Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Merrell Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Osmanagic's fringe theories are discussed in more
> detail
> [url=http://irna.lautre.net/IMG/pdf/Addressing.pdf
> ]here, pp 16-17[/url] (PDF).
>
> The quality of evidence that he cites for any of
> his theories is disappointingly low.
Seriously?
Tera C. Pruitt, read her resume. A young archaeologist who has not worked in the field, who has an obvious axe to grind against the alternative. Her 2nd longest employment gig was as a high school teacher in San Jose being there for just over a year.
Her credibility is based on what exactly? Nothing that I can see. But then I couldn't get past the 3rd page of her extremely biased tirade against alternative viewpoints. I did not see that she addressed physical evidence.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Osmanagic's fringe theories are discussed in more
> detail
> [url=http://irna.lautre.net/IMG/pdf/Addressing.pdf
> ]here, pp 16-17[/url] (PDF).
>
> The quality of evidence that he cites for any of
> his theories is disappointingly low.
Seriously?
Tera C. Pruitt, read her resume. A young archaeologist who has not worked in the field, who has an obvious axe to grind against the alternative. Her 2nd longest employment gig was as a high school teacher in San Jose being there for just over a year.
Her credibility is based on what exactly? Nothing that I can see. But then I couldn't get past the 3rd page of her extremely biased tirade against alternative viewpoints. I did not see that she addressed physical evidence.
He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.