> Origyptian Wrote:
> > Thanks, I corrected it on my post.
> There's a first.
> > Oops, I was trying to reason with ideologues.
> > Thanks for the reality check.
> > Silly me.
> So this explains why you went on a tirade and
> don't even know who you are reffering to?
> > If your hostilities aren't based simply on the
> > fact that I have a different opinion than you
> > about the Germans and SGS, then what is the
> > for the instant hostilities here?
> I would hardly characterize my comment as
> "hostile" nor any of the "hostilities" as you call
> them "instant". You reap what you sow which is for
> you a never ending and bountiful harvest. You say
> "different opinion than you guys" yet can you
> quote anywhere where I have given any "opinion" on
> the subject?
> > All I said was I was willing to give the
> > and SGS the benefit of the doubt for the time
> > being, pending additional evidence.
> Because they tell you want you want to hear.
How about they they tell the world and each individual can make up his own mind. While maintaining the right to change their mind if additional evidence is forthcoming.
> others like Vyse do not, so goes your "benefit of
> the doubt".
If their dates came back as belonging
> to the period no doubt you would make the same
> arguments, not to mention whatever else you could
> make up, against their credibility as others.
"NO DOUBT" eh?? You're guessing again.
> you do know the reason these two chuckleheads did
> this was to "prove" Yahweh and the Hebrews built
> the pyramids, right?
> > All of your accusations of me being a liar are
> > empty, based on the written word in these very
> > posts.
> I am speaking to your history in general as to why
> you attract such consistent disdain from your
> fellow posters which is not because you "simply
Following is Thanos' definition of "Ori's disagreement"
but because of the self absorbed, single
> minded, intellectually dishonest and incompetent
> way in which you without exception disagree with
> anything and everything that does not support your
Thanos seem's to have a problem with being disagreed with?
"Self absorbed" Disagreement?? Yes Ori is speaking for himself.
"Single minded", Disagreement? Yes Ori is agreeing with his own opinion and disagreeing with yours.
"Intellectually dishonest"? So you're saying that Ori really agrees with you but doesn't admit it??
"Incompetent" Disagreement? If Ori's disagreements are incompetent, what are you whinging about?
Ori doesn't agree with Thanos. Get over it.
What exactly are Ori's beliefs??
only further compounded by the fact it is
> more often than not given from a position of
Crystal ball time folks. Thanos knows everything that Ori doesn't..
Sorry, but you are no "martyr for the
> cause" being unfairly prosecuted just because you
> "dare" to disagree with the evil "ideologue"
He disagrees with you, he has no intention of making himself a martyr. You're making a pretty good job of that.
> establishment, so get over yourself and stop
> repeating that nonsense whenever you start getting
> picked on for your BS.
Who's "picking" on him? and why? It wouldn't by any chance be you would it? Because he disagrees with you?
What exactly is ORI BSing about?
Seems to me Thanos, my little man that you have a serious problem with anyone, including on occasion myself disagreeing with you. Now this may be a personal weakness such as a lack of confidence or a security issue on your part, but can you please deal with it and not make it quite so obvious in the public domain. It's embarrassing.. Cringe-worthy..