Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
R Avry Wilson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And if I didn't actually "say is in so many
> > words",
then why did you put
> "Egyptologist"
> > in quotes to imply I actually said "no
> > 'Egyptologist' contradicted Reisner" when I
> never
> > said that? Not even once, let alone "post after
> > post".
>
> Dear Philip,
>
> Your ability to follow a conversation and stick to
> a simple, logical flow is so bloody disturbing and
> frustrating that you draw out harsh criticism of
> both your grammatical gymnastics and obtuse
> argumentation with galactic ease. Stop jumping
> around like a small child in your attempts to
> micromanage these tendential tangents. It's no
> wonder Martin doesn't let up on you (nor some
> others) because your stubbornness invites it.
>
> You are so determined not to admit an error you'd
> rather (subliminally?) continue to post pointless
> debate content no matter how absurd it is. You
> most certainly did both say and imply Reisner's
> opinion stood unchallenged for sixty years.
>
> Now SHUT UP. Don't come back with a typical, "Duh,
> where'd I say that?" "Did I say that?" "I did
> not!" feigned, innocent BS.
>
> I don't know what's worse: You're inane responses
> to the charge(s), or the utter
> irrelevancy
of Reisner's opinion being a
> mold to all of Egyptology, or, as we may guess
> blindly, that it somehow has a bearing on the
> 'forgery' question. You're like a lawyer who knows
> his client is 100% guilty, yet digs out fanatical
> twirls of invented 'evidence' to try to get the
> client off because, by law, you must give him/her
> the right of a defense. (I fully expect you to go
> off on a debate over law practices rather than see
> I've given an EXAMPLE.)
>
> (snip diatribe on your tangent Reisner argument)
>
> > It's interesting that you omitted that
> > pesky detail (pg.83 of Lehner '85):
> >
> >
    "the mother image fullfills a distinct
    > > function in the Egyptian belief of a life after
    > > death--- it holds out the promise of
    > immortality"
    > > (Ibid., 174). In effect, the king's rebirth
    > > invokes the image of a return to, and passage
    > > through, the mother.40
>
> First, you have no understanding of the mother
> image, nor what he is actually saying here. This
> would require an understanding of AE symbolism.
> Second, your 'pesky' detail is not 'pesky', nor is
> it contextual to the provenance of Hetepheres. See
> what I mean? You're poking around to elongate your
> impression of Reisner but can't even stay relevant
> to your own irrelevancy.
>
>
> > Regarding your reference to Romer, does he
> > actually deny or even express doubt about
> anything
> > in Reisner's narrative? Does he deny that
> G7000x
> > was her tomb even though the alabaster box was
> > empty? Does he discuss Verner, Aldred, Münch's
> > "funerary deposit" hypothesis, Lehner's '85
> > rebuttal to Reisner, or even cite any of them
> in
> > his bibilography? He doesn't deny Reisner's
> claim
> > of the family tree, and so I doubt he
> acknowledges
> > Lehner's alternate interpretation (and Edwards'
> > acknowledgement) of "Mother" as it applies to
> the
> > afterlife.
>
> Sadly, there gets a point where there's no other
> way to say something: Who *(**%^$%! cares? None of
> this Pied Piper discursion is relevant. The flute
> you employ is satiated with mucous, giving off
> whiffs of air in place of expected clear notes.
> Ffft, fft, goes Philip, trying to blow out another
> chorus. You can check the volume or peer down the
> tube to inspect the problem all you want. No
> amount of self-assessment is going to perform a
> song of logic for us. Alas.
>
> > He called it "ingeneous", not "fanciful" and
> not
> > "speculation". That imbues credibility, not
> doubt.
>
> Trying to redefine what or how a synonym is or how
> its applied is clearly not a tool in your set. And
> who cares about tearing down individual words in
> someone's narrative? This is more failed flute
> ffft, i.e. useless semantics.
>
> And I respond here only because your tactics are
> worthy of fly-swatting. In other words, what you
> think is content added to a debate is
> nothing other than a desire to be combative as
> opposed to conversational. And it is gruesomely
> tiresome, Philip.
