Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
R Avry Wilson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And if I didn't actually "say is in so many
> > words",
then why did you put
> "Egyptologist"
> > in quotes to imply I actually said "no
> > 'Egyptologist' contradicted Reisner" when I
> never
> > said that? Not even once, let alone "post after
> > post".
>
> Dear Philip,
>
> Your ability to follow a conversation and stick to
> a simple, logical flow is so bloody disturbing and
> frustrating that you draw out harsh criticism of
> both your grammatical gymnastics and obtuse
> argumentation with galactic ease. Stop jumping
> around like a small child in your attempts to
> micromanage these tendential tangents. It's no
> wonder Martin doesn't let up on you (nor some
> others) because your stubbornness invites it.
>
> You are so determined not to admit an error you'd
> rather (subliminally?) continue to post pointless
> debate content no matter how absurd it is. You
> most certainly did both say and imply Reisner's
> opinion stood unchallenged for sixty years.
>
> Now SHUT UP. Don't come back with a typical, "Duh,
> where'd I say that?" "Did I say that?" "I did
> not!" feigned, innocent BS.
>
> I don't know what's worse: You're inane responses
> to the charge(s), or the utter
> irrelevancy
of Reisner's opinion being a
> mold to all of Egyptology, or, as we may guess
> blindly, that it somehow has a bearing on the
> 'forgery' question. You're like a lawyer who knows
> his client is 100% guilty, yet digs out fanatical
> twirls of invented 'evidence' to try to get the
> client off because, by law, you must give him/her
> the right of a defense. (I fully expect you to go
> off on a debate over law practices rather than see
> I've given an EXAMPLE.)
>
> (snip diatribe on your tangent Reisner argument)
>
> > It's interesting that you omitted that
> > pesky detail (pg.83 of Lehner '85):
> >
> >
    "the mother image fullfills a distinct
    > > function in the Egyptian belief of a life after
    > > death--- it holds out the promise of
    > immortality"
    > > (Ibid., 174). In effect, the king's rebirth
    > > invokes the image of a return to, and passage
    > > through, the mother.40
>
> First, you have no understanding of the mother
> image, nor what he is actually saying here. This
> would require an understanding of AE symbolism.
> Second, your 'pesky' detail is not 'pesky', nor is
> it contextual to the provenance of Hetepheres. See
> what I mean? You're poking around to elongate your
> impression of Reisner but can't even stay relevant
> to your own irrelevancy.
>
>
> > Regarding your reference to Romer, does he
> > actually deny or even express doubt about
> anything
> > in Reisner's narrative? Does he deny that
> G7000x
> > was her tomb even though the alabaster box was
> > empty? Does he discuss Verner, Aldred, Münch's
> > "funerary deposit" hypothesis, Lehner's '85
> > rebuttal to Reisner, or even cite any of them
> in
> > his bibilography? He doesn't deny Reisner's
> claim
> > of the family tree, and so I doubt he
> acknowledges
> > Lehner's alternate interpretation (and Edwards'
> > acknowledgement) of "Mother" as it applies to
> the
> > afterlife.
>
> Sadly, there gets a point where there's no other
> way to say something: Who *(**%^$%! cares? None of
> this Pied Piper discursion is relevant. The flute
> you employ is satiated with mucous, giving off
> whiffs of air in place of expected clear notes.
> Ffft, fft, goes Philip, trying to blow out another
> chorus. You can check the volume or peer down the
> tube to inspect the problem all you want. No
> amount of self-assessment is going to perform a
> song of logic for us. Alas.
>
> > He called it "ingeneous", not "fanciful" and
> not
> > "speculation". That imbues credibility, not
> doubt.
>
> Trying to redefine what or how a synonym is or how
> its applied is clearly not a tool in your set. And
> who cares about tearing down individual words in
> someone's narrative? This is more failed flute
> ffft, i.e. useless semantics.
>
> And I respond here only because your tactics are
> worthy of fly-swatting. In other words, what you
> think is content added to a debate is
> nothing other than a desire to be combative as
> opposed to conversational. And it is gruesomely
> tiresome, Philip.
