khufu? 621 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 07:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 663 Corpuscles 05-Jun-16 23:41
Schoch and the Quarry Marks 693 loveritas 06-Jun-16 01:17
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 598 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 691 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 02:57
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 629 loveritas 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 536 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:53
Re: Khufu Cartouche 764 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 05:47
Re: Khufu Cartouche 654 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 07:37
Re: Khufu Cartouche 674 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Khufu Cartouche 667 R Avry Wilson 07-Jun-16 05:24
Re: Khufu Cartouche 645 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 05:58
Re: Khufu Cartouche 674 Warwick 07-Jun-16 21:28
Re: Khufu Cartouche 526 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 22:12
Re: Khufu Cartouche 586 Thanos5150 07-Jun-16 01:15
Re: Schoch and Maryann! 597 DScribr 23-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 519 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 13:56
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 582 Warwick 23-Jun-16 15:47
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 576 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 19:21
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 590 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Schoch and the Quarry Marks 662 Corpuscles 06-Jun-16 03:55
Jury in Stunned Silence 863 loveritas 12-Jun-16 03:14
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 723 Warwick 12-Jun-16 16:49
Re: Jury in Stunned Silence 605 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 17:27
showing my age 612 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:01
Re: showing my age 616 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:27
Re: showing my age 602 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 19:49
Re: showing my age 590 Thanos5150 12-Jun-16 18:51
Re: showing my age 542 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:09
Re: The red ochre marks 631 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 691 Thunderbird 06-Jun-16 20:50
Re: Khafre Valley Temple...Hathor/Bastet 639 Martin Stower 06-Jun-16 21:46
Re: Who Was Khufu? 636 Rofhessa 06-Jun-16 09:33
Re: Who Was Khufu? 628 Spiros 06-Jun-16 13:21
Re: Who Was Khufu? Khufwey was Yakov/Jacob? 724 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 02:53
Sphinx decoded 652 Rofhessa 07-Jun-16 05:13
Re: 26th Dyn. ....Homage to Khufu 640 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 16:46
Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 705 loveritas 13-Jun-16 07:31
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 680 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 11:51
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 549 Thanos5150 13-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 519 Jon Ellison 13-Jun-16 17:49
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 620 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 01:24
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 628 Thunderbird 14-Jun-16 03:03
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 609 Corpuscles 14-Jun-16 04:27
Re: Giza gets a face-lift 1st dynasty ! 667 Thanos5150 14-Jun-16 05:33
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 572 eyeofhorus33 13-Jun-16 17:55
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 680 Audrey 13-Jun-16 22:24
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 705 eyeofhorus33 14-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Court In Uproar Over Turd Claim 509 Morten 14-Jun-16 02:55
Science and the Conspiracy 603 loveritas 18-Jun-16 22:46
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 553 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 03:23
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 543 loveritas 19-Jun-16 04:39
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 646 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:57
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 534 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 07:38
Re: Khufu and..... Time 617 Thunderbird 19-Jun-16 08:28
Re: Science and the Conspiracy 532 Thanos5150 19-Jun-16 04:58
Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 621 loveritas 20-Jun-16 11:11
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 657 Thunderbird 20-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 504 Brian Patterson 20-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 675 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 19:47
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 714 Jon Ellison 20-Jun-16 20:05
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 649 Martin Stower 20-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 624 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 00:08
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 635 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 01:03
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 653 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 01:12
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 674 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 658 Audrey 21-Jun-16 05:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 549 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:41
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 539 Corpuscles 21-Jun-16 03:58
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 554 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 546 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 14:18
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 543 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 611 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 15:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 656 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 607 eyeofhorus33 21-Jun-16 17:24
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 566 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 582 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 506 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 587 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 599 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:00
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 567 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 16:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 625 Warwick 21-Jun-16 16:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 576 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 640 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 17:34
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 546 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 17:44
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 517 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 524 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 18:56
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 529 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 19:29
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 554 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 20:28
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 643 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 21:38
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 594 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 22:06
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 500 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 564 Audrey 22-Jun-16 00:07
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 549 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 559 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 571 Audrey 21-Jun-16 23:02
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 568 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:10
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 619 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 542 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 23:23
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 581 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 23:30
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 645 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 00:57