>
> Get it: The massive thread on this topic is
> focused on a forgery claim. Put simply, there is
> no forgery. It is a silly, preposterous notion
> being flatulently redistributed by those who
> refuse to see it for what it is ... even in
> opposition to our host, who at first inserted it
> into his early work, but when faced with the
> evidence was unequivocal in his acceptance. You
> and others deny first-hand witness accounts of the
> cartouche ... why? Do you need someone to poke
> your forehead with an index finger?
>
> Anyways.
>
> Play your flute all you want. It is better to just
> ignore your posts until such time as you can own
> up to being honest with us and yourself. Saying
> 'sorry, I got that wrong' or 'I have reflected on
> my previous view and ...' won't make you look bad
> (though you may fear so), it will make you much
> more impressive.
>
> Regards,
> Avry



I'm still waiting to hear how Vyse got into the Boat Pit.

apparently the easiest questions ARE the hardest to answer. Or, is that easiest to ignore?

Warwick

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Creighton Persists Part 2 4039 JonnyMcA 19-May-16 14:30
That chemical analysis . . . 642 Martin Stower 19-May-16 17:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 572 Origyptian 19-May-16 20:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 546 Jon Ellison 19-May-16 21:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 516 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 510 Martin Stower 19-May-16 21:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 491 Origyptian 19-May-16 22:12
The unfounded accusations continue..... 596 DScribr 19-May-16 22:46
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 577 Martin Stower 20-May-16 00:14
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 500 Thanos5150 20-May-16 00:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 386 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 01:57
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 516 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:47
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 396 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 03:20
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 474 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:10
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 467 DScribr 20-May-16 23:23
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 496 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 23:35
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 476 DScribr 20-May-16 23:40
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 431 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:07
Re: The unfounded accusations continue..... 348 DScribr 20-May-16 02:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 503 Martin Stower 19-May-16 22:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 504 DScribr 19-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 486 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 550 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:48
The lack of analysis . . . 577 DScribr 20-May-16 03:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 537 Audrey 20-May-16 04:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 456 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 06:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 490 DScribr 20-May-16 23:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 625 Origyptian 20-May-16 15:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 451 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 446 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 491 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 471 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 06:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 495 Origyptian 21-May-16 14:58
So much for chemical analysis . . . 466 DScribr 21-May-16 19:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 475 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 467 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:00
Re: What's the end game with this? 575 Thunderbird 20-May-16 17:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 469 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 454 Audrey 20-May-16 22:43
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 423 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:54
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 461 Audrey 20-May-16 23:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 395 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 472 Audrey 21-May-16 00:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 543 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 397 DScribr 21-May-16 01:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 348 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:06
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 426 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 504 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 599 Martin Stower 21-May-16 02:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 529 Martin Stower 20-May-16 18:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 543 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 444 Thanos5150 20-May-16 20:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 463 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 488 Martin Stower 20-May-16 23:44
Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 419 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:36
