> Theft HAD taken place. The paint sample was
If it was returned with no intention of "depriving the owner permenantly", then there is no theft.
and then, (some of it) was
How do you know (some of it) "supposedly"..
How much was returned?? How much was taken in the first place??
Was it weighed before and after? If so what were the comparative weights?
Are you just making things up again?
> IF you don't know what moral values are by now, I
> can't help you.
No you can't can you.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 21-May-16 21:34 by Jon Ellison.