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 505 Audrey 22-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 599 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 02:35
Re: Creighton's Legal Team In Shambles! 549 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 547 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 548 Thunderbird 24-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 689 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 12:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 601 Merrell 24-Jun-16 13:06
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 511 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 592 Audrey 24-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 531 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 19:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 589 Audrey 24-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 533 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:44
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 587 Audrey 24-Jun-16 22:58
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 466 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 456 Audrey 25-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 572 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 617 Audrey 25-Jun-16 03:15
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 606 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 21:23
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 500 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 21:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 562 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 22:00
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 506 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 533 Martin Stower 25-Jun-16 23:21
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 572 Jon Ellison 25-Jun-16 23:34
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 619 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 627 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 00:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 652 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 511 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:25
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 498 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 06:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 601 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 12:23
Expert? Specialist? 594 Merrell 26-Jun-16 14:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 597 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 15:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 553 Merrell 26-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 461 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 563 Merrell 26-Jun-16 17:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 493 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 534 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 657 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 19:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 544 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 496 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 20:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 530 eyeofhorus33 26-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 547 Corpuscles 27-Jun-16 00:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 577 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 07:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 585 Merrell 27-Jun-16 08:16
Re: Expert? Specialist? 609 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 08:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 562 DUNE 27-Jun-16 09:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 526 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 503 Merrell 27-Jun-16 09:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 574 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 10:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 621 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 582 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 14:53
Re: Expert? Specialist? 644 Merrell 27-Jun-16 15:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 490 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:38
Re: Expert? Specialist? 612 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 444 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 599 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 516 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 00:23
Re: Expert? Specialist? 547 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 00:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 567 Audrey 28-Jun-16 01:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 547 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 13:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 519 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 13:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 465 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 14:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 520 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 02:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 515 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 16:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 530 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 524 Audrey 27-Jun-16 20:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 625 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 20:17
Re: Expert? Specialist? 499 Audrey 27-Jun-16 21:25
Re: Expert? Specialist? 476 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 21:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 525 Merrell 28-Jun-16 09:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 513 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 09:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 574 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 11:26
Re: Expert? Specialist? 539 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 12:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 513 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 14:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 534 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 14:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 487 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 15:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 525 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 542 Merrell 28-Jun-16 15:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 498 Audrey 28-Jun-16 16:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 535 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 18:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 547 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 526 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:22
Re: Expert? Specialist? 516 Jon Ellison 28-Jun-16 21:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 566 Audrey 28-Jun-16 19:15
Re: Expert? Specialist? 623 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 01:35
Re: Expert? Specialist? 520 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 465 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 19:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 459 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 20:43
Re: Expert? Specialist? 540 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 516 Merrell 28-Jun-16 20:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 518 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 21:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 533 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 572 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:42
Re: No parallel? 522 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 22:27
Re: No parallel? 492 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 22:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 537 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:49
Re: Expert? Specialist? 509 Martin Stower 28-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 538 R Avry Wilson 28-Jun-16 19:31
Re: R Avery Wilson 447 Thunderbird 28-Jun-16 20:47
Thanks, Brad 514 drrayeye 28-Jun-16 22:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 511 Audrey 29-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Expert? Specialist? 457 R Avry Wilson 29-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 424 Audrey 29-Jun-16 02:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 532 Thunderbird 29-Jun-16 06:32