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 400 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:23
Re: Höfer and Görlitz meet Stein 597 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:55
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 457 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 483 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:15
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 413 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 484 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 429 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:49
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 521 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 492 Origyptian 22-May-16 01:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 485 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 01:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 486 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:51
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 464 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:21
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 509 Martin Stower 22-May-16 14:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 473 Origyptian 22-May-16 17:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 493 Martin Stower 22-May-16 18:33
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 442 Origyptian 22-May-16 20:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 407 Martin Stower 22-May-16 21:30
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 499 Origyptian 22-May-16 23:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 518 Martin Stower 23-May-16 00:03
Re: That chemical analysis is all but forgotten...... 469 DScribr 23-May-16 03:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 503 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 08:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 474 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 438 Martin Stower 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 466 Origyptian 22-May-16 00:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 498 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 399 Origyptian 22-May-16 04:45
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 408 Martin Stower 22-May-16 16:13
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 402 Martin Stower 21-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 590 Origyptian 21-May-16 23:58
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 441 Martin Stower 22-May-16 01:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 686 Martin Stower 20-May-16 22:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 441 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 522 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:28
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 548 Origyptian 21-May-16 04:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 365 Martin Stower 21-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 508 Thanos5150 19-May-16 22:50
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 489 Martin Stower 19-May-16 23:18
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 405 DScribr 20-May-16 03:07
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 487 Origyptian 20-May-16 02:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 432 DScribr 20-May-16 03:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 508 Thanos5150 20-May-16 05:20
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 401 Origyptian 20-May-16 13:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 511 Thanos5150 20-May-16 17:57
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 514 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 18:56
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 488 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 553 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 430 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 19:29
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 462 Audrey 20-May-16 21:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 473 Origyptian 20-May-16 21:12
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 466 Jon Ellison 20-May-16 21:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 524 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:08
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 506 Audrey 20-May-16 22:34
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 419 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:36
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 485 Audrey 20-May-16 22:47
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 405 Thanos5150 20-May-16 23:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 425 Audrey 20-May-16 23:11
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 408 Thanos5150 21-May-16 00:01
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 419 Audrey 21-May-16 00:23
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 472 Thanos5150 21-May-16 03:14
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 466 Audrey 21-May-16 05:02
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 402 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:10
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 546 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 09:28
The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 504 DScribr 21-May-16 13:37
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 418 Origyptian 21-May-16 13:56
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 466 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:48
Willful ignorance continues....... 491 DScribr 21-May-16 19:49
