Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Sample wasn’t big enough for radiocarbon, as has
> > been explained ad nauseam—another respect in
> > which Görlitz bungled and committed his act of
> > vandalism for nothing.
>
> And yet you spent time looking up sampling methods
> for radiocarbon dating when it's clear that's not
> what the sample was analyzed for?

Really? So why do we have reports citing the Institut Fresenius on the sample being too small for radiocarbon dating?

http://www.focus.de/kultur/diverses/archaeologie-riesenwirbel-in-aegypten-um-gizeh-splitter_id_3423004.html

http://www.ingenieur.de/Panorama/Am-Rande/Deutsche-Amateur-Archaeologen-kratzen-Steinsplitter-Cheops-Pyramide

But please don’t let me stop you making a fool of yourself, with your clueless, off-the-cuff pronouncements. Be my guest.

M.