Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Yes, Femano, I can quite see that you’d give
> > “the benefit of the doubt” to a bumbling
> > criminal liar who shares your ideology.
> >
> > Görlitz and Erdmann first of all claimed to
> have
> > sampled the cartouche and then, when something
> hit
> > the fan, furiously denied having done so. One
> way
> > or another, they lied.
> >
> > Görlitz (as seen on video) failed to followed
> > elementary sampling protocols.
> >
> > Such as these you’re prepared to trust,
> when it suits you.
>
> "Benefit of the doubt for the time being" is not
> "trust".
>
>
> > Not so strange, then, that no such “benefit
> of
> > the doubt” is extended to Richard Howard Vyse.
>
> > Here you align yourself with the moral
> > charlatanism of Scott Creighton and condemn him
> > utterly for the far less egregious and relevant
> > offence of behaving very much like other
> > parliamentary candidates in the early decades
> of
> > the 19th century.
> >
> > M.
>
> Well let's see, Vyse apparently wasn't able to
> produce any independent lab or anyone else that
> wasn't part of his own team that could verify the
> authenticity of his cartouche or even the
> existence of his infamous G3
> sarcophagus. And yet you find something about
> Vyse's personal word that somehow supercedes the
> contradictory - or in many aspects the total lack
> of - data. You can't even verify whether the crate
> was aboard the Beatrice when it departed from
> Alexandria. The entire insurance payout barely
> paid for the cost to ship it from Cairo to
> Alexandria. And yet you take Vyse on his own
> personal word without requiring any other
> verification amidst all the contradictions and
> lack of supporting evidence.
>
> And I said "for the time being" which
> obviously means pending contradiction or
> verification from the lab. But your own ideology
> must have missed that pesky detail.
>
> Why did you bother to quote that German page at
> all other than to take yet another shot at being
> the braggadocio for finding it?
>
> Troll on, Stower.
What evidence do you have that proves the Beatrice was stolen/used by Vyse, or anyone else, for that matter???
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Yes, Femano, I can quite see that you’d give
> > “the benefit of the doubt” to a bumbling
> > criminal liar who shares your ideology.
> >
> > Görlitz and Erdmann first of all claimed to
> have
> > sampled the cartouche and then, when something
> hit
> > the fan, furiously denied having done so. One
> way
> > or another, they lied.
> >
> > Görlitz (as seen on video) failed to followed
> > elementary sampling protocols.
> >
> > Such as these you’re prepared to trust,
> when it suits you.
>
> "Benefit of the doubt for the time being" is not
> "trust".
>
>
> > Not so strange, then, that no such “benefit
> of
> > the doubt” is extended to Richard Howard Vyse.
>
> > Here you align yourself with the moral
> > charlatanism of Scott Creighton and condemn him
> > utterly for the far less egregious and relevant
> > offence of behaving very much like other
> > parliamentary candidates in the early decades
> of
> > the 19th century.
> >
> > M.
>
> Well let's see, Vyse apparently wasn't able to
> produce any independent lab or anyone else that
> wasn't part of his own team that could verify the
> authenticity of his cartouche or even the
> existence of his infamous G3
> sarcophagus. And yet you find something about
> Vyse's personal word that somehow supercedes the
> contradictory - or in many aspects the total lack
> of - data. You can't even verify whether the crate
> was aboard the Beatrice when it departed from
> Alexandria. The entire insurance payout barely
> paid for the cost to ship it from Cairo to
> Alexandria. And yet you take Vyse on his own
> personal word without requiring any other
> verification amidst all the contradictions and
> lack of supporting evidence.
>
> And I said "for the time being" which
> obviously means pending contradiction or
> verification from the lab. But your own ideology
> must have missed that pesky detail.
>
> Why did you bother to quote that German page at
> all other than to take yet another shot at being
> the braggadocio for finding it?
>
> Troll on, Stower.
What evidence do you have that proves the Beatrice was stolen/used by Vyse, or anyone else, for that matter???
Currently accepted Pyramide dates stand until proven otherwise.
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."