Re: Willful ignorance continues....... 519 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 21:28
Re: Stealing IS a crime! Willful ignorance continues....... 426 DScribr 22-May-16 00:39
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 500 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 18:17
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 387 DScribr 21-May-16 19:57
Re: The chemical analysis is of little help without R-C Dating 515 Richard Fusniak 21-May-16 20:24
Stealing IS A Crime!!! 497 DScribr 22-May-16 00:32
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 496 Origyptian 21-May-16 15:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 404 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 17:53
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 473 Origyptian 21-May-16 21:39
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 458 Jon Ellison 22-May-16 00:46
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 418 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:09
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 497 Audrey 21-May-16 00:26
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 504 Martin Stower 21-May-16 00:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 456 Audrey 21-May-16 01:04
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 524 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:41
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 489 Jon Ellison 21-May-16 11:00
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 450 DScribr 21-May-16 01:44
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 460 Origyptian 20-May-16 19:25
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 469 Thanos5150 20-May-16 19:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 422 Origyptian 20-May-16 20:35
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 489 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:03
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 412 Origyptian 20-May-16 22:38
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 496 Thanos5150 20-May-16 22:52
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 429 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 493 Martin Stower 21-May-16 01:05
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 434 Origyptian 21-May-16 01:27
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 453 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:31
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 432 Audrey 21-May-16 01:42
Re: That chemical analysis . . . 507 Martin Stower 21-May-16 03:34
Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 732 Richard Fusniak 20-May-16 12:04
Re: Pending statement from Dr. Gorlitz 522 Martin Stower 20-May-16 19:25
Martin Persists 569 drrayeye 23-May-16 01:30
Re: Martin Persists 536 Martin Stower 23-May-16 12:01
Re: Martin Persists 412 R Avry Wilson 24-May-16 19:58
Mainstream Persists 447 DScribr 25-May-16 00:56
Re: Martin Persists 621 Merrell 28-May-16 09:00
Re: Martin Persists 442 Martin Stower 28-May-16 11:11
as long as we are counting 548 Warwick 25-May-16 16:42
Re: as long as we are counting 509 DScribr 26-May-16 01:53
Re: as long as we are counting 556 cladking 26-May-16 16:57
Re: as long as we are counting 463 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:31
Re: as long as we are counting 476 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:40
Re: as long as we are counting 399 cladking 27-May-16 00:21
Re: as long as we are counting 482 Warwick 27-May-16 01:27
Re: as long as we are counting 312 Origyptian 27-May-16 02:53
And work hard at obfuscation. 377 DScribr 27-May-16 00:57
Re: And work hard at obfuscation. 438 cladking 27-May-16 02:55
Re: as long as we are counting 407 Warwick 27-May-16 01:29
Re: as long as we are counting 513 cladking 27-May-16 02:59
Re: as long as we are counting 487 Warwick 27-May-16 03:35
Re: as long as we are counting 476 Audrey 27-May-16 04:32
Re: as long as we are counting 432 Warwick 27-May-16 05:34
Re: as long as we are counting 521 cladking 27-May-16 13:35
Re: as long as we are counting 479 Warwick 27-May-16 14:56
The original page on Indiegogo etc. 569 Martin Stower 25-May-16 22:10
Another performance . . . 463 Martin Stower 26-May-16 13:47
Re: Another performance . . . 414 Warwick 26-May-16 13:57
Re: Another performance . . . 362 Origyptian 26-May-16 14:53
Re: Another performance . . . 449 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:09
Re: Another performance . . . 465 cladking 26-May-16 16:18
Re: Another performance . . . 369 Martin Stower 26-May-16 16:31
Re: Another performance . . . 630 cladking 26-May-16 17:54
Re: Another performance . . . 484 Martin Stower 26-May-16 18:29
Re: Another performance . . . 350 cladking 26-May-16 23:52
Re: Another performance . . . 486 eyeofhorus33 26-May-16 19:00
Re: Another performance . . . 391 cladking 27-May-16 00:05
Re: Another performance . . . 419 Audrey 27-May-16 00:23
Re: Another performance . . . 405 Warwick 27-May-16 01:42
Re: Another performance . . . 486 cladking 27-May-16 02:07
Re: Another performance . . . 427 Warwick 27-May-16 02:15
Re: Another performance . . . 466 cladking 27-May-16 02:48
Re: Another performance . . . 446 Warwick 27-May-16 03:48
Re: Another performance . . . 471 cladking 27-May-16 03:53
Re: Another performance . . . 532 Warwick 27-May-16 05:41
Re: Another performance . . . 425 Audrey 27-May-16 04:51
Re: Another performance . . . 437 Warwick 27-May-16 05:18
NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 424 DScribr 28-May-16 14:09
Re: NOT Primitive, Low-Tech 469 cladking 28-May-16 14:31