>
> Get it: The massive thread on this topic is
> focused on a forgery claim. Put simply, there is
> no forgery. It is a silly, preposterous notion
> being flatulently redistributed by those who
> refuse to see it for what it is ... even in
> opposition to our host, who at first inserted it
> into his early work, but when faced with the
> evidence was unequivocal in his acceptance. You
> and others deny first-hand witness accounts of the
> cartouche ... why? Do you need someone to poke
> your forehead with an index finger?
>
> Anyways.
>
> Play your flute all you want. It is better to just
> ignore your posts until such time as you can own
> up to being honest with us and yourself. Saying
> 'sorry, I got that wrong' or 'I have reflected on
> my previous view and ...' won't make you look bad
> (though you may fear so), it will make you much
> more impressive.
>
> Regards,
> Avry



I'm still waiting to hear how Vyse got into the Boat Pit.

apparently the easiest questions ARE the hardest to answer. Or, is that easiest to ignore?

Warwick

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton Persists Part 2 4083 JonnyMcA 19-May-16 14:30
That chemical analysis . . . 650 Martin Stower 19-May-16 17:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 581 Origyptian 19-May-16 20:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 556 Jon Ellison 19-May-16 21:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 523 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Martin Stower 19-May-16 21:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 499 Origyptian 19-May-16 22:12
The unfounded accusations continue..... 608 DScribr 19-May-16 22:46
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 586 Martin Stower 20-May-16 00:14
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 509 Thanos5150 20-May-16 00:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 394 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 01:57
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 525 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:47
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 404 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 03:20
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 483 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:10
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 491 DScribr 20-May-16 23:23
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 506 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 23:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 487 DScribr 20-May-16 23:40
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 460 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:07
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 356 DScribr 20-May-16 02:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 512 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 515 DScribr 19-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 494 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 561 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:48
The lack of analysis . . . 611 DScribr 20-May-16 03:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 549 Audrey 20-May-16 04:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 464 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 06:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 499 DScribr 20-May-16 23:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 634 Origyptian 20-May-16 15:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 459 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 454 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 500 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 485 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 06:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 502 Origyptian 21-May-16 14:58
So much for chemical analysis . . . 481 DScribr 21-May-16 19:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 485 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 479 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:00
Re: What's the end game with this? 584 Thunderbird 20-May-16 17:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 480 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 463 Audrey 20-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 431 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 469 Audrey 20-May-16 23:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 404 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 478 Audrey 21-May-16 00:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 555 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 405 DScribr 21-May-16 01:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 365 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:06
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 438 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 515 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 631 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 537 Martin Stower 20-May-16 18:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 555 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 453 Thanos5150 20-May-16 20:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 478 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 495 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:44
Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 428 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:36
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 407 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:23
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 617 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 467 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 491 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:15
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 420 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 495 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 575 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 439 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 529 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 501 Origyptian 22-May-16 01:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 01:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 511 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:51
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 473 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:21
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 520 Martin Stower 22-May-16 14:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 Origyptian 22-May-16 17:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Martin Stower 22-May-16 18:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 480 Origyptian 22-May-16 20:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 418 Martin Stower 22-May-16 21:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 511 Origyptian 22-May-16 23:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 527 Martin Stower 23-May-16 00:03