Re: Not all geeks are equal : ) 503 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 474 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 461 Merrell 28-Jun-16 21:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 443 eyeofhorus33 28-Jun-16 21:33
Re: Expert? Specialist? 577 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 00:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 454 Audrey 30-Jun-16 02:41
Re: Expert? Specialist? 422 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 03:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 433 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 378 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 382 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:29
Re: Expert? Specialist? 441 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Expert? Specialist? 448 eyeofhorus33 30-Jun-16 06:10
Re: Expert? Specialist? 522 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:37
Re: Ignore the evidence 481 Thunderbird 30-Jun-16 06:08
Re: Expert? Specialist? 483 Audrey 30-Jun-16 04:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 521 R Avry Wilson 30-Jun-16 04:34
Re: Expert? Specialist? 493 Audrey 30-Jun-16 05:06
Re: Expert? Specialist? 483 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:07
Re: Expert? Specialist? 497 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 06:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 436 Corpuscles 30-Jun-16 23:14
Re: Expert? Specialist? 451 Audrey 30-Jun-16 23:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 413 Martin Stower 30-Jun-16 23:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 484 Audrey 01-Jul-16 00:36
Re: Expert? Specialist? 495 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 00:50
Re: Expert? Specialist? 370 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:09
Re: Expert? Specialist? 493 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 430 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:57
Re: Expert? Specialist? 518 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 513 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 477 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 14:55
Please, Steven 511 drrayeye 01-Jul-16 00:44
Re: Please, Steven 484 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 01:19
Re: Please, Steven 547 Audrey 01-Jul-16 01:56
Re: Please, Steven 556 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 04:24
Re: Please, Steven 439 Martin Stower 01-Jul-16 15:01
Re: Expert? Specialist? 439 Origyptian 26-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Expert? Specialist? 498 Merrell 26-Jun-16 19:18
Re: Expert? Specialist? 459 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Expert? Specialist? 423 Merrell 27-Jun-16 07:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 503 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 13:19
Re: Expert? Specialist? 394 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 13:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 475 Merrell 27-Jun-16 14:56
Re: Expert? Specialist? 463 Jon Ellison 27-Jun-16 15:11
Re: Expert? Specialist? 443 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:28
Re: Expert? Specialist? 426 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:42
Re: Expert? Specialist? 564 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Expert? Specialist? 492 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 17:45
Re: Expert? Specialist? 543 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 21:13
Re: Expert? Specialist? 570 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 22:32
Re: Expert? Specialist? 479 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 00:21
Re: Expert? Specialist? 529 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:02
Re: Expert? Specialist? 505 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:40
Re: Expert? Specialist? 500 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Expert? Specialist? 389 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 15:55
Re: Expert? Specialist? 576 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Expert? Specialist? 409 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:30
Re: Expert? Specialist? 472 Martin Stower 27-Jun-16 21:27
Re: Expert? Specialist? 475 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 01:59
Re: Expert? Specialist? 453 eyeofhorus33 27-Jun-16 17:00
Re: Expert? Specialist? 519 Origyptian 27-Jun-16 18:51
Re: Gatekeeping 424 Thunderbird 27-Jun-16 16:38
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 524 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:54
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 614 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 458 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:42
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 531 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:18
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 528 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 03:27
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 435 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:31
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 536 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 434 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 466 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:52
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 476 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:23
No Moderator Conspiracy 461 loveritas 27-Jun-16 05:55
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 470 Morten 25-Jun-16 23:19
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 446 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:37
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 507 Audrey 25-Jun-16 23:51
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 429 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 00:45
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 542 Audrey 26-Jun-16 01:49
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 588 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:12
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 425 DScribr 30-Jun-16 02:48
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 497 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 455 Merrell 26-Jun-16 13:30
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 450 Audrey 24-Jun-16 16:43
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 589 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:08
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 498 Audrey 24-Jun-16 20:33
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 567 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Strange Graffiti. ....mighty strange indeed 594 Merrell 25-Jun-16 10:59
Re: Perring - Lady Arbuthnot chamber 550 Martin Stower 24-Jun-16 11:38
Post o' the week! 496 DScribr 22-Jun-16 21:07
Summertime In England 501 loveritas 21-Jun-16 05:52
Re: Who Was Khufu? 557 DUNE 21-Jun-16 15:14
Re: Who Was Khufu? 457 Jon Ellison 21-Jun-16 15:22
Re: Who Was Khufu? 563 DUNE 21-Jun-16 16:05
Re: Minute Examination 544 Thunderbird 21-Jun-16 18:12
Re: Minute Examination 506 Martin Stower 21-Jun-16 18:48
Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 664 loveritas 22-Jun-16 03:34
Re: Gilligan Accepts Michaelangelo Challenge 520 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 20:20
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 558 DScribr 23-Jun-16 19:14
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 604 Martin Stower 23-Jun-16 21:37
Re: Gilligan and Ginger 515 DScribr 23-Jun-16 23:00
Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 538 loveritas 22-Jun-16 23:20
Re: Court Rocked By Stalker Allegation! 596 Martin Stower 22-Jun-16 23:57
Creighton's Legal Team In Hiding 592 loveritas 23-Jun-16 23:54
it all boils down to this 519 Warwick 25-Jun-16 19:21
How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 534 Corpuscles 25-Jun-16 23:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 548 Audrey 26-Jun-16 00:19
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 545 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 01:24
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 470 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:17
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 530 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:33
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 543 Audrey 26-Jun-16 02:48
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 445 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:52
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 481 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 02:57
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 522 Jon Ellison 26-Jun-16 02:59
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 410 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 03:40
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 456 Audrey 26-Jun-16 03:46
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 582 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 04:04
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 523 Audrey 26-Jun-16 04:47
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 550 Martin Stower 26-Jun-16 13:49
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 464 Warwick 26-Jun-16 17:32
Re: How about... all cut out the c RAP!? 498 Corpuscles 26-Jun-16 07:01
Re: Who Was Khufu? 542 atul.seth 28-Jun-16 12:48
Re: Who Was Khufu? 500 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 15:13
Re: Who Was Khufu? 567 Howard West 28-Jun-16 15:37
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 507 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 16:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 515 Origyptian 28-Jun-16 18:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 458 wonderwall 28-Jun-16 20:52
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 500 Brian Patterson 28-Jun-16 21:22
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 554 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 04:46
Lackeys 571 loveritas 29-Jun-16 07:19
Re: Lackeys 540 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 08:06
Re: Lackeys 476 Corpuscles 29-Jun-16 09:41
Re: Lackeys 510 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 09:45
Re: Lackeys 459 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:52
Re: Lackeys 514 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:05
Oxymoron Alert 398 Warwick 29-Jun-16 16:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 455 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Oxymoron Alert 444 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Oxymoron Alert 477 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:28
Re: Oxymoron Alert 523 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 17:36
Re: Oxymoron Alert 403 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Oxymoron Alert 408 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 18:59
Surely you Jest 442 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 19:59
Re: Surely you Jest 490 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:29
Re: Surely you Jest 453 WonderWho 29-Jun-16 20:48
Re: Oxymoron Alert 463 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:32
N/T 428 Merrell 01-Jul-16 17:22
Re: Oxymoron Alert 512 Warwick 29-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Oxymoron Alert 528 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 17:24
Say what? 489 Warwick 30-Jun-16 14:27
Re: Say what? 409 Origyptian 30-Jun-16 15:16
Re: Say what? 474 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:55
Re: Say what? 484 Origyptian 01-Jul-16 17:10
Re: Say what? 489 Warwick 01-Jul-16 17:28
Re: Say what? 536 Jon Ellison 30-Jun-16 15:26
Re: Say what? 471 Warwick 01-Jul-16 16:51
The Lackey Called John Snape 427 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:14
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 468 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 11:38
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 540 loveritas 29-Jun-16 11:55
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 447 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 12:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 458 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:16
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 554 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:33
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 431 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:47
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 515 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:58
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 408 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:09
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 545 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:28
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 457 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 495 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:01
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 463 eyeofhorus33 29-Jun-16 17:10
Re: The Lackey Called John Snape 509 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:30
Re: Lackeys 469 Audrey 29-Jun-16 15:59
Re: Lackeys 448 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:08
Re: Lackeys 523 Audrey 29-Jun-16 16:31
Re: Lackeys 408 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:54
Re: Lackeys 423 Audrey 29-Jun-16 17:06
Re: Lackeys 475 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 17:37
Re: Lackeys 408 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Lackeys 497 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 18:46
Re: Lackeys 505 Audrey 29-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Lackeys 496 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 19:19
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 521 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 12:40
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 485 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 13:35
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 405 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 13:38
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 420 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 14:42
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 479 Jon Ellison 29-Jun-16 15:16
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 508 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:50
'Officially' in the gutter. 505 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:16
Scotts 'New" Book 530 DScribr 29-Jun-16 03:36
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 493 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 13:27
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 446 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 14:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 464 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:44
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 498 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 15:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 441 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 15:57
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 484 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 16:07
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 457 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 16:14
n/t 484 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:59
The Need For Proof. 470 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:56
Re: The Need For Proof. 498 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:00
Hypocrisy 528 DScribr 29-Jun-16 20:10
Re: Hypocrisy 452 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 20:19
Re: Hypocrisy 465 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 20:56
Re: Hypocrisy 427 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:01
Re: Hypocrisy 478 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 21:14
Re: Hypocrisy 499 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 21:36
Re: Hypocrisy 449 Martin Stower 29-Jun-16 22:21
Re: Hypocrisy 465 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:55
Re: Hypocrisy 403 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:53
Re: Hypocrisy denied, but..... 516 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:50
Re: Hypocrisy 485 DScribr 29-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Scotts 'New" Book 449 DScribr 29-Jun-16 19:49
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 440 cladking 29-Jun-16 03:48
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 499 Origyptian 29-Jun-16 05:09
Re: This Is Scotts Book Page 405 cladking 29-Jun-16 19:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.