Re: Another performance . . . 501 Thanos5150 26-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 387 cladking 26-May-16 16:44
Re: Another performance . . . 491 Origyptian 26-May-16 17:33
Re: Another performance . . . 499 cladking 26-May-16 17:40
Re: Another performance . . . 497 Martin Stower 26-May-16 17:49
Re: Another performance . . . 498 cladking 27-May-16 00:15
Re: Another performance . . . 491 Martin Stower 27-May-16 19:17
Re: Another performance . . . 505 Warwick 27-May-16 20:00
Re: Another performance . . . 443 cladking 27-May-16 20:21
Re: Another performance . . . 545 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:06
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 354 Thunderbird 27-May-16 23:28
Re: Oops....we missed the Basalt flooring and machine disc cuts 466 Martin Stower 27-May-16 23:41
Re: Another performance . . . 487 cladking 28-May-16 00:33
Re: Another performance . . . 474 Martin Stower 28-May-16 00:59
Re: Another performance . . . 467 cladking 28-May-16 02:36
Re: Another performance . . . 450 Martin Stower 28-May-16 23:55
Re: Another performance . . . 394 cladking 29-May-16 01:23
Re: Another performance . . . 430 Martin Stower 29-May-16 19:35
Re: Another performance . . . 575 cladking 29-May-16 20:43
Re: Another performance . . . 485 R Avry Wilson 28-May-16 02:39
Re: Another performance . . . 507 cladking 28-May-16 03:41
Re: Another performance . . . 452 Thanos5150 28-May-16 06:20
Re: Another performance . . . 529 cladking 28-May-16 13:40
Re: Another performance . . . 476 Origyptian 28-May-16 15:04
Re: Another performance . . . 477 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 16:38
Re: Another performance . . . 339 cladking 28-May-16 17:52
Re: Another performance . . . 438 Jon Ellison 28-May-16 17:58
Re: Another performance . . . 365 Origyptian 29-May-16 02:51
Re: Another performance . . . 386 cladking 29-May-16 03:08
Re: Another performance . . . 448 Origyptian 29-May-16 04:03
Re: Another performance . . . 462 Thanos5150 29-May-16 05:03
Re: Another performance . . . 495 Origyptian 29-May-16 13:18
Re: Another performance . . . 510 Thanos5150 29-May-16 15:03
Focus on the axiom 458 Origyptian 29-May-16 15:27
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 506 DScribr 29-May-16 15:41
Re: Focus on everything BUT the facts 410 cladking 29-May-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 396 Thanos5150 30-May-16 01:49
Re: Focus on the axiom 451 Origyptian 30-May-16 05:32
Re: Focus on the axiom 446 Thanos5150 31-May-16 02:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 479 Origyptian 31-May-16 06:41
Re: Focus on the axiom 479 Thanos5150 01-Jun-16 00:28
Re: Focus on reality. 436 DScribr 01-Jun-16 00:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 426 Origyptian 01-Jun-16 06:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 471 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 03:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 446 cladking 02-Jun-16 04:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 399 Origyptian 02-Jun-16 04:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 400 Thanos5150 02-Jun-16 16:34
Re: Focus on the axiom 407 cladking 02-Jun-16 18:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 451 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 18:04
Re: Focus on the axiom 441 R Avry Wilson 03-Jun-16 18:43
Re: Focus on the axiom 417 Origyptian 03-Jun-16 21:24
Re: Focus on the axiom 439 Corpuscles 03-Jun-16 23:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 302 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 06:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 364 R Avry Wilson 04-Jun-16 00:12
Re: Focus on the axiom 358 Origyptian 04-Jun-16 07:02
Re: Focus on the axiom 487 Jon Ellison 04-Jun-16 10:18
Re: Focus on the axiom 424 R Avry Wilson 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 417 Martin Stower 03-Jun-16 22:28
Re: Focus on the axiom 433 cladking 03-Jun-16 22:51
Re: Focus on the axiom 551 Thanos5150 04-Jun-16 01:08
Re: Focus on the axiom 438 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 01:25
Re: Focus on the axiom 487 Thanos5150 05-Jun-16 04:15
Re: Focus on the axiom 430 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 17:29
Re: Focus on the axiom 478 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 19:35
Re: Focus on the axiom 489 Origyptian 05-Jun-16 22:48
Re: Focus on the axiom 412 Martin Stower 05-Jun-16 23:47
Re: Focus on the axiom 439 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 00:54
Re: Focus on the axiom 400 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 01:01
Re: Focus on the axiom 446 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 01:05
Re: Focus on the axiom 421 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 02:40
Re: Focus on the axiom 446 R Avry Wilson 06-Jun-16 03:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 365 Audrey 06-Jun-16 04:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 381 Jon Ellison 06-Jun-16 07:59
Re: Focus on the axiom 383 Origyptian 06-Jun-16 14:00
Re: Focus on the axiom 448 cladking 06-Jun-16 16:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 401 Corpuscles 07-Jun-16 00:20
Re: Focus on the axiom 447 Origyptian 07-Jun-16 02:55
Re: Focus on the axiom 377 Thanos5150 06-Jun-16 15:33
Re: Focus on the axiom 326 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:17
Re: Focus on the axiom 458 Audrey 06-Jun-16 16:39
Re: Focus on the axiom 450 Warwick 06-Jun-16 16:58
Re: Focus on the axiom 357 Audrey 06-Jun-16 17:46
Re: Focus on the axiom 396 Warwick 06-Jun-16 18:13
Re: Focus on the axiom 344 Audrey 06-Jun-16 23:44
