Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
R Avry Wilson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> Please provide a rationale for
> > the presence of a solitary "Kh-u-f-u" cartouche
> up
> > there in the RCs amidst all the other
> cartouches
> > of the "Khnum-Khfu" variant.
>
>
> Poke to the forehead: It is a variant of his
> name.
>
He had 5 Titles ( this is where the curious should look it up) and I should imagine an informal form for use with close family, and of course whatever his mummy called him. He also had various titles that related to his divine attributes ie Lion, the Apis Bull.
No one name, or style of writing that name is necessarily the Correct one.
This whole discussion is a boondoggle, wild goose chase, a simple waste of everyone's time.
Scott's Podex is a nonstarter. The special pleading that is all his theories amount to is a disservice to understanding.
Debating those for whom his notions are gospel is only valuable as a learning tool, as in how to debate with those who don't know what they're talking about without sounding tediously patronising..
which I fear I must appear to some. But they are not the one we are hoping to get thru to
Warwick
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> Please provide a rationale for
> > the presence of a solitary "Kh-u-f-u" cartouche
> up
> > there in the RCs amidst all the other
> cartouches
> > of the "Khnum-Khfu" variant.
>
>
> Poke to the forehead: It is a variant of his
> name.
>
He had 5 Titles ( this is where the curious should look it up) and I should imagine an informal form for use with close family, and of course whatever his mummy called him. He also had various titles that related to his divine attributes ie Lion, the Apis Bull.
No one name, or style of writing that name is necessarily the Correct one.
This whole discussion is a boondoggle, wild goose chase, a simple waste of everyone's time.
Scott's Podex is a nonstarter. The special pleading that is all his theories amount to is a disservice to understanding.
Debating those for whom his notions are gospel is only valuable as a learning tool, as in how to debate with those who don't know what they're talking about without sounding tediously patronising..
which I fear I must appear to some. But they are not the one we are hoping to get thru to
Warwick