Re: That chemical analysis is all but forgotten...... 476 DScribr 23-May-16 03:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 513 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 08:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 445 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 475 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 407 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 416 Martin Stower 22-May-16 16:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 411 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 600 Origyptian 21-May-16 23:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 450 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 701 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 454 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 529 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 558 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 372 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 520 Thanos5150 19-May-16 22:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:18
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 415 DScribr 20-May-16 03:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 496 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 444 DScribr 20-May-16 03:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 516 Thanos5150 20-May-16 05:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 410 Origyptian 20-May-16 13:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Thanos5150 20-May-16 17:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 523 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 18:56
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 500 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 571 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 442 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 19:29
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 472 Audrey 20-May-16 21:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 485 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 476 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 21:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 533 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 521 Audrey 20-May-16 22:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 427 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Audrey 20-May-16 22:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 414 Thanos5150 20-May-16 23:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 433 Audrey 20-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 416 Thanos5150 21-May-16 00:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 426 Audrey 21-May-16 00:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 481 Thanos5150 21-May-16 03:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 476 Audrey 21-May-16 05:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 410 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:10
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:28
The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 512 DScribr 21-May-16 13:37
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 426 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:56
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 475 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:48
Willful ignorance continues....... 505 DScribr 21-May-16 19:49
Re: Willful ignorance continues....... 527 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 21:28
Re: Stealing IS a crime! Willful ignorance continues....... 432 DScribr 22-May-16 00:39
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 507 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 18:17
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 395 DScribr 21-May-16 19:57
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 528 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 20:24
Stealing IS A Crime!!! 508 DScribr 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 505 Origyptian 21-May-16 15:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 427 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:53
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 481 Origyptian 21-May-16 21:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 474 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 00:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 425 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 510 Audrey 21-May-16 00:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 470 Audrey 21-May-16 01:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 536 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 500 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 11:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 458 DScribr 21-May-16 01:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 470 Origyptian 20-May-16 19:25
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 480 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 431 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 425 Origyptian 20-May-16 22:38
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 508 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 436 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 502 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 443 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 464 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 441 Audrey 21-May-16 01:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 519 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:34
Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 759 Richard Fusniak 20-May-16 12:04
Re: Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 529 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:25
Martin Persists 580 drrayeye 23-May-16 01:30
Re: Martin Persists 545 Martin Stower 23-May-16 12:01
Re: Martin Persists 419 R Avry Wilson 24-May-16 19:58
Mainstream Persists 454 DScribr 25-May-16 00:56
Re: Martin Persists 633 Merrell 28-May-16 09:00
Re: Martin Persists 468 Martin Stower 28-May-16 11:11
as long as we are counting 560 Warwick 25-May-16 16:42
Re: as long as we are counting 529 DScribr 26-May-16 01:53
Re: as long as we are counting 563 cladking 26-May-16 16:57
Re: as long as we are counting 471 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:31
Re: as long as we are counting 487 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:40
Re: as long as we are counting 406 cladking 27-May-16 00:21
Re: as long as we are counting 496 Warwick 27-May-16 01:27
Re: as long as we are counting 322 Origyptian 27-May-16 02:53
And work hard at obfuscation. 388 DScribr 27-May-16 00:57
Re: And work hard at obfuscation. 447 cladking 27-May-16 02:55
Re: as long as we are counting 418 Warwick 27-May-16 01:29
Re: as long as we are counting 528 cladking 27-May-16 02:59
Re: as long as we are counting 500 Warwick 27-May-16 03:35
Re: as long as we are counting 485 Audrey 27-May-16 04:32
Re: as long as we are counting 443 Warwick 27-May-16 05:34