Read what I wrote 343 Warwick 07-Jun-16 17:15
Re: Read what I wrote 378 Audrey 08-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Read what I wrote 370 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 01:40
Re: Read what I wrote 536 Audrey 08-Jun-16 01:52
Re: Read what I wrote 396 Martin Stower 08-Jun-16 13:47
Vyse's veracity.... 397 Warwick 09-Jun-16 16:29
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 323 Audrey 09-Jun-16 16:51
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 418 Warwick 09-Jun-16 17:19
Re: Vyse's veracity.... 454 Audrey 09-Jun-16 17:45
Wilkinson's opinions 380 Warwick 09-Jun-16 18:47
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 387 Origyptian 09-Jun-16 20:57
Ori's opinions 529 DScribr 10-Jun-16 01:45
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 378 Thunderbird 10-Jun-16 04:07
Re: The incredible Teflon Red Ochre 495 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:49
Re: The incredible Red Ochre lasted 4500 yrs. 418 DScribr 11-Jun-16 00:40
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 335 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 02:28
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 337 Audrey 10-Jun-16 03:05
Re: Wilkinson's opinions 454 Martin Stower 10-Jun-16 14:09
Bibliography 391 Warwick 10-Jun-16 18:07
Re: Bibliography 404 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 401 Warwick 10-Jun-16 20:01
Re: Bibliography 452 Origyptian 10-Jun-16 21:54
Re: Bibliography 468 Corpuscles 10-Jun-16 23:45
Re: Bibliography 292 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 17:01
Re: Bibliography 414 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 22:36
Re: Bibliography 381 Audrey 11-Jun-16 23:08
Re: Bibliography 391 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:26
Re: Bibliography 309 Audrey 12-Jun-16 02:30
Re: Bibliography 363 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:19
Re: Bibliography 305 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:32
Re: Bibliography 338 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 03:40
Re: Bibliography 339 Audrey 12-Jun-16 03:50
Re: Bibliography 322 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 04:30
Re: Bibliography 302 Audrey 12-Jun-16 04:47
Re: Bibliography 295 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 05:02
Re: Bibliography 427 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:49
Re: Bibliography 388 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:56
Re: Bibliography 315 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:41
But Avry.. 358 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:58
Re: But Avry.. 429 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:14
Re: But Avry.. 388 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:37
Re: But Avry.. 402 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:15
Re: But Avry.. 409 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:44
Re: But Avry.. 373 Warwick 12-Jun-16 18:59
Re: But Avry.. 368 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 20:11
This whole discussion is a boondoggle 424 DScribr 13-Jun-16 01:04
Re: This whole discussion is a boondoggle 405 Warwick 13-Jun-16 16:24
Re: Bibliography 287 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 10:28
Re: Bibliography 371 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 23:35
Re: Bibliography 407 Corpuscles 11-Jun-16 23:58
Re: Bibliography 380 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 00:48
Re: Bibliography 417 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 01:13
Re: Bibliography 446 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:33
Re: Bibliography 442 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 02:05
Re: Bibliography 434 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 18:09
Re: Bibliography 420 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 19:22
Re: Bibliography 366 Origyptian 11-Jun-16 19:56
Re: Bibliography 294 Martin Stower 11-Jun-16 20:47
Re: Bibliography 404 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:03
Re: Bibliography 400 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:22
Re: Bibliography 298 Audrey 12-Jun-16 01:58
Re: Bibliography 423 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:24
Re: Bibliography 347 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 12:23
Re: Bibliography 362 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 14:50
Re: Bibliography 365 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 16:46
Re: Bibliography 286 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:10
Re: Bibliography 403 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:18
Re: Bibliography 389 Corpuscles 12-Jun-16 00:35
Re: Bibliography 426 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 00:39
Re: Bibliography 352 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 01:23
Re: Bibliography 352 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 02:18
Re: Bibliography 303 Martin Stower 12-Jun-16 13:55
Re: Bibliography 360 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 15:45
Re: Bibliography 398 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 17:32
Re: Bibliography 332 Warwick 12-Jun-16 17:41
Re: Bibliography 397 R Avry Wilson 12-Jun-16 18:08
Re: Bibliography 378 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:48
Re: Bibliography 386 Audrey 12-Jun-16 18:35
Re: Bibliography 338 Origyptian 12-Jun-16 19:09
Gonna ignore the noise and try again 379 Warwick 12-Jun-16 19:53
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 390 Thunderbird 12-Jun-16 20:18
Re: Gonna ignore the noise and try again 358 Audrey 12-Jun-16 21:04