For me...and yes...biased...and joining the Giza adoption theory side.
The above link to Gigal and Sher water erosion evidence on the Giza plateau...this and Schochs publish on Sphinx
The above evidence removes Giza from Dynastic Egypt.....they simply adopt and repair what they can.
Mainstream Egyptology admits to the old Kingdom repairs.
Khufu can not be the Builder of GP...nor himself or Khafra builder of the Sphinx.
The Khnum Khufu at the Red Sea port may be Dynastic in step with Khufu smashing mace into skull by Turquoise
Mines in Sinai.
Simply means he was regional in trade and exploitation. ..
Snefru is on record as raiding into lands for cattle and Slaves.
Both accounts do not confirm either built giant pyramids.
They may simply have existed amongst ancient legacy they inherited.
The symbol discovered by Upawat robot camera....
This red ochre symbol may be from beyond 10,000bc.
It's probable then that an ancient symbol language remained at quarry and around pre Dynastic Egypt
Which the 42 Tribes of Khemet may have built upon to create the early Egyptian script language...that. .in
Concert with Pre Dynastic language influence via Mesopotamia and Levant.
Red ochre symbols found on stone does not validate Khufu build the GP.
Of note....the Book of Jubilees states that the family of Noah which drew lots for their land inheritance after
The family which drew lot for the land we know today as Iraq.
Found the language of the Fallen Angel's written on Stone....when they arrived.
Jubilees then narrates that they soon began to build great cities and became corrupted.
So...here is at least one narrative marking pre flood language written on stone...influencing later generations.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02-Jun-16 17:12 by Thunderbird.