Re: as long as we are counting 532 cladking 27-May-16 13:35
Re: as long as we are counting 491 Warwick 27-May-16 14:56
The original page on Indiegogo etc. 579 Martin Stower 25-May-16 22:10
Another performance . . . 472 Martin Stower 26-May-16 13:47
Re: Another performance . . . 428 Warwick 26-May-16 13:57
Re: Another performance . . . 370 Origyptian 26-May-16 14:53
Re: Another performance . . . 459 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:09
Re: Another performance . . . 473 cladking 26-May-16 16:18
Re: Another performance . . . 381 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:31
Re: Another performance . . . 640 cladking 26-May-16 17:54
Re: Another performance . . . 520 Martin Stower 26-May-16 18:29
Re: Another performance . . . 358 cladking 26-May-16 23:52
Re: Another performance . . . 498 eyeofhorus33 26-May-16 19:00
Re: Another performance . . . 398 cladking 27-May-16 00:05
Re: Another performance . . . 431 Audrey 27-May-16 00:23
Re: Another performance . . . 414 Warwick 27-May-16 01:42
Re: Another performance . . . 492 cladking 27-May-16 02:07
Re: Another performance . . . 438 Warwick 27-May-16 02:15
Re: Another performance . . . 474 cladking 27-May-16 02:48
Re: Another performance . . . 455 Warwick 27-May-16 03:48
Re: Another performance . . . 509 cladking 27-May-16 03:53
Re: Another performance . . . 545 Warwick 27-May-16 05:41
Re: Another performance . . . 434 Audrey 27-May-16 04:51
Re: Another performance . . . 470 Warwick 27-May-16 05:18
NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 433 DScribr 28-May-16 14:09
Re: NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 480 cladking 28-May-16 14:31
Re: Another performance . . . 508 Thanos5150 26-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 399 cladking 26-May-16 16:44
Re: Another performance . . . 499 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:33
Re: Another performance . . . 516 cladking 26-May-16 17:40
Re: Another performance . . . 506 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:49
Re: Another performance . . . 507 cladking 27-May-16 00:15
Re: Another performance . . . 500 Martin Stower 27-May-16 19:17
Re: Another performance . . . 514 Warwick 27-May-16 20:00
Re: Another performance . . . 451 cladking 27-May-16 20:21
Re: Another performance . . . 554 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:06
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 361 Thunderbird 27-May-16 23:28
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 475 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:41
Re: Another performance . . . 495 cladking 28-May-16 00:33
Re: Another performance . . . 483 Martin Stower 28-May-16 00:59
Re: Another performance . . . 479 cladking 28-May-16 02:36
Re: Another performance . . . 461 Martin Stower 28-May-16 23:55
Re: Another performance . . . 404 cladking 29-May-16 01:23
Re: Another performance . . . 437 Martin Stower 29-May-16 19:35
Re: Another performance . . . 605 cladking 29-May-16 20:43
Re: Another performance . . . 494 R Avry Wilson 28-May-16 02:39
Re: Another performance . . . 515 cladking 28-May-16 03:41
Re: Another performance . . . 459 Thanos5150 28-May-16 06:20
Re: Another performance . . . 538 cladking 28-May-16 13:40
Re: Another performance . . . 486 Origyptian 28-May-16 15:04
Re: Another performance . . . 484 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 347 cladking 28-May-16 17:52
Re: Another performance . . . 448 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 17:58
Re: Another performance . . . 373 Origyptian 29-May-16 02:51
Re: Another performance . . . 397 cladking 29-May-16 03:08
Re: Another performance . . . 457 Origyptian 29-May-16 04:03
Re: Another performance . . . 474 Thanos5150 29-May-16 05:03
Re: Another performance . . . 506 Origyptian 29-May-16 13:18
Re: Another performance . . . 520 Thanos5150 29-May-16 15:03
Focus on the axiom 466 Origyptian 29-May-16 15:27
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 525 DScribr 29-May-16 15:41
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 420 cladking 29-May-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 406 Thanos5150 30-May-16 01:49
Re: Focus on the axiom 460 Origyptian 30-May-16 05:32
Re: Focus on the axiom 458 Thanos5150 31-May-16 02:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 488 Origyptian 31-May-16 06:41
Re: Focus on the axiom 486 Thanos5150 01-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Focus on reality. 449 DScribr 01-Jun-16 00:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 436 Origyptian 01-Jun-16 06:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 481 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 03:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 453 cladking 02-Jun-16 04:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 406 Origyptian 02-Jun-16 04:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 418 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 16:34
Re: Focus on the axiom 415 cladking 02-Jun-16 18:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 468 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 18:04
Re: Focus on the axiom 456 R Avry Wilson 03-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Focus on the axiom 437 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 21:24
Re: Focus on the axiom 447 Corpuscles 03-Jun-16 23:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 311 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 06:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 376 R Avry Wilson 04-Jun-16 00:12
Re: Focus on the axiom 366 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 07:02
Re: Focus on the axiom 494 Jon Ellison 04-Jun-16 10:18
Re: Focus on the axiom 432 R Avry Wilson 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 425 Martin Stower 03-Jun-16 22:28
Re: Focus on the axiom 441 cladking 03-Jun-16 22:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 560 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 01:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 447 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 01:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 496 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 453 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 490 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 19:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 500 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Focus on the axiom 419 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 23:47
Re: Focus on the axiom 453 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 00:54
Re: Focus on the axiom 413 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 01:01
Re: Focus on the axiom 454 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:05
Re: Focus on the axiom 440 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 02:40
