> And following, we have this: “Die
> Detail-Analysen stehen jedoch noch aus, . . .”
> And his partner-in-crime has gone noticeably quiet
> on a point clearly relevant to what he has to
> Yes, Femano, I can quite see that you’d give
> “the benefit of the doubt” to a bumbling
> criminal liar who shares your ideology.
> Görlitz and Erdmann first of all claimed to have
> sampled the cartouche and then, when something hit
> the fan, furiously denied having done so. One way
> or another, they lied.
> Görlitz (as seen on video) failed to follow
> elementary sampling protocols.
> Such as these you’re prepared to trust, [i]when
> it suits you[/i].
> Not so strange, then, that no such “benefit of
> the doubt” is extended to Richard Howard Vyse.
> Here you align yourself with the moral
> charlatanism of Scott Creighton and condemn him
> utterly for the far less egregious and relevant
> offence of behaving very much like other
> parliamentary candidates in the early decades of
> the 19th century.
It's highly unlikely the paint samples stolen by Görlitz and Erdmann would be, (would've been) represented in a legitimate and respectable manner anyway. We still have only their word to back what they have/will claim.
So much for 'physical evidence'.
(And the fringe still needs the Radio-Carbon Test, as the AE's red ochre paint was still made/used in Vyse's day.)
Campbell's Chamber roof blocks are Tura Limestone until proven otherwise.
THE Cartouche in Campbell's Chamber IS Authentic, as are ALL other RC's Glyphs, until proven otherwise.
"This Forgery 'theory' has more holes than a sieve basket."