Re: Focus on the axiom 468 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 382 Audrey 06-Jun-16 04:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 389 Jon Ellison 06-Jun-16 07:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 394 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 14:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 456 cladking 06-Jun-16 16:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 412 Corpuscles 07-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 455 Origyptian 07-Jun-16 02:55
Re: Focus on the axiom 400 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 15:33
Re: Focus on the axiom 340 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:17
Re: Focus on the axiom 474 Audrey 06-Jun-16 16:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 463 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Focus on the axiom 367 Audrey 06-Jun-16 17:46
Re: Focus on the axiom 409 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 351 Audrey 06-Jun-16 23:44
Read what I wrote 362 Warwick 07-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Read what I wrote 385 Audrey 08-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Read what I wrote 379 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 01:40
Re: Read what I wrote 543 Audrey 08-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Read what I wrote 404 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 13:47
Vyse's veracity.... 410 Warwick 09-Jun-16 16:29
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 331 Audrey 09-Jun-16 16:51
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 430 Warwick 09-Jun-16 17:19
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 469 Audrey 09-Jun-16 17:45
Wilkinson's opinions 392 Warwick 09-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 407 Origyptian 09-Jun-16 20:57
Ori's opinions 541 DScribr 10-Jun-16 01:45
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 387 Thunderbird 10-Jun-16 04:07
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 510 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:49
Re: The incredible Red Ochre lasted 4500 yrs. 426 DScribr 11-Jun-16 00:40
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 353 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 02:28
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 345 Audrey 10-Jun-16 03:05
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 473 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:09
Bibliography 418 Warwick 10-Jun-16 18:07
Re: Bibliography 429 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 412 Warwick 10-Jun-16 20:01
Re: Bibliography 461 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 21:54
Re: Bibliography 478 Corpuscles 10-Jun-16 23:45
Re: Bibliography 300 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Bibliography 426 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 22:36
Re: Bibliography 390 Audrey 11-Jun-16 23:08
Re: Bibliography 404 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:26
Re: Bibliography 328 Audrey 12-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Bibliography 374 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:19
Re: Bibliography 319 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:32
Re: Bibliography 348 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Bibliography 353 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:50
Re: Bibliography 332 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 04:30
Re: Bibliography 311 Audrey 12-Jun-16 04:47
Re: Bibliography 303 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 05:02
Re: Bibliography 438 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Bibliography 400 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Bibliography 329 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:41
But Avry.. 371 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:58
Re: But Avry.. 455 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:14
Re: But Avry.. 420 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:37
Re: But Avry.. 415 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:15
Re: But Avry.. 420 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:44
Re: But Avry.. 382 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:59
Re: But Avry.. 381 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:11
This whole discussion is a boondoggle 459 DScribr 13-Jun-16 01:04
Re: This whole discussion is a boondoggle 418 Warwick 13-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Bibliography 296 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:28
Re: Bibliography 386 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 23:35
Re: Bibliography 419 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:58
Re: Bibliography 388 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 00:48
Re: Bibliography 426 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Bibliography 453 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:33
Re: Bibliography 473 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 02:05
Re: Bibliography 446 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Bibliography 431 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 19:22
Re: Bibliography 375 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 19:56
Re: Bibliography 302 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Bibliography 418 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Bibliography 411 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Bibliography 311 Audrey 12-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Bibliography 448 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Bibliography 356 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 12:23
Re: Bibliography 376 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 14:50
Re: Bibliography 401 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 16:46
Re: Bibliography 319 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:10
Re: Bibliography 414 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:18
Re: Bibliography 400 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:35
Re: Bibliography 448 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Bibliography 359 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:23
Re: Bibliography 361 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:18
Re: Bibliography 312 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 13:55
Re: Bibliography 378 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Bibliography 419 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:32
Re: Bibliography 355 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:41
Re: Bibliography 409 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:08
Re: Bibliography 401 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Bibliography 394 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 346 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 19:09
Gonna ignore the noise and try again 393 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 399 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 20:18
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 366 Audrey 12-Jun